Connect with us

News

Reps Summon Aiteo E&P, Agip Oil Over Oil Spillage In Bayelsa Community

Published

on

 
 
By Gloria Ikibah 
 
 
The House of Representatives joint Committee on  Environment and Petroleum Resources (Upstream), Petroleum (downstream ) has summoned the Managing Directors of Aiteo E & P Company, Victor Okoronkwo and Nigerian Agip Oil Company, Bolondi Fabrizio (now Oando Oil Ltd) to appear within 7 days over oil spillage at Olugboboro  Community in Southern Ijaw area of Bayelsa State. 
 
 
The Commitee also expressed its displeasure over the refusal by oil companies executives to appear before the it after three consecutive invitions.

 
Chairman of the Commitee, Rep. Pondi Gbabador in his address, on Tuesday at the commencement of the investigative hearing, he said the Commitee’s mandate, was to investigate the activities and operations of Aiteo E & P Company and Nigerian Agip Oil Company (now Oando Oil Ltd).
 
 
According to him,  these companies’ allegedly portend deadly environmental consequences in their host communities and, by extension, the nation at large.
 
 
Rep. Gbabojor explained that the oil industry plays a critical role in the economic development of the country, and it’s contributes significantly to the national income, provides employment, and supports infrastructure development in various regions. 
 
 
He however stated that  contributions by oil companies should not be at the cost of the health, well-being, and livelihood of the people in the host communities, nor the expense of the environment.
 
 
He said: “You may recall that the House of Representatives, at its sitting of Tuesday, 12th March 2024, considered a motion titled Environmental Impact of Transporting Crude Oil by Mega Seagoing Vessels from Nembe Creek Trunk to Offshore Crude Oil Storage in the Atlantic Ocean by Aiteo E & P, and resolved to:Urge the Federal Ministry of Environment to compel the Management of Aiteo E & P to conduct an environmental impact assessment of the project, as dictated by the Environment Impact Assessment Act, 2004, and include the host communities, the State Government and stakeholders, in line with international global practice, subject to scrutiny of the public and environmental experts.
 
 
“Recall that the House in a motion mandated it’s committees on Environment and Petroleum Resources (Midstream) to:Investigate Environmental Impact of Transporting Crude Oil by Mega Seagoing Vessels from Nembe Creek Trunk to Offshore Crude Oil Storage in the Atlantic Ocean by Aiteo E & P, and Monitor compliance with the Ministry of Environment and the Management of Aiteo E & P with this requirement, and report within four (4) weeks.
 
 
“In the same vein, the House also on Tuesday, 23rd July 2024, considered a motion titled Oil Spillage at Olugboboro Community in Southern Ijaw from Nigerian Agip Oil Company Facility, and subsequently resolved to:Urge the Management of the Nigerian Agip Oil Company to urgently stop/contain the oil leakages from its Facilities at Ogboinbiri/Teibidaba affecting Olugboboro community in southern Ijaw Federal Constituency; 
 
 
“Also urged the National Emergency Management Agency to urgently supply relief materials to ameliorate the suffering of the impacted communities who have lost sources of livelihood;Further urge the Nigeria Agip Oil Company to immediately pay compensation to the affected community for the economic trees and aquatic life damaged since April 2024, by the spillage; and Mandate the Committees on Environment and Petroleum Resources (Upstream) to carry out extensive investigation into the immediate and remote causes of the spillage, to ascertain and assess the extent of impact to Olugboboro community of Southern Ijaw Federal Constituency and report within four (4) weeks.
 
 
“In light of the above, we have invited the Managing Directors of both Aiteo E & P Company and Nigerian Agip Oil Company (now Oando Oil Ltd) to this Hearing, to provide us with detailed explanations regarding their activities, particularly in their areas of operations. We expect full cooperation and transparency from all stakeholders in this process. 
 
 
“It is our collective responsibility to ensure that the operations of oil companies in our country are carried out in a manner that is sustainable, environmentally responsible, and respectful of the rights and welfare of the communities they operate in and the Country at large.
 
 
“It is also noteworthy, to emphasize that the Committees are not here to vilify any corporate entity but to ensure accountability, transparency, and adherence to environmental laws and regulations that govern the oil sector in our country. We aim to find solutions, hold the responsible parties accountable where necessary, and recommend the appropriate remedial actions”.
 
 
According to the chairman, the outcome of the Hearing will not only affect the immediate communities involved but will also set a precedent on how Nigerians  approach environmental issues related to industrial activities in the future. 
 
 
“The environment is our common heritage, and we must protect it for ourselves and future generations.I trust that the deliberations today will be conducted with the highest level of professionalism, respect, and commitment to justice.Thank you all for your attention, and I look forward to a productive session”, he added.
 
 
Speaking at the meeting, Rofikat Odetoro  who represented the ministry of Environment said the EIA approval issued by the ministry stipulated that the crude oil from Altio oil fields should be evacuated through pipelines and not through barges as being currently practiced by the company. 
 
 
“In terms of children, they are not used to have cyanosis. They are not used to wear glasses. You see 8-month-old children are using glasses.Children are not used to have fatty liver. Now we see children having fatty liver. Even if it is a rare condition, it’s not supposed to be as young as that.You start touching the fingers. They put that in the system. That entire human being is responsible.So your action is timely. And it’s very well concentrated.
 
 
“However, we also have this to say, that the Ministry was neither notified or advised or even sought for permitting sake – they are guardians of the Ministry in respect of the deviation or change in scope. In line with best global practices, if you are given a medication and you want to change to a similar effect, the best thing to do is to go back to the doctor. So if you are going to change the scope of the EIA approval, the best practice is to come back to seek the guidance of the Ministry.
 
 
“This they acknowledged that is a mistake on their part, but it was as a result of a sister agency putting pressure on them to produce more in order to have more revenue. So the issue of synergy also comes to fore. 
 
 
“At our meeting, we reached the following resolutions.Altio should urgently register for the EIA of the project or in the alternative conduct a post-embargo assessment since they have been operating for two years. Let’s see what has been done, what has been the effect of that particular activity that has been going on for the last two years. 
 
 
“Altio should submit to the Ministry within two weeks the technical details, the video clips and other relevant documents in the project process that will enable us to take an informed decision that will be in the overall interest of Nigerians.
 
 
“We also noted Altio’s concerns of its existing pipeline’s integrity and the need not to disturb it so that we don’t have more leakage in or spill into the environment. We also saw the need and advised Altio appropriately for an inclusive stakeholders engagement in order to be able to define the project as better persons, those communities, and so on and so forth. 
 
 
“To reduce the distance of crude oil transportation through the pipelines. Because the integrity of the pipelines were no longer what it was supposed to be.There were leakages along the line. It’s a swampy environment. Some are on the seabed.They couldn’t ascertain where the leaks were coming from. 
 
 
“If they now decide to disturb it, it will create more havoc. More leakage and so on.As a result of that, and also with the activities of pipeline vandalization, they decided to construct an oil sand farm at the Nambe Creek flow station. Where crude oil is transported via the St. John-Rio Beto River through Nambe Grass, Okoma and Benema to the offshore crude oil storage facility in the Antarctic Ocean. That’s seven kilometers off the shoreline of the Grass Island.
 
 
“Accordingly, after receiving your letter, the ministry forwarded a letter to the company requesting the company to update the ministry on the status of the project and intimate us of any associated developments that were not covered by the previous EIA approval. 
 
 
“We also had a meeting with the representative of the company and it was noted, not to waste your time, let me go straight to the point, that the EIA approval issued by the ministry stipulated that the crude oil from Altio oil fields should be evacuated through pipelines and not through barges as being currently practiced by the company. 
 
 
“I am not an expert on barges transportation.We have relevant agencies that could give more advice on the merits and demerits of that. But be it as me, they have been doing that for the past three years. So if they have actually wanted to comply with the provisions of the law, that could have been done much earlier.Let me digress a little bit, sir. 
 
 
“The proceeds of the joint venture is for Nigerians, including myself. And being an indigenous company, they are also Nigerians.So we are all answerable to governments and the entire Nigerian populace. We also noted that Altio has completed the installation of the FSO, that is Floating Storage Offshore Storage Facilities, the 54-kilometer pipeline that was also permitted by Nigerian upstream, has been finalized, but construction is yet to commence. I will reiterate my earlier suggestion.
 
 
“If there were more synergy and perhaps joint monitoring exercises, maybe we would have had better compliance. When you make a law and you compartmentalize the law, it gives into duplication and less efficiency, and you spend more. 
 
 
“So that needs to be looked into.Also, Altio adopted and commenced temporary budgeting of crude oil about two years ago. We requested that they should furnish us with the details, visuals, audio-visuals of the budgeting exercise, and if there has been any incident of spillage or accident or incident, and we equally informed them of this investigative panel, and we advised that it would be good we have such before this panel today. I regret to inform this honorable committee that the Ministry, the Department, is yet to receive any submission from Altio.
 
 
“On behalf of my Director, Dr. Abbas Suleiman, I regret to inform this Honorable Committee that the House is yet to receive the EIA registration documents from Altio and other documents that would have enabled us to give appropriate advice or suggestions to this Honorable Committee”, she stated.
 
 
While responding to inquiries from the lawmakers, Mr. Yahaya who earlier disclosed that NUPRC granted the first permit of six months to Aiteo to badge to avoid loss of about 90 percent of the 50,000 barrels per day oil production, however affirmed that two years permit was given to Aiteo to badge considering the criticality of oil production.
 
According to him, any attempt to ask Aiteo to shut down will have huge cost implications on the oil production target.
 
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

COP29: Reps, Others Advocate Equitable Policy For Energy Transition

Published

on

By Gloria Ikibah
The House of Representatives has solicited for accessible and equitable policies, including tax breaks and vocational grants to empower youth in renewable energy in African nations, and most especially in Nigeria.
Chairman, House Committee on Renewable Energy, Rep. Victor Afam Ogene made this call alongside other stakeholders at a side event co-hosted by the Committee on Renewable Energy and INCLUDE, a Netherlands based knowledge platform, at the ongoing Conference of Parties, COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, where world leaders are gathered to discuss issues of climate change.
Rep. Ogene also want the inclusion of youths and legislators in conferences and workshops where issues involving policies regarding developments in climate change and energy transitions are discussed, for a better understanding that would engender right policy formulation and intentional youth involvement.
The side event, titled “Driving the Just Transition: Labor-Based Incentives and Youth-Centric Policies for a Sustainable Future,” according to a statement endorsed by both Hon. Ogene and Anika Altaf, PhD, Executive Director, INCLUDE, focused on actionable strategies to foster a fair and inclusive renewable energy transition in Africa. The discussions centered around labor-based incentives, youth-centered policies, and the intersection of equity, sustainability, and job creation.
Speakers at the side event included Ogene, Dr. Altaf, Victoria Manya, (Knowledge Broker, INCLUDE), Nurgul Iliazova, Professor of Economics, Bishkek State University, Kazakhstan, Farida Ally, Kenyan youth leader, Solomon Abu, a nuclear scientist and Kgaugelo Mkumbeni, research officer, Institute for Security Studies, Kenya.
Dr. Altaf in her presentation suggested mentorship programmes and international funding to authentically support youth-led renewable energy projects.
The conversations outlined a comprehensive approach to design labour incentives that not only support job creation, but also address the specific needs of young people. This includes accessible financial incentives, such as grants for youth-led startups and subsidies for skills acquisition in renewable energy industries; and policies that will integrate transparency and inclusivity to ensure equitable access.
The outcomes of the event reflected a unified approach to addressing Africa’s unique challenges and opportunities in the global energy transition.
The statement said further: “Victoria Manya set the scene for the panel’s conversation predicated on three critical points:
• Africa has pressing needs, like job creation and energy access, to address energy poverty.
• Africa contributes less than 4% of global emissions, so our transition must prioritize fair, localized strategies.
• For this transition to truly benefit Africa, we must base it on labour incentives that empower youth to take the lead.
“The event underscored the importance of crafting policies that resonate with young people. This involves using youth-friendly language, actively involving young voices in policy formulation, and prioritizing initiatives that align with their aspirations, such as meaningful, skill-based employment opportunities in the renewable energy sector.”
The various speakers were also in agreement that “Young people are emerging as key contributors to renewable energy solutions tailored to their communities. These innovations are not only effective but scalable, demonstrating the transformative potential of youth-led technological advancements in combating climate change. Emphasis was placed on the role of AI and digital technologies in enabling this progress. Early exposure, such as teaching coding skills to children as young as eight, was highlighted as a critical step in fostering a generation capable of driving impactful solutions.”
Participants also stressed the importance of involving youths, not merely as advisors but as decision-makers in climate policy formulation.
Standardized toolkits and training programmes were identified as essential for equipping youth with the skills necessary to thrive in the renewable energy sector.
The session called for partnerships between governments, educational institutions, and private sector actors to develop and implement targetted technical and vocational training.
A critical theme in the conversation was ensuring that vulnerable and marginalized communities are not left behind in the renewable energy transition. Inclusive policies must address systemic inequalities by bridging access gaps, particularly for young people in underprivileged regions.  This approach includes promoting social equity in labour opportunities and decision-making processes.
Global and regional collaboration,
international organizations and regional stakeholders were urged to provide authentic support for youth-led initiatives. These includes mentorship programs, direct funding for grassroots projects, and platforms for cross-sector collaboration that prioritize local solutions.
The event concluded with a call for turning discussions into actionable frameworks, including involving piloting labour-based incentives, integrating youth-focused priorities into national renewable energy policies, and leveraging global forums such as COP 2024 to amplify Africa’s voice in the energy transition.
Participants unanimously urged international organizations and regional stakeholders to provide authentic support for youth-led initiatives. This includes mentorship programmes, direct funding for grassroots projects, and platforms for cross-sector collaboration that prioritize local solutions.
Continue Reading

News

Alleged adultery: Shari’a court clears Jigawa commissioner

Published

on

The Upper Shari’a Court in Kano, presided over by Ibrahim Sarki Yola, has cleared Jigawa State’s Commissioner for Special Duties, Auwal Danladi Sankara, of allegations of committing adultery with a married woman.

Recall that the case was filed by Nasiru Buba, who accused Sankara of having an illicit affair with his wife, Tasleem Baba Nabegu.

While delivering his ruling, Sarki Yola stressed the need for holistic and cautious investigations by law enforcement and regulatory bodies like the Hisbah Commission, noting that allegations against prominent individuals must be handled with care to avoid unnecessary tarnishing of reputations.

The court also observed that the complainant and his legal representatives failed to appear to contest the Police findings.

Advertisement

“Following the investigation by the office of the Assistant Inspector General of Police, the report shows there is no evidence to prove that there was any illicit affair between Auwal Danladi Sankara and Tasleem Baba Nabegu.

“Since the complainant and his lawyers are not present to challenge the submission by the police, I have no choice but to strike out the case,” the judge stated.

Speaking on behalf of Sankara, his counsel, Barrister Sadam Suleiman, expressed satisfaction with the judgment.

“We have always maintained that our client is innocent. The court has affirmed this by clearing his name based on the police investigation,” Suleiman said.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Rabiu Shu’aibu, counsel for Tasleem Baba Nabegu, indicated that his team might take further legal action against Nasiru Buba for defamation.

“We will discuss with our client to explore the possibility of filing a case against Nasiru Buba, as he has defamed her name,” Shu’aibu remarked.

Continue Reading

News

Court hears suit challenging Lagos-Calabar highway contract Jan 14

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Lagos, on Monday, adjourned the hearing of the Lagos- Calabar Coastal Highway Project over environmental impact to January 14, 2025.

A former governorship candidate of the African Democratic Congress in Lagos State, Funsho Doherty, had dragged the Attorney General of the Federation, Bureau of Public Procurement and HiTech Construction company before the court over open competitive bidding.

He alleged that the Federal Ministry of Works violated the Public Procurement Act 2007 by awarding the first two phases of the highway to Hitech Construction through a single-source procurement process, bypassing the required open competitive bidding.

Doherty is accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of unlawfully awarding the highway’s first two sections to Hitech Construction without adhering to Nigeria’s public procurement laws.

Advertisement

In his originating summons, Doherty argued that the ministry’s decision bypassed the open competitive bidding process mandated by the Public Procurement Act 2007.

He claimed that the construction began without the required Environmental Impact Assessment, which breaches the Environmental Impact Assessment Act 1992.

The plaintiff is asking the court for a declaration that the award of the first two sections of the Lagos- Calabar Coastal Highway Project by the Federal Ministry of Works to the third defendant without subjecting same to open competitive bidding was unlawful and void, being in breach of the Public Procurement Act 2007.

He also asked the court for a declaration that the commencement of construction of the Lagos- Calabar Coastal Highway Project without first undertaking an Environmental Impact Assessment was unlawful and a breach of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, 1992.

Advertisement

He further sought a declaration that the Federal Ministry of Environment and the second defendant failed in their statutory duties of ensuring compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Act and the Public Procurement Act.

Doherty asked the court for an order setting aside the award of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway project to the third defendant.

“An order of court restraining the Federal Ministry of Works and the third defendant, by themselves or through their agents, from further construction of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway until compliance with the Public Procurement Act and the Environmental Impact Assessment Act.

“An order of court directing the Federal Ministry of Works to subject all other sections of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway project yet to be awarded to open competitive bidding as contemplated under the Public Procurement Act.”

Advertisement

When the case came up on Monday, the plaintiff’s counsel, D. D. Duru, informed the court that the matter was coming up for the first time.

He informed the court that the defendants had been served and had responded with counter-affidavits and a preliminary objection, making the matter ripe for hearing.

But the first and second defendants counsel, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), who announced his appearance for both defendants, was opposed by Duru, for representing the second defendant, arguing that the second defendant’s separate counsel should appear as it is an independent institution.

Owonikoko, in his reply, said the process referred to by the plaintiff’s counsel was only brought to his notice on Monday.

Advertisement

“The process referred to by my learned friend was only brought to my notice today.

“I asked if the counsel who filed the processes was in court but it appears he was not,” he said.

Owonikoko then asked that the process filed by the second defendant should be struck out.

Duru, in his response, said,” It will be improper for the SAN, to say he was instructed to ask for the striking out of the second defendant’s application.

Advertisement

“It is either the lawyer who signed the processes that come to withdraw or the SAN files for change of counsel.”

The third defendant’s counsel, Oyinkansola Badejo-Okunsanya, sought an extension of time.

She said the application was filed on November 15, 2024, adding that the application was supported by an 11-paragraph affidavit.

Badejo- Okunsanya, moved the application in terms, which the court granted.

Advertisement

Justice A. O. Owoeye adjourned the case till January 14, 2025, to regularise the processes and scheduled the hearing for January 27, 2025.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News