Connect with us

Politics

Again, Abia PDP expels Wabara as Ortom, others shun Ikimi panel

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Peoples Democratic Party State Working Committee in Abia State on Tuesday expelled the embattled PDP Board of Trustees Chairman, former Senate President Adolphus Wabara.

The chapter, in a statement jointly signed by Chairman Abraham Amah and Secretary Peter Nwaokonko, stated that the decision was made during an emergency meeting held after receiving the Disciplinary Committee’s report.

This comes as former Benue governor, Samuel Ortom, embattled PDP factional National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu and others again refused to appear before the Ikimi Disciplinary Panel.

According to the Abia State PDP chairman, the investigative committee thoroughly reviewed Wabara’s earlier suspension before deciding to expel him.

Advertisement

He explained that the expulsion was due to Wabara’s endorsement of Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, for a second term in office, which the PDP considered an act of disloyalty to the party.

As of the time of this report, Wabara had yet to issue any statement regarding his expulsion.

This is happening a few weeks after Wabara was suspended by the SWC for alleged anti-party activities

However, the National Working Committee nullified his suspension.

Advertisement

Despite Wabara challenging the suspension in court, the Abia chapter insisted on his expulsion from the party.

Following Wabara’s expulsion, the party asked the PDP leadership to replace him.

A statement issued by the Abia PDP read in part, “Senator Adolphus Wabara is hereby expelled from the Peoples Democratic Party. The Abia State PDP reaffirmed its commitment to upholding party discipline and ensuring that all members operate within the framework of the PDP Constitution (2017 as amended).

‘’The party remains resolute in preserving unity, loyalty, and respect for party structures. No member, regardless of status, is above the party’s rules and regulations.’’

Advertisement

The party asked the National Working Committee and the National Executive Committee to act swiftly by appointing an acting chairman for the PDP BoT ‘’in the interest of the party’s stability and in compliance with our party’s constitution.”

“In line with Article 57(3) and 59(1) of the PDP Constitution (2017 as amended), which stipulates that an expelled member cannot exercise any rights or privileges within the party, the Abia State Executive Committee hereby recommends the immediate appointment of an Acting BoT Chairman by the National Working Committee and the National Executive Committee of our great party,’’ it declared.

Meanwhile, the crisis within the PDP has further escalated with former Benue State governor, Ortom, Senator Anyanwu, and others failing to attend the National Disciplinary Committee led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Tom Ikimi.

The committee held its session in Abuja on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Ortom was represented by his legal adviser, Clement Mue, while Anyanwu, in an interview with The PUNCH, disclosed that he had informed the NDC that the matter is currently before the Supreme Court, and addressing the issues related to his invitation would amount to prejudice.

On February 6, the NDC, led by Ikimi, issued a statement summoning Ortom, Anyanwu, and 10 other individuals to appear before the committee on February 12, 2025, at the Legacy House in Maitama, Abuja.

The proceedings of the NDC have been kept confidential, and the identities of the other 10 invitees remain undisclosed.

Since the 2023 presidential election, the PDP has been embroiled in internal conflicts, with members accusing others of undermining the party’s interests and calling for disciplinary measures.

Advertisement

In response, the PDP National Working Committee established a disciplinary committee on August 21 to allow members to file complaints, hear both sides, and make recommendations to the National Executive Committee.

However, nearly five months after its creation, the crisis has worsened, with both former National Youth Leader Sunday Ude-Okoye and Anyanwu claiming the position of National Secretary.

Despite Ude-Okoye receiving backing from the Board of Trustees, led by former Senate President Adolphus Wabara, and the Governors Forum, chaired by Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed, the dispute remains unresolved.

Ortom, who raised legal concerns about the authenticity of the petitioners, Anyanwu, who cited medical reasons and the other 10 individuals did not attend the NDC meeting on February 12.

Advertisement

Despite receiving invitations from Ikimi’s committee, both Ortom and Anyanwu, along with the others, also failed to show up on Tuesday at the committee’s meeting at the Legacy House in Maitama.

The meeting, which was exclusively covered by The PUNCH, began at approximately 12:30 pm. In attendance were the Chairman of the NDC, the Secretary, Eyitayo Jegede (SAN), and former Minister of Women Affairs, Zainab Maina.

The leaders of the group behind the petition against Anyanwu, the PDP Young Generation Caucus, who were called into the closed-door session, called for the embattled Secretary’s resignation.

In an interview with The PUNCH, the group’s legal director, Alex Ter Adum, and President, Afolabi Adekanbi disclosed that they filed a petition against Anyanwu due to allegations that he had threatened the party with violence.

Advertisement

Adum stated that Anyanwu should have fully utilized the PDP’s internal conflict resolution processes before resorting to the court.

He noted, “Today, we appear before the National Disciplinary Committee of the party. Our petition is specifically against the former National Secretary of the PDP, Senator Samuel Anyanwu.

“Our petition is that Senator Samuel Anyanwu’s actions, immediately after the resolution of the PDP Governor’s Forum meeting of January 31, 2025, in Asaba, Delta State, where he, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, wrote letters to external bodies, including the police, the DSS, and other threatening to bring violence to the PDP Governor’s Forum, the BOT, the National Executive Committee members of the party, and the National Working Committee and to take over the PDP Secretariat.

“This is a clear violation of Article 58, Sub-Article H of the PDP Constitution, which states that no member of the party shall do anything likely to bring the party into disrepute.

Advertisement

“Senator Samuel Anyanwu, who was then the National Secretary of the party and an officer of the NWC and NEC of the party, ought to have exhausted all internal channels of dispute resolution if he was aggrieved by the decision of the PDP Governor’s Forum and the PDP Board of Trustees.

“He had no right, as the chief protector of the constitution of the party, to act in flagrant violation of a very substantive provision of the constitution. His actions have brought the party into disrepute and continue to do so, contesting every decision made by all the relevant organs of the party and its leaders up to this moment.”

He expressed hope that the NDC would recommend Anyanwu’s suspension if he was unable to defend the allegations.

Adum added, “We feel that he should come and face the National Disciplinary Committee to defend himself against these allegations.

Advertisement

“But if he is unable to, and the committee finds merit in our petition, which we adopted this afternoon, then Senator Anyanwu should be suspended from the party, expelled from the party, and denied all privileges that come with his membership.

“We are praying and hoping that the National Disciplinary Committee will do what is right and recommend this to the National Executive Committee of the party so that we can restore peace to our party.”

The president of the group explained that they believed the current problems within the party were orchestrated by some individuals, including Anyanwu.

Adekanbi argued, “He claimed to be in defiance of the appeal court judgments. So, he is going to the Supreme Court on that because the Appeal Court has declared Ude-Okoye as the National Secretary.

Advertisement

“There are some activities that went wrong with him. He has written to the DSS, police, and others, trying to cause disturbances within the party.

“So, just take it clearly that nobody is above the party; if there are issues in the party, they have to remain within the party. That’s why we have a committee that can take care of those issues. But for someone to believe they are above the party, writing to the DSS, writing to the police, and whatever, that means the party is no longer supreme.

‘’We know we have a lot of petitions, whatever case in courts, and they want disaster with the National Secretariat. That’s why the NWC, the governors, and others have to rely on that judgment. Who are you not to rely on that?

“So, we want the NDC to make a judgment because once you violate that section of our constitution, you have to be suspended. That’s it. So, we ask the panel to suspend him from the party.”

Advertisement

In his defence, Anyanwu stated that he had notified the committee of his intention to appear before it but emphasized that the matter is currently before the Supreme Court.

The factional national secretary, in an interview with The PUNCH, declared that since the issue is under Supreme Court review, no one can make a decision on it, and discussing is sub judice.

“I did not attend (the NDC session) because of the pending litigation. I wrote a letter to the committee informing them that the matter surrounding my office is before the Supreme Court.

“So, it would amount to sub judice for me to go before them and for them to start talking about a matter before the Supreme Court. As it is now, nobody can do anything until the court decides,” he submitted.

Advertisement

On his part, Ortom’s lawyer asserted that the NDC has yet to apologise to the former Benue governor for publicly announcing its petition in the media without formally inviting him.

Mue further revealed that they were shown the acknowledged copy of the petition they had sent earlier, adding that the absence of the petitioners had rendered their petition meaningless.

The counsel stated, “I came here regarding the petition written against the former governor of Benue State, His Excellency Samuel Ortom, and 10 other members of the PDP in Benue State.

“ PDP is our party. Though they didn’t write an apology as Ortom requested, but eventually, they showed us a copy of the first petition and the letter they wrote. That’s why we’re here. And when we came, regrettably, those who wrote the petition are not here to defend it.

Advertisement

“So, it’s like that petition is non-existent, and it’s dead on arrival because nobody came forward to admit they are the author of the petition. I think it’s just a matter of name-dropping in the nature of politics we have found ourselves in.

“I have advised them to be guided by the provisions of the PDP Constitution and other extant laws governing this type of proceedings.”

When reached for comment, Ortom’s media aide, Nathaniel Ikyur, explained that the former governor did not attend the session because the procedures being followed by the NDC were legally flawed.

He said the ex-governor had also faulted the composition of the committee.

Advertisement

“The former governor cannot just jump into a process. So, it’s a legal matter, and we’re there to ask questions and ensure that the NDC is operating within the legal framework.

“He was not there because he travelled, and also because the composition of the NDC did not align with the PDP 2017 Constitution, as amended.”

A member of the committee informed The PUNCH that the Ikimi panel requested additional evidence from the anti-Anyanwu petitioners.

Speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid victimization, the insider further revealed that some NDC members believed that the continued absence of those who complained against Ortom made their petition invalid.

Advertisement

‘’While questioning those who petitioned Anyanwu, the NDC observed that the evidence wasn’t convincing enough and demanded that the petitioners provide more.

“As for Ortom and the 10 others, the petitioners failed to show up for the second time. The committee members are concerned that if this continues, their petition may be dismissed. Therefore, the committee has adjourned again, I believe, till April 4 to deliberate further.”

The chairman of the committee refused to comment when approached by our correspondent.

Credit: PUNCH

Advertisement

Politics

Reactions As Osun Governorship Debate Is Cancelled

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Stakeholders and residents in Osun State have expressed concern over the cancellation of the planned Osun 2026 Governorship Debate.

The stakeholders said the development has denied voters an opportunity to assess the programmes and policies of candidates ahead of the August 15 governorship election.

The debate, scheduled for Saturday, August 1, in Osogbo, was called off after the organisers cited security concerns and the reluctance of some leading governorship candidates to participate under the prevailing circumstances.

The event was jointly organised by Uniq FM, Rave FM, Diamond FM and Fresh FM.

Advertisement

In a statement, the organisers said “the decision was reached unanimously following unfavourable security reports and the unwillingness of some major candidates to attend the debate.”

They explained that “the cancellation was necessary to safeguard participants, invited guests, journalists and members of the public.”

The debate was expected to feature governorship candidates of the All Progressives Congress, APC, African Democratic Congress, ADC, Accord and the African Action Congress, AAC, providing an opportunity for them to present their manifestoes and respond to public questions before the election.

The organisers also noted that the decision followed reports of security concerns in parts of Osun State, adding that public safety remained their priority.

Advertisement

They thanked residents and stakeholders for their understanding and promised to communicate any future arrangements through appropriate channels.

Following the announcement, several residents reacted, with many expressing disappointment over the inability of the leading candidates to publicly present their plans for the state before the electorate.

Media executive and civil society advocate Jare Tiamiyu criticised the absence of the candidates from the debate, describing it as a missed opportunity for democratic engagement.

“It’s highly unfortunate that leading governorship candidates in Osun are avoiding scrutiny. It’s obvious that they intentionally orchestrate and sustain crisis to cover discussion on their agenda. So sad!” Tiamiyu wrote on his social media page.

Advertisement

Responding to the post, a resident identified as Mayowa argued that the All Progressives Congress governorship candidate, Bola Oyebamiji, was preparing for a separate debate with Channels Television rather than the cancelled event.

Mayowa wrote, “My party governorship candidate, Asiwaju Munirudeen Bola Oyebamiji (AMBO), is preparing for a debate with an independent television station whose founder is not an appointee of Mr President or any governor. Rave FM, Fresh FM and Westerspring Television can invite AAC, SDP or Accord to their debate.”

Another resident, AbdulAzeez Ismail, also expressed concern over the development, saying governorship aspirants should be willing to explain their agenda directly to the electorate before seeking their votes.

The cancellation of the debate comes less than two weeks before the Osun governorship election.
(DAILY POST)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

APC, Accord Trade Allegations Over Osun Poll As INEC Dismisses Electoral Officers Accommodation Claim

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Accord Party in Osun State on Saturday traded accusations over alleged plans to compromise the August 15 governorship election, with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) dismissing the claims raised by the ruling party as unlikely to be true.

The controversy began after the Accord Party alleged that the APC, in collaboration with a section of the Nigeria Police Force, was plotting to secure accommodation for local electoral officers across the 30 local government areas of the state as part of a plan to manipulate the outcome of the election.

In a statement issued by the state chairman of the party, Pastor Victor Akande, Accord claimed it had received credible reports that the Osun APC held a meeting in Osogbo on Friday night and resolved to direct Divisional Police Officers, through the Commissioner of Police, to arrange accommodation for electoral officers in each local government.

According to the party, the alleged plan was to use the facilities as “safe havens” where election results would be written before being announced as official results.

Advertisement

Accord urged INEC to reject what it described as an attempt to compromise its officials, while also accusing the police of gradually shifting from alleged partisan activities to direct interference in the electoral process.

“We view with grave concern this sinister plot, and we call on the Independent National Electoral Commission to reject any attempt to rope its officials into garrison accommodation for election rigging. Osun people reject any attempt to write election results from barricaded hotel rooms under police illegal operations,” the statement read.

The party further alleged that the police had no constitutional role in providing accommodation for electoral officers and warned against any action capable of undermining the credibility of the election.

However, the Osun APC dismissed the allegation as false, describing it as a fabrication borne out of fear of defeat by the Accord Party.

Advertisement

In a statement signed by its spokesperson, Kola Olabisi, the APC said the allegation existed only in the imagination of the Accord leadership, insisting that its governorship candidate had no need to manipulate the electoral process to secure victory.

“The allegation is false, which only exists in the imagination of the leadership of the Accord Party in Osun State. It is borne out of the fear of the imminent loss of the party’s governorship candidate, Governor Ademola Adeleke, in the forthcoming August 15, 2026 election,” the APC stated.

The opposition party accused the Accord leadership of manufacturing excuses ahead of the poll and alleged that the ruling party had continued to misinform the public with falsehoods.

Amid the exchange, INEC dismissed the allegation, saying its operational guidelines make such a scenario unlikely.

Advertisement

Speaking with journalists at the commission’s headquarters in Osogbo on Saturday, INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, said all ad hoc staff and election officials would be accommodated at designated Registration Area Centres (RACs) a day before the election, alongside security personnel.

“I know it is an allegation, and it is not likely to be true, because we have our RAC centres, and that is where our ad hoc staff is going to be accommodated with all the things that we need. Not only will the ad hoc staff be there, but the security agents will also be there. All our ad hoc staff will be there, and other officials of INEC at all levels will be there, and this will happen a day before the election,” Amupitan said.

He explained that the commission could not afford to lodge officials in different locations because they must be deployed to polling units between 7:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. on election day.

“They must get deployed to the polling unit by 7:00-7:30 a.m., so we cannot afford to scatter them. They are accommodated and housed at the RAC centre. So we cannot afford accommodation that will take our materials anywhere. Nonetheless, we will also put it as part of the risk factors,” the INEC chairman added.

Advertisement

The August 15 governorship election is expected to be keenly contested, with political parties intensifying campaigns and trading accusations as preparations for the poll gather momentum.

Continue Reading

Politics

Osun 2026: Accord Is Like Keke Napep Facing Trailer – APC Mocks Adeleke

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, has boasted that the Accord Party cannot withstand it in the forthcoming August 15, 2026, governorship election in Osun State.

The National Chairman of the party, Nentawe Yilwatda, said this on Tuesday at the inauguration of the Osun State APC Governorship Campaign Council in Abuja.

He likened the APC’s political strength in Osun State to a trailer facing a keke napep, declaring that no political party in the state, including Accord, the party of the incumbent governor, Ademola Adeleke, can withstand the calibre of governors, National Assembly members and local government chairmen the APC is deploying ahead of the polls.

According to him, the committee members had been carefully selected from the National Assembly, governors, members of the Federal Executive Council (FEC), deputy governors, past and present lawmakers, and different stakeholders of the party, including the business community.

Advertisement

“It is like a trailer facing a keke. I do not know how the political party standing against us in Osun can withstand the strength of these people who are going there to mobilise and win the election in 2026,” he said.

Yilwatda emphasized that the APC would mobilise human and material resources across the state, with governors from the South-West, South-South and South-East each taking responsibility for a senatorial district alongside National Assembly members, House of Assembly members and local government chairmen, while governors from the North would also deploy their local government chairmen, councillors and lawmakers for grassroots campaigns.

The APC National Chairman described the Osun election as a litmus test for the party’s preparedness for the 2027 general election, saying it would serve as a rehearsal for the political machine being built for that contest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News