Connect with us

Sports

European Football Chiefs, FIFPRO Slam FIFA Over Schedule

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

European football chiefs and the global players’ union, FIFPRO, united on Monday to criticise FIFA over the global football calendar as they filed an antitrust complaint against the global football governing body.

FIFPRO and the European Leagues, which represents 37 domestic leagues, jointly filed the complaint at the European Commission in Brussels in which they argue global football’s governing body FIFA is abusing its right as both tournament organiser and regulator.

LaLiga president Javier Tebas said Monday has been “one of the most important days in football” and compared the case to that against the failed European Super League, while Premier League boss Richard Masters said in a statement that football has reached a “tipping point.”

LaLiga is not a member of the European Leagues but it is a part of Monday’s complaint.

Advertisement

FIFA declined to comment at this stage when approached by ESPN.

FIFPRO, the worldwide representative organisation for professional footballers, said it has tried to negotiate the issue with FIFA but said the governing body has “consistently refused” to consult them. It has also described FIFA’s intention to host its expanded Club World Cup competition in the United States this summer as a step too far.

However, a source told ESPN this summer’s competition is unlikely to be impacted given the short amount of time before it takes place.

“Today is one of the most important days in football,” Tebas said.

Advertisement

“For me, there’s been two historical days in football. One in 2019 when we stopped a reform of the Super League and today we’ve given a very important step in what we believe is the path of changing the governance of football institutions and we’re not going to let this opportunity get away.”

Player workload been a hot topic in football over recent seasons, with players and coaches repeatedly urging organisers to condense the schedule and allow players more rest. Last month, Manchester City midfielder Rodri said players are “close” to going on strike over the issue.

“It is getting to a tipping point,” Masters said in a statement.

“The feedback we have from players is that there is too much football being played and there is constant expansion. The Premier League hasn’t changed shape. What has changed over the last few decades is the march of international and regional football competitions.”

Advertisement

Serie A chief executive Luigi De Siervo said: “Serie A, like almost all other European Leagues, in the last 20 years hasn’t increased the number of games.

“On the contrary FIFA and UEFA, cycle after cycle, have increased constantly the size of their competitions for both clubs and national teams and we have now reached a saturation point in the calendar.”

FIFA argues that its most recent calendar, set through to 2030, was approved by its council which “included FIFPRO and league bodies.”

It said in July, when the antitrust complaint was first announced: “FIFA’s calendar is the only instrument ensuring that international football can continue to survive, co-exist, and prosper alongside domestic and continental club football.”

Advertisement

A source told ESPN that FIFA believes the Club World Cup will have a minimal impact on the football calendar or on player welfare, given it will be held once every four years, featuring a maximum of seven games.

A recent analysis published by Opta shows that, while City played the most games last season (59), the majority of teams in Europe played fewer than 50 matches, with five Premier League sides playing 42 games last season — just four more than the league season.

Another recent paper by CIES Football Observatory found there is only a minor difference in the number of games players play per season compared to previous decades.

However, FIFPRO said their research shows 72% of players are in support of reducing the calendar and ensuring a mandate rest period, as well as data that says 17% of players made over 55 appearances last season and 30% had a sequence of six “back-to-back” matches.

Advertisement

FIFPRO and the European Leagues argue that FIFA is abusing its status as a governing body and tournament organiser, saying the body favours its own competitions rather than looking out for player welfare.

“Enough is enough, we can’t take it anymore,” Mathieu Moreuil, Premier League director of international football relations and EU affairs, said.

“We have now an international match calendar which is beyond saturation… We’ve tried to engage with FIFA on that for years now without any positive response. So enough is enough.”

The antitrust complaint is not the only case against FIFA regarding the international match calendar. Domestic players unions in England, France and Italy took legal action against the governing body at the Brussels Court of Commerce in June and they are attempting to have the case tried at the European Court of Justice.

Advertisement

That case centres on employment law and players’ rights to holiday. One of their aims is to have a mandated rest period — between three to four weeks per year — for players to recuperate.

European governing body UEFA has also increased its schedule, notably with the new Champions League and Europa League formats, but has not been targeted in the complaint to regulators.

Moreuil said that was because FIFA was responsible for the international calendar and relations were different with UEFA thanks to dialogue.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Man City Fight Back, Appeal Premier League Verdict Over £830m Financial Charges

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Manchester City have formally appealed the Premier League commission’s verdict in the club’s long-running financial case involving 115 charges, insisting that the decision contains serious errors and that they are innocent of the allegations.

The Premier League champions confirmed on Friday that they had submitted a comprehensive appeal on Thursday, October 1, 2026, challenging the findings of an independent commission.

The commission found that Manchester City had arranged what it described as “sham” contracts with several commercial partners between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons.

According to the findings, the arrangements formed part of an alleged “disguised funding scheme” designed to artificially inflate the club’s revenue by approximately £830 million.

Advertisement

In a statement released on Friday, City strongly rejected the commission’s conclusions, arguing that the verdict was fundamentally flawed and should not stand.

The club maintained that the decision contained substantial errors of law, principle and fact, raising questions about the reliability of the findings.

Manchester City also insisted that they possess extensive evidence to support their defence and challenge the accusations brought by the Premier League.

The club’s statement read:

Advertisement

“Manchester City Football Club can confirm that at 7pm on Thursday 1st October 2026 the Club lodged its comprehensive Appeal against the opinion of the Premier League Commission, in relation to the Premier League disciplinary matter.

“The Club’s firm position is that, on multiple grounds, the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact and is unsafe.

“The Club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case.

“We will continue to respect due process and are necessarily restricted in what we can say further until all proceedings are complete.”

Advertisement

The appeal marks another major development in one of English football’s most closely watched financial disputes.

Manchester City’s case centres on allegations of financial rule breaches spanning several seasons. The club has consistently denied wrongdoing and has maintained its position throughout the proceedings.

With the appeal now formally lodged, attention will turn to the next stage of the legal process and the arguments presented by both sides.

The outcome could have significant implications for Manchester City and the Premier League’s efforts to enforce its financial regulations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Man City Launch Appeal Against Premier League Verdict Over £830m Financial Scandal

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Manchester City have formally appealed an independent commission’s ruling that the club breached Premier League financial regulations, escalating a long-running dispute that could have major consequences for the English champions.

The club confirmed that it filed its appeal at 7pm on Thursday, October 1, just hours before the Premier League’s deadline on Friday.

City, who have consistently denied wrongdoing, are challenging the commission’s findings, arguing that the ruling contains “clear material errors” of law, principle and fact.

The appeal marks another major development in a financial case that has dragged on for years. In February 2023, the Premier League charged City with more than 100 alleged breaches of its financial regulations covering the period between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons.

Advertisement

At the heart of the case is the commission’s finding that City used what it described as “sham” commercial contracts to disguise funding arrangements and artificially inflate the club’s reported revenues.

The commission linked more than £830 million to the disputed funding scheme and concluded that City had breached both Premier League and UEFA financial regulations. It also found the club guilty of failing to cooperate fully with the league’s investigation.

The controversy dates back to the years following City’s 2008 takeover by Abu Dhabi-based ownership, a period during which the club transformed into one of European football’s most powerful sides.

During the years under investigation, City enjoyed remarkable success on the pitch, winning multiple Premier League titles and other major trophies while expanding their commercial operations and spending significantly on players.

Advertisement

However, the commission’s findings focus on whether the club’s financial reporting and commercial sponsorship arrangements complied with the league’s rules.

City are expected to renew their argument that additional funding associated with sponsorship agreements originated from the Abu Dhabi government rather than the club’s owners.

That position was rejected by the independent commission during the original proceedings, but the club is now seeking to overturn the findings through the appeal process.

The case will be reviewed by a separate three-member appeal panel, which will examine the grounds presented by Manchester City and determine whether the original ruling should stand.

Advertisement

Under the Premier League’s current regulations, the appeal process is expected to be completed within 12 weeks. The hearing is limited to five days, while the panel has 30 days to deliver its decision.

However, City could challenge the application of the accelerated timetable, arguing that the charges were filed in 2023 and the original hearing took place in 2024, before the introduction of the new rules.

The appeal also leaves uncertainty surrounding the punishment City could face if the commission’s findings are ultimately upheld.

Possible sanctions under Premier League rules include a points deduction, a financial penalty, a transfer restriction or other disciplinary measures.

Advertisement

With the appeal now formally lodged, the high-profile dispute remains unresolved, leaving the club’s financial record and potential disciplinary consequences subject to further proceedings.

Manchester City have vowed to continue defending their position, setting the stage for another crucial legal battle with the Premier League.

Continue Reading

Sports

AFCON 2027: Chelle Vows Super Eagles Will Bounce Back, Targets Tanzania Double

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Super Eagles head coach Eric Chelle has vowed to revive Nigeria’s 2027 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) qualifying campaign, insisting his side must secure maximum points from their double-header against Tanzania in November.

Chelle’s confidence comes despite Nigeria’s humiliating 3-0 defeat to Guinea-Bissau in Bissau, a result that dealt a major blow to the Super Eagles’ qualification hopes.

The defeat was particularly disappointing after Nigeria opened their qualifying campaign with a hard-fought 2-1 comeback victory over Madagascar in Uyo.

Reflecting on the heavy loss, Chelle admitted that Guinea-Bissau were the better team, acknowledging that their aggression, intensity and determination proved decisive.

Advertisement

“They were more aggressive than us,” the Franco-Malian coach said after the match.

Despite the setback, Chelle maintained that Nigeria’s qualification hopes remain alive, shifting his attention to the crucial back-to-back encounters against Tanzania in November.

“We have two games against Tanzania in November, we have to win both games,” he stated.

The Super Eagles coach also pointed to Nigeria’s upcoming home fixture against Guinea-Bissau as another opportunity to recover lost ground and settle scores after the disappointing defeat in Bissau.

Advertisement

With four matches remaining in the qualifying campaign, Nigeria still have opportunities to turn their fortunes around. The remaining fixtures include two meetings with Tanzania, a return clash against Guinea-Bissau and another encounter with Madagascar.

Chelle did not hide his disappointment with the team’s performance in Bissau, describing it as the worst display he had witnessed from his players.

However, he expressed continued faith in the squad, urging the players to take lessons from the defeat and remain focused on securing qualification for the 2027 AFCON.

For the Super Eagles, the November double-header against Tanzania could prove crucial in determining the direction of their qualifying campaign.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News