Connect with us

News

A MINISTER’s TEMPEST AND TELECOMS SURVIVAL

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore.

 

The new “National Digital Economy and E-Government bill “ maybe an albatross described in Samuel Taylor Coleridge,s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”.And as Coleridge puts it in his master piece “Water,water everywhere,but nor to drink”.That is the irony with our situation now.

And the Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, Bosun Tijani thought differently when he boasted two weeks ago that the new bill when enacted was capable of revolutionizing the nation’s economy with a projected revenue of $18.3 billion by the turn of 2026.

Advertisement

> But this appears to be a mere projection and perhaps a gamble at best.

> Does the Minister know that like most things and people within a troubled economy, telecommunications is also troubled?

And at a time when spirited efforts are needed to cushion the troubles, should a Minister be in hot pursuit of a new law that he claims will boost the economy by about $18.3 billion by 2026?.There may be other reasons for this new bill other than what we know.

Perhaps he thinks foisting a new law on the sector which at best would create multiple layers of regulations and more burden for the operators will make a positive difference?
But stakeholders are worried that a brazen law ,which is viewed as self serving,is the least needed now especially when foreign direct investments and investors are scared stiff about bringing in their money to a wobbling economy.

Advertisement

The new bill, if translated to an Act, is a potential albatross that will hang menacingly on the necks of everybody including the Minister.

These fears were made very clear last week in Lagos when stakeholders gathered to review the sector and its needs and concluded that there are bigger headaches than bringing in a new law now.

It was lamentation all the way and no one saw any light at the end of the tunnel.

Even those who were austere with their words couldn’t keep their characteristic cool anymore.We are all victims of poor network services and the operators claim to be helpless citing several reasons especially paucity of funds due to declining investments and recorded losses among others.

Advertisement

> But despite the Minister,s obsession to push this bill down the throats of everybody including the legislators,there are more troubling days ahead the telecommunications industry.

> At the Lagos gathering last week, Bolaji Balogun, a pioneer telecommunications revolution leader and one of the original promoters of Econet Wireless Nigeria ( now Airtel after several name changes), who worked side by side with Strive Masiyiwa at the Digital Mobile License (DML ) bidding in January 2001, told the gathering in Lagos that the sector requires a minimum of $1billion yearly investment if we are to get out of the woods and have robust telecommunications services.

The-well attended event was hosted by Bismarck Rewane led Financial Derivative Limited.

But the Minister was conspicuously missing as stakeholders bemoaned the pitiable state of the sector especially now that foreign investors are scared of bringing their money to a wobbling economy.

Advertisement

> “No investor would be excited in bringing in one dollar and get 66 cents in return “ one stakeholder lamented.

> It’s as bad as that and one thinks the Minister should have been more interested in raising the investment profile of the sector before hurriedly packaging a bill that he claims will be a game changer. How? worried participants queried last week.

> But the Minister appears to be running a solo race as he had not earned the confidence of the industry players except for those who come to massage his ego. Even those with whom he was in the trenches and pushed very hard for his appointment are now on the sidelines waiting for him to fail. Their excuse is that he has jumped ship so he should swim or sink alone because like one worried stakeholder put it “the Minister went to sleep too early forgetting that so much work is left undone to revive the sector, certainly not his fancy bill”.

> The Global System for Mobile Communications Association (GSMA) has also echoed these concerns, stating that the telecom industry’s financial health in recent years has been insufficient to support its capital-intensive operations.

Advertisement

In Its 2024 reports on the Nigerian digital economy, the GSMA warned that high inflation levels have driven up costs for mobile service providers, further impacting profitability and investment potential.
>>> Balogun who Heads, Chapel Hill Denham emphasized that the sector’s yearly investment of the $1 billion is primarily to meet the country’s service quality standards.

“We cannot secure this nation without improving our digital infrastructure,” Balogun stated. “Our digital infrastructure has the power to transform Nigeria’s economy. While significant investments have been made, much more work remains and this requires more funds “.
> The economic downturn has been worsened by the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) unification of the foreign exchange market in June 2023, leading to a sharp devaluation of the naira.

The currency plummeted from N471/$ before the move to N1,043.09/$ by December 28, 2023, and further to N1,570.99/$ by August 12, 2024.

This devaluation has inflicted heavy losses on the telecom sector, with Airtel Africa and MTN Nigeria reporting a combined N1.29 trillion in foreign exchange (FX) losses alone.

Advertisement

MTN Nigeria also posted its first loss since its 2019 listing on the Nigerian stock exchange, recording a N137 billion deficit.

Foreign investment in Nigeria’s telecom sector has also taken a hit, with serious nosediving from $456.83 million in 2022 to $134.75 million in 2023, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).

Writing on the new bill ,a very knowledgeable analyst explained that “ in Part XV, under Miscellaneous, which is annotated as Supremacy of National Digital Economy and E-Governance Act, the Bill which is confusingly called an Act, states as follows: “Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law but subject to the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, in all matters relating to the digital economy and e-government, the provisions of the Act shall override the provisions of any other Law.; and The Regulatory agency shall establish regulations on the use and adoption of new and emerging technologies as it relates to information technology.”

Provisions in the new bill will override the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Act, 2015; Nigerian Communications Act 2003; The National Broadcasting Commission Act Cap N11 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004; National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) Act 2007, and, in fact, there is already a very controversial Bill at the National Assembly which seeks to amend the existing NITDA Act. And then, this new one entirely.

Advertisement

> “This particular Bill will set up a regulator for the digital space which may be given the rapacious opportunity to swallow up other Acts before it. That may be the only way to accommodate a new regulator in these days that the current administration is trying to trim the size of governance. The dollar sign is only a ruse, a smokescreen that will evaporate at the approach of reality.”

Another analyst explained that while the bill will enable e-government and boost digital literacy among government workers, section 62 of the draft seeks to override the provisions of any other law in all matters relating to digital economy and e-government. Thus creating imminent power tussles between existing government agencies who already cater to some part of what the bill covers.

The National Digital Economy and E-Governance bill as the Minister explains “will enable government businesses including contracts to be conducted electronically.”

“The National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) will be responsible for implementing the bill when passed.” the Minister confirmed.

Advertisement

This bill is filling the gap where immediate past Minister left off after a failed attempt to smuggle in a new bill to super impose NITDA on everyone.

By reintroducing this spectre of a bill,this Minister may know more than all of us do.

The Digital Economy and E-Governance Bill mandates electronic records and contracts within government organizations. It also stipulates a fine of not less than ₦1 million per individual and not less than ₦10 million for corporations who fail to comply with the frameworks, guidelines, and regulations under the act.

Strangely this new bill also seeks to create a new ICT division not in tandem with existing laws established by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) and the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA).

Advertisement

Analysts are however worried that instead of creating an amorphous law, ”the Minister could have sent a working paper to the President to direct different institutions on how they can come together and achieve e-governance, ”adding that the ultimate desire is the success in the collaborative nature of the Bill development process.”

> But the Minister thinks otherwise .”The Digital Economy Bill will bring Nigeria closer to e-governance when enacted. The country lags behind other African countries—Ghana, Mauritius, South Africa, and Tunisia—that have been identified with high e-government development indexes. The move will also contribute to Nigeria’s goal of increasing digital literacy rates. “

The new bill when enacted would warehouse mega regulatory powers in the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) whose original Act in 2007 limited its purview to research and development and policies for ICT growth.

NITDA will wield enormous authority in the sector including but not limited to infrastructure development and management,hitherto under the Nigerian Communications Commission;NCC, thus leading to a dirge for the foremost regulator of repute.

Advertisement

The new bill when passed into An Act of parliament will gradually confine the NCC to the dustbin of history as the only law that will override the new Act is the Nigerian Constitution.The document is so beautifully couched that even legal minds are bewildered.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Coup plot: DSS arraigns five associates of ex-Gov Silva

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Department of State Service (DSS) has arraigned five associates of former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Silva, before the Federal High Court in Abuja over allegations that they concealed information about the whereabouts of their principal, who the agency said was implicated as a financier of an alleged aborted coup attempt against President Bola Tinubu.

Silva, a former Governor of Bayelsa State, has been declared wanted by the Federal Government, while some of his identified properties have been marked for forfeiture following allegations that he sponsored and masterminded the purported coup plot.

The five associates — Reuben Ayuba, Musa Mohammed, Friday Paul, Paganengigha Anagaha and Ayebaifife Suobite — were brought before Justice Peter Lifu on Wednesday and charged with allegedly concealing the whereabouts of Silva, who the DSS described as a fugitive of the law.

A two-count charge filed against them indicated that the accused persons, on April 28, 2026, became accessories after the fact of felony by concealing the whereabouts of Timiprey Silva, said to be a fugitive of the law.

Advertisement

The alleged offence is said to be contrary to Section 519 of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

The DSS also accused them of conspiracy to commit a felony, specifically concealing the whereabouts of Timiprey Silva, who is described as a fugitive of the law, contrary to Section 516 of the Criminal Code LFN, 2004.

However, all the accused persons pleaded not guilty to the charges when they were read to them.

DSS lawyer, Emmanuel Orubor, urged the court to fix a date for the agency to open its case by calling witnesses to testify against the accused persons.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Sunusi Musa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who represented Reuben Ayuba and Paganengigha Anagaha, the first and fourth accused persons, moved applications for bail on behalf of his clients.

Similar bail applications were also argued by Ibrahim Imadegbelo, who represented Musa Mohammed, the second accused person; I. G. Kelubia, who stood for Friday Paul, the third defendant; and E. C. Sogo, who represented Ayebaifife Suobite, the fifth accused person.

The lawyers informed Justice Lifu that their clients had been in custody since October 25, 2025, and urged the court to admit them to bail on liberal terms.

In a brief ruling, Justice Lifu granted the accused persons bail in the sum of N5 million each, with two sureties each in the like sum.

Advertisement

The sureties are required to swear to an affidavit of means, provide evidence of three years’ tax payment, show evidence of visible means of livelihood and deposit their recent passport photographs.

Justice Lifu further ordered that the identities of the sureties must be verified by the Registrar of the Court.

Pending the perfection of the bail conditions, the judge ordered that the accused persons be remanded in Kuje Prison.

The judge fixed July 22 for the commencement of trial.

Advertisement

The charges against them read:

COUNT ONE:
“That you, RUBEN AYUBA, MUSA MOHAMMED, FRIDAY PAUL, PAGANENGIGHA ANAGAHA and AYEBAIFIE SUOBITE, adults, males, on or about the 28th day of April, 2026, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did become accessories after the fact of felony by concealing the whereabouts of Timiprey Silva, who is a fugitive of the law and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 519 of the Criminal Code Act LFN, 2004.”

COUNT TWO:
“That you, RUBEN AYUBA, MUSA MOHAMMED, FRIDAY PAUL, PAGANENGIGHA ANAGAHA and AYEBAIFIE SUOBITE, adults, males, on or about the 28th day of April, 2026, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did conspire to commit a felony to wit: concealing the whereabouts of Timiprey Silva, who is a fugitive of the law and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 516 of the Criminal Code LFN, 2004.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Why we declared Delta lawmaker’s seat vacant – Assembly

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Delta State House of Assembly says the decision to declare the seat of the member representing Udu Constituency vacant was taken in line with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution.

The Chairman of the House Committee on Information and House Leader, Hon. Emeka Nwaobi, gave the explanation in Asaba.

Nwaobi said the Assembly acted strictly within its constitutional powers and not for political reasons.

He said, “The House merely carried out its constitutional responsibility after considering the resignation and defection letter submitted by the lawmaker representing Udu Constituency.”

Advertisement

The assembly spokesman explained that the Constitution clearly states the conditions under which a lawmaker can defect from the political party on whose platform he or she was elected without losing the seat.

According to him, the only condition is where there is a division or crisis within the political party at the national level.

He said there was no evidence before the Assembly to show that the lawmaker’s defection met that constitutional requirement.

Nwaobi said, “The Delta State House of Assembly is guided solely by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Every action taken by the House is rooted in the law, and nothing is done outside the provisions of the Constitution.”

Advertisement

He added that the Assembly’s resolution should not be seen as a political vendetta but as a faithful implementation of the Constitution.

The House leader reaffirmed the commitment of the Assembly to the rule of law, constitutional democracy and legislative integrity.

He urged members of the public to study the relevant provisions of the Constitution before drawing conclusions on the Assembly’s decision.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge’s illness stalls El-Rufai’s bail ruling

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal High Court in Kaduna on Wednesday failed to sit after the presiding judge reportedly fell ill, stalling the ruling on the bail applications filed by former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai and his co-defendant, Jimi Lawal.

The case was that of an alleged corruption case instituted by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission against the defendants.

Justice Hauwa’u Buhari had fixed Wednesday, July 1, 2026, for the ruling after hearing arguments from counsel for the prosecution and the defence.

However, proceedings could not go on as scheduled.

Advertisement

A court source who confirmed the development to The PUNCH said, “They said the judge is sick.”

A fresh date for the ruling is expected to be communicated to parties in the case.

The development came barely two days after the Kaduna State High Court declined a separate bail application filed by El-Rufai in another ICPC prosecution.

On Monday, Justice Diruis Khobo dismissed the former governor’s bail application, holding that it lacked merit.

Advertisement

The judge ruled that the defendant failed to place sufficient and convincing materials before the court to justify the exercise of its discretion in his favour.

Justice Khobo held that El-Rufai did not present reliable evidence or credible documents capable of warranting his release on bail.

Although the court refused the application, it directed the ICPC to grant the former governor unhindered access to his medical team or any medical facility of his choice within Nigeria for appropriate medical attention.

The court also ordered that El-Rufai remain in the custody of the anti-graft agency pending the determination of the case and adjourned the trial until July 7 and 8, 2026.

Advertisement

At the Federal High Court, El-Rufai is standing trial alongside his former Special Adviser, Jimi Lawal, and five corporate entities on an amended 11-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office, financial impropriety and money laundering.

El-Rufai pleaded not guilty to count one, while Lawal pleaded not guilty to counts six, seven and eight.

One of the companies, Singularity Network Security Limited, pleaded not guilty to counts two, three, four, five, nine, ten and eleven.

The ICPC alleged that investigations uncovered irregularities in the handling of government funds and the award of contracts during El-Rufai’s administration, resulting in the alleged diversion and misapplication of public resources.

Advertisement

The former governor has consistently denied all allegations, insisting that every action taken during his eight-year administration was lawful and in the public interest.

The Federal High Court case had earlier been adjourned after the absence of two co-defendants at a previous sitting.

The PUNCH recalls that on April 14, 2026, Justice Rilwan Aikawa granted El-Rufai bail in the sum of N200m with two sureties, one of whom must be a serving or retired civil servant on Grade Level 15, while the other must be a recognised traditional ruler.

The court subsequently declined the former governor’s application seeking a variation of the bail conditions.

Advertisement

In the separate Kaduna State High Court case, El-Rufai is facing a nine-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office said to have been committed during his tenure as governor between 2015 and 2023.

The ICPC accused him of violating public procurement and financial management procedures in the execution of some government contracts.

El-Rufai has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

While his legal team described the prosecution as politically motivated and lacking merit, the anti-graft agency maintained that it had assembled sufficient documentary and witness evidence to prove its case.

Advertisement

The twin prosecutions have continued to attract widespread public attention due to El-Rufai’s prominence in national politics and his eight-year tenure as governor of Kaduna State.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News