The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has launched a scathing critique against President Bola Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Strategy and Information, Bayo Onanuga, branding him a “historical loose cannon” for his contradictory statements and lack of introspection.
HURIWA argues that Onanuga’s propensity to speak without thoughtful consideration disqualifies him from representing the Nigerian president effectively. The group suggests that the adviser only reflects the views of a president who shuns criticism and critical thought.
The rights group particularly condemned Onanuga for allegedly misinterpreting a recent cover story in The Guardian, which highlighted the dire state of hunger, poverty, and rising living costs in Nigeria, prompting some citizens to call for military intervention. HURIWA asserts that Onanuga’s interpretation distorts the narrative, which does not endorse military action but rather sheds light on the citizens’ existential struggles.
HURIWA also referenced comments made by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, who previously told youths calling for protests against bad governance that he would be watching them from the comfort of his mansion. They criticized Onanuga for seemingly justifying the refusal of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello to comply with legal orders.
The organization stressed that the legal immunity granted to governors does not extend to their residences, stating, “The police or military can’t be stopped from arresting wanted persons even if they hide under the AGBADA of the governor or president.” They urged President Tinubu to appoint a more qualified and reflective media spokesperson to prevent Onanuga’s controversial remarks from tarnishing Nigeria’s image.
HURIWA’s discontent also extends to Onanuga’s defense of Bello, who has been evading arrest due to allegations of financial misconduct amounting to N80.2 billion. Despite efforts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to apprehend him, Bello has not appeared in court, with claims that his successor had facilitated his escape.
In conclusion, HURIWA described Onanuga’s justifications as “spurious, laughable, and fallacious,” reiterating that government properties cannot serve as sanctuaries for individuals sought by law enforcement agencies.