Connect with us

News

Manufacturers accept FG N60,000 minimum wage — MAN DG

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The Director-General of the Manufacturing Association of Nigeria, Ajayi Kadri, has confirmed that the organised private sector accepted the Federal Government’s proposal for a new minimum wage of N60,000.

Ajayi disclosed this during an interview with Channels TV in Abuja on Saturday.

He clarified that ongoing negotiations between the government, the private sector and labour were focused on establishing a minimum wage rather than a living wage which represents the lowest amount that can be paid to any worker in the country.

Advertisement

He also stressed that both labour and private businesses have been facing significant economic challenges, making it extremely difficult for them to meet the wage demands put forward by labour unions.

He stated, “To start with, this is a very difficult time for anyone to negotiate minimum wage. From the perspective of government, labour and organized private sector, we operate in an environment where there is general acceptance of the fact that the macroeconomics are not right, even the global economy is experiencing a lot of shakeups and the aftermath of government necessary reforms.

“From the beginning of the negotiations of the minimum wage, it’s evident to the tripartite— that is the government, labour, and organized private sector— that we are going to operate in a difficult terrain.

“Incidentally, the organized private sector and government have offered N60,000 as the minimum wage and I think it is very important for us to understand that what we are talking about is the minimum wage. That is what some people have called the walk-in wage. That is the amount we will pay the least workers in the country. It is the minimum wage we are negotiating, not a living wage,” Ajayi said.

Advertisement

Ajayi disclosed further that both the government and the private sector face significant constraints in fulfilling the proposed N419,000 living wage request.

He mentioned that the private sector, for example, is dealing with economic challenges and inflation, making it impossible to pay such an amount.

He also explained that this is not the most appropriate time for organized labor to negotiate a new minimum wage. Instead, they should collaborate with other stakeholders to strengthen the economy.

“All of us in the tripartite— the government, the labour, and the private sector — we all knew that we were operating in a very difficult environment. The government itself realized that it had limited capacity to pay. The private sector is constrained by microeconomic, infrastructure and security challenges. So, we are also constrained to pay.

Advertisement

“Labour on its part, is under intense pressure from its constituencies to ask for a higher wage because inflation has hit the roof and the operating environment is tough.

“Throughout the negotiation process, we made it known that this is not the best time to negotiate minimum wage. This is the time for us to agree, the crew behind the government, and grow the economy in such that we will bake a bigger cake and then we’ll be able to share,” the director general added.

He, however, appealed to the organised labour to reconsider its decision to embark on a nationwide strike.

He noted that the labour walking out of discussions and declaring strike would not help matters.

Advertisement

He added that it is unfortunate that labour rejected the N60,000 offer from the government and the organised private sector, choosing to declare a nationwide strike.

“We cannot afford to cripple the economy when all we needed to do was continue to build it. I think President Tinubu was very clear when he emerged as president that these are not going to be easy times and I think we needed to tighten our belts to deliver on economy that we know has been seriously battered,” Ajayi-Kadir said on Channels Television’s Sunrise programme on Saturday.

“Of course, the government on its own side has to demonstrate leadership, sensitivity and sense and sense of mind as well as the sense of occasion of the period that we are in. So, government expenditure, government choices of what needs to be done, how much to be spent, the cost of governance itself, all of it has to come to the table.

“I think what labour is actually worried about is that they appear to be the ones on the brunt of it but we needed to be able to engage, walking out on the process and declaring strike, I do not think that that is what is going to solve this issue,” he added.

Advertisement

On Friday, organised labour declared a nationwide indefinite strike over the Federal Government’s refusal to raise the proposed minimum wage from N60,000.

They claimed that the strike followed the expiration of an earlier request to the Federal Government to conclude all negotiations for a new minimum wage before the end of May.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Chelsea, Brentford  shares the spoil in premier league’s goalless draw

Published

on

 

Chelsea’s frustrations on the road continued on Sunday as they played out a drab 0-0 draw against Brentford in the Premier League. The fourth-placed Blues, desperate to solidify their position in the race for Champions League qualification, delivered another uninspiring display under manager Enzo Maresca. Much of the attention was focused on the decision to bench England forward Cole Palmer for almost an hour, sparking questions about the Italian boss’s priorities ahead of a crucial UEFA Conference League quarter-final clash with Legia Warsaw on Thursday. When Palmer was finally introduced, his impact was muted, with his only significant contribution being a missed chance over the crossbar.

Chelsea have a UEFA Conference League quarter-final trip to Legia Warsaw on Thursday, but Maresca’s priorities were questioned following the Blues’ insipid display.

The match itself offered little excitement, highlighting the struggles of both sides. Brentford, battling their own challenges of form at home, seemed unable to capitalize on Chelsea’s sluggish performance. Despite the Blues’ attempts to gain control, Maresca’s cautious tactical approach failed to generate clear-cut opportunities for his team. With Chelsea winless away from home in the league since December, the encounter at the Brentford Community Stadium was emblematic of their recurring troubles on the road. Fans and analysts alike questioned whether Maresca’s approach was adequate for a team still fighting for Champions League qualification amid an increasingly competitive field.

Advertisement

The spotlight on Cole Palmer’s absence from the starting lineup was another defining feature of the match. The England forward, widely regarded as a key player for Chelsea this season, could have provided the creativity and attacking edge the Blues sorely lacked throughout the game. Maresca’s decision to hold Palmer back drew criticism, especially given the urgency of securing vital points for Chelsea’s league ambitions. When Palmer did make his long-awaited entrance, the young star struggled to find his rhythm, leaving fans disappointed and underscoring the broader issues in Chelsea’s attacking play.

With Manchester City breathing down Chelsea’s neck in the Premier League standings, the stakes for Sunday’s result were high. The goalless draw opened the door for fifth-placed City to overtake Chelsea should they secure a win against Manchester United in the day’s late fixture. For the Blues, the outcome not only added pressure to their domestic campaign but also cast a shadow over their upcoming Europa Conference League clash. Maresca now faces the dual challenge of rejuvenating Chelsea’s confidence in Europe while addressing their league form, which could ultimately determine their fate in the pursuit of Champions League football next season.

Top copy trading platform
Discover the best copy trading platform. Copy expert traders’ strategies on Deriv cTrader.
Deriv.com
by TaboolaSponsored Links
The result also extended Brentford’s struggles at home, as they continued their winless streak in front of their fans. Both teams leave the match with unanswered questions about their form, tactics, and aspirations as the Premier League season enters a critical phase. For Chelsea, the disappointment underscores the need for decisive action from Maresca and his squad as they prepare for crucial fixtures on both domestic and continental fronts. Brentford, meanwhile, will aim to regroup and find ways to regain momentum in their remaining matches. The uneventful encounter serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by teams vying to navigate the pressure of top-flight football.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

“How we imortalised Olunloyo before his death-Makinde

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Governor of Oyo State, Seyi Makinde has said he is happy that former governor of the State, Omololu Olunloyo was imortalised before his demise.

Makinde, in a condolence message by his media aide Sulaimon Olanrewaju on Sunday, said the country had lost a patriotic leader, an icon and one of its most cerebral former administrators with the politician’s demise.

The governor said it is sad that the late mathematical guru and administrator passed away before his 90th birthday.

Advertisement

“This death hits differently because I was looking forward to Baba’s 90th birthday, which would have come up on April 14. However, we have to submit to the will of God, who gives and takes lives as He wills.

“My joy is that our government immortalised and honoured Pa Olunloyo in his lifetime and he was present to witness it as we named the Ibadan Airport Road and the Leisure Park on the axis after him in recognition of his service to the state.

“May the Lord grant repose to his soul and give his family the fortitude to bear his demise,” Mr Makinde said.

The death of Mr Olunloyo was confirmed on Sunday morning through a statement by his family.

Advertisement

The deceased died just a few days before his 90th birthday, according to the statement.

Continue Reading

News

Iran turns down Trump’s call for direct nuclear talks

Published

on

By

Iran’s top diplomat has rejected direct negotiations with the United States as pointless, his office said Sunday, after US President Donald Trump said he preferred face-to-face talks over its nuclear programme.

Trump sent a letter to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei last month calling for negotiations but warning of military action if diplomacy failed.

On Thursday, the US president said he favoured “direct talks”, arguing they were “faster” and offered a better understanding than going through intermediaries.

But Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said direct talks made no sense with a country “that constantly threatens to resort to force in violation of the UN Charter and that expresses contradictory positions from its various officials”.

Advertisement

“We remain committed to diplomacy and are ready to try the path of indirect negotiations,” he was quoted as saying in a statement issued by his ministry.

Iran keeps itself prepared for all possible or probable events, and just as it is serious in diplomacy and negotiations, it will also be decisive and serious in defending its national interests and sovereignty.”

On Saturday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country was willing to engage in dialogue with the United States on an “equal footing”.

He also questioned Washington’s sincerity in calling for negotiations, saying “if you want negotiations, then what is the point of threatening?”

Advertisement

Iran and the United States have had no diplomatic relations since shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution with some regional countries like Oman playing a mediating role between the two sides.

Letter diplomacy
Trump’s letter was delivered to Iran via the United Arab Emirates, and Tehran responded at the end of March via the Sultanate of Oman.

On Sunday, the chief of staff of the Iranian armed forces, General Mohammad Bagheri, said Iran’s response stressed that “we seek peace in the region”.

“We are not the ones who start wars, but we will respond to any threat with all our might,” he said of the content of Iran’s response.

Advertisement

Western countries, led by the United States, have for decades accused Tehran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons.

Iran rejects the allegation and maintains that its nuclear activities exist solely for civilian purposes.

In 2015, Iran reached a landmark deal with the permanent members of the UN Security Council, namely the United States, France, China, Russia, and the United Kingdom, as well as Germany, to limit its nuclear activities.

The 2015 agreement — known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — gave Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme to guarantee that Tehran could not develop a nuclear weapon.

Advertisement

In 2018, during Trump’s first term in office, the United States withdrew from the agreement and reinstated biting sanctions on Iran.

A year later, Iran began rolling back on its commitments under the agreement and accelerated its nuclear programme.

On Monday, Ali Larijani, a close adviser to Khamenei, warned that while Iran was not seeking nuclear weapons, it would “have no choice but to do so” in the event of an attack against it.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News