ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The rebuttal by the Iranian foreign ministry follows Trump saying he had held off launching new strikes on the Islamic republic to allow for further diplomatic efforts, a familiar pattern in the conflict.

Iran denied that any negotiations were taking place with the United States after President Donald Trump said new talks would begin Monday in an effort to end their war, now in its sixth month.

The rebuttal by the Iranian foreign ministry follows Trump saying he had held off launching new strikes on the Islamic republic to allow for further diplomatic efforts, a familiar pattern in the conflict.

Washington and Tehran have been at war since February 28, when the US and Israel launched surprise strikes against Iran, though months of on-off diplomacy have led to periods of relative calm.

Trump last week threatened to hit Iran “very hard”, with the US leader reportedly considering renewed attacks, including against energy infrastructure.
But the president pulled back from that threat Saturday, saying the “perimeters” of a deal were there.

Iran’s foreign ministry, however, denied there were currently negotiations taking place.

“We are not currently negotiating with the United States. Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz,” said foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei during a weekly press briefing.

The Hormuz shipping route is a major sticking point in efforts to end the war.

Iran has obstructed vessels attempting to pass the critical trade corridor, firing on commercial ships.
Before the war, there was free passage through the strait, but Iran now insists on retaining control and charging fees, something the US rejects.

The US-Saudi strikes killed at least 20 militants, including Iranians, according to the Hashed al-Shaabi.

Tehran has refused to let ships travel any route other than one which hugs the Iranian coast.
On Sunday, Baqaei told state television that a deal was close on managing Hormuz together with Oman, which sits on the other side of the narrow waterway.

“We are now going to reach an understanding on a route acceptable to both sides — neither the northern route nor the southern route — but one that respects the sovereign rights of both sides and safeguards our national interests and security,” he said.
But he insisted that such an agreement did not mean the reopening of the strait.

The Israeli bombardment of Lebanon has caused widespread destruction, mainly in the south, though violence has declined since the signing of a US-Iran memorandum last month and the Lebanon-Israel framework deal. Lebanon was drawn into the Middle East war on March 2 when Tehran-backed militant group Hezbollah launched attacks on Israel to avenge the killing of the Iranian leader. Israel has responded with broad strikes across Lebanon and a ground offensive.

On Sunday, a tanker off the coast of Oman reported hearing an explosion nearby, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) Centre reported, but the ship and crew were all reported safe.

Trump told reporters on Sunday that the new talks with Iran would cover Hormuz and ultimately the denuclearisation of Iran.

The US president said at the start of the conflict that the war was necessary to deal with Iran’s nuclear programme. Western nations accuse Iran of seeking a bomb, though Tehran insists the programme is entirely civilian in nature.

“Now what we’re doing is we’re talking to them in the form of a negotiation. It begins tomorrow afternoon,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, without providing details of the venue or participants.

The president said he had been asked by Iran as well as US partners Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar to hold off on further strikes, which he claimed would have been “the biggest attack since World War II”.
Iranian media denied that Tehran had asked Trump not to strike.
Trump has repeatedly claimed a settlement to end the war is near, only for fighting to resume. He has previously issued apocalyptic warnings to Tehran, only to later backtrack by saying diplomacy was underway.

A previous ceasefire deal between the foes fell through last month. It was supposed to open the Strait of Hormuz to ships carrying vital energy exports from the Gulf to feed the global economy.
Iranian lawmaker Hassan Ghashghavi, spokesman for the parliament’s national security commission, said on Sunday that mediators were trying to revive the US-Iran memorandum of understanding that was agreed in June.

That agreement was not intended as a final peace deal, but as a stepping stone to negotiations on a comprehensive agreement, though it did include provisions on Hormuz.
“They know that the main issue and, in fact, the key to the matter right now is the issue of the Strait of Hormuz, so yes, there is an exchange of views,” Ghashghavi said.
Posting on X, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said: “We must strive to compel the enemy to remain committed to what it has signed.”

AFP

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The High Court Judge kidnapped in Kebbi State one week ago, Justice Faruku Bunza, has regained his freedom and returned home safely after staying in abductors haven for one week.

This was contained in a statement issued on Monday, the Public Relations Officer of the Kebbi State Police Command, Bashir Usman, said the judge regained his freedom on Monday, adding that his release had been confirmed by both his family and the Kebbi State Ministry of Justice.

The police disclosed that although the kidnappers demanded a ransom, the Command maintained its policy against ransom payments.

Police authorities said security agencies have intensified investigations to track down those responsible for the abduction and ensure they are brought to justice.
The Command appealed to members of the public to provide useful information that could aid the ongoing investigation, assuring that all information received would be treated with strict confidentiality.

The police also expressed appreciation to residents and partner security agencies for their support and cooperation throughout the period of the judge’s captivity.

“We are in jubilation and full of gratitude to God for seeing our own return safely from captivity.

He was just released and has returned home now after spending one week with the bandits,” the relative said.

The family expressed appreciation to all those who stood by them during the ordeal.

“We sincerely thank and appreciate the Kebbi State Judiciary, the security agencies, and the entire people of Kebbi State who contributed in different ways, offered prayers, and sent messages of sympathy. Your concern and support gave us strength, and we are grateful for your solidarity,” the family member stated.

The source said details of how the judge was released will be made public later.

“Other details of how he was released will be made available later,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Senator, Shehu Sani, has suggested that the renewed feud between former President Olusegun Obasanjo and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar could continue until one of the two political heavyweights dies.

Sani made the observation on Saturday, August 1, while commenting on the latest exchange between the former political allies.

In a post on X, the former lawmaker described the long-running dispute as a decades-old political feud that began when members of the younger generation were still in primary school.

“The Obj/Atiku feud began when Gen Zs were in nursery and primary school,” Sani wrote.

He noted that the dispute had persisted despite the passage of time, with members of the generation who witnessed its beginnings now graduating from university, getting married and raising families.

“It’s continuing even when that generation has graduated from universities, married and had children,” he added.

Sani suggested that the dispute could remain unresolved until one of the former leaders passes away, after which the surviving party would likely pay tribute to the deceased.

“It’s likely going to continue until one of them is gone, and the other will pay a glowing tribute,” he said.

The former senator also likened the latest attacks from Obasanjo to “hypersonic missiles”, claiming that Atiku had faced sustained criticism from his former principal after previously launching what he described as a “devastating bomb” against him.

“Since Atiku threw a devastating bomb at Obj, he has been receiving Obj’s hypersonic missiles for two decades,” Sani said.

The latest exchange follows Obasanjo’s recent criticism of Atiku, during which the former President said choosing him as his running mate in 1999 was one of his biggest mistakes in office. ExecutiveBranch

Atiku, the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) for the 2027 election, has also repeatedly criticised Obasanjo while revisiting political disagreements from their time in government.