Opinion
Rivers State and the Constitutional Burden of Legislative Power
By Abdul Mahmud
The Rivers State House of Assembly last week served impeachment notices on Governor Siminalayi Fubara and Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu respectively. The notices and the proceedings that will ultimately ensue draw their forces from the Constitution.
Although the impeachment notices emerged from a political environment marked by prolonged institutional conflict and conduct the legislature considers inconsistent with constitutional duty, their issuance squarely falls within the lawful powers of the House of Assembly. The Constitution does not condition legislative authority on political harmony or executive approval. On the contrary, it anticipates conflict and equips the legislature with instruments to manage it within legal bounds. Impeachment serves as one such instrument, designed to restrain executive power where dialogue has failed and constitutional norms appear threatened. The presence of political tension does not taint the process. It underscores its necessity. When institutional disagreements harden into sustained obstruction or disregard for constitutional obligations, the legislature bears a duty to act.
In exercising that duty through impeachment proceedings, the House affirms its role as the guardian of constitutional order, ensuring that political disputes remain subject to law rather than resolved through force, fiat, or governance paralysis.
In a constitutional democracy, impeachment stands as a grave instrument. Its gravity does not diminish its legitimacy. The power belongs to the legislature, and its exercise calls for sober analysis rather than alarm. Rivers State has endured months of political turbulence marked by a breakdown of trust between the executive and the legislature. That breakdown did not occur in a vacuum. It followed disputes over the control of legislative business, the status of members, access to public funds, and compliance with judicial pronouncements.
The Assembly insists that the executive has acted in ways that weaken legislative authority and frustrate constitutional governance. In that charged environment, the impeachment notice signals an attempt by the legislature to reassert its constitutional place.
The 1999 Nigerian Constitution establishes a system of separation of powers anchored on mutual restraints. The legislature occupies a central position within that design. At the state level, the House of Assembly wields the authority to make laws, approve budgets, oversee public expenditure, and hold the executive to account. These powers do not depend on executive goodwill or fiat. They derive directly from the Constitution. Where the Assembly believes that the Governor or Deputy Governor has committed gross misconduct, the Constitution confers on the Assembly the power to commence impeachment proceedings. Impeachment, properly understood, functions as a constitutional safeguard. It protects the polity from executive excess and preserves the supremacy of the Constitution.
The threshold for impeachment remains high, and the process carries procedural safeguards. Notice must be served. Allegations must be stated. Investigations must follow. A panel of inquiry must be constituted. The Assembly must reach the constitutionally required majority. Each stage underscores legislative primacy in enforcing constitutional discipline within the executive arm.
The political context in Rivers State has sharpened the stakes. The House of Assembly claims that the executive has sought to govern without legislative cooperation. Allegations include attempts to bypass the Assembly in budgetary matters and to impede legislative sittings. The Constitution vests the power of appropriation in the legislature. No public funds may be withdrawn from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of a state without legislative authorisation. Where a Governor presents a budget to a faction or declines to present one to a duly constituted Assembly, the allegation points to a serious breach of constitutional process. Another area of concern centers on compliance with court orders.
The rule of law binds all authorities and persons. The Assembly alleges that the executive has disregarded judicial decisions relating to the functioning of the legislature and the recognition of its leadership. Disobedience to court orders strikes at the heart of constitutional governance. The Constitution envisions courts as arbiters of constitutional disputes. Executive defiance undermines legal certainty and weakens democratic institutions.
Opinion
NO GROUP OF IMPOSTERS HAVE THE MONOPOLY OF INTERPRETING THE LAW OR ISSUING THREATS IN THE PDP
The so-called press statement credited to one Comrade Ini Ememobong reads less like a responsible communication from a National Publicity Secretary and more like a panicked monologue of an imposter that has run out of political, moral, and legal capital.
Let us state clearly and without equivocation: no individual, imposters, or self-appointed structure within the Peoples Democratic Party has the authority to determine which court processes deserve obedience and which should be treated with contempt. That power resides solely with the courts and the relevant statutory authorities, not with press releases, not with threats, and certainly not with emotional blackmail.
The attempt to cloak partisan desperation under the robe of legal sanctity is both disingenuous and intellectually dishonest.
While some imposters continue to cherry-pick litigation that suits their narrow interest, the fact remains that multiple suits, conflicting orders, and subsisting appeals exist around the status, leadership, and administrative control of the PDP. You cannot elevate one case as sacred scripture while pretending others do not exist. Law is not a buffet where you pick what favors you and discard the rest.
More importantly, the PDP is not a private club. It is a national political institution with millions of members, constitutional organs, and an impending National Convention less than sixty (60) days away. Party activities cannot be suspended indefinitely because an impostor wishes to convert litigation into a substitute for legitimacy.
If the relevant statutory authorities and security agencies, acting within the bounds of the law, deem it fit to allow access to the National Secretariat for legitimate party activities in preparation for the National Convention, that decision stands. It is not subject to the veto power of any imposter or self-styled factional group.
*Enough of the melodrama.*
*Enough of the alarmist graphics.*
*Enough of the hollow grammar.*
You will not manufacture relevance through press theatrics. You will not secure validation through intimidation. And you will not rewrite political reality with strongly worded statements.
All objective indices (legal, political, and procedural) are firmly against your position and the collapsing coalition you represent. The party has moved on. The process has moved on. The membership has moved on.
Rather than issuing daily threats and recycling tired narratives, you should prepare to subject your claims to the only place they legitimately belong: the courts of law and the court of party opinion.
The PDP will not be held hostage by imposters that have exhausted their goodwill, squandered their credibility, and mistaken noise for authority.
The party must breathe.
The party must organize.
The party must convene.
No amount of press intimidation can stop that.
Signed,
*Concerned Stakeholders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)*
06022026
Opinion
CAN AYO OMIDIRAN PROVIDE SILVER LINING AT FEDERAL CHARACTER COMMISSION?
BY BOLAJI AFOLABI
Given the multi-lingual, multi-tribal, and multi-ethnic diversities of Nigeria, the continuous clamour for consideration in the distribution of resources is expected. Often times, it has led to accusations and counter accusations, across board, as people angle for one benefit or the other for their respective groups and cleavages.
It is argued that structural imbalances have birth unending complaints about marginalization, inequality, and disparities. Sadly, it has produced social tension, deepening of tribal and ethnic gulf, as well as political agitations. For some people, these biases, disparities, and imbalances are prevalent in opportunities and possibilities; appointments and employments; allocation and distribution of resources.
Conscious of the implications of imbalances to national development, the Federal Character Commission, (FCC) was established as an agency of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by Act No. 34 of 1996. It was enshrined in Sections 14 and 153 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), to give legal instruments to its operations. The primary mandate is to ensure equity and fairness in the allocation of positions, and distribution of socio-economic infrastructure among all federating units. This is anchored on the promotion of national integration and unity through fair representation; formulating guidelines for appointments into the public and civil service, MDAs, and security agencies; ensuring compliance and monitoring; ensuring equitable representation of all regions and states in public service; sanctioning identified MDAs for wilful violations of the federal character principle. In the early years, its impact was not felt as many people described the FCC as “another agency” created by the military rulership for “unclear reasons.”
However, this perception changed with the enthronement of democracy in 1999. The FCC began to play its role as the “stabilizing and balancing agency” of government.
There were talks that during the Obasanjo presidency, deliberate and intentional actions were taken to ensure that a state from the South South geo-political zone got one Permanent Secretary position; when the FCC discovered that it had no representation in federal ministries.
Successive governments have also done their beats in ensuring that the FCC promotes national unity and address cases of regional imbalances. Aware that the federal character principle is crucial to every activity of government, the Legislature has shown commitment towards ensuring that the FCC meets its responsibilities. To underscore this, the House of Representatives, and Senate have Committee on Federal Character; and Committee on Federal Character & Governmental Affairs, respectively to oversight the agency.
Though Nigeria’s federal character principle has been described as one of the best globally, in terms of policies and intended objectives, the operations and implementation has not been too successful. Indeed, it recorded marginal positives in the past few years. The FCC was bogged with allegations of corruption and manipulation; complaints of lack of transparency; alleged inequitable distribution of opportunities and resources; perceived inertia and ambiguities; and alleged over-ambitious tendencies.
The serial controversies also bordered on alleged favouritism, mismanagement, and abuse of office led to disputes, protests, and polarization, which grossly affected the agency’s output. In fact, some people wondered why it was difficult for the FCC to wriggle out of the challenges that made the effective implementation of policies difficult. They argued that, something must give for the FCC to be re-positioned for improvement, and efficient service delivery.
Identifying the FCC as a critical component of the realization of the Renewed Hope Agenda, may have informed the nomination of Hon. Ayo Hulayat Omidiran by President Bola Tinubu as the Executive Chairman of the FCC, and subsequent confirmation by the Senate on 27 November 2025. That President Tinubu made sweeping changes at the agency, by appointing over 30 others (to serve as National Commissioners/Members of the Board) succinctly shows his commitment towards addressing imbalances in the MDAs. There have been divergent opinions about the necessity, timely intervention, and the choices made by Tinubu. Many who applauded the move, described it as a frank action reflecting the government’s vision for all-inclusivity. Some other people believe that it signposts government’s resolve to ensure equity, fairness, and fairness across all MDAs. However, a few others, though not doubting the capacity of the new Chairman, wondered if she can literally make omelette out of eggs.
A few days back, the writer had a brief discussion with a very senior retired civil servant on the changes at the FCC, challenges, and other relevant issues. The hugely experienced technocrat who occupied top positions across strategic ministries during his over three decades career provided useful insights about the peculiarities of the agency as the clearing house for all human resources matters in the federal bureaucracy. While opting for anonymity, he revealed that, “to succeed at the FCC, the chief executive must be resolute, resilient, and committed. Also, advocacy, networking skills, and leadership are very necessary. Happily, from what I have read and heard about her, I think she has these qualities.
Interestingly, during my tour of duties in the civil service, I had the opportunity of observing her on a few occasions, during interactions with four different committees at the House of Representatives. She came across as a meticulously focussed politician whose knack for details, fairness, and equity was unequivocal.”
Going by Omidiran’s antecedents, her appointment may not be wrong. Her life and career odysseys reveal that she’s in a familiar terrain. As a student leader at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria; sports administrator; lawmaker; politician; and philanthropist, her life revolves around advocacy for equality, fairness, and justice.
In Zaria, where she read Biochemistry, as an Executive Member of the popular Amina Hall, she fought for better, improved, and quality facilities for the all-female hall. Her advocacy for fair representation, equity, and improved welfare for footballers which she started as the Founder of the hugely successful Omidiran Babes remains sources of inspiration to stakeholders in the sector. Leveraging on her pursuits for common good, many globally recognized associations have appointed her into different positions at various times. It includes Member, FIFA Women’s Football Committee – since 2006; Chairperson, NFF Women’s Football Committee; Board Member, Nigerian Football Association, and a few others.
From empirical data, Omidiran, who represented Ayedaade/Irewole/Isokan Federal Constituency at the House of Representatives, from 2011 to 2019, distinguished herself creditably.
During her time at the House, where she was the Deputy Chairman, Committee on Sports, and Member of Committees on Communications, Interior, Justice, Solid Minerals, Women Affairs, Women In Parliament, and a few others, the Osun-born amazon was rated as one of the top-fliers. She was reputed to be very strong in advocacy, insightful in contributions, engaging in oversight. Her passion for excellence was as deep as her commitment to every cause that was geared towards the general well-being of Nigerians; anchored on transparency, integrity, fairness, and equality – pillars on which the FCC was created. A staff member of the National Assembly bureaucracy, who pleaded anonymity declared, “Madam was very dutiful, vocal, and upright at meetings. She was a detribalized lawmaker who emphasized fairness to all.”
General perceptions about the FCC are not encouraging, just as the mood of the staff members. There are reports that workers’ morale are low; unresolved welfare matters; and some other operational issues which may be traceable to alleged divisions witnessed in the last few years.
Aside from these, there are worries about the possibility of Omidiran meeting the expectations of Nigerians. More importantly, how she justifies the confidence reposed in her by President Tinubu, and the All Progressives Congress, (APC) remains a big puzzle. A very senior political journalist who has covered the National Assembly for about two decades affirmed that, “having observed her at close quarters in the House, I can boldly state that she will achieve milestones at the agency.”
Continuing, the veteran journalist who craved anonymity said, “she’s a go-getter, bridge-builder, and resourceful politician who is ever resolute in realizing objectives.”
Indeed, going by Omidiran’s comments at the first interface with the FCC, she seems to know the task ahead; and prepared for it. Her declaration that the agency was not established solely, to regulate public service appointments but to uphold justice, promote inclusion, and foster unity, took many staff members unawares. It confirmed her readiness and preparedness for the job. That Omidiran repeatedly emphasized on fairness, equity, and justice as being “essential to building trust in public institutions and strenghthening of the Nigerian state” shows her desire to re-position, and re-invigorate the agency for quality performances and realistic service delivery. Her five-year strategic plan to guide the agency’s operations, which is anchored on institutional reforms, capacity building and professionalization, digital transformation, public engagement and citizens enlightenment, collaboration with MDAs and other stakeholders reveals her depth of knowledge, commitment to positive change, and desire for breaking grounds. Her pledge that the agency, “would discharge its responsibilities with humility, professionalism, and an unwavering commitment to(wards) ensuring (that) equity is not only articulated in policy statements but consistently practiced in governance outcomes” is what a staff member described as, “the most assuring and inspiring statement by any Chairman of the agency.”
As Omidiran; the new sheriff at the FCC settles in her new office, many stakeholders, confident about her performances, have equally admonish her to be wary of interlopers, and scavengers. They believe that if she sustains the “fire and energy” seen since her assumption of office, Omidiran may emerge as the most successful FCC boss since 1999. One hopes, she will provide the silver lining that will make the FCC one of the most resourceful and responsive agency in the President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
* BOLAJI AFOLABI, a Development Communications specialist was with the Office of Public Affairs, The Presidency, Abuja.
Opinion
NCC, Ookla alliance and QoS performance reports
by
Sonny Aragba-Akpore
In a bid to convince Nigerians that its data on network performances especially on Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) are in order, telecom regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) recently took a bold step to initiate a partnership with Okla, of Seattle, United States of America to carry out an independent analysis of the state of the networks.
And when he reeled out the fourth Quarter performance reports for 2025, last week, an elated Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive of NCC, Dr Aminu Maida, said the commission’s quest for transparency has been fully activated by this independent exercise.
Maida spoke in Abuja to stakeholders, saying the report by Ookla, a globally acclaimed organisation for such studies, has made both operators and regulators be on the same page. Specifically, the study will serve as a guide to assess the position of the various networks, especially the gaps and coverage of rural and urban centres. This will also boost informed regulatory decisions and management of various networks by the operators. Ookla is a global independent leader in connectivity intelligence that brings together the trusted expertise of Speedtest, Down Detector, Ekahau, and RootMetrics to deliver unmatched network and connectivity insights. By combining multi-source data with industry-leading expertise, Ookla transforms network performance metrics into strategic, actionable insights. Incessant complaints and comments on Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE), have been a nightmare to the regulator, but last week, Maida said, although there were visible gaps between urban and rural communities, the over $1b investment by Mobile Network Operators (MNOS) to build 2,850 new sites by 2025 indicates an upward trend in connectivity. The 2,850 new sites have raised the total number of sites in the country to 42,850 as of December 2025. The industry investment in 2025 resulted in the deployment of the new sites to expand both coverage and capacity nationwide. Much of the progress reflected in industry reports accounts for the direct outcome of these investments. The NCC boss submitted that the Commission had secured commitments from operators to exceed their 2025 investment levels in 2026, with infrastructure investments continuing in earnest. As he put it, “today’s engagement reflects our commitment to transparent, data-driven regulation and the continuous improvement of Nigeria’s digital ecosystem. Through our collaboration with Ookla, we are providing independent insights into real-world network performance and the lived experience of Nigerians across cities, rural communities, highways, and emerging 5G zones. It is in this context that we have released the Q4 2025 Network Performance Reports. “These reports enable the Commission to track progress, identify gaps, and guide targeted regulatory interventions—ranging from spectrum optimisation and infrastructure upgrades to quality-of-service enforcement and the expansion of rural connectivity. “The data shows clear and steady improvements in network quality, particularly in median download speeds across both urban and rural areas, especially when compared to Q3 performance. Notably, the video Quality of Experience gap between urban and rural areas has narrowed, and the strength of our 4G backbone continues to improve. “Maida admits the challenges that have plagued the sector, but assured that with collaborative efforts of the commission and network providers, things will surely get better. “The industry is not without challenges, as reflected in gaps in 5G services and inequalities in upload speeds highlighted in the reports. However, we are actively engaging with operators to address these issues, including gaps in mobile service coverage “Maida submitted adding that the independent data provided by Ookla through which various industry reports emerged “enable us to track progress, identify gaps, and guide targeted regulatory interventions—ranging from spectrum optimisation and infrastructure upgrades to quality-of-service enforcement and the expansion of rural connectivity.” Published quarterly, these reports provide unbiased insights into network performance, coverage, and service quality across operators, states, and regions in Nigeria.
By combining Ookla’s advanced analytics with the Commission’s regulatory oversight, this collaboration enhances transparency, empowers consumers to make informed choices, and fosters improved service delivery and enhanced network performance nationwide.On Urban vs Rural Network Performance, the report was arrived at through the use of advanced geospatial analysis to provide a clearer view of the performance gap between Nigeria’s urban and rural communities, while also highlighting encouraging improvements in rural broadband speeds and the emergence of digital corridors along major highways.By identifying underserved signal zones linked to slower speeds and higher delays, it provides a clearer picture of quality gaps affecting everyday connectivity.” “The NCC is using these insights to guide targeted infrastructure upgrades, strengthen quality standards and drive data-led regulatory interventions focused on improving real Quality of Experience across the country. “The 5G Reality Check and Closing the Gap between Coverage and Usage tells a different story as the NCC report explores how Nigeria’s growing 5G footprint is translating into real user experience, introducing the “5G Gap” between nominal coverage and actual service quality on the ground. “
In terms of Network Performance and 5G Reality, the report offers an independent view of Nigeria’s overall mobile network performance, alongside the real-world experience of 5G users, revealing a clear gap between where 5G has been deployed and how effectively it is experienced in practice. Consumer Insights and Industry Trends indicate that the report provides a nationwide, data-driven snapshot of how Nigerians experience mobile connectivity, drawing on millions of real user measurements to highlight performance trends, regional variations and evolving consumer usage patterns. It showcases areas of progress alongside locations where service quality can be strengthened, helping to guide targeted improvements. Explaining why the NCC opted for a partnership with Ookla, Executive Commissioner, Technical Standards and Network Integrity, Abraham Osh Adami said, “Last year, the Commission deepened this commitment by partnering with Ookla to develop nationwide Network Coverage Maps. NCC’s Head, Public Affairs, Mrs Nnenna Ukoha, told stakeholders, particularly the media, that “In reporting industry data to Nigerians and the world, we encourage what we call constructive framing, which does not mean ignoring sectoral challenges, far from it. Rather, it means presenting issues in a way that highlights progress alongside challenges, showing the solutions being deployed, reflecting the investments and innovations shaping the sector, recognising improvements in quality of service and experience, and supporting industry resilience.” Our quarterly performance reports provide rich material for daily news coverage, feature stories, data-driven investigative reporting, background analysis for interviews, and sector monitoring dashboards used by your newsrooms.”
-
News12 hours agoAkpodiete Congratulates Elder Johnbull Kenairu on His inauguration as Delta PDP Caretaker Committee Member
-
News13 hours agoEdo: Police Confirms Damage, Thuggery at ADC Secretariat
-
Entertainment13 hours agoTiwa Savage Reveals She’s Still In Love With Wizkid
-
News23 hours agoJust in: Tinubu drops Uzodinma as chairman APC Convention Committee
-
News13 hours agoKaiama massacre, evidence of total collapse of security under Tinubu — ADC
-
Metro13 hours agoRivers: Gunmen kill 2, behead youth president
-
News13 hours agoTinubu, State Governors Attend Matawalle’s Children Wedding In Abuja
-
News7 hours agoResign now, you’re complicit in Yahaya Bello’s corruption cases, MEKSTA tells Ododo
