News
READ Tinubu’s Final Words Of Solace to fired ministers before their removal
Bayo Onanuga, the Special Adviser on Information and Strategy to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has shed light on the recent dismissals of several ministers, emphasizing the president’s respectful approach in communicating his decisions.
In a significant departure from past practices where dismissals were often abrupt and made public via radio or television, Onanuga detailed how President Tinubu personally met with the dismissed ministers to convey his decisions in a considerate manner.
During an appearance on Channels Television’s “Sunday Politics,” Onanuga elaborated on the rationale behind the decision to replace five ministers and reassign ten others. He stressed that this move was not made lightly but was the result of a careful and deliberate evaluation process. This evaluation was structured and methodical, aimed at ensuring that the decisions were grounded in solid performance assessments rather than impulsive choices.
The recent changes were officially announced following a Federal Executive Council meeting last Wednesday. The ministers who were let go included Uju-Ken Ohanenye, Minister of Women Affairs; Lola Ade-John, Minister of Tourism; Prof. Tahir Mamman (SAN), Minister of Education; Abdullahi Muhammad Gwarzo, Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development; and Dr. Jamila Bio Ibrahim, Minister of Youth Development. The president’s decision was framed within the context of ongoing efforts to optimize government performance and accountability.
Onanuga highlighted that the impetus for these changes stemmed from a detailed performance review led by Hadiza Usman, who serves as the Special Adviser on Policy and Coordination. He noted that Usman’s team utilized modern technology and actively sought citizen feedback to comprehensively assess the performance of the ministers. This approach represented a significant shift in how ministerial effectiveness is evaluated, moving beyond traditional methods to incorporate direct input from the public.
The use of technology and citizen feedback is a key element in this evaluation process. Onanuga pointed out that data was collected through various means, focusing on public opinion and ratings given by Nigerians regarding their ministers’ performances.
This innovative method aimed to ensure that the assessments were not only fair but also reflective of the citizens’ experiences and perceptions regarding the government’s effectiveness.
Onanuga explained, “The president did not change his ministers whimsically. The change underwent a rigorous procedure. Since our retreat in October of last year, the president made it clear to the ministers that they would be subject to evaluation. Hadiza Usman was placed in charge of this process.” This statement underscores the president’s commitment to accountability and performance measurement in governance, suggesting that he intends to foster a culture of responsibility within his administration.
According to Onanuga, Usman’s team’s methodical approach included soliciting public feedback on ministerial performance, allowing citizens to provide scores and comments based on their experiences. This interactive engagement with the populace not only empowered citizens to voice their opinions but also ensured that the decision-making process was anchored in real-world evaluations of ministerial effectiveness.
As the discussions around these dismissals unfolded, Onanuga addressed the terminology used to describe the situation. While many observers might have referred to the ministers as being “sacked,” he clarified that President Tinubu preferred the term “discharged.” This choice of language reflects a more respectful approach to leadership and change, highlighting the president’s intent to maintain dignity in the process of restructuring his cabinet.
During the private meetings held with the dismissed ministers, Onanuga recounted that the president approached the situation with grace and politeness. He thanked each minister for their contributions to the government and wished them well in their future endeavors. “When he communicated his decision on Wednesday, he was very polite and expressed gratitude for their services to the country,” Onanuga noted. This manner of communication contrasts sharply with the more public and often harsh methods employed in previous administrations, where dismissals were frequently made through impersonal announcements that lacked the personal touch.
The context of these changes reflects a broader strategic vision that President Tinubu aims to implement during his tenure. By prioritizing performance evaluations based on citizen feedback, Tinubu is not only fostering a culture of accountability within his administration but also signaling to the public that their voices matter in governance. This approach is likely to enhance public trust in government institutions, as citizens see that their opinions can directly influence ministerial appointments and government performance.
Moreover, Onanuga’s insights into the evaluation process and the subsequent changes in the cabinet suggest that the Tinubu administration is serious about reforming how governmental performance is assessed and managed. The emphasis on technology and public feedback indicates a progressive shift towards transparency and responsiveness in governance, which could serve as a model for future administrations.
In conclusion, the recent ministerial changes under President Tinubu, as articulated by Bayo Onanuga, highlight a significant evolution in governmental communication and accountability practices. By personally informing dismissed ministers of his decisions and emphasizing a respectful approach, the president sets a new tone for leadership.
The focus on performance assessments driven by citizen feedback showcases a commitment to improving governance and ensuring that public officials are held accountable for their roles. As these changes unfold, they may pave the way for a more engaged and responsive government, ultimately benefiting the Nigerian populace as a whole.
Bank customers in Nigeria will begin paying N6 for each SMS transaction alert starting Thursday, May 1, 2025, following an upward adjustment in telecommunications service rates recently approved by the federal government.
The new fee represents a 50 percent increase from the previous N4 charge per message and has been communicated by several commercial banks to their customers ahead of the implementation.
Guaranty Trust Bank Limited was among those that issued notices. In an email to customers titled “Increase in SMS Transaction Alert Fee,” the bank explained that the revision was necessitated by higher charges from telecommunications providers. “Dear Valued Customer, Please be informed that effective Thursday, May 1, 2025, the SMS transaction alert fee will increase from N4 to N6 per message. This adjustment is due to a recent increase in telecom rates as communicated by the telecommunication service providers,” the notice read.
The bank emphasized the importance of SMS alerts, stating they are essential tools for customers to monitor and maintain control over their account activities. It also noted that SMS alerts sent to international phone numbers would incur additional charges.
The increase in telecom rates and corresponding adjustment in SMS alert fees come amid broader concerns over rising costs of living and digital access in the country.
National Judicial Commission, NJC has slammed three judges for gross misconduct.
The NJC spokesperson, Mrs. Kemi Babalola, said the decision was taken at its 108th meeting held in Abuja between April 29 and 30.
Part of the statement reads: “The council suspends Hon. Justice Jane E. Inyang, Court of Appeal, Uyo division, for one year without pay, as the Investigation Committee found
His Lordship to have breached Rule 3 (5) of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
“Hon. Justice Inyang was found to have abused his office by issuing inappropriate ex-parte orders for the sale of Hon. Udeme Esset’s petrol station and other businesses at interlocutory stage of the case.
“The act of judicial misconduct occurred while His Lordship presided over Suit No. FHC/UY/CS/46/2023, at the Federal High Court, Uyo judicial division, before his elevation to Court of Appeal.
“Furthermore, Hon. Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja division, has been placed on suspension for one year without pay. His Lordship was also placed on a watch-list for five years and barred from elevation for five years.
“The complaints against Hon. Justice Ekwo arose from Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/184/2021, wherein His Lordship delivered a ruling in a pending application without hearing the parties.
“His Lordship ignored an application to set aside the proceedings of the court conducted in the absence of the parties.
“Subsequently, His Lordship proceeded to deliver a ruling dismissing the charge against the defendants.
“Consequently, His Lordship was found to have violated Rule 3.1 and 3.3 of the 2016 Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The Council also suspended Hon. Justice Aminu Baffa Aliyu of the Federal High Court, Zamfara Division for a period of one year without pay for judicial misconduct in breach of Rule 3 (1) and 5 of the 2016 Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
“It also placed His Lordship on the watch-list for three years, within which period he is barred from elevation.
“Hon. Justice Baffa was found liable for act of judicial misconduct in Suit No. FHC/GS/CS/30/2021, the Government of Zamfara State vs EFCC, wherein His Lordship granted an order restraining security agencies from carrying out their statutory duties, and disregarded the doctrine of stare decisis in adjudication of the case.
“The Council also issued a letter of caution to Hon. Justice A. O. Awogboro of Federal High Court, Lagos division in a petition filed by one Kasali Azeez Olagoke and S. Hamza in Suit No. FHC/CS/2021 between Chief Adesanya Musediku against the Assistant General of Police, Onikan, Zone 2.
Related News
When will their lordships be prosecuted?
Post-election judgments: Justice Owoade calls on NJC to improve capacity of judiciary
NJC sanctions three judges, probes 35 others
“The petition against Hon. Justice Othman A. Musa of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory was put in abeyance pending the outcome of the decision of the Court of Appeal arising from Suit No. FCT/HS/BW/2274/15.
“The petition against Hon. Justice C. N. Mbonu Nwenyi of the High Court of Anambra State by one Prof. Paul C. Obianaso was discountenanced after investigation revealed that there was no misconduct on the part of His Lordship.
“Another petition against Hon. Justice I. E. Ekwo in suit No FHC/ABJ/CS/321/2015 was put in abeyance pending the outcome of appeal before the Court of Appeal.
“Council discountenanced a petition by Mrs Adaku Amadi against Hon. Justice R. B. Haastrup of the National Industrial Court, as the petitioner withdrew her complaints.
“Council equally considered the report of its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee, which contained a total number of 43 petitions.
“Nine committees were empanelled for further investigation of 11petitions, while 29 petitions were dismissed for lacking in merit.
“Three petitions against Hon. Justice Abubakar Babashani of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory; Hon. Justice Isaac Essien of the National Industrial Court; and Hon. Justice A. O. Musa of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory by Henry Chinweike Okoro; Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye, Esq.; and Lassborn Chichebem Orjiugo, respectively, were put in abeyance pending the decisions of the Court of Appeal.
“Council also considered a petition by one Mahmud Aliyu against the appointment of three Judges to the High Court of Zamfara State.
“The petitioner complained that the exercise conducted in 2022 by the Zamfara State Judicial Service Commission, which led to the emergence of shortlisted candidates, was not transparent and was characterized by nepotism, high-handedness and non-compliance with Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the NJC guidelines for the appointment of Judicial Officers 2014.
“That the nominees were unilaterally picked by the Chairman of the Zamfara State Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in disregard of the NJC guidelines on merit-based assessment.”
“Council, however, deliberated on its committee’s findings on the petition and resolved that the petitioner was an interested party who had indicated interest but was not selected as a candidate.”
“Council noted that the petitioner’s allegations were unsubstantiated and substantially based on falsehood.
It, therefore, resolved that the “petitioner who was a candidate for judicial appointment and intentionally peddled falsehoods against another aspiring judicial officer will be barred from participation in any future exercise.
“In a petition to probe the recruitment exercise for the appointment of six Federal High Court Judges in 2021 by one Abdullahi Liman, the Council noted that the petition violated Section 11 (1) of the Judicial Discipline Regulations which stipulated that a complaint must be filed within six months of the occurrence of the event or matter complained of, whereas the petitioner filed his complaints on the 22nd day of January, 2025.
“It also resolved that a petition on the unconstitutional composition of Oyo State Judicial Service Commission written by Monday Adjeh has been overtaken by events.
“The Council also accepted the voluntary retirement of Hon. Justice Babatunde Ahmed Ademola Bakre and approved the notification of change of name of Hon. Justice I. A. Osayande to Hon. Justice I. A. Dika of the Edo State High Court.
“Council at the meeting, finally resolved that henceforth, the names of candidates being considered for appointment as judicial officers to superior courts of records will be published for information and comments by the public.
“The primary objective of this initiative is to solicit comments from the public where there is objection to the integrity, reputation and/or competence of the candidates by opening the process to public participation and scrutiny.”
The NJC spokesperson, Mrs. Kemi Babalola, said the decision was taken at its 108th meeting held in Abuja between April 29 and 30.
Part of the statement reads: “The council suspends Hon. Justice Jane E. Inyang, Court of Appeal, Uyo division, for one year without pay, as the Investigation Committee found
His Lordship to have breached Rule 3 (5) of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
“Hon. Justice Inyang was found to have abused his office by issuing inappropriate ex-parte orders for the sale of Hon. Udeme Esset’s petrol station and other businesses at interlocutory stage of the case.
“The act of judicial misconduct occurred while His Lordship presided over Suit No. FHC/UY/CS/46/2023, at the Federal High Court, Uyo judicial division, before his elevation to Court of Appeal.
“Furthermore, Hon. Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja division, has been placed on suspension for one year without pay. His Lordship was also placed on a watch-list for five years and barred from elevation for five years.
“The complaints against Hon. Justice Ekwo arose from Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/184/2021, wherein His Lordship delivered a ruling in a pending application without hearing the parties.
“His Lordship ignored an application to set aside the proceedings of the court conducted in the absence of the parties.
“Subsequently, His Lordship proceeded to deliver a ruling dismissing the charge against the defendants.
“Consequently, His Lordship was found to have violated Rule 3.1 and 3.3 of the 2016 Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The Council also suspended Hon. Justice Aminu Baffa Aliyu of the Federal High Court, Zamfara Division for a period of one year without pay for judicial misconduct in breach of Rule 3 (1) and 5 of the 2016 Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
“It also placed His Lordship on the watch-list for three years, within which period he is barred from elevation.
“Hon. Justice Baffa was found liable for act of judicial misconduct in Suit No. FHC/GS/CS/30/2021, the Government of Zamfara State vs EFCC, wherein His Lordship granted an order restraining security agencies from carrying out their statutory duties, and disregarded the doctrine of stare decisis in adjudication of the case.
“The Council also issued a letter of caution to Hon. Justice A. O. Awogboro of Federal High Court, Lagos division in a petition filed by one Kasali Azeez Olagoke and S. Hamza in Suit No. FHC/CS/2021 between Chief Adesanya Musediku against the Assistant General of Police, Onikan, Zone 2.
“The petition against Hon. Justice Othman A. Musa of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory was put in abeyance pending the outcome of the decision of the Court of Appeal arising from Suit No. FCT/HS/BW/2274/15.
“The petition against Hon. Justice C. N. Mbonu Nwenyi of the High Court of Anambra State by one Prof. Paul C. Obianaso was discountenanced after investigation revealed that there was no misconduct on the part of His Lordship.
“Another petition against Hon. Justice I. E. Ekwo in suit No FHC/ABJ/CS/321/2015 was put in abeyance pending the outcome of appeal before the Court of Appeal.
“Council discountenanced a petition by Mrs Adaku Amadi against Hon. Justice R. B. Haastrup of the National Industrial Court, as the petitioner withdrew her complaints.
“Council equally considered the report of its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee, which contained a total number of 43 petitions.
“Nine committees were empanelled for further investigation of 11petitions, while 29 petitions were dismissed for lacking in merit.
“Three petitions against Hon. Justice Abubakar Babashani of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory; Hon. Justice Isaac Essien of the National Industrial Court; and Hon. Justice A. O. Musa of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory by Henry Chinweike Okoro; Ikemefuna Stephen Nwoye, Esq.; and Lassborn Chichebem Orjiugo, respectively, were put in abeyance pending the decisions of the Court of Appeal.
“Council also considered a petition by one Mahmud Aliyu against the appointment of three Judges to the High Court of Zamfara State.
“The petitioner complained that the exercise conducted in 2022 by the Zamfara State Judicial Service Commission, which led to the emergence of shortlisted candidates, was not transparent and was characterized by nepotism, high-handedness and non-compliance with Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the NJC guidelines for the appointment of Judicial Officers 2014.
“That the nominees were unilaterally picked by the Chairman of the Zamfara State Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in disregard of the NJC guidelines on merit-based assessment.”
“Council, however, deliberated on its committee’s findings on the petition and resolved that the petitioner was an interested party who had indicated interest but was not selected as a candidate.”
“Council noted that the petitioner’s allegations were unsubstantiated and substantially based on falsehood.
It, therefore, resolved that the “petitioner who was a candidate for judicial appointment and intentionally peddled falsehoods against another aspiring judicial officer will be barred from participation in any future exercise.
“In a petition to probe the recruitment exercise for the appointment of six Federal High Court Judges in 2021 by one Abdullahi Liman, the Council noted that the petition violated Section 11 (1) of the Judicial Discipline Regulations which stipulated that a complaint must be filed within six months of the occurrence of the event or matter complained of, whereas the petitioner filed his complaints on the 22nd day of January, 2025.
“It also resolved that a petition on the unconstitutional composition of Oyo State Judicial Service Commission written by Monday Adjeh has been overtaken by events.
“The Council also accepted the voluntary retirement of Hon. Justice Babatunde Ahmed Ademola Bakre and approved the notification of change of name of Hon. Justice I. A. Osayande to Hon. Justice I. A. Dika of the Edo State High Court.
“Council at the meeting, finally resolved that henceforth, the names of candidates being considered for appointment as judicial officers to superior courts of records will be published for information and comments by the public.
“The primary objective of this initiative is to solicit comments from the public where there is objection to the integrity, reputation and/or competence of the candidates by opening the process to public participation and scrutiny.”
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
In a bid to ease the impact of rising food prices and economic hardship, the Zed-Faith Foundation International has donated food items and medical supplies to Ark of Refuge Orphanage and Old People’s Home in Kado, Abuja.
The items were distributed over the weekend by representatives of the Foundation on behalf of its Founder and Chairman, Amb. Daniel Onyeka Newman, a UK-based Nigerian and Chief Executive Officer of SBI.
The Foundation’s Media Consultant, Amb. Victor Atewe, who led the delegation, said the donation was a personal initiative by the Chairman and not funded by government or external bodies.
“These items are intended to directly support the children and elderly, and we trust they will be used solely for that purpose,” Atewe said.
He added that the Foundation plans to continue its outreach efforts across the country, noting that the economic situation has made daily survival increasingly difficult for vulnerable groups.
The Foundation also used the occasion to urge the federal government to collaborate more with credible non-governmental organisations in supporting disadvantaged populations, especially as inflation and food insecurity worsen.
Speaking on behalf of the Country Representative, Mr. Chinnaya Dominic Chikwado, the Foundation’s Administrative Officer, Mr. Udodirim Okorie, called on well-meaning Nigerians to support charitable causes and contribute to alleviating the burden on those most affected by the country’s economic crisis.
Representatives of the Old People’s Home and Ark of Refuge Orphanage expressed appreciation for the gesture, describing it as timely and impactful. They noted that such support helps bridge the gap in essential services for the elderly and children in their care.
“This donation will go a long way in meeting our daily needs.”
“We thank the Foundation for its continued support, especially during such challenging times.”
“Even the smallest gesture makes a big difference to those who have no one else to turn to.”
“We hope others are inspired to follow suit and remember those most in need.”
-
News19 hours agoA Chat with Janet Odio Okolo: A Mother’s Journey Raising a Child with Down Syndrome
-
News21 hours agoHon. Dennis Agbo Resigns From Labour Party
-
News21 hours agoJust in: Osun PDP receives defectors from APC, others
-
News24 hours agoSpokesperson Warns Nigerians Against Fake Ministry Of Foreign Affairs Recruitment Scam
-
News22 hours agoIGP Egbetokun orders his men to resume issuance of tinted glass permits
-
News9 hours agoJust In: Explosion rocks Borno military barracks
-
News19 hours agoHon. Nnamchi Begins Street Lights Deployment In Isi Uzo(Photos)
-
Entertainment10 hours agoWhy Portable was sentenced to three months in prison