Opinion
Permutations On Edo Governorship Election 2024

By Professor Echefuna’ R G ONYEBEADI
The die is cast! By September 21, 2024 (roughly twenty four hours from now), Edo people shall vote for who will be the next governor of their State.
The stake seems to be very high. It’s most likely to be a “roforofo” show between the “haves” and the “have nots”. Between wits and brawns; and between “godsons” and the “godfatherless”.
The election is poised to be a straight fight between three categories of people viz (not in a particular order):
1. The Elites
2. The Idealists
3. The Vulnerables (terminology loosely used).
The forthcoming election is for three political parties namely: APC, LP and PDP (in alphabetical order), to win or lose.
PDP represents the Elites group. Labour Party (LP) represents the Idealists group while the APC represents the Vulnerables group in the forthcoming election.
Whereas APC has the “Federal Might” (don’t ask me what that means), APC as a political, a former Governor and a humongous flow of money that is flowing from doubtful sources; PDP has the “power of incumbency” (please, don’t ask me what that means), a sitting governor and some unhindered flow of the State’s money, but without the global support of PDP as a political party.
The LP does not have those skewed “advantages” of both the APC and the PDP, but they have the full backing of the “Obidients” with a divided LP as a political party.
Ordinarily, going by “Nigerian factor” (again, please, don’t ask me what that means) on election matters among others, the election would have been for the APC to lose. But, it may not be so this time by a combination of factors.
PDP may have just had an easy win as the political party in power in the State, but again, that may not be so by a combination of factors.
The LP may have just lost the election outrightly in the fight for power between the trio of APC, PDP and LP, but again, that may not be so due to a combination of factors.
So, who then does the odds favour to win the forthcoming governorship election in Edo State? Wait for it!
By simple logic and by the unwritten principles of zoning and rotation, the governorship election is ordinarily for the Edo Central zone to pick, more so, considering the fact that, in this new political dispensation from 1999 to date, Edo South has produced governors twice spanning 16 years out of 25 years. Edo North has produced a governor for 8 years while Edo Central had produced a governor by default for just about one year, off record.
If the general perception of the incumbent Governor’s ‘poor’ performance connotes reality, then, it will be a very herculean task for the current PDP “controlled” State government to win the forthcoming governorship election in Edo State.
This apart, the latent “Omonoba” factor is a very big abartross that will be very difficult if not impossible for the current PDP led government of the State to overcome.
Going by the unprecedented, multifaceted and highly excruciating pains inflicted on Nigerians by the APC led Federal Government, it may be very difficult to convince the Edo people at this time, that their lots will be better served with a replication of an APC governor in the State.
Besides, the APC governorship candidate cuts across as a person bereft of original ideas, pedestrian and lacks self confidence/self esteem.
So, what would have ordinarily been an edge of having the so-called “Federal Might” and a favoured geopolitical zone, may backfire to cause a fatal political damage to the APC and its candidate.
The APC’s zonal factor sentiments of “tiwa ni tiwa” (our own is our own) and/or “it is our turn” ( awa lo kan) with an inappropriate candidate may really be offensive to the sensibilities and sensitivity of a people who had produced political juggernauts in the past in the persons of Chief Anthony Enahoro, Professor Ambrose Alli and Chief Tony Anenih, just to mention a few.
APC seems to have an inappropriate candidate for a zone that is ordinarily favoured to produce the next governor.
Another fear to contend with is that of an overbearing APC god father which may not synchronize well with the psyche of many Edo people at this time.
Therefore, what may have become a disadvantage to APC’s candidate would have naturally become a clear advantage for the PDP candidate, considering that Edo Central is the favoured zone to produce the next governor. But, it may not turn out to be so.
The PDP candidate is elitist, highly educated, but seems imposed on the people and even supposedly alien to his own people.
The PDP candidate seems to have the right credentials and/or pedigree, coming from a private sector but, his involvement in the current PDP led supposedly “failed” government and close association with a perceived “failed” incumbent Governor of the State is a big abbartross for the PDP candidate.
It may also be difficult for Edo people at this time to accept a political neophyte they hardly knew who is seemingly being put forward by a perceived “non performing” PDP godfather Governor!
It may be instructive at this juncture to note that, the so called rotation/zoning of elective political offices is not by any known law.
There hasn’t been any time that elective positions and particularly, that of governorship elections in Edo State have been exclusively restricted to and/or reserved solely, wholly and entirely for any particular zone without the active participation of the other zones.
Otherwise, an Obaseki wouldn’t have been put forward and became governor for 8 years after an Igbinedion had previously governed for eight (8 ) years, when they are both from the same geopolitical zone of Edo South, without other zones taking their turns prior to.
There has never been any time all the zones didn’t present candidates for elections for governorship in the past.
Therefore, the present sentiments for the Edo Central zone to produce the next governor is neither a right nor any agreement by the stakeholders and citizens of Edo State. It can only be hinged on pleas, persuasions, negotiations, building bridges across the geopolitical divides and on moral ground. The clamour for zoning is not enforceable by any law.
Though the yearnings for zoning the governorship this time to Edo Central is justifiable based on the doctrines of equity, fairness and justice. It is also imperative to note that, one of the maxims of equity states that: he who must come to equity must do so with clean hands!
Then, the pertinent question that needs an answer is: how clean are the hands of Edo Central stakeholders in producing inappropriate candidates that seem to be incurably deficient in the art and science of modern governance and/or unable to effectively communicate, with the added curiosity of being led and spoken for in their own campaigns by controversial people with lots of questionable baggage?
Flowing from the aforementioned therefore, it is my considered opinion that, the cloak of zoning elective positions, good as it may, is not a stand alone prerogative and can not rightly overshadow the overall interest and wellbeing of the citizens of the State.
While plying the route of zoning sentiments, it is only proper that competence, credibility, accountability, transparency and acceptability should not be sacrificed on the altars of incurable defective baggage and zoning.
Now, let’s consider some basic statistics.
According to the data from INEC, a total of 2,210,534 people registered to vote in the Edo Governorship election of Saturday, September 21, 2024.
Out of this number, only 1,726,738 people have collected their permanent voter cards (PVCs) while 483,796 PVCs are yet to be collected.
The breakdown of eligible voters for each of the Edo state’s three geopolitical zones and the 18 Local Government Areas in alphabetical order are as follows:
*Edo Central (LGAs)*:
1. Esan Central – 57,100
2. Esan North East – 80,245
3. Esan South East – 76,842
4. Esan West – 99,983
5. Igueben – 46, 828
*Total = 364,998 or 16.51%*
*Edo North (LGAs)*:
1. Akoko Edo – 119,254
2. Etsako Central – 50,058
3. Etsako East – 81, 639
4. Etsako West – 160,137
5. Owan East – 91,841
6. Owan West – 61, 193
*Total = 564, 122 or 25.52%*
*Edo South (LGAs)*:
1. Egor – 219,832
2. Ikpoba Okha – 315,410
3. Oredo – 313,553
4. Orhinmwon – 118,672
5. Ovia North East – 143,009
6. Ovia South West – 96,409
7. Uhunmwode – 74,529
*Total = 1,281,414 or 57.97%*
From the foregoing, it could be observed that *Edo Central has the least number of Local Government Areas (LGAs) with the least number of eligible voters, which is only 16.51% of the total number of eligible voters in Edo State.*
*Edo North has the second highest number of LGAs and the second highest number of eligible voters, which is 25.52% of the total number of eligible voters in Edo State.*
*Edo South has the highest number of eligible voters which is 57.97% of the total number of eligible voters in Edo State*
It may also be noticed that, Edo South alone where the LP candidate comes from, constitutes more than twice of the total number of eligible voters in both Edo Central and Edo North combined!
Therefore, with all the variables and factors considered, the LP’s candidate for the forthcoming governorship election in Edo State may jolly well cruise to victory by default; more so if Edo South people decide to vote for their own, in addition to the palpable “Omonoba” sentiments as evidenced in recent massive protests in Benin City against the perceived enemies of the Oba of the ancient Benin kingdom.
In that case, the remnant votes of the Edo Central people which may be majorly shared by the two prominent candidates from that zone and that of the Edo North, which may mainly favour the candidate of the former governor from that zone, the overall effect may be such that will eventually tend to be insignificant.
All things considered, if the forthcoming election in Edo State is peaceful, free, fair, transparent and credible, all that the LP’s candidate needs to win the election is to secure a huge majority vote from his Edo South people and then, make some strategic inroads into the other two zones to get the mandatory 25% of the votes cast in 2-3rd of the LGAs of the State.
This simply translates to having the majority of the total votes cast as well as 25% of the votes cast in 12 (twelve) LGAs of Edo State.
How these pans out will be an interesting watch!
In the final analysis, the ultimate decisions on who to vote for and/or against in the forthcoming governorship election in Edo State rests squarely on Edo State people. We wait to see!
Opinion
Financial health and Quality of Service by Network Operators

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore
In March 2024 Mobile Network Operators (MNOS) lamented losses of revenue when services were negatively impacted as they suffered internet outage due to damage to some fibre optic cables.
Earlier in 2023 alone, MTN Nigeria suffered more than 6,000 cuts on its fiber cable. The operator relocated 2,500 kilometres of vulnerable fiber cables between 2022 and 2023 at a cost of more than N11bn —enough to build 870 kilometres of new fiber links in areas without coverage.
In August 2024 ,Chief Executive Officer of Airtel Nigeria, Carl Cruz, while speaking during an industry forum, said the telecom company had been recording an average of 1,000 cases of fibre cuts every month.All of these cost money and avoidable losses of revenue.
Both operators which are believed to be dominant service providers suffered a series of setbacks so much that even some of their Mobile Switching Centres (MSCs) and Base Transceiver Stations (BTS) were also affected thus creating negative impact on Quality of Service (QoS).
While they swallowed the bitter pills of trying to resolve the infrastructure issue,some of them have not been able to meet the QoS threshold effectively,as expected by industry regulators,the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC).
> Globacom Limited and 9mobile ,though not publicly quoted ,have no figures available in the public space on their financial losses but both too have suffered losses in that regard.
Each of the four MNOs has suffered incalculable losses so much that these have affected QoS and while subscribers groan over the poor quality of service and depleting data in the face of unavailable network and where available in poor coverage especially in some areas of the country, the operators appear helpless.
Vandalism by miscreants is another cross many operators bear.
There are also frequent instances of official high handedness by certain categories of government officials who are empowered by cruel legislations to go after operators for payments on Right of Way (RoW) fees and illegal taxes not known to any law.And the operators have had to contend with these too.
And so the operators are trapped inescapably between the vandals and government officials.The subscribers suffer in all of these.
In all of these,the subscribers swallow the bitter pills as they are made puns in the vicious cycle of the gods-vandals,none state actors and regimented state and local government officials riding on crooked legislation to fleece the operators.
Apart from frequent harassments operators encounter in the hands of vandals and alleged unscrupulous government officials at state and local council areas across the country,there have been reported cases of revenue losses sustained by the operators through the burden of high operational expenditure.
Some of them have even lost millions of subscribers in the last 20 months so much that these have led to dwindling revenues.
For instance in the first eight months of 2024, Globacom Nigeria experienced a significant loss of 42 million active subscribers, representing a 73% reduction thus losing its market share by moving from number two to three on the subscriber chart.
While the telecommunication sector in Nigeria has shown resilience, Globacom’s subscriber decline is worrisome.
By pioneering per-second billing—unlike the ₦50-per-minute norm—it immediately disrupted the market, forcing rivals to return to the drawing board to rejig their billing templates.
“If per-second billing was a game-changer for the industry, Globacom pulled off another stunt in October 2004 by offering free Subscriber Identification Modules (SIM) cards—at a time competitors were selling theirs for ₦2,000 per SIM card.
“This too rocked the market with aggressive price war and inspite of its late market entry status ,Globacom backed it with hefty marketing campaigns, signing Nigeria’s biggest celebrities as ambassadors” according to an analyst.
MTN Nigeria reported a N400 billion post-tax loss in 2024, marking a significant financial setback. “
But the company bounced back last week when it announced a profit after tax of N133.7 billion for first quarter (Q1) ended March 31, 2025, from a loss of N392.7 billion declared in the first quarter of 2024. MTN announced a total revenue of N1.06 trillion, representing an increase of 40.5 per cent from N752.96 billion in Q1 2024.
The telecommunication giant listed on the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) said it invested N202.4 billion in Q1 2025, a 159 per cent increase year-on-year, to upgrade and expand network infrastructure, enhancing service quality and capacity.
Airtel Africa reported a loss after tax of $89 million for the full year ended March 2024. This loss was primarily attributed to foreign exchange (FX) headwinds in Nigeria and Malawi. Airtel Nigeria’s revenue also fell by 40.34% to $738 million in 2024, mainly due to the devaluation of the Nigerian naira.
Despite the revenue decline, data usage per customer in Nigeria increased by 37.2% accounting for 8.4 Gigabyte (GB)per month.
Airtel has a subscriber base of 56.6 million, as the second largest operator by numbers.
To mitigate further foreign exchange induced losses, MTN and Airtel cut FX liabilities.
MTN Nigeria slashed its outstanding letters of credit (LC) dollar obligations from $416.6 million as of 31 December 2023 to $20.8 million by the end of 2024.
Airtel Africa, on its part, repaid $739 million in foreign currency debt over the last year, reducing its foreign currency debt exposure.
Both companies believe that reducing their foreign currency obligations is key to strengthening their financial positions.
With over 10 million of its subscribers lost to other networks out of its 13m subscribers base,and a desperate quest for $3billion loan to stay afloat,9mobile is clearly in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the telecommunications sector.
Its pathetic situation is almost beyond redemption after it managed to scale through its initial hiccups as a result of over a billion dollar debt Overhang to a consortium of Nigerian banks.
It survived through the interventions by the NCC and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which offered a reprieve for new owners to take over.
It rebranded from Etisalat to 9mobile with a lot of promises which later turned out to be
mere pipe dreams as the company is now comatose.
Its now on the bottom of chart.
Its new management led by Obafemi Banigbe is shopping for over $3 billion in investment to rejig its services in the face of internal wrangling of shareholders.
“9mobile is also facing issues from competitors, especially Globacom, as regards its spectrum lease agreement with MTN.”
A telecom analyst explained last week that “the spectrum lease agreement,was framed in the form of infrastructure sharing, where 9mobile could make use of MTN’s wave bands, where it has no coverage , and MTN can also do the same.”
But in order to cushion the serial losses sustained by operators,the government approved a tariff hike in March 2025 by about 35% down from the 100% the operators proposed initially.
Industry regulators the NCC,
in January this year, approved the request by telecoms operators for tariff adjustments in the telecoms industry.
It announced a 50 per cent increase in telecoms tariff.
But the Nigerian Labour Congress ( NLC) resisted this and took its protests to the Office of National Security Adviser (ONSA) which called a tripartite meeting of his office ,labour and operators after which the tariff was pegged at 35%.
“Telecom operators had requested for 100 per cent hike in telecoms tariff for industry sustainability, which was rejected by different groups of telecoms subscribers, who felt that any increase would impose further hardship on the subscribers.”
The NCC riding on its power under Section 108 of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003 (NCA) to regulate and approve tariff rates and charges by telecommunications operators, approved tariff adjustment requests by Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) in response to prevailing market conditions.
The adjustment, capped at a maximum of 50 per cent of current tariffs, though lower than the over 100 per cent requested by network operators, was arrived at, taking into account ongoing industry reforms that will positively influence sustainability.
“These adjustments will remain within the tariff bands stipulated in the 2013 NCC Cost Study, and requests will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis as is the commission’s standard practice for tariff reviews. It will be implemented in strict adherence to the recently issued NCC Guidance on Tariff Simplification, 2024”the NCC said.
But will the adjustment make any difference to the myriad of problems in the industry especially with declining purchasing powers and general apathy of subscribers?
>> Will the NCC re-examine the financial health of the operators in a wobbling economic environment?
There are far more questions than available answers.
>> Time alone will tell.
Opinion
Delivering differently: The FG’s drive to reform public sector procurement, By Sufuyan Ojeifo

A quiet revolution is unfolding in the often-noisy landscape of Nigerian governance, where reform announcements can feel as routine as rainfall. It is not wrapped in fanfare, nor driven by political expediency. It is measured, genuine, and gathering momentum in a place where reform has long been needed yet stubbornly resisted: public procurement.
On 30th April 2025, the Federal Government launched the National Procurement Certification Portal (NPCP), a new digital platform designed to professionalise, sanitise, and modernise the country’s procurement architecture.
Though seemingly technical, this development is anything but mundane. It is a significant milestone, part of the broader Sustainable Procurement, Environmental, and Social Standards Enhancement (SPESSE) programme, a collaborative effort between the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) and the World Bank.
At first glance, SPESSE might look like just another acronym in Abuja’s alphabet soup, like many lifeless government committees. But behind the tidy name lies a far-reaching and urgent initiative designed to institutionalise professionalism, build capacity at scale, and restore credibility to the systems through which public funds are spent.
● Procurement reform as governance reform
Procurement accounts for over 60 per cent of government expenditure. It is the invisible scaffolding behind how roads are built, hospitals equipped, classrooms furnished, and public utilities maintained. However, Nigeria’s procurement ecosystem has suffered for decades from manual inefficiencies, uneven capacity, and a tolerance for the occasional swallowing of millions of naira by infamous snakes. The result? A system that has been too easy to game and slow to serve.
The NPCP aims to change all that. By supporting structured certification programmes and digital training, the platform equips procurement officers across ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs) with the clarity, consistency, and competence that modern governance demands.
As the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris aptly put it, “The portal is not merely a technological upgrade. It is a tool of accountability for citizens and the state.”
I cannot overstate this point. Certification, now mandatory and accessible, ensures that procurement officers are compliant and globally competitive. The portal also empowers the public to demand better outcomes and enables oversight institutions to monitor performance with new precision. It is not just for government; it is for governance.
● Key reforms and achievements
Since assuming office, the Director-General of the BPP, Dr. Adebowale Adedokun, has moved with quiet but unmistakable determination to recalibrate Nigeria’s procurement culture. From elevating capacity building as a national development priority to accelerating digitisation and enforcing harmonised standards, Dr. Adedokun has demonstrated that effective public sector leadership does not need a megaphone. It simply needs to deliver.
On his watch, Nigeria is recording several notable reforms in procurement governance within the SPESSE framework. With the NPCP as its linchpin, these reforms have begun to bear fruit. These include:
■ e-Procurement Platforms: Digitised processes reduce errors, curb manipulation, and allow for real-time tracking.
■Monthly Contract Award Reports: MDAs must now publish updates on awarded contracts and their implementation status.
■ Project Approval Categorisation: Classification guidelines streamline approvals and cut red tape.
■ Revised Standard Bidding Documents: Updated to meet global best practices and improve clarity.
■ Twenty-One Day Processing Cap: Procurement processes are now time-bound, without sacrificing due diligence.
■ Price Intelligence and Benchmarking: New tools ensure value for money and help eliminate over-invoicing.
■ Community-Based and Affirmative Procurement: Designed to promote inclusivity by prioritising local contractors and disadvantaged groups.
When subjected to community appraisal, these reforms do more than tidy up procedures. They are helping to birth a governance culture where value for money, fairness, and speed are not distant goals, but everyday expectations.
● Addressing the skills gap
It is a no-brainer that no matter how well-designed a system might be, it cannot function without competent people. The skills gap among procurement officers has been one of the system’s most persistent problems. Many officers were able to navigate high-stakes transactions with little more than intuition and a handful of outdated circulars.
This is where SPESSE, particularly the NPCP, proves its worth. Through structured certification and training modules, the portal is building a new generation of procurement professionals who are not just digitally literate but fluent in public procurement ethics, law, and economics.
Implementation has already begun, starting with more than 7,000 procurement officers and graduates from six designated Centres of Excellence. In partnership with professional bodies, these institutions deliver training tailored to sector-specific needs, from infrastructure and defence to health and education. The aim is not just to tick training boxes but to produce professionals who can hold the line when it matters most.
Let us not forget that the procurement officer is often the last line of defence between public funds and institutional chaos. In a country where a single signature can spell disaster, this training is not a nicety but a necessity.
● Institutionalising reform across government
To give these reforms staying power, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (OHCSF) have moved to institutionalise them. Public Service Rules and Circulars are under review to mandate certification as a prerequisite for any officer handling procurement.
The Head of Service, Mrs Didi Esther Walson-Jack, has gone further, urging MDAs to dedicate budget lines for ongoing training. Her message is clear: public procurement is too important to be left to chance. It demands professionalism, rigour, and routine investment.
Moreover, what of officers who refuse to step up and bring themselves up to date? The era of sweeping misconduct under the carpet with a wink and a clerical excuse is over. This new regime provides room for discipline, which is how institutions earn trust.
● Ethics and accountability at the core
Beyond technology and training, reform must be moral. No software can substitute for integrity. This is why SPESSE and BPP place ethics at the centre of reform.
Procurement officers are now expected to operate with heightened transparency and an unwavering commitment to professional standards. Lapses in integrity will trigger consequences in line with civil service rules.
It is a long-overdue recalibration not just to satisfy internal controls but also to renew public confidence. A government that takes procurement seriously is a government that takes its citizens seriously. That message is now baked into law, practice, and institutional memory.
● Leadership, quietly delivered
What makes this moment particularly noteworthy is the leadership style behind it. Dr Adebowale Adedokun, Director-General of the BPP, has pursued reform with steady focus and without theatrics. He has nudged Nigeria’s procurement ecosystem from the periphery of governance to its centre.
Similarly, Mrs Walson-Jack has exemplified what strategic civil service leadership can look like, clear on expectations, bold in enforcement, and unrelenting in pursuing results.
That this work is being quietly but firmly led by public servants like Dr. Adedokun and Mrs. Walson-Jack should inspire more profound reflection on effective leadership in our public institutions. Not all reformers speak in made-for-social-media video clips, some work in era-defining blueprints, with the courage to execute them quietly.
● The road ahead
As the SPESSE programme expands its reach and deepens its roots, the actual test will be durability. Indeed, as the programme enters its next phase, it must be admitted that rising complexities will dog the dynamic evolution of initiatives, systems, processes, procedures, and programmes.
However, as with every worthwhile programme, sustainability is key. Will future governments build on these foundations? Will procurement officers internalise the new norms? Will MDAs continue to invest in training once external support fades?
These questions are real, but so is the progress already made. Time, as always, will tell how all of this will play out in the future.
What we know now is that for the first time in decades, Nigeria is not just tweaking procurement. It is reimagining it, not as a bureaucratic obligation, but as a strategic engine for national development.
This revolution may be quiet, but its implications could be thunderous. What is unfolding is worth noting, worth commending, and worth preserving.
A new procurement culture is being written into the software and soul of the Nigerian public service, a tribute to the high-quality input made by quiet public servants like Dr Adedokun and Mrs Walson-Jack. It is hoped that their good work will endure for posterity; and, that, eventually, Nigeria will reap the benefits.
● Sufuyan Ojeifo, publisher/editor-in-chief of THE CONCLAVE, attended the launch of NPCP by BPP in Abuja.
Opinion
Who is afraid of Fidelity Bank? By Udeme Etukeyen

Leading up to the recent superlative annual reports showcasing one of the most significant growth experienced by a Nigeria Financial Institution in recent years I was forced to ask “what is Fidelity Bank” doing right?
My banking and financial sector experience got me digging deeper into the statistics of the report-Fidelity Bank recorded a substantial 210.0% growth in PBT, reaching N385.2 billion in FY 2024. Deposits increased by 47.9%, from N4.0 trillion in 2023FY to N5.9 trillion in 2024FY, Gross earnings shooting by 87.7% to N1,043.4 billion which was primarily caused by a 106.9% increase in interest and similar income. Was I impressed? Absolutely 👍🏾
Now to the scary part, they opened the year with a bang implying that 2025 year end results was going to be nothing but spectacular; check this out-Fidelity reported a whooping 167.8% increase in PBT (Profit Before Tax)to N105.8 billion in Q1 2025, compared to N39.5 billion in Q1 2024. Gross earnings from January to April had reached some N315.421 billion signaling a 64.21% increase year-on-year.
These results were nothing short of astonishing and with great hope I sat my team to review our Investment Strategy to accommodate taking up equities in Fidelity and advising our portfolio investors to do same.
We quickly appraised the fundamentals and Key Success Factors to include their focus on the strategic youth economy that the Creative and Digital Transformation sector promises, the banks bullish inroads in MSME promotion and financing, their glowing penchant for Gender inclusion without abandoning the core sectors of Mining, Renewables and other key industries
Then came the dissecting of Leadership, my team of analysts mostly female went on about Fidelity MD being one of the most experienced and affable Amazons in the industry; done this, achieved that and all the entreaties you’d expect from smart ladies who feel mentored from a distance. I didn’t hesitate to draw their attention to the experience of the menfolk within the organization like I had any measurable data to establish that mix…truth remains you can’t but admire the Banks Leadership and strides
A deeper look at the banks expansion globally could reveal a strategic and noiseless acquisition of Union Bank,London and their planned incursion into African and other European financial markets, you just can see that such daring strides and impact would give competition and detractors sleepless nights. Not in an era where sleeping pills are sold strictly by prescription and no thanks to the high cost of medication for peddlers of cheap propaganda
Within barely 30days of announcing such magnificent results little wonder how pundits would cook or spin a narrative to suggest a bank that has announced herself as First Tier with shoulders leveled up with other Banking giants would shudder over a judgement against her customer G.Cappa or even the contribution they would be required to cough out over that said Sagecom saga. With that judgement not going the way of pundits a contemptuous attempt at calculating interest at unclassified rates from an initial N14b to cause an unnecessary scare or negative press on the bank speaks volumes of how we unrepentantly strive to destroy value in our economy.
One would think that interpretation of the judgment and computation of due figures which will understandably come with a payment plan be awaited instead of the usual bad blood generated and envisaged by toddler media characters.
It is not in doubt that the discerning public sees through the cruise and flat falling attempt of dramatic clout chasers ever ready to stain Fidelity’s white apparel which savvy Investors and analysts are filled with bridal admiration
Like Joseph Campbell hinted in his famous quote “The cave you fear to enter holds the treasure you seek.” We cast our treasures and bets on Fidelity Bank as the Nigerian treasure house to beat in the years ahead!
■ Udeme Etukeyen is an Abuja based Pan African Investment Advisory Expert.
-
News24 hours ago
Minister, EFCC chairman inspect 753 units estate forfeited by ex-CBN Gov, Emefiele
-
Politics8 hours ago
Just in: Another LP HoR Member dumps party, joins APC
-
News15 hours ago
Wike defends FCTA’s N1. 78 trillion 2025 budget
-
News6 hours ago
Just in: Finally, Tinubu presents Rivers State 2025 budget to NASS
-
News10 hours ago
Missing Lady Who Criticized Sokoto Governor Found In Zamfara Hospital
-
News24 hours ago
Reps move to investigate delayed pension payments to Nigerian retirees
-
Foreign16 hours ago
Coup rumours: Côte d’Ivoire’s Ouattara attends council of ministers meeting
-
News7 hours ago
Senate Passes Bill for Establishment of Federal Medical Centre in Oleh