Connect with us

News

Senate passes South-South Development Commission Bill

Published

on

The Senate yesterday passed the South South Development Commission (SSDC) Bill.

It also passed amendments to the Acts Establishing the North West Development, South East Development Commission, South West Development Commissions to make provisions for geopolitical representations.

The passage came less than 24 hours after the Federal Executive Council (FEC) renamed the Niger Delta Ministry as the Ministry of Regional Development to oversee Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) and the Development Commissions in the six geo-political zones.

Yesterday’s resolution of the Senate followed its consistent and adoption of the recommendations of its Committee on Special Duties, chaired by Senator Kaka Shehu.

Advertisement

The resolution was on the Shehu-led committee report on the Bill titled: “A Bill for an Act to Establish South South Development Commission charged with the responsibility to receive and manage funds from the Federation Account Allocation and other sources, donations, grants, aids for the integration, development, resolution of infrastructural deficit, militancy, communal crises as well as tackle ecological, environmental problems; and for related matters, 2024.”

The Bill was sponsored by All Progressive Congress (APC) Cross River South Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong.

The Bill was co-sponsored by all Senators from the South South including Senate President Godswill Akpabio,  Sampson Ekong Akpan, Etim Aniekan Bassey, Sunday Benson Agadaga and Konbowei Friday Benson.

Others are: Henry Seriake Dickson, Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe, Eteng Jonah Williams, Ede Dafinone, Thomas Joel-Onowakpo, Munir Chinedu Nwoko, Neda Imasuen, Monday Okpebholo, Adams Aliyu Oshiomhole, Heacho Allwell Onyesoh, Ipalibo Harry Banigo and Barinada Barry Mpigi.

Advertisement

There was however heated arguments among senators on source of funding for the various zonal development commissions created by the National Assembly.

Besides, the Senate during the consideration, struck out provisions in Section 23 of the  bills conferring  operational immunity  on board and executives of the commissions.

Arguments on approval of source of funding recommended for the commission among Senators arose during clause by clause consideration of the SSDC Bill.

The Senate Committee on Special Duties had in its report,  recommended that 15 per cent of statutory allocations of member States in a commission, should be used to fund the commission by the federal government.

Advertisement

But some senators like Senator Yahaya Abdullahi (PDP – Kebbi North), Wasiu Eshinlokun (APC – Lagos East) and Seriake Dickson (PDP – Bayelsa West) objected to the recommendation.

Specifically, Senator Yahaya Abdullahi said the provision would lead to litigation against the federal government from state governments as no state would like its statutory allocation to be tampered with in the process of funding a zonal development commission.

“The 15 per cent of statutory allocations of member states recommended for funding of the zonal development commissions would be litigated against by some state governments,” he said.

In a bid to quickly correct the meaning read into the 15 per cent statutory allocation of the state by Senator Abdullahi and many other Senators who indicated interest to comment,  the Deputy President of the Senate, Barau Jibrin, quickly rose to correct their impression.

Advertisement

Senator Barau in his explanation told the Senate that the 15 per cent statutory allocation of member states for funding of the zonal development commissions would not lead to any deduction from their statutory allocations.

“The 15 per cent of statutory allocation of member states recommended for funding of zonal development Commissions by the federal government, is not about deduction at all.

“What is recommended as contained in the report presented to us by the committee on Special Duties and being considered by the Senate now, is that 15% of statutory allocation of member states in a zonal development commission would by way of calculation by the federal government, used to fund the commission from the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

“Each state has monthly statutory allocation, 15 % of which as contained in this report being considered, will be calculated by the federal government and removed from the consolidated Revenue Fund for funding of their development commission,” Barau said.

Advertisement

Despite Barau’s explanation, many senators, who were not swayed, indicated their interest to speak but were prevented from doing so by the President of the Senate who said the provision was in order as constitutionally supported.

He said: “We don’t need to be debating on whether  15% statutory allocation of member states  in a commission would be deducted or not in view of provisions of section 162 (subsection 4) of 1999 constitution which empowers the National Assembly to appropriate from either the Consolidated Revenue Fund or Federation Account.

“Fifften15 % of statutory allocation of member states, has been recommended by the Senate and by extension, National Assembly, for funding of their zonal development commission by the federal government, anybody who want to go court over that may do so.”

Barau consequently put the question on adoption of the provision to voice vote and ruled that the ‘ayes have it’.

Advertisement

In his remarks after the passage of the bills, Akpabio thanked his colleagues for spending several hours on final consideration and passage of the SSDC Bill and amendments of the Zonal Development Commissions Acts which according to him, would serve as bedrock for the newly-created Ministry of Regional Development.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG drops charges against journalists

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The federal government on Friday withdrew all six-count charges against an Abuja-based online newspaper, Order Paper, and nine officers of the media organization.

Director-General of the Department of State Security (DSS), Mr. Tosin Adeola Ajayi advised the federal government to withdraw the charges.

It emerged Thursday that the Federal Government had sued the media house for allegedly publishing a false report that DSS operatives, on October 16, stormed the National Assembly on the basis of a rumoured plot to unseat Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

Advertisement

Considering what the DSS said was the serious national security threats and local and international embarrassment the story caused, they sued Order Paper and its officials.

However, a credible source in the office of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), who filed the suit, disclosed that the charges were withdrawn after the DSS boss reached out to their office.

“The new DG, DSS, Mr. Ajayi, reached out to us. He told my boss that the Nigerian chapter of the International Press Institute (IPI), which facilitated the early release of Order Paper’s admin officer, Ms. Edna Ulaeto, also played a key role. The people at Order Paper came to the DSS office, admitted their mistake, apologized, and promised to be more professional,” said the DPP officer.

From the visit of the Order Paper officials, the DSS boss further told my bosses, it was clear that the reporters were misled by less than credible sources in the National Assembly.

Advertisement

“Above all, added the DSS DG, the Order Paper management, on realizing their mistake, had quickly retracted the story. Being an adherent for civility, Mr. Tosin Ajayi therefore felt that the interventions by relevant professional bodies, including the IPI and Nigeria Union of Journalists, and the remorse by Order Paper, were sufficient to warrant the withdrawal of the charges,” the official of the Ministry of Justice declared.

Continue Reading

News

Hardship: Men now collect marriage list from different families to get cheapest – Report

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

In recent years, the age-old tradition of marriage has undergone a myriad of transformations, reflecting societal changes, economic conditions, and shifting values. One particularly intriguing trend emerging in some communities is the concept of men requesting “marriage lists” from multiple women. This practice, driven by a desire to evaluate potential marriage costs, raises several questions about tradition, love, and the commodification of relationships.

Marriage lists are essentially detailed accounts of the financial demands associated with a prospective marriage. These lists may include dowries, gifts, and other financial obligations that a groom or his family must meet. Traditionally, dowries were a way to secure the financial future of a bride and her family, but in contemporary settings, they can vary significantly based on cultural, regional, and individual factors.

Men requesting these lists from various women aims to assess which marriage would be the most economically feasible. This practice can stem from a combination of personal financial constraints, cultural expectations, and the desire to make informed decisions in an era where economic considerations are increasingly important.

Advertisement

In many cultures, marriage is not just a union of two individuals; it is a significant financial transaction involving families. While in some societies, love and companionship are the primary motivations for marriage, in others, financial considerations play a pivotal role. The practice of comparing marriage lists could be seen as a practical approach to ensuring financial stability, but it also risks reducing the complex institution of marriage to a mere transactional relationship.

The practice raises several ethical questions. First, is it fair to women to be evaluated based solely on financial demands? This approach can reinforce harmful stereotypes and perpetuate a culture where women’s worth is tied to monetary value. Additionally, it may lead to emotional detachment in relationships, prioritizing financial calculations over genuine compatibility and affection.

Moreover, this practice could create an environment of competition among women, fostering insecurities and undermining the foundational values of trust and love that are vital for a successful marriage.

On a practical level, the comparison of marriage costs can be influenced by economic realities. In times of financial uncertainty, individuals may feel compelled to prioritize financial security over emotional connection. This trend can also reflect broader societal changes, where economic factors increasingly dictate personal choices.

Advertisement

However, it’s essential to recognize that while financial considerations are valid, they should not overshadow the fundamental aspects of partnership—mutual respect, love, and shared goals.

While the practice of men requesting marriage lists from various women may appear to be a logical approach to navigating the complexities of modern relationships, it brings to light significant ethical, cultural, and emotional concerns. Marriage, at its core, is a partnership that thrives on connection and commitment, transcending financial considerations.

As society continues to evolve, it’s crucial to strike a balance between practical realities and the deeper values that define successful and fulfilling relationships. Ultimately, a marriage built on love and mutual respect will likely yield a more rewarding and lasting partnership than one anchored solely in economic calculations.

Credit vanguard

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Reps Query Minister Of Works Over Shameful State Of Nigerian Roads

Published

on

…call for replacement of management of ministry
By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives has queried the ministry of Works over the deplorable state of the Nigerian roads, calling for a total replacement of the management of the ministry.
Chairman, Commitee on FERMA, Rep. Remi Oseni issued the query during an interactive session with the Federal Road Maintenance Agency (FERMA) and Minister of Works on Thursday in Abuja.
According to the chairman, the ministry despite been allocated huge amount of money has not utilized the resources in fixing bad roads across the country.
Rep. Oseni express displeasure at the response of the representative of the Minister of Works, who is the Director Bridges and design, Bede Obiora, when he said the roads were bad due to the unavailability of funds by the ministry.
Obiora said: “The Ministry does not know how to address the challenges. But the issue is when you ask for resources, are those resources available? That is the big challenge. Yes, we’ve heard your request, about the 20 percent. We will do what we can. But, Mr. Chairman, you agree with me that it is still the National Assembly that does the appropriation, not the ministry. All we do is to do a proposal. The final result we get is after the appropriation by the National Assembly.
“So, we will still be bringing back the same request you gave us to your committee and urge you to assist us in clear terms about how this problem can be solved. The big challenge is the resources. Whether you go to budget, whether you go to visit the president, anywhere you go, the challenge is I need 1 billion Naira, what is available is N100,000. So, the issue now is how do we manage this little resource to address this enormous challenge”.
In response the Chairman of the Commitee insisted that the ministry has over the years not made repair of roads a priority, rather they award contract on yearly basis without maintaining already constructed roads.
“Where we find ourselves call for serious dedication, it calls for a total replacement of the management of the entire ministry for everyone of course to be identified
with the challenges that we are going through in the area of this road.
“We are not here for business of whether you want to do the job or you don’t want to do the job. How can you be telling us that there is no resources?  In less than one minute, from everything that everybody has said, it’s a clue. You have no plan for us as a nation.
“It’s unfair to us as a nation. Tell me specifically where we have good roads. You are not concentrating your attention on fixing existing bad roads.
“Don’t tell me about the issue of resources.  I’m sorry, we will not accept this. And if you want us to escalate things, let’s go into debates. What you are wasting on things that are not relevant for now to address other issues are much more important than what you are doing. I put it to you. If we are not honest enough to address some of these issues, you would have solve this problem at once.
“We are wasting our resources than solving our problems. I am not interested in emotion. I am concerned about how to fix Nigerian roads.
“We are not here for apology or asking whether you want to do it or you don’t want to do it. And that is why I feel sad that the Honorable Minister is not here in person. So that we can open our minds and see how we can fix our problem.
“There is no way you can relate the way we are feeling as individuals. We did not invite you because we wanted to see the Minister’s face. We invited you because we wanted to solve the problem. And tell us in a clear and scientific way. For us, you are only telling us you know there is no resources. And that is the end of the essence of your being here.
“It’s simple. Go and tell them that we don’t have resources. So, what is important is go and solve Nigerian road challenges.
“Go and review your job methodology. If you have an existing rule, you are not concentrating on how you want to get them resolved. And you are only concentrating on awarding contracts that you know they are not ready to execute.
“It’s not fair. Now, that brings me back to the issue of these resources that we are talking about. Sir, 60%, I don’t want to exaggerate, of why almost all the roads fail at the same time,  has to do with the quality of your work.
“Poor quality delivery. I told them, I saw some of your contractors working across the country. You will be ashamed that you are supervising the jobs. I was at some sites. I was almost calling the minister when they told me that the job was awarded by Minister of Works. So, don’t discuss resources. You will take me out of this place.
“Majority of the roads that they are repairing on a daily basis, or they are maintaining on a regular basis, are roads that will last 2-3 years, they are bad. Sir, that road failed less than a year after it was completed. You are still separating the state contractors to execute major highways in the country.  Don’t discuss resources.
The committee however demanded that the ministry go back to the drawing board to put an end to the state of roads across the country.
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News