Connect with us

News

Obi’s reaction on IBB’s confession shakes social media, says Nigeria is worse off, demands recognition of true election winners

Published

on

Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Peter Obi, has responded to former Nigerian Military President Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida’s (IBB) recent acknowledgment that the late Chief MKO Abiola won the June 12, 1993, presidential election.

Babangida made this earth shaking revelation during the launch of his autobiography, A Journey in Service, in Abuja on Thursday. Obi praised Babangida’s admission as a crucial step toward national healing and unity.

He also expressed hope that other key players in Nigeria’s democracy would have the courage to recognize the true winners of past elections.

In his speech during the book launch, Babangida admitted that the annulment of the June 12 election was a regrettable moment in Nigeria’s history.

Advertisement

He stated: “That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my impression of regret. As a leader of the military administration, I accept full responsibility for all decisions taken under my watch.”

Babangida’s acknowledgment of Abiola’s victory marks a significant departure from his previous stance and has reignited conversations about Nigeria’s democratic evolution.

Peter Obi’s Reflections Peter Obi, who attended the book launch, shared his reflections on the event through a post on his verified X (formerly Twitter) account. In his statement, Obi praised Babangida’s contributions to Nigeria’s economy and efforts to foster national cohesion during his tenure. “IBB’s contributions to Nigeria’s economy and his strong support for entrepreneurship and private sector growth remain immeasurable,” Obi wrote.

He highlighted Babangida’s role in promoting substantial growth in the financial sector and creating policies aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s economic and social fabric.

Advertisement

Key Takeaways from the Event Obi also shared two key takeaways from the event’s keynote address and Babangida’s comments:

Nigeria’s Development Compared to Peer Nations Obi reflected on a quote from the keynote speaker, “Rien n’a changé,” which translates to “Nothing much has changed.” In the case of Nigeria, we are worse off than we were during IBB’s era.

He observed that Nigeria has stagnated in terms of human development compared to peer countries like Bangladesh, India, Vietnam, and Ghana.“When IBB left office in 1992, these countries were in the low Human Development Index (HDI) category, just like Nigeria.

Today, they have advanced to medium and high HDI levels, while Nigeria remains in the low HDI category,” Obi lamented.

Advertisement

Democratic Transitions in Ghana vs. Nigeria Obi praised Ghana’s democratic progress over the past 30 years, noting that the country has experienced smooth leadership transitions that reflect the genuine votes of the people. He contrasted this with Nigeria’s history of disputed electoral outcomes.“In Ghana, ruling party candidates have conceded defeat, respecting democracy in its truest form. In Nigeria, electoral outcomes often fail to reflect the people’s will,” he added.

Babangida’s Admission and Its Significance One of the most profound moments of the event, according to Obi, was Babangida’s admission that MKO Abiola won the June 12 election. Obi described the acknowledgment as a step toward national healing and progress. “IBB’s admission is a step toward national healing, unity, and progress for our nation,” Obi stated. He emphasized that recognizing the truth about past elections is essential for Nigeria to move forward with honesty and reflection.

A Call for Recognition of Past Election Winners Obi expressed hope that other key players in Nigeria’s political history would also find the courage to acknowledge the true winners of past elections. He highlighted the importance of such admissions in promoting transparency, reconciliation, and trust in Nigeria’s democratic system.

“I hope that one day, other key players in Nigeria’s democracy will find the courage to recognize the true winners of past elections, allowing our nation to tell its story with honesty and reflection,” Obi stated. This call resonates with many Nigerians who have long demanded electoral reforms to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections that truly reflect the will of the people.

Advertisement

Historical Context: The June 12 Election and Its Fallout The June 12, 1993, presidential election is widely regarded as one of the freest and fairest elections in Nigeria’s history. MKO Abiola, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) candidate, was on the verge of being declared the winner when the election was annulled by the military government led by Babangida. This decision led to nationwide protests and unrest, as many Nigerians saw the annulment as a betrayal of democracy. Abiola, determined to claim his mandate, declared himself president in 1994.

This act resulted in his arrest and detention by the regime of General Sani Abacha, who took power after Babangida’s exit. Abiola died in detention on July 7, 1998, under mysterious circumstances, just weeks after Abacha’s sudden death. His passing remains a dark chapter in Nigeria’s democratic journey.

Impact of Babangida’s Admission Babangida’s admission that Abiola won the June 12 election has reignited discussions about Nigeria’s democratic development and the long-term consequences of the annulled election. It has also sparked renewed calls for justice and recognition of Abiola’s contributions to Nigeria’s democracy.

Many Nigerians see the admission as an opportunity for healing and reconciliation. However, some critics argue that the acknowledgment comes too late to provide meaningful justice for Abiola and his supporters.

Advertisement

REACTIONS
Public Reactions to Obi’s Statement Obi’s reflections and call for the recognition of past election winners have been met with widespread reactions across social media and political circles. Supporters praised his commitment to transparency and democratic ideals, while others criticized him for not offering more concrete proposals for electoral reform. One political analyst noted, “Obi’s statement is timely. Acknowledging historical truths is essential for healing and nation-building. However, actions must follow words if Nigeria is to truly move forward.”

Government Efforts to Honor June 12 and Abiola’s Legacy In 2018, then-President Muhammadu Buhari made a significant gesture by moving Nigeria’s Democracy Day from May 29 to June 12 in honor of Abiola. This move was seen as an official acknowledgment of Abiola’s victory and a step toward reconciling the injustices of the past. Buhari also posthumously awarded Abiola Nigeria’s highest national honor, the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR), a title traditionally reserved for sitting presidents. This act was widely praised as a long-overdue recognition of Abiola’s contributions to Nigeria’s democratic struggle. The Road Ahead: Strengthening Nigeria’s Democracy Peter Obi’s call for the recognition of true election winners is a reflection of broader concerns about Nigeria’s electoral process.

While Babangida’s admission is a step towards historical truth, many believe that systemic reforms are necessary to prevent similar injustices in the future. To strengthen Nigeria’s democracy and ensure electoral transparency, several key actions must be taken:

1. Electoral Reforms Nigeria’s electoral system has been criticized for inconsistencies, fraud, and a lack of transparency. Experts argue that adopting more rigorous voting and result collation methods—such as electronic voting and real-time result transmission—will minimize irregularities.

Advertisement

2. Judicial Independence in Election Disputes A major challenge in Nigeria’s democracy is the perception that judicial rulings on election disputes are often influenced by political interests. Ensuring that the judiciary remains independent and impartial is crucial for upholding the true outcomes of elections.

3. Political Will to Uphold Democratic Principles For democracy to thrive, political leaders must prioritize the integrity of the electoral process over personal and party interests. The ability of incumbents to concede defeat when necessary, as seen in Ghana and other democratic nations, should become a norm in Nigeria.

4. Civic Education and Voter Awareness An informed electorate is essential for a functional democracy. Educating Nigerians about their voting rights, the electoral process, and the importance of active civic participation can help reduce voter apathy and increase public demand for free and fair elections.

5. Recognition and Compensation for Past Electoral Injustices .

Advertisement

Many political and human rights groups continue to push for official recognition of past electoral injustices. While the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day was a step in the right direction, some believe that the Nigerian government should go further by issuing a formal apology and providing reparations to the families of those who lost their lives in the struggle for democracy.

News

Bill To Make Appeal Court Final Arbiter In Governorship Election Disputes Passes 2nd Reading

Published

on

By Gloria Ikibah

A bill to amend the 1999 Constitution to make the Court of Appeal the final court in disputes involving governorship, and National and State Houses of Assembly elections in Nigeria has passed second in the House of Representatives on Tuesday at plenary.

The bill sponsored by Rep. Nnamdi Ezechi, member representing Ndokwa East/Ndokwa West/Ukwani Federal Constituency of Delta State, seeks to delete some sections of the Constitution.

Debating the general principles of the bill, Rep. Ezechi said the proposed legislation seeks to alter the provision of sub-section (3) of Section 246 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

Advertisement

The bill seeks to delete the existing subsection (3) and substitute a new subsection (3) to read “The decisions of the Court of Appeal in respect of appeals arising from the Governorship, National and State Houses of Assembly election Petitions shall be final.”

“Mr Speaker, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Second Alteration) Act of 2010 altered section 246 subsection (1) by providing in paragraphs (b) and (c) that appeals to the Court of Appeal shall be as of right from the decisions of the National and State Houses of Assembly and decisions of the Governorship Election Tribunals as to whether a person has been validly elected as a lawmaker or a governor or whether his tenure has ceased or his seat has become vacant.

“The Second alteration specifically provided in section 246 subsection (3) that the decisions of the Court of Appeal arising from the National and State Houses of Assembly election petition shall be final.

“However, the amendment did not say anything about the Governorship Election Petition thereby allowing all governorship election petitions to proceed to the apex Court (Supreme Court).

Advertisement

“This bill is trying to amend the present provision of Section 246 subsection (3) by making the Court of Appeal the final appeal Court for all election petitions”, he said.

According to the lawmakers, “This would enable the final winner of a governorship election to be known without delay.  If the person declared as winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission wins in the Court of Appeal, it would allow him to settle down and face the business of governance without distraction.”

He also noted that terminating election disputes at the appellate court would save cost, saying, “If such petitions end in the Court of Appeal, it would reduce the financial resources being wasted by the parties in prosecuting such cases to the Supreme Court.”

He continued, “We should note that the original provision of Section 246 (1)(b) stated that an appeal shall lie as of right from the decisions of the National Assembly Election Tribunals and Governorship and Legislative Houses Tribunals on the issues mentioned above.

Advertisement

“Subsection (3) of the said section clearly stated that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in respect of appeals arising from election petitions shall be final.”

Following its adoption, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Constitution Review, chaired by the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu for further legislative actions.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING! INEC tells Kogi Central constituents your petition on Natasha unsatisfactory

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The Independent Electoral Commission, INEC has queried the process adopted in the petition filed by Kogi Central constituents against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Naijablitznews reports this was contained in a statement issued and signed by Sam Olumekun
National Commissioner & Chairman
Information and Voter Education Committee
Tuesday 25th March 2025.

In the statement it was stressed that: “Among other issues, the meeting discussed the petition for the recall of the Senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District.

Advertisement

“The process of recall is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution, the Electoral Act 2022 as well as the Commission’s detailed Regulations and Guidelines for Recall 2024, available on our website. All petitions will be treated in strict compliance with the legal framework.

“The petition from Kogi Central Senatorial District was accompanied by six bags of documents said to be signatures collected from over half of the 474,554 registered voters spread across 902 Polling Units in 57 Registration Areas (Wards) in the five Local Government Areas of Adavi, Ajaokuta, Ogori/Magongo, Okehi and Okene.

“The Commission’s immediate observation is that the representatives of the petitioners did not provide their contact address, telephone number(s) and e-mail address(es) in the covering letter forwarding the petition through which they can be contacted as provided in Clause 1(f) of our Regulations and Guidelines. The address given is “Okene, Kogi State”, which is not a definite location for contacting the petitioners. Only the telephone number of “the lead petitioner” is provided as against the numbers of all the other representatives of the petitioners.

“The Commission wishes to reiterate that the recall of a legislator is the prerogative of registered voters in a constituency who sign a petition indicating loss of confidence in the legislator representing them. Once the petition meets the requirements of submission, as contained in our regulations, the Commission shall commence the verification of the signatures in each Polling Unit in an open process restricted to registered voters that signed the petition only.

Advertisement

“The petitioners and the member whose recall is sought shall be at liberty to nominate agents to observe the verification, while interested observers and the media will also be accredited. At each Polling Unit, signatories to the petition shall be verified using the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).

“Consequently, if the petitioners fully comply with the requirements of Clause 1(f) of the Regulations and Guidelines regarding the submission of their petition, the Commission will announce the next steps in line with the extant laws, regulations and guidelines. In the absence of a definite contact address, the Commission is making efforts to use other means to notify the representatives of the petitioners of the situation.

“The Commission reassures the public that it will be guided by the legal framework for recall. The public should therefore discountenance any speculations and insinuations in the social media.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

NSITF, NDE partner to curb unemployment

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Determined to curb unemployment in the country, the Nigeria Social Insurance Trust (NSITF) is to partner the National Directorate of Employment (NDE), by providing social safety nets that would enhance job creation in Nigeria.

Giving this assurance in his goodwill message at the resettlement of beneficiaries under the Renewed Hope Employment Initiative organized by the NDE in Abuja, the Managing Director of NSITF, Barrister Oluwaseun Faleye, said skills of this nature at this level is what we need to stimulate the economy in the country.

Buttressing the importance of such initiative, the NSITF MD, noted that “Efforts like this create a huge boost to the Informal sector of the economy and should be strengthened to meet the aspirations of many underprivileged Nigerians and the beneficiaries.

Advertisement

“Continuous initiative like this will further help decrease the unemployment net in the country.

” At NSITF, we would continue to be partners with NDE with emphasis on economic growth, job creation,and poverty alleviation, which is in alignment with the Renewed Hope Agenda of this government.

” We would continue to provide the support and social safety nets to help curb unemployment in the country with our several efforts in this direction,” Faleye added

The Renewed Hope Employment Initiative, which is to enhance job creation had 250 beneficiaries who were presented with starter pack, was designed to enhance the impact of the NDE’s core programme by aligning them more closely with market demands and national priorities.

Advertisement

The strategic plan outlines specific goals, such as increasing the employability of trainees, supporting the establishment of small-scale enterprises, promoting agricultural productivity, improving rural infrastructure and providing transient jobs.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News