Connect with us

News

Senators bicker over source of funding for regional devt commissions

Published

on

Senators on Thursday bicker on source of funding for the various Zonal Development Commissions created by the Senate along with the House of Representatives .

This is as it struck out some provisions of section 23 of their establishment bills , conferring operational immunity on board and executives of the commissions .

Division on approval of source of funding recommended for the commission among Senators arose during clause by clause consideration of the South – South Development Commission Establishment bill 2024 in plenary Thursday which is used as operational and structural template for the other commissions .

Senate Committee on Special Duties had in its report , recommended that 15% of Statutory allocations of member States in a commission , should be used to fund the commission by the federal government .

Advertisement

But some Senators like Senator Yahaya Abdullahi ( PDP Kebbi North ) , Wasiu Eshinlokun ( APC Lagos East ) , Seriake Dickson ( PDP Bayelsa West ) etc , raised observations on the recommendation .

Specifically , Senator Yahaya Abdullahi , said the provision would lead to litigation against the federal government by the State government as no state would like its statutory allocation to be tampered with in the process of funding a zonal development commission .

” Mr President , distinguished colleagues , the 15% of statutory allocations of member States , recommended for funding of their zonal development commissions , would be litigated against by some state government”, he said .

In a bid to quickly correct the meaning read into the 15% statutory allocation of the State by Senator Yahaya Abdullahi and many other Senators who indicated interest to comment , the Deputy President of the Senate , Barau Jibrin, quickly rose to correct their impression .

Advertisement

Senator Barau in his explanation told the Senate that the 15% Statutory allocation of member states for funding of their zonal development commission , would not entail any deduction from their statutory allocation .

” Mr President , distinguished colleagues , the 15% of Statutory allocation of member states , recommended for funding of Zonal Development Commissions by the federal government, is not about deduction at all .

” What is recommended as contained in the report presented to us by the committee on Special duties and being considered by the Senate now , is that 15% of statutory allocation of member states in a zonal development commission would by way of calculation by the federal government, used to fund the commission from the Consolidated Revenue Fund .

” Each state has monthly statutory allocation, 15 % of which as contained in this report being considered, will be calculated by the federal government and removed from the consolidated Revenue Fund for funding of their Development Commission .

Advertisement

Despite Barau’s explanation, many of the Senators still not convinced, indicated their interest to speak , but prevented from doing so by the President of the Senate , Godswill Akpabio who said the provision was in order as constitutionally supported .

” We don’t need to be debating on whether 15% statutory allocation of member states in a commission would be deducted or not in view of provisions of section 162 ( subsection 4) of 1999 constitution which empowers the National Assembly to appropriate from either the Consolidated Revenue Fund or Federation Account .

” 15 % of statutory allocation of member states , has been recommended by the Senate and by extension , National Assembly , for funding of their zonal development commission by the federal government, anybody who want to go court over that may do so “, he said .

He consequently put the question on adoption of the provision for voice votes to Senators and ruled that the ayes have it .

Advertisement

In his remarks after the passage of the consolidated bills , Akpabio thanked the Senators for spending several hours on final consideration and amendment of the Zonal Development Commission which according to him , would serve as bedrock for the newly created Ministry of Regional Development.

The bills cosidered and passsed are the South – South Development Commission Establishment Bill 2024, North West Development Commission Act ( Amendment) Bill 2024, South East Development Commission Act ( Amendment) Bill 2024 apart from the South West Development Commission Establishment Bill 2024 and North Central Development Commission Establishment Bill 2024 earlier passed.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Cabinet Reshuffle: Why Tinubu Was Silent Over Sack Of Betta Edu – Presidency

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The presidency has dismissed the suspended Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, Betta Edu, from its cabinet.

The Senior Special Assistant to President Bola Tinubu on Media and Publicity, Temitope Ajayi, confirmed the development in an interview with SaharaReporters on Thursday.

Recall that Edu was suspended in January 2024 over the alleged diversion of more than N585 million in public funds into a personal bank account.

Advertisement

Tinubu also asked the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to thoroughly investigate all the ministry’s financial transactions.

The investigation extended to the entire framework of Nigeria’s social investment programmes.

However, Edu has denied any wrongdoing.

Tinubu, in the list of new ministers released on Wednesday, replaced Betta Edu with a former gubernatorial candidate on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Nentawe Yilwatda.

Advertisement

However, Tinubu was silent about the replacement as Edu’s name was not among the list of sacked ministers.

Speaking on why Betta Edu was not listed along with the names of other ministers dismissed by President Tinubu, as announced by the Presidency on Wednesday, Ajayi said, “Since the President did not bring her back, it is as clear as it is.

“If she’s not coming back to the cabinet, it means she’s not part of it, especially if you didn’t see her name in the reshuffled cabinet yesterday.

The President has the power to hire and fire, to appoint and reappoint whoever he wants to reappoint. If her name is not there, that means she’s not there. I don’t think there is anything to argue about.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

APC Leaders in Anambra demand explanation over Bianca’s appointment

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Anambra State have condemned the appointment of Bianca Ojukwu as a minister-designate, calling it an anti-party action.

They questioned the rationale behind President Bola Tinubu’s decision to appoint Bianca, a member of the Board of Trustees of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), without consulting APC party members.

During an emergency meeting of party stakeholders in Awka on Thursday, October 24, the APC leaders described the appointment as a gross violation of party loyalty that undermines the morale of their members.

Advertisement

High Chief Bunty Onuigbo, the South East Zonal Secretary of APC and a member of the APC Elders Forum in Anambra, who spoke on behalf of the stakeholders, said: “This is nothing but an act of anti-party, and it is detrimental. By empowering members of other political parties at the expense of the APC in Anambra State, Mr President is not supporting party loyalty,” he stated.

Onuigbo further questioned the implications of the appointment, asking, “Does Mr President want a mass defection of APC members in Anambra to the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA)? Is he indirectly working for APGA in Anambra State?”

He expressed that the situation is both “unheard of and highly demoralising,” lamenting that the leadership in Abuja seems to be enhancing the fortunes of rival parties at the expense of the APC

Of the seven ministers appointed on Wednesday, October 23, Bianca Ojukwu’s appointment has been the most talked about, with Nigerians across various social media accounts debating this move by the president.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Finally Obasanjo Opens Up On Third Term Ambition, Exposes Actual Sponsors

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Ex- President Olusegun Obasanjo has finally broken his silence on the long-standing controversy surrounding his alleged third-term ambition.

The former President made the disclosure in an interview on News Central which aired on Thursday.

In the interview, Obasanjo denied ever nursing such ambitions, contrary to claims by his former vice president, Atiku Abubakar, and ex-Senate President Ken Nnamani.

Advertisement

Obasanjo stated that if he had wanted a third term, he would have gotten it. He attributed the rumours to some governors who were secretly working towards extending their own terms in office. These governors believed that if Obasanjo secured a third term, they would also benefit from an extended tenure.

His words: “If I had wanted a third term, I would have gotten it. I didn’t want a third term. I know some governors working for this, believing that if I, as president, got a third, they would also get it.”

Obasanjo revealed that getting debt relief for Nigeria was a far more challenging task than securing a third term. He proudly noted that his administration successfully obtained debt relief for the country, a feat that required diplomatic efforts with countries like France, England, Japan, and the United States.

Atiku Abubakar and Ken Nnamani have both claimed to have played instrumental roles in toppling Obasanjo’s alleged third-term bid.

Advertisement

Ahead of the 2023 presidential election, Atiku claimed that his connections within the National Assembly enabled him to block Obasanjo’s third-term agenda.

Obasanjo and Atiku served as Nigeria’s president and vice president from 1999 to 2007. However, their relationship went sour when Obasanjo chose not to support Atiku as his successor.

Meanwhile, Nnamani, stated that he had to give up his senatorial ambition to ensure Obasanjo’s third-term bid was defeated. He alleged that lawmakers were offered promises and cash incentives, but he remained committed to preventing the agenda, which ultimately led to his failure to secure re-election in 2007.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News