Connect with us

News

Confusion Trails Rivers LG Election Amid Conflicting Court Rulings on INEC Voters’ Register

Published

on

Uncertainty has shrouded the planned local government election in Rivers State, following the setting aside of all steps taken so far by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) towards the conduct of the October 5 polls.

Justice Peter Lifu of a Federal High Court in Abuja, who set aside all the processes taken by the Rivers State Government, also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from releasing the voter’s register used in the conduct of the 2023 general election to the Rivers SIEC for the purpose of conducting the October 5, 2024 local government elections in the state.

Besides, Justice Lifu, in a judgment delivered on Monday, also restrained the Inspector General (IG) of Police and the Department of State Services (DSS) from providing security for the said election.

This latest order by Justice Lifu however, runs contrary to an earlier order issued by a High Court in Rivers State, which had cleared the coast for the conduct of the October 5 polls.

Advertisement

Justice I. Igwe of the Rivers State High Court had, in a judgment delivered on September 4, ordered the Rivers State electoral body to conduct the October 5 council polls using the 2023 voter’s register.

In making the order, Justice Igwe had held that the defendants are bound by Section 7, Subsection 1 of the Constitution and Section 5 (A) of RSIEC Law Number 2 of 2018 to make provisions and conduct the local government polls within the shortest possible time, especially following the expiration of the tenure of the former elected officials on June 17.

Besides, Justice Igwe observed that the Federal Government has urged states without democratically elected local governments to do so within three months, following the Supreme Court’s judgment on local government autonomy.

The Rivers High Court subsequently ordered that all necessary arrangements be made to ensure the conduct of the election on October 5, 2024, as announced by RSIEC.

Advertisement

But with the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, it is not certain the order INEC, Police and DSS would obey considering the fact that both courts are of equal jurisdiction.

While the suit in Rivers was filed by the All People’s Party (APP), that of Abuja was filed by the All Progressives Congress (APC), which claimed that before the RSIEC can announce the date for the conduct of the local government elections, the voter’s register from INEC to be used for the polls must be updated and published 90 days to the poll.

APC argued that since this has not been done, the court should intervene by ordering INEC not to release the voter’s register used in Rivers State during the last general election.

Delivering judgment, Justice Lifu agreed with the plaintiff that all processes for the conduct of the October 5 council polls has not been fully complied with hence the need to restrain INEC and security agencies from participating in the election.

Advertisement

It is the position of the court that the update and revision of the voter’s register ought to have been concluded before a date for the conduct of the polls can be fixed.

The judge therefore ordered INEC not to make the certified voter’s register available to RSIEC until the law has been fully complied with.

Justice Lifu also barred RSIEC from accepting any voter’s register from INEC or using it for the purpose of the October 5 local governments poll.

Earlier, the court dismissed nine preliminary objections filed by the defendants against the suit for lacking in merit.

Advertisement

The court also struck down Section 60(2) of the Rivers Electoral Act, 2018, signed by former governor and now Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mr Nyesom Wike, for being inconsistent with the constitution, pointing out that the said law restricted access to justice by aggrieved persons.

Justice Lifu also held that his court has the necessary jurisdiction to entertain the case of the plaintiff because INEC and the security agencies who were defendants in the suit are federal agencies.

The court also settled the issue of representation of the APC in favour of the nation as against the state.t

A the hearing, the Rivers State APC had through its lawyer, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), applied for the withdrawal of the suit but, Justice Lifu held that the state chapter of the APC is not a juristic person and had also failed to prove that the National Working Committee (NWC) of the APC had instructed them to take any steps in respect of the case before him.

Advertisement

According to the judge, it is only the National Legal Adviser of the party and the NWC that could engage a counsel to represent the party in any court case, adding that Chief Joseph Daudu and Ogwu Onoja both SANs were duly engaged to represent the APC in the suit.

The court subsequently struck out all the submissions of the Rivers State APC in the suit.

Meanwhile, Chief Gordy Uche (SAN), who represented the Rivers APC, told journalists shortly after the judgment that his client would appeal the judgment of Justice Lifu at the appropriate time.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Oil magnate sues EFCC for unlawfully declaring him wanted

Published

on

Unidentified EFCC Operative Takes Own life

Chairman/CEO of Global Signature Hotel and Total Grace Group Limited, Dr. Henry Mobolaji Akinduro, has filed a N5 billion lawsuit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for allegedly declaring him wanted unlawfully.

In the suit filed yesterday at the Federal High Court, Lagos, Akinduro submitted that the EFCC declared him wanted without any form of judicial intervention, recourse to constitutional safeguards or order of court.

The EFCC on Friday, October 11, 2024 about 7.20pm on its official twitter handle, also known as ‘X’ declared the oil magnate ‘Wanted’. The businessman is praying the court to order the EFCC to remove his name from the wanted list published on the commission’s official website or any other related platform including Twitter (X).

Akinduro is seeking N5 billion as “general damages”.

Advertisement

On Monday, the businessman, via his counsel, Olalekan Ojo (SAN) had petitioned the Chairman of the EFCC over the unconstitutional violation of his fundamental human rights to personal liberty and human dignity by the publication of his name on the list of wanted persons on the EFCC’s website.

Ojo averred in the petition that at all times preceding the said publication, there was no order of any court of competent jurisdiction authorising the said publication and no charge had been preferred against our client before any court.

According to Akinduro’s lawyer, the Commission had allegedly made the said illegal or unlawful publication declaring him wanted upon the prompting or instigation of one Mr. Femi Olushakin who had earlier written a petition against the oil magnate in respect of a N240 million contractual dispute between them —Messrs Olushakin and Akinduro.

He affirmed that disputes had arisen from the investment agreement entered into between the two men leading to Olushakin petitioning EFCC.

Advertisement

“Our Client (Akinduro) was invited by the Commission on 4th June, 2024 and he immediately responded via letter dated 5th June, 2024 notifying the Commission of his unavailability due to medical reasons. In the said letter, it was stated therein that our Client was out of the Country receiving medical attention. He subsequently provided assurances that he would be present at the Commission as soon as he was medically cleared to travel. It is pertinent at this juncture to chronicle the genesis of the subject matter which led to the declaration of our Client Wanted by the Commission,” Ojo stated.

The Counsel disclosed that there was a business transaction between Akinduro and Olushakin which was backed by a viable collateral which included Akinduro’s Global Signature Hotel worth N500 million, three (3) 60-Seater Yutong buses valued at over N240 million and a Toyota 4Runner SUV.

Ojo claimed that Olushakin has sold the three 60-Seater Yutong buses and currently drives around the city in the Toyota 4Runner SUV which were used as collateral by Akinduro.

“It is clear from the above that this is a purely civil business transaction with no element of criminality embedded in it. Mr. Femi Olushakin maliciously petitioned the Commission after selling the 60-Seater Yutong buses and currently using the Toyota 4runner SUV for his personal use,” he stated.

Advertisement

The senior lawyer added that despite Akinduro’s medical condition overseas, he has maintained close communication with the Commission.

He said: “Our Client regularly sends his Legal Officer to the Commission, affirming his willingness and desire to appear before the Commission upon due confirmation of his being fit to travel by his doctors. There was no further request by the Commission inviting our Client before the unlawful publication.

“It is to be further noted that on 11 October, 2024, our Client’s Legal Officer was physically present at the office of the Commission around noon to submit a correspondence to the Commission and he also reassured the Operatives of the Commission of our Client’s desire and willingness to cooperate with the investigation by the Commission upon his arrival in Nigeria.

“It is regrettable that despite the repeated reassurances of our Client to cooperate with the investigation upon his arrival in Nigeria, the Commission proceeded to declare our Client ‘Wanted’ later that same day at about 7.20pm without an order of Court and in the absence of a valid charge in a Court of law.

Advertisement

“The Commission published our Client’s name and photograph depicting our Client as a fugitive from the law and branded him “WANTED” without any evidence of evading investigation. This action of the Commission has not only defamed our Client but also violated our Client’s right to freedom of movement without the order of the Courts.

“The Commission has also by the unlawful publication subjected our Client to public humiliation and ridicule thus causing our Client loss of personal and business relationships as well as reputational damage. It is our instruction that since the publication, our Client has been inundated with calls, Whatsapp messages from his business associates all over the world who had read the post expressing their disgust and dismay at the defamatory publication, and the said publication has also caused our Client emotional trauma and distress.”

Akinduro, through his lawyer, said he considered it imperatively necessary to put the records straight with a view to showing that the fraud allegations are trumped-up allegations aimed at causing incalculable damage to his hard earned but richly deserved reputation.

“It is pertinent to state that the petition against Dr. Henry Akinduro was an ignoble attempt to criminalize purely contractual disputes that had arisen from the investment agreement between Dr. Henry Akinduro and the Petitioner, Mr. Femi Olushakin.”

Advertisement

Ojo stated that the commercial or contractual disputes had earlier been referred to the competent Court by the parties before Olushakin resorted to lodging the fraud allegations against the oil magnate for reasons best known to him.

Continue Reading

News

EFCC an unlawful organisation, Agbakoba writes National Assembly

Published

on

Legal luminary, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has described the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as an “unlawful organisation” that was “unconstitutionally established.”

Agbakoba made this claim in October 14 letters to the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu.

They are the Chairmen of the Adhoc Committee on the review of the Constitution in both chambers of the National Assembly.

In his letter titled: “Re: Urgent legislative constitutional reforms relating to law enforcement agencies and anti-corruption efforts,” Agbakoba drew the attention of the National Assembly to constitutional issues related to law enforcement agencies and factors inhibiting the government’s objective of abolishing corruption as stated in Section 13 of the Constitution.

Advertisement

He said: “I very strongly believe the EFCC is unconstitutionally established.

“The powers under which it was established go beyond the powers of the National Assembly.

“The EFCC is an unlawful organisation.”

Agbakoba, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, said he was delighted to note that many states had finally taken it upon themselves to challenge the constitutionality of the EFCC.

Advertisement

“This will put to rest the question relating to the validity of the EFCC.”

The letter to the Deputy Senate President, reads in part: “I write to draw attention to certain constitutional issues on matters related to law enforcement agencies. As you are obviously aware, the fundamental objective of the government is to abolish corruption.

“But from my observation, there is no harmony amongst law enforcement agencies on corruption. They all appear to be working at cross purposes.

“This has been confirmed by the Supreme Court in so many cases. The Supreme Court has consistently sanctioned the EFCC for its conduct and questioned if the EFCC can in fact validly do what it does.

Advertisement

“I will go further to say that I very strongly believe the EFCC is unconstitutionally established.

“The powers under which it was established go beyond the powers of the National Assembly. The EFCC is an unlawful organisation.

“I am very delighted to note that many states have finally taken it upon themselves to challenge the constitutionality of the EFCC.”

“This will put to rest the question relating to the validity of the EFCC.

Advertisement

“Whilst we await the decision of the Supreme Court as the final court on the matter, I respectfully request that the Senate convene a public hearing to consider these constitutional issues.

“Such a hearing would provide an invaluable platform for stakeholders to discuss the reforms needed to strengthen Nigeria’s legal and institutional frameworks for law enforcement and anti-corruption, which will meet the stated and laudable objective of the government to abolish corruption as stated in Section 13 of the Constitution.

“I trust that, under your capable leadership, the Senate Constitution Review Committee will give these matters urgent attention in the interest of our nation’s development.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Fed Govt, Labour meet over fuel price hike

Published

on

The Federal Government yesterday engaged the Labour over the new petrol price regime.

The meeting was held at the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), with representatives from both government and Labour in attendance.

It was learnt that the meeting discussed the consequential adjustment of the new minimum wage, and the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) initiative, among others.

Government representatives at the meeting were National Security Adviser (NSA) Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, Minister of Labour Nkeiruka Onyejeocha, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy Wale Edun, Minister of Information Mohammed Idris, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil) Heineken Lokpobiri, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Gas) Ekperikpe Ekpo and representatives of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL).

Advertisement

Labour representatives included Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) President Joe Ajaero, Deputy President Kabiru Ado Sani, General Secretary Emma Ugboaja, Deputy President of the Trade Union Congress (TUC) Dr. Tommy Okon, Secretary General Nuhu Toro and President of the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT), also a Deputy President of the NLC.

Also present were Benjamin Anthony, Vice President of NLC, and Comrade Deborah Yusuf, Deputy Women leader of NLC.

NLC had decried the hike in the price of petrol, demanding a reversal and accusing the government of betrayal.

Idris, who addressed reporters after the meeting, described it as ‘normal engagement with labour to interact on national issues’.

Advertisement

He said the government does not believe there must be tension before an interaction.

“The government is always desirous of engaging with labour. This is one of such engagements.

“We’ll continue to interact with them. We don’t wait until there is tension about anything before we engage Labour,” he said.

His Budget and Economic Planning counterpart, Abubakar Bagudu, assured Nigerians that the country’s economy is on the path to recovery, despite current challenges.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News