Site icon Naija Blitz News

Shehu Sani Confronts El Rufai Over Claims Made Against Kaduna Governor Concerning LG Funds

Senator Shehu Sani who represented Kaduna Central in the 8th Assembly has challenged the former Governor of Kaduna State, Malam Nasiru El-Rufai to publicly show evidence that Governor Uba Sani diverted local government councils’ funds.

Sani, a Civil Rights Activist, in an interview over the weekend reacted to claims of fund diversion against El Rufai’s successor.

He followed up on his position on Monday in Abuja, by further insisting that such a thing never happened.

According to him, El-Rufai’s allegation is “falsely crafted to smear the name of of the Governor because of the N420 billion investigation hanging on him like the sword of damogue.”

Advertisement

He challenged the former Governor to release proofs of purchases of properties in South Africa, Seychelles and London by Uba Sani publicly, if the allegation was to be taken seriously.

He said, Kaduna people would not forget in a hurry how Nasir El-Rufai plundered the State in eight years as Governor of the State, stressing that he should stop pushing falsehood into the public space.

He said: “As Kaduna indigenes, we are all living witnesses to how El-Rufai plundered the State and now investigation has indicted him and he should face it rather than pushing falsehood into the public domain.

“El-Rufai should be bold enough to show proofs linking governor Uba Sani in the purchase of properties in South Africa, Seychelles and London, then we will take him serious.

Advertisement

“But he should be ready answer for the whereabouts of N420 billion because that money is substantial enough to develop Kaduna State to an extent”, Shehu Sani maintained.

Sani’s reaction followed Nasir El-Rufai’s allegation that Governor Uba Sani has diverted Local Government funds which he used to purchase properties in South Africa, Seychelles and London.Benue Judicial Crisis: Protest Rocks Abuja As Coalition Demands Tinubu, Kekere-Ekun’s interventions

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the Honourable Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekum, have been called to save the nation’s judiciary.

In his speech, Monday, at the #Save the Nigerian Judiciary Rally in Abuja, the Chief Convener, Coalition of Civil Society Organisations in Nigeria, Comrade Igwe Ude-Umanta, noted that the court in Nigeria has become more politicised than registered political parties.

Advertisement

Ude-Umanta explained that they are here to submit a petition against Justice Maurice Ikpambese and Justice M. M Adamu who by their actions have converted the title of justice to injustice.

He said: “We demand urgent intervention of Hon. Justice Kekere-ekun, we demand the intervention of Mr. President, we demand that NJC call its members involved in the ongoing crisis to order in the interest of peace and justice in Benue State.

The strength of every democracy is the judiciary. The court of law is supposed to be the arbiter of justice where the constitution is interpreted without bias, but today, the reverse is the case. The court in Nigeria has become more politicised than registered political parties.

“How on earth could a Chief Judge of a state fragrantly abuse his office by flaunting the state laws and the National Judicial Council (NJC) is quiet? Justice Maurice Ikpambese, the Chief Judge of Benue State unilaterally granted a waver to petitioners of Local Government Election Tribunal not to pay security deposit, a constitutional prerequisite for any valid petition and he is not been sanctioned.

Advertisement

“On the strength of the refusal of the NJC to punish him, he again violated the Electoral Laws of Benue State when he relocated the Local Government Elections Petition Tribunal to Abuja which is clearly off territorial jurisdiction in clear violation of the Benue State Electoral Law, yet the NJC is just watching.

“In an attempt to protect the constitution of Nigeria and the laws of Benue State, the Attorney General of Benue State approached the Federal High Court sitting in Makurdi which granted an order restraining the Tribunal from sitting anywhere outside Benue State including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) house Abuja. This order was granted on the 7th of March 2025 to the admiration of Nigerians.

“Surprisingly, on Friday 14th March 2025, an FCT High Court 34 presided by Justice M.M Adamu frivolously issued another other compelling the Benue State Local Government Election Tribunal Tribunal to conduct sitting in Abuja and particularly at the NBA house.

“The question is, can the Benue State laws be apply in the FCT or any other state other than Benue State? If the answer is NO, it is also clear that the Benue State Local Government Election Tribunal can not sit outside Benue State.”

Advertisement

Ude-Umanta further said: “We are here today to submit a petition against Justice Maurice Ikpambese and Justice M. M Adamu who by their actions have converted the title of justice to injustice.

“The burden behooves on the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Honourable Justice Kudirat Kekereke-Ekum to expunge corrupt judges off the Nigerian judiciary in order to restore the integrity of the judiciary.

“Honourable CJN Ma, under your watch, the Supreme Court descended into live issues in Rivers State and decided a case that is not before it when it held that, Matthew Ameaweh is the Speaker of the House of Assembly while the case is still pending in the High Court and Appeal Court respectively.

“The judgment of the Supreme Court has been criticized by the 11- Man Independent Judicial Accountability panel headed by a retired Justice Mojeed Omoade.

Advertisement

“As part of its recommendations, the panel held that ‘politicians should generally avoid undue influence on the judiciary and be more accommodating of each other in the interest of their people.’

“It also urged the government at all levels to obey court orders and respect the fundamental rights of citizens in a democracy, decrying that over nine months after the ECOWAS Court awarded damages to victims of the October 2020 End SARS protest, the Federal Government had yet to comply with the judgment.”

Exit mobile version