Connect with us

News

“You have no right to suspend CJ, NJC tells Benue govt, insisting Ikpambese remains

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The National Judicial Council, NJC, on Wednesday, voided the removal of Justice Maurice Ikpambese as the Chief Judge of Benue State.

The Council, in a statement it made available to newsmen, stressed that the Benue State House of Assembly was bereft of the statutory powers to recommend the removal of the CJ.

It maintained that under the 1999 Constitution, as amended, only the NJC was vested with the powers to appoint or to discipline erring judicial officers.

However, the Council disclosed that it had on Wednesday morning, received a petition that was written against the embattled CJ.

Advertisement

It said until the petition is fully investigated, Justice Ikpambese would remain in office as CJ of the state.

The statement, which was signed by the Deputy Director of Information at the NJC, read: “The attention of the National Judicial Council has been drawn to a certain media report to the effect that the Benue State House of Assembly has purportedly passed a resolution recommending the removal of the state Chief Judge, Hon. Justice Maurice Ikpambese from office.

“Unfortunate as this development is, Council wishes to reiterate that there are clear and unambiguous provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, on discipline and appointment of Judicial Officers, vested in the Council, which are not adhered to in the instant case.

“Although the Council had this morning, received a petition against Hon. Justice Maurice Ikpambese, that petition is yet to be investigated in line with Council’s Investigation Procedure and the principle of fair hearing.

Advertisement

“As far as Council is therefore concerned until the complaint is investigated and deliberated upon by it, Hon. Justice Maurice Ikpambese remains the Chief Judge of Benue State.”

Meanwhile, the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, has urged the NJC to sanction any judge of the Benue State High Court that accepts to be made the acting Chief Judge of the state.

The legal body, in a statement that was co-signed by its President and General Secretary, Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, and Dr. Mobolaji Ojibara, respectively, maintained that Sections 153 and 271 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, established the NJC as the body responsible for recommending the appointment and removal of state Chief Judges.

“The Constitution gives the NJC the exclusive power of exercising disciplinary control over judicial officers, by ensuring that any allegation of misconduct is thoroughly investigated and decided to maintain the integrity and independence of the judiciary.

Advertisement

“By purporting to have the power to consider allegations of financial impropriety and abuse of office against the Chief Judge as well as recommending his removal, the Benue State House of Assembly exhibited crass knowledge of the provisions of the Constitution in that regard and clearly evinced an intention to trample on the Constitutional guardrails against such bad behaviour.

“It is disheartening that the Benue State House of Assembly does not know or pretends not to know that the process for the removal of a Chief Judge of a state is expressly provided for under Section 292(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution.

“The absence of an investigation, hearing and recommendation from the NJC renders the purported removal of Hon. Justice Maurice Ikpembese unconstitutional, null, and void.

“It is indeed, sad that assuming that the Benue State House of Assembly has power to remove or recommend the removal of the Chief Judge, it would purport to do so without affording him an opportunity to defend himself against the weighty allegations against him.

Advertisement

“The Benue State House of Assembly has not only contravened constitutional provisions but has undermined the foundational principles of judicial independence and the rule of law. Such actions set a dangerous precedent, eroding public confidence in our legal institutions and threaten the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution.

“NBA urgently calls upon all elected officials to desist from arbitrary and unconstitutional actions that jeopardize the sanctity of our judiciary. We also call upon all law enforcement agencies, particularly the Nigeria Police Force and Department of Security Services, to ensure that the Chief Judge, Honourable Justice Maurice Ikpambwese, is not in way prevented from discharging the powers and functions of his office.

“It is imperative that the Chief Judge is protected from any form of harassment, intimidation or hindrance that may impede his ability to perform his constitutional duties.

“We strongly advise all judges of the High Court of Benue of State to resist any temptation to accept any filthy offer to act as Chief Judge of the State as no vacancy exists in that office. The Branches of NBA in Benue State and all lawyers are hereby directed to boycott the court of any judge of the Benue State High Court who accepts to act as the Chief Judge of the State.

Advertisement

“NBA stands firm in its commitment to defend the integrity and independence of the Nigerian judiciary. We will not relent in our efforts to ensure that the rule of law prevails and that all actions by governmental bodies are conducted within the ambit of the Constitution.

“The arbitrary removal of judicial officers without adherence to due process is unacceptable and will be met with unwavering opposition from the legal community.

“Therefore, we call on the Benue State House of Assembly to immediately rescind its unconstitutional decision and follow the proper channels through the NJC for any grievances or allegations against judicial officers. The show of shame must stop,” NBA added.

Advertisement

News

Just in: APC Demands Atiku Quit 2027 Race Over $500,000 Mambilla Payment

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential Campaign Council has called on African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar to withdraw from the 2027 presidential race over a controversial $500,000 payment made to his former wife, Jennifer Douglas, during negotiations surrounding the Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project.

The demand followed revelations from a final award issued by a three-member International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration tribunal in Paris in the long-running dispute between Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited and the Federal Government.

The tribunal ruled in favour of Nigeria, rejecting Sunrise Power’s claims and ordering the company and its promoter, Leno Adesanya, to reimburse Nigeria for 75 per cent of its legal costs.

At the centre of the controversy is a $500,000 transfer made by Adesanya on January 30, 2003, through China Castle Investments Limited, an offshore company he controlled, into Douglas’s Citibank account in the United States.

Advertisement

The payment came less than four months before Sunrise was purportedly awarded a 3,960-megawatt Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract for the Mambilla project in Taraba State.

Tribunal Questions $500,000 Payment

During the arbitration, Adesanya told the tribunal that the $500,000 was part of a foreign-exchange transaction carried out on behalf of Atiku.

However, the tribunal did not accept the explanation, noting the absence of documentary evidence showing the underlying naira payment, exchange rate, instructions from Atiku or his aides, correspondence relating to the transaction or records establishing its commercial purpose.

Advertisement

The tribunal also noted that neither Atiku nor Douglas testified or submitted witness statements to corroborate Adesanya’s account.

It further questioned the explanation because the payment was made during the period when Sunrise was pursuing the Mambilla project and months before the company was purportedly awarded the contract.

The tribunal’s findings, however, concerned the evidence and claims before it in the arbitration; they did not establish in the award that Atiku personally received a bribe.

Mambilla Contract Controversy

Advertisement

The Mambilla project, initially conceived in 1982 as a 3,050MW hydropower scheme, later became the subject of negotiations involving Sunrise and its Chinese partner.

Sunrise expressed interest in developing the project from 2001 and subsequently submitted proposals to the Federal Government.

A technical committee eventually recommended Sunrise for the 3,960MW project in March 2003.

Former Minister of Power Olu Agunloye later issued a letter which Sunrise relied upon as evidence that it had been awarded the project.

Advertisement

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo, however, maintained that the Federal Executive Council never approved the contract and that he directed the withdrawal of the relevant memorandum.

The disputed letter subsequently became central to Sunrise’s multibillion-dollar arbitration claims against Nigeria.

APC Accuses Atiku of Conflict of Interest

Reacting to the tribunal’s findings, APC Presidential Campaign Council spokesman Dele Alake accused Atiku and Agunloye of working together to facilitate the disputed Sunrise contract.

Advertisement

Alake described the $500,000 payment as an alleged bribe connected to the Mambilla deal and argued that its timing raised questions about a possible conflict of interest involving Atiku, who was vice-president at the time.

The APC spokesman also criticised Atiku for not appearing as a witness before the tribunal, saying his testimony could have helped clarify the circumstances surrounding the payment.

The campaign council subsequently demanded that Atiku withdraw from the 2027 presidential contest.

Long-Running Mambilla Legal Battle

Advertisement

The dispute over the Mambilla project has continued for years.

Sunrise previously pursued billions of dollars in claims against Nigeria, alleging breaches relating to the proposed project.

Continue Reading

News

Niger Deaths: Survivor Alleges Substance Was Sprayed in Cell Before Detainees Collapsed

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A surviving miner has alleged that an unidentified substance was sprayed inside a detention cell shortly before several suspected illegal miners began collapsing while in the custody of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) in Niger State.

The survivor made the allegation while recounting his experience in detention during a visit to the state by the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo.

According to the miner, detainees were locked inside a cell before an unidentified substance was sprayed into the facility.

He alleged that shortly after the substance was released, some of the detainees began experiencing difficulties before collapsing.

Advertisement

«“They sprayed something inside the cell after locking us in, and people began collapsing,” the survivor reportedly said.»

The allegation comes amid growing scrutiny over the circumstances surrounding the deaths of suspected illegal miners who were detained by security authorities in Niger State.

The survivor did not identify the substance allegedly sprayed inside the cell, nor did he state who allegedly authorised or carried out the action.

He also did not provide details on the number of detainees who were affected or establish whether the alleged spraying directly caused any of the reported deaths.

Advertisement

The NSCDC and other relevant authorities have yet to publicly respond to the specific allegation.

The account is likely to intensify calls for a thorough investigation into the treatment of the detainees and the circumstances surrounding the deaths.

Establishing what happened inside the cell would require further investigation, including determining the identity of the substance allegedly used, who introduced it into the facility and whether there was any link between the incident and the subsequent collapse or deaths of detainees.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Just in: Enugu Politician Ikechukwu Oloto Reportedly Killed in Nsukka Home Attack

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

 

Enugu State politician, Prince Ikechukwu Oloto, also known as Okanga Moo, has reportedly been killed in an attack at his residence in Nsukka Local Government Area of the state.

Oloto was allegedly attacked by unknown assailants at his home in the Odenigbo area of Nsukka on Thursday evening.

According to reports by Daily Post, the attackers invaded the politician’s residence and killed him during the incident. The report further alleged that a knife was used in the attack.

Advertisement

The circumstances surrounding the reported killing remain unclear, while the identities and motive of the attackers had not been established as of the time of filing this report.

The incident was also reported on Facebook by social media influencer Sen. Chijinkem Ugwuanyi, who claimed that Oloto was killed at his Odenigbo residence.

The reported killing comes amid heightened political activities and preparations ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 general elections. However, there is currently no confirmed information linking the attack to Oloto’s political activities.

The Enugu State Police Command had yet to publicly confirm the reported killing or disclose whether an investigation had commenced as of the time of filing this report.

Advertisement

Further details are expected as authorities investigate the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News