Connect with us

News

INEC Call For Stricter Laws to Curb Vote-Buying at Polling Units

Published

on

By Gloria Ikibah

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has urged the National Assembly to pass tougher laws restricting the possession of large sums of money within polling areas to combat vote-buying and other electoral offences.

The Director of Litigation and Prosecution INEC, Tanimu Muhammed (SAN), raised concerns over vote-buying, describing it as a serious threat to Nigeria’s democracy, at a consultative meeting with security agencies and the technical committee on electoral law reforms on Friday in Abuja.

The meeting was organised by the Joint Senate and House of Representatives Committees on Electoral Matters, in partnership with the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC) and supported by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO), and had key stakeholders in attendance to discuss electoral security and legal reforms.

Muhammed stated that politicians often claim they carry large sums on election day for party agent payments and logistics. However, he warned that unrestricted cash flow at polling units has encouraged vote-buying and undermined electoral integrity.

Advertisement

To tackle this issue, Muhammed proposed a legal limit of ₦50,000 for individuals within polling areas on election day.

“Vote-buying remains one of the biggest threats to credible elections in Nigeria. We need legislation that not only criminalizes this practice but also puts preventive measures in place,” Muhammed stated.

The commission therefore called on lawmakers to focus on amending laws to eliminate loopholes frequently exploited by politicians.

INEC officials also renewed their call for the creation of an Electoral Offences Commission, stressing that the commission currently lacks the capacity to prosecute electoral offenders effectively.

“INEC is doing its best to handle prosecutions, but we need a dedicated institution with the legal authority and resources to investigate and prosecute electoral crimes comprehensively.
“The creation of an Electoral Offenses Commission would ensure that vote-buying, ballot snatching, and other crimes are met with swift legal action,” Muhammed stated.
Ondo Resident Electoral Commissioner, Oluwatoyin Babalola, emphasised that reducing cash transactions at polling units would make it harder for politicians to influence voters with financial inducements.
“If we set a cash limit, security agencies will have clearer guidelines on what constitutes an electoral offense, making enforcement easier,” she added.
In response to INEC’s concerns, security agencies at the meeting reaffirmed their commitment to ensuring free and fair elections.
However, they acknowledged challenges, particularly in logistics and coordination.
The Commissioner of Police in charge of Election Planning and Evaluation, Abayomi Shogunle, who represented the Inspector General of Police, pointed out that inadequate resources often hamper law enforcement efforts during elections.
“We face major logistical challenges, from deploying officers to remote areas to ensuring real-time communication during elections. These are issues that need to be addressed if we are to effectively enforce electoral laws,” Shogunle said.
Despite these challenges, security agencies pledged to remain neutral and professional in carrying out their duties.
Responding to the concerns raised, the Chairman of the House Committee on Electoral Matters, Hon. Adebayo Balogun, assured that all issues discussed would be addressed in future electoral reforms.
He announced plans for a 2025 Electoral Act to replace the current 2022 version, which he said had exposed gaps during the 2023 elections.
“The 2022 Electoral Act was a significant step forward, but its implementation in the last general elections showed areas that need improvement. We are committed to strengthening our electoral laws to reflect the realities of our democracy,” Balogun said.
He emphasized that, apart from legislative reforms, there was a need for increased awareness among political parties, INEC officials, and civil society organizations on the dangers of vote-buying and other electoral malpractices.
“The Nigerian people deserve an electoral process they can trust. We must ensure that our laws are not just strong on paper but are also effectively enforced,” Balogun added.
The Senate Chairman on Electoral Matters, Senator Sharafadeen Alli, noted that while the 2022 Electoral Act was initially considered comprehensive, its implementation revealed gaps that must be closed.
“This meeting is a step towards strengthening our electoral system. The reforms we propose must reflect lessons learned from past elections and ensure that our democracy continues to evolve positively,” Alli said.
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PDP Leadership Tussle: S’Court sets March 10 for Anyanwu’s appeal against removal

Published

on

The Supreme Court has set March 10 for the hearing of Senator Samuel Anyanwu’s appeal contesting his ousting as the National Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP), as announced yesterday.

The decision was made by a five-member panel led by Justice Ibrahim Saulawa during the ruling on Anyanwu’s motion for expedited consideration.

Last December, the Court of Appeal sitting in Enugu upheld a High Court decision that sacked Samuel Anyanwu as PDP national secretary.

The lower court upheld Sunday Udeh-Okoye as the substantive national secretary of the opposition party.

Advertisement

In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Ridwan Abdullahi, the Court of Appeal held that Anyanwu‘s appeal was incompetent and lacking in merit.

The appellate court held that the appellant violated the PDP constitution by laying claim to the national secretary position, having contested and picked as the party’s candidate in the 2024 governorship election in Imo State.

Dissatisfied with the ruling, Anyanwu approached the apex court last month and asked the court to set aside the judgment of the two lower courts and recognise him as the authentic national secretary of the PDP.

He also filed a motion for accelerated hearing as well as an abridgment of time on grounds of the crucial role of the office of national secretary.

Advertisement

Delivering ruling in the motion, the Supreme Court  granted the relief sought and ordered service of the court processes on the respondent, Mr. Aniagu Emmanuel, who the court said, must file in his reply brief within three days of service.

Anyanwu, on the other hand was given two days to reply on point of law.

But the apex court did not hear Anyanwu’s motion for stay of execution of the judgment of the appellate court was not heard by the apex court.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Looted Benin Artefacts: Netherlands to repatriate 119  bronzes to Nigeria

Published

on

The Nigerian government is looking forward to the repatriation of 119 Benin bronzes from the Netherlands.

A formal request for the return of these artefacts, which were acquired during the British assault on the Benin Kingdom in 1897, has been made.

It has been reported that an agreement regarding their repatriation was signed yesterday by representatives of both countries.

Of the 119 objects being returned, 113 of them were among the Dutch State Collection, while the remaining six were returned by the Municipality of Rotterdam.

Advertisement

The signing ceremony took place at the Wereldmuseum in Leiden, the Netherlands, where the Benin bronzes were previously displayed.

Dutch Minister of Education, Culture and Science, Mr. Eppo Bruins, and the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM), Olugbile Holloway, signed for their countries.

A statement by Anneloes Hoff of the Embassy of the Kingdom of The Netherlands said the artefacts are expected to arrive later this year, according to the agreement.

The statement reads: “The Netherlands will return 119 Benin Bronzes to Nigeria, following a request from the Nigerian government. The transfer agreements were signed today by the Dutch Minister of Education, Culture and Science and the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM).

Advertisement

“The objects are expected to arrive in Nigeria later this year. The restitution underscores the strong partnership between The Netherlands and Nigeria.

The Netherlands is returning the Benin Bronzes unconditionally, recognising that the objects were looted during the British attack on Benin City in 1897 and should have never ended up in The Netherlands.

Continue Reading

News

Lagos Assembly: DSS writes TV stations, requests retraction, apology

Published

on

The Department of State Services (DSS) has accused two television stations, Africa Independent Television (AIT) of DAAR Communications Plc and Channels Television, of airing reports that are allegedly false, defamatory, and malicious in nature regarding its activities.

The agency indicated that these inaccurate reports were related to the presence of its personnel at the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday.

Through its counsel, Chief Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), the DSS has called for a retraction and a public apology to be issued within a period of seven days, threatening to pursue both criminal and civil actions against the television stations should they fail to comply.

In a letter, dated February 17, 2025, titled: “False, Defamatory and Malicious Publication Concerning the State Security Service (or DSS) Regarding Their Presence at the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday February 17, 2025,” Adedipe said the DSS (SSS) denied allegations it invaded the Assembly and attempted to prevent the members of the Assembly and Speaker Mojisola Meranda from entering the chamber for plenary.

Advertisement

The secret police insisted that it was duly invited through a letter by the Deputy Clerk to support the security operatives attached to the Assembly in order to forestall an imminent breakdown of law and order.

“However, without any verification of the reason for the presence of our client’s officials at the Lagos State House of Assembly on February 17, 2025, your organisation maliciously and falsely broadcast, both on your news bulletin and print media, that our client had invaded/stormed the Lagos State House of Assembly with a view to preventing the members and speaker from entering the chamber for plenary.

“By this publication, our client, which is a highly responsible and respected organisation, was portrayed as an irresponsible and reckless organisation, which, in a Gestapo manner, invaded/stormed the Lagos State House of Assembly to support one of the feuding parties and to desecrate the hallowed chambers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News