News
Fake Agency: PFIPC Never Recognised by FG – Foreign Ministry
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IMG-20260721-WA0013-1000x600.jpg&description=Fake Agency: PFIPC Never Recognised by FG – Foreign Ministry ', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IMG-20260721-WA0013-1000x600.jpg&description=Fake Agency: PFIPC Never Recognised by FG – Foreign Ministry ', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
…as House committee invite NSA, insist Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu must appear
By Gloria Ikibah
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu has told the House of Representatives that the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC), allegedly headed by Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, were never recognised by the Federal Government.
The minister also revealed that the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) had, in November 2025, officially confirmed that both the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and the Chief of Staff to the President had no knowledge of either the council or its self-acclaimed Director-General.
The disclosure was made on Tuesday during the resumed investigative hearing of the House Ad-hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the existence and operations of the controversial council.
Naijablitznews.com recalled that the committee was set up following concerns that the body allegedly operated under the guise of a presidential institution, participated in government processes and sought official recognition despite questions over its legal status. Lawmakers are investigating how the council allegedly secured access to public institutions and whether due process was followed.
Representing the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Ambassador Dunoma Umar Ahmed, said Prince Adeyemi wrote to the ministry on three separate occasions seeking collaboration and endorsement to host a World Investment Summit in Nigeria.
According to him, the ministry declined all the requests after identifying inconsistencies in the correspondence and initiated its own verification process.
He said: “I have the honour to most respectfully refer to your letter addressed to the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs Ref. No. NASS/HR/68/7/2026/012 dated 14th July, 2026 on the above subject and to invite the kind attention of the Honourable Chairman to note that, in line with available records, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, the self-acclaimed Director-General of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PEAC/PFIDC), has approached the Ministry on three (3) different occasions, requesting for the Ministry’s collaboration and endorsement to enable him host World Investment Summit in Nigeria, both in 2025 and 2026.
“Specifically, the Ministry received the first, second and third requests on 26th June, 2025, 5th August, 2025 and 5th June, 2026 respectively,” he said.
Ahmed explained that the ministry deliberately withheld approval because it was obliged to carry out due diligence before granting any official endorsement.
“Guided by extant rules and regulations as well as the necessity of carrying out due diligence before obliging any request, the Ministry, however, did not take any action on the requests.
“The Ministry’s refusal to oblige the requests was further necessitated by some of the discrepancies observed in the letters submitted by Prince Adeyemi and the ongoing investigation on the legitimacy of the PFIPC and the personality of its alleged Director-General,” he added.
He further disclosed that after noticing the inconsistencies, the ministry formally sought clarification from the Office of the National Security Adviser.
“Furthermore, it is pertinent to state that having discovered the discrepancies on the requests submitted by Prince Adeyemi, the Ministry, on 16th October, 2025, wrote a letter to the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), requesting clarification on the status of Prince Adeyemi Adeniyi Matthew as Director-General of the PFIPC.
“In response, the ONSA reverted to the Ministry on 26th November, 2025, indicating that the responses it received from the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and Chief of Staff (CoS) to Mr President revealed that Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew is unknown to any office of the Federal Government,” he stated.
The Permanent Secretary told lawmakers that the ministry had no official dealings whatsoever with the council.
“The Ministry did not participate in any diplomatic engagement, bilateral and multilateral discussions held by the PFIPC; the PFIPC did not facilitate or receive any foreign investors, partners and delegations through the Ministry.
“According to the available records in the Ministry, there is no document, Memorandum of Understanding or agreement signed with foreign governments by the Council. The Ministry did not play any role with the Council in promoting Nigeria’s investment abroad.
“No Nigerian Mission had interaction with the PFIPC, since they did not receive any directive from the Ministry in that regard, in line with the Ministry’s extant procedures and line of communication, and the Ministry does not have any other document linked to the PFIPC apart from the ones indicated above.
“Flowing from the above, I wish to respectfully conclude by saying that the Ministry has never had any official interaction or engagement with the PFIPC or its alleged Director-General,” Ahmed said.
Following the presentation, the committee directed the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, to appear before it on Thursday to explain what actions his office took after confirming that the council was not recognised by the Federal Government.
The committee also insisted that the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Odumegwu-Ojukwu, must personally appear before lawmakers to clarify outstanding issues.
Chairman of the committee, Rep. Yusuf Gagdi, said the testimony presented by the ministry raised important questions that only the Office of the National Security Adviser can answer.
“It is now the duty of the Committee to move further and invite the Office of the National Security Adviser to come and answer the very important question raised by Honourable Abubakar Fulata that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received a letter from this agency under investigation, whether it exists or it doesn’t exist.
“What have you done as an office that have the power and capacity to make an investigation, further investigation in respect to this? He is to appear before this Committee, based on the fact that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received correspondence from the suspended DG and they suspected foul play, discrepancies.
“NSA responded that it is an illegal agency. What has the Office of NSA done as a security office in forbearance to investigating? If they discovered that the agency does not exist, I think they should take action. So, they should tell us the action they have taken,” Gagdi said.
The committee is expected to continue its investigation as it seeks to establish how the controversial council allegedly operated within government circles despite repeated indications from key federal institutions that it had no legal recognition.
News
AEF-Ethiopia Forge Partnership to Drive Investment, Intra-African Trade
By Gloria Ikibah
The Africa Economic Forum (AEF) and the Government of Ethiopia have agreed in principle to strengthen cooperation on key development initiatives aimed at boosting investment, trade and economic integration across Africa.
The understanding was reached during a courtesy visit by the regional management of the Africa Economic Forum to Ethiopia’s Ambassador to Nigeria, His Excellency Legesse Geremew Haile.
Leading the four-member AEF delegation, Dr Hope Uweja outlined several areas where both sides intend to collaborate, including the hosting of the AEF Annual General Meeting in Addis Ababa later this year, organising an investment summit focused on Ethiopia’s energy sector, promoting intra-African trade and strengthening cooperation with the Ethiopian Chambers of Commerce.
He said the proposed partnership will create fresh opportunities for investment, regional networking and economic collaboration across the continent.
Secretary of the AEF Governing Council, Prof. Victor Odoeme, emphasised the need for Africa to speak with a unified voice on the global stage, drawing attention to platforms such as the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
He noted that the Africa Economic Forum has continued to expand its footprint across the continent, with representatives in 27 African countries, and appealed to the Ethiopian government to support efforts to strengthen the organisation’s presence in Addis Ababa, the headquarters of the African Union.
In response, Ambassador Haile welcomed the initiative and praised the Forum’s commitment to promoting Africa’s economic development.
“Africa has the capacity and potentials to pull together and bring prosperity to its people”, he said.
The envoy highlighted the importance of private sector-led investment in driving sustainable economic growth, pointing to the presence of Dangote Industries in Ethiopia, where the company operates cement and urea businesses, as an example of how African investments can deepen economic cooperation between countries.
He also expressed confidence that hosting the AEF Annual General Meeting in Addis Ababa will enhance the organisation’s visibility and create valuable networking opportunities for participants from across the continent.
Reaffirming Ethiopia’s support for the initiative, Ambassador Haile assured the delegation of his country’s commitment to advancing Africa’s development agenda.
“Always you can count us (Ethiopia) to provide assistance within the context of development in Africa”, he added.
The proposed collaboration is expected to further strengthen economic ties between the Forum and Ethiopia while advancing shared efforts to promote investment, regional integration and sustainable development across Africa.
News
PFIPC Probe: Reps Issue Final Ultimatum to MDAs, Vows Sanction for Defaulters
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives Ad-Hoc Committee investigating the alleged establishment and operations of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) has issued a final ultimatum to key Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) that failed to honour its invitation, warning that continued absence will attract constitutional sanctions.
The warning came on Tuesday after several invited agencies failed to appear before the committee during its ongoing investigation into the controversial council, whose legal status and operations have come under intense scrutiny.
The probe follows mounting concerns over how the PFIPC allegedly secured official recognition in some government processes despite claims by several federal institutions that it was never lawfully established. In recent hearings, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) have all provided testimonies as lawmakers seek to unravel the circumstances surrounding the council’s activities.
Addressing journalists after the sitting, Chairman of the committee, Rep. Yusuf Gagdi, condemned the absence of the affected agencies, describing it as a direct challenge to the constitutional oversight powers of the National Assembly.
He said: “The House of Representatives Ad-Hoc Committee investigating activities surrounding the alleged establishment and operations of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council wishes to express its profound disappointment over the failure of some Ministries, Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government of Nigeria to honour its invitation and appear before the committee today.
“The committee views this misconduct as a very serious affront to the constitutional oversight powers of the House of Representatives and an unacceptable disregard for the authority of the Parliament, which represents the sovereign will of the Nigerian people.”
Gagdi reminded the affected agencies that invitations from the National Assembly are backed by law and must not be treated as optional.
“The invitations issued by a duly constituted committee of the House of Representatives are not a matter of discretion. They are issued pursuant to the constitutional powers vested in the National Assembly under Sections 88 and 89 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). Therefore, it is a legal obligation, not an act of courtesy”, he said.
Gagdi announced that the committee had issued what it described as a final notice, directing the chief executives and accounting officers of all defaulting agencies to personally appear before the panel on Thursday with all relevant documents.
He warned that failure to comply would leave the committee with no option but to invoke its constitutional powers.
“Thursday is the final opportunity for every defaulting agency to comply. We don’t want representation. We don’t want permanent secretaries. We want the accounting officers of the agencies to appear before us with all the relevant documents requested by the committee and any other documents they consider useful to this investigation.
“Any ministry, department or agency that fails to appear without lawful justification will leave the committee with no alternative but to invoke every constitutional and statutory power available to us as the House of Representatives to compel compliance and ensure accountability.
“The committee will not hesitate to recommend and pursue every sanction permitted by law against any person or institution that deliberately obstructs or frustrates this investigation”, he stated.
Gagdi stressed that the investigation was aimed at protecting the integrity of public institutions rather than targeting individuals or organisations.
He also assured Nigerians that the committee would conduct its assignment impartially and professionally.
“This investigation is in the national interest. It is not targeted at any individual or institution, but it is aimed at establishing the facts, protecting the integrity of public administration, guarding the rule of law and ensuring that no public officer or institution operates outside the framework of the Constitution and the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The committee remains committed to conducting this assignment professionally, fairly, transparently and without fear or favour. However, no agency of government, regardless of its status or perceived influence, will be permitted to undermine the constitutional authority of the House of Representatives or frustrate the discharge of its legislative responsibility”, he said.
During the proceedings, the committee declined to hear from a representative of the Ministry of Finance after he introduced himself as the Deputy Director in the Cash Management Department and explained that he had been delegated by the minister.
Lawmakers ruled that only the ministry’s accounting officer will be accepted at subsequent hearings, insisting that such a sensitive investigation required the personal appearance of the relevant chief executives.
The committee noted that issues raised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs during its testimony further underscored the need for the Ministry of Finance’s leadership to appear in person.
The hearing was adjourned until Thursday, 23 July 2026, at 12 noon, when all defaulting agencies and their accounting officers are expected to appear with the requested documents.
News
Breaking: CBN retains interest rate at 26.5%
The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has retained the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR), the country’s benchmark interest rate, at 26.5 percent.
The decision was announced at the end of the 306th meeting of the MPC, held in Abuja on July 20 and 21, 2026.
All 11 members of the committee attended the two-day meeting, where they reviewed recent domestic and global economic developments before deciding to leave the benchmark lending rate unchanged.
The decision means the CBN has maintained its tight monetary policy stance amid efforts to sustain the moderation in inflation, stabilise the foreign exchange market and consolidate recent macroeconomic gains.
Details shortly…
-
News24 hours agoHeavy trouble for NBA as court asked to stop swearing in of President-elect, others
-
News21 hours agoReps Probe Alleged Fake Presidential Council as Head of Civil Service Confirms Budget Participation, Approval for 314 Posts
-
News24 hours agoAtiku demands answers from Tinubu over suspicious N12.8trn service-wide vote
-
News23 hours agoCourt sentences pastor to death for killing daughter over witchcraft claim
-
News14 hours agoTinubu Appoints former Ekiti Governor Ayo Fayose, 25 Other Nigerians into Federal Agencies
-
News24 hours agoSix dead, 15 rescued as canoe capsizes in Jigawa
-
Economy14 hours agoOyedele exonerates TInubu, tells Senate TInubu did not borrow N82trn debt
-
News13 hours agoFG denies rumours of Defence Minister Christopher Musa’s alleged resignation
