Connect with us

News

PDP crisis: Expulsion of Wike and others has no legal effect – BoT member, Teejay Yusuf declares

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

… Ibadan convention was a mere jamboree

… its outcome is laced with illegality

A member of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Hon Teejay Yusuf has declared that the expulsion of Nyesom Wike and other prominent members of the major opposition in Nigeria has no legal effect.

Yusuf, a three term member of the House of Representatives made this declaration at the weekend while fielding questions from journalists in Abuja.

Advertisement

He noted hat the Ibadan convention was simply a jamboree and its inputs, outputs and outcomes are laced in illegality.

Yusuf wondered how a jamboree can produce any legal effect when from day one the purveyors swam in illegality.

Giving a vivid account on what brought the major opposition in Nigeria to its present sorry state, he said: “Let me start from the convention. I’m a lawmaker. I’m not a lawyer, I’m not a judge. However, by privilege of being in the Green Chamber for 12 years, and having ran four elections, I can in my own little way, express some opinion about legal matters.

“Little I know, there was no convention in Ibadan. It was a gathering of people to socialise, to further boost their ego, and no matter how far you travel on the wrong road you will not get to your destination.

Advertisement

“It is progression in error it does not lead to the right thing.I have the privilege, because I took my time before coming to a position on the matter, and I was one of those who advocated for a middle-course resolution.

“Saraki pushed the same position.The Wabara led Board of Trustees set up a committee of eminent Nigerians who came out with the same position, that don’t do convention, let us do a caretaker of four-four from both sides, eight, to midwife the affairs of the party so as to reposition the party.

“But some persons who assume that emotion and wrong narratives that is populated on the social media, lead to victory, forgetting that at the end of the day, it is facts of the matter that the court will look at. How did you get there?Let me give you some background.

“The issue of who controls the secretariat was the major reason why you had crisis in PDP. The director of organisation is Makinde’s ally, he determines who go for primaries and who does not, administratively, Sam Dadi, secretary of the party is the head of the secretariat.

Advertisement

“If not, all of a sudden, what we heard before was that Damagun must go, all of a sudden Sam Dadi must go, aren’t you surprised how that crisis came.

“There is nothing that signify that even the impression that there is any issue with the secretary. Then people said he went to run an election and that constitution of the party, the rules of the party says he must resign, nothing like that is in the rule of the party.We have plethora of people who have gone to run for an election.

“Current Governor of Taraba State was state chairman of PDP, he didn’t resign, he ran primary, he won.

“So when we got to that, that is when the crisis began to build.In the course of all these, you now began to see attempt by Governor Seyi Makinde especially to see how to undermine the secretary of the party.

Advertisement

“Then all of a sudden Southeast purported caucus said they removed Anyanwu.There is nowhere in our constitution that a caucus remove an elected National Working Committee member, there are processes.

“Yes, when PDP was in power because the president has enormous power, people can do such thing and nobody challenges it in court.

“But we are an opposition party, if we don’t go by the law, people will challenge it in court. Anyanwu challenged it in court and won.

“But a lot of gaps and what have you, misgivings have been built up because of that, camps have been built and what have you; so the PDP could not function as a cohesive political party because by the INEC rules, any letter coming from a political party must be signed by the secretary and the chairman.

Advertisement

” INEC now said for any correspondence from a political party must come with the secretary and the chairman’s signature.So because chairman was Makinde, Anyanwu was on this side, they could not agree.
” Then a committee was set up to broker a peace after the Supreme Court judgment.

“In fact if you remember, the Supreme Court judgment came and the lack of understanding of the National Publicity Secretary of PDP, he began to interpret Supreme Court judgment in the way he feels and he is supposed to be a lawyer.If you observed the legal adviser never said anything.

“But I have details of the legal advice that was given to the party on the need to observe and obey court judgment.So a team was set up, governors and everybody, Saraki behind the scene midwife a meeting where it was agreed that for us to move forward, it is about interest, it is not hatred towards any individual, it is about who controls what, it is about cleavages but can we come together rather than destroying ourselves.

“Okay, Anyanwu forgive us, in the area council election in the FCT, we pleaded with you to write a letter to INEC with Damangun but we went to press to deny that it wasn’t you.

Advertisement

” In the submission of names for Anambra we pleaded with you underground, you signed and we went to press to say it wasn’t you; so forgive us, so what do we do?Anambra, Ebonyi and Southeast caucus election were disputed and court ruling came against what National Working Committee did.

“Before you went to those conventions, there was court ruling, legal adviser advised you not to you went ahead.You did not appeal, to see the irresponsibility, you did not appeal these rulings, you now start over.

“And you went ahead to recognise those the court said, in fact, the court declare Aliyu Dauda as not being a member of PDP. You still went ahead and say those are the men that will go to do convention in Ibadan.

“After that meeting, let me put it in perspective, with Saraki and what have you, they agreed. We will go and do congresses in Ebonyi, Enugu and then Southeast.

Advertisement

“South South, there was a congress for South South, everybody gathered there, few days to the congress some governors wrote, no a day to the congress that they won’t be attending the congress, can you shift it?

He explained that: “There is nowhere in our constitution that says that because you are not attending a congress it must be shifted.

“It was conducted on a Saturday, National Working Committee through Damagun wrote to INEC, not with the secretary that he is postponing the congress that was held on Saturday.

“He now went ahead to set up a caretaker committee but meanwhile there was a congress that elected officials.

Advertisement

So at that meeting Saraki brokered a deal, everybody resolved, recognised the South South.They now pleaded, not to make it look as if we have lost all out, let us go and do a congress in Souths South still affirming those people led by Dan Orbih so as to make it look as if that it is not one side that won all through, it was agreed.But Southeast zonal congress had to be done, Ebonyi had to be done and Enugu has to be done.

“Sam Dadi signed the letter for the last NEC meeting we had on that ground.There was supposed to be a NEC before convention in Ibadan because your zoning that you did, must be affirmed by NEC before you go to Ibadan. But after that NEC meeting that was done and Ibadan for that convention, everything that was agreed on, it was thrown into the dustbin.

“So that was how the court case came.Then you now went to the press that it is Wike that wants to kill the party. Let’s agree that Wike wants to kill the party, why are you giving him ammunition. I asked a question, is Lamido Wike’s man? Lamido does not like Wike but why is he not with you on this matter?So Saraki is Wike’s boy. Is Abah Moro Wike’s boy?

“Every one of them saw the error and said no, don’t go in this trajectory. They went to court, court ruled because I hear people say the High Court flouted the Supreme Court ruling that nobody should interfere.It is very clear, the High Court said there was a judgment you flouted, if you are going for a convention, your constitution and your rule, state the procedures, so the court has a right because those who went to court said they are being disenfranchised from convention.If you don’t so Southeast zonal this thing, don’t do Ebonyi, don’t do Enugu.

Advertisement

“So who goes to Ibadan? So the court ruled, Justice Omotosho said that go and do so, so and so, then you can do your convention. INEC make sure they do so, so and so.

“You ignore.People are shouting, Trump come and save our democracy, they want to kill our democracy, hello, I have been in PDP by the grace of God for a long time, I have not joined any other political party, what you have during conventions are cleavages, interest; you have Unity Group, Progressive Group, what have you because people buy forms for any office.

“This convention they printed only one form for each office and gave it by hand. They are the same people who are shouting that people want to destroy democracy.

“Then National Organising Secretary of the party whose office should supervise those processes, did not know when forms were printed, did not sell any form and that’s how Lamido went there to buy form and he couldn’t get a form.

Advertisement

“In fact when they got to know that Lamido was coming, National Organising Secretary office was locked by the aides of those who were carrying out all these.So Lamido went to court to procure judgment and the court ruled that you are denying him his right for participation, so Ibadan will not hold.

“You now went to state high court and got, let me explain something, the judgment of Federal High Court can only come when both parties have made representations, argue your case. But you can get an injunction by you just filing. So that party has not done anything.

“Can such override a Federal High Court judgment? And again INEC is a federal institution, I have done four elections and I have gone to tribunal and Court of Appeal, so you cannot file anything against INEC or give INEC instructions from a State High Court, they know all these.But to be seen as having some judgments, so that is why I said Ibadan never was, it was a jamboree, I think ego has a way of blinding people’s reality.

“People say focus, wrong focus mostly is partial blindness. You are blind to truth and what have you.So I want people to understand that this matter, look at how it happened before we got to where we are.

Advertisement

“Then at the last minute, there was a meeting on a Thursday, Ibadan was on Saturday and Aba Moro, Makarfi, a lot of leaders of the party, pleaded that let’s leave Ibadan.

“What is the essence of going to Ibadan when we know that INEC will not be there, they said that no, it doesn’t mean that INEC does not come. I said what do you mean? I have ran four elections, if you want anything to be valid in court because INEC will write its report, if you see that report and you say it does not matter.I asked a question, will Seyi Makinde run election in PDP if this kind of convention produces the exco then, National Working Committee? Will he take that risk?You now want people o take that risk and you say you want to help the party.

“So deliberately you want to ground the party for selfish reasons. But you will look at the nature of Wike to now say Wike wants to kill the party. But the facts are there, who is trying to kill the party? Is that convention legal? No!

“Yes, you have a State High Court judgment but you know that if it gets to appeal it cannot stand. Do you need to subject us to this, when people pleaded and sat over night on a Thursday and said can we just use what we did in Port Harcourt 2016, we were gathered in Port Harcourt for a convention and we saw that this convention will take us into crisis, that was how we came up with the Makarfi Caretaker Committee to midwife the affairs of the party pending when we resolve this thing.That was the same proposal that was brought saying that there is no how this Ibadan convention, first of all there are those who feel disenfranchised, you didn’t sell form.

Advertisement

“You are journalist, are you aware of when people bought form?Normally PDP convention, those who want to aspire for chairman, the day they go to pick their form, you will see them address the press.

“The last convention that produced Anyanwu and Iyorchia Ayu, you saw them going round the states, meeting states working committee, I never saw such thing happening in this convention.

“Forms were procured and given to people secretly for a convention. So what kind of illegality is that, Yusuf wondered.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

ADC Southwest Leaders Demand Removal Of Aregbesola As Interim National Secretary

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Leaders of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, in the South West have asked the party’s national leadership to immediately remove Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as Interim National Secretary, accusing him of brazen constitutional violations that are threatening the party ahead of 2027.

The South West leaders, in a petition dated July 28, 2026, signed by state chairmen from across the zone and addressed to the National Chairman, said they resolved during an emergency meeting in Ibadan that Aregbesola’s conduct had plunged the ADC into avoidable crises.

According to DAILY POST, the copies of the letter signed by Olusoji Adebiyi, Ogun State Secretary; Abideen Okanlawon, Osun State Acting Chairman; Adesola Akitunde, Osun State Youth Leader; Yinka Olona, Oyo State Chairman; Adebimpe Adelowo, Oyo State member; Ilesanmi Olaiya, Ekiti State Chairman, among others, were copied to the National Working Committee (NWC), National Executive Committee (NEC), the party’s 2027 presidential candidate, the vice-presidential candidate, and the National Legal Adviser.

The chairmen alleged that Aregbesola created a parallel structure across South West states under the name “Omoluabi Progressive” and began parading officers of the splinter group as legitimate ADC executives from the ward to the state level, asserting that this directly contravenes the ADC constitution.

Advertisement

They cited Article 22, Section 1 (2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and 11) of the party’s constitution, listing offences including breach of the constitution, acts likely to bring the party into disrepute, disobedience to lawful directives, creation of parallel organs, and collusion to convene unauthorised meetings.

The petitioners also accused the former Osun State governor of using his office to interfere in the party’s candidate selection process, alleging that on the last day for uploading National Assembly candidates, Aregbesola “colluded with some cohorts within INEC” to remove duly elected ADC candidates who emerged from INEC-monitored primaries and replace them with members of his Omoluabi Progressive group who never purchased nomination forms.

They also blamed Aregbesola for the lingering crises in Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti and Ondo states, alleging that he usurped the functions of the National Organising Secretary by appointing parallel primary election committees and submitting them to INEC.

Part of the petition reads:
“We, the undersigned State Chairmen of the South West Zone of the ADC, on behalf of the ADC South West Zonal Stakeholders, write to officially transmit our resolutions reached during the South West Zone emergency stakeholders’ meeting held on July 28, 2026, in Ibadan and equally request urgent action regarding the ceaseless, blatant violations and brazen breaches of our party’s constitution by OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA.

Advertisement

“OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA acted directly in contravention of our great party’s constitution by creating parallel party structures across the South West states, including local government areas and wards, under the name and style of Omoluabi Progressive, and parading the so-called officers of this splinter group as the legitimate structures and officers of our great party across the South West, contrary to the provisions of the party constitution.

“His actions and activities do not in any way befit the status, carriage, disposition and character expected of any person occupying the high-ranking and sensitive position of National Secretary of a great party like the ADC.

“We equally learnt from reliable sources that OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA used his position as National Secretary to collude with some of his cohorts within INEC to, on July 14, 2026, the last day for uploading National Assembly candidates, unlawfully infiltrate the party’s system and fraudulently substitute the names of successful National Assembly candidates who emerged through INEC-monitored primary elections across the South West and other zones of the country with members of his Omoluabi Progressive splinter group, who did not even purchase nomination forms in the first place.”

The South West ADC leaders demanded that the coalition leadership review Aregbesola’s appointment and relieve him of his position, urging it to present a new, “competent, loyal and patriotic” replacement.

Advertisement

“OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA is not fit to hold the position of Interim National Secretary. His continued stay in office will spell doom for the party.

“We therefore request the coalition leadership to review the appointment of OGBENI RAUF AREGBESOLA as Interim National Secretary, relieve him of this position, and request the APC extraction of the coalition to present a new, suitable person who is competent, loyal, amiable, patriotic and possesses the native intelligence required to lead the South West zone and the ADC to victory in 2027,” the petition added.

They urged the NWC and NEC to act urgently to stem the crisis and save the party ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explain Missing School Records In INEC Form – Buhari’s Ex-Minister Challenges Tinubu

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Former Minister of Sports, Solomon Dalung, has called on President Bola Tinubu to explain why the sections for his primary and secondary school qualifications were left blank in the personal particulars he submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the 2027 presidential election.

Dalung made the call in a post on his X account on Saturday while reacting to the nomination documents published by INEC.

According to him, his comments were based on the documents released by the electoral commission and should not be interpreted as an allegation against the President.

“I just read the published particulars of presidential candidates released by INEC for the 2027 election, and one thing immediately caught my attention,” Dalung wrote.

Advertisement

He noted that Tinubu listed only his university degree while leaving the sections for his primary and secondary school qualifications blank.

The former minister said the omission raises questions that deserve clarification, stressing that public trust is strengthened through openness and transparency.

“If there is a perfectly reasonable explanation, Nigerians deserve to hear it. Public office, especially the presidency, is built on public trust. Trust flourishes where there is openness, not ambiguity,” he stated.

Dalung argued that the same standard of accountability demanded of other political actors should also apply to the incumbent president.

Advertisement

He maintained that the issue was not whether Tinubu attended any particular primary or secondary school, but whether holders of public office should provide complete disclosures in official documents.

Dalung further stated that transparency remains the easiest way to address public concerns, adding that silence often fuels speculation.

“The same standard applied to every other candidate should apply to the incumbent President. No more, no less.

“The easiest way to put every question to rest is transparency. Silence rarely ends speculation; openness usually does,” he added.

Advertisement

DAILY POST reports that Dalung’s remarks followed the publication of the personal particulars of presidential candidates by INEC on Saturday.

A review of Tinubu’s EC9 nomination form showed that the President listed only a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration obtained from Chicago State University in 1979 under the educational qualifications section, while the spaces provided for his primary and secondary school qualifications were left blank.

The President, however, attached copies of his university degree certificate and National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate as part of the supporting documents submitted to INEC.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Why I Need To Go Beg God — Ex-JAMB Registrar

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Former Registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, has said he will return to teaching and religious activities after completing his tenure at the board, revealing that one of his priorities is to seek God’s forgiveness after spending 10 years in public office.

He made the disclosure while handing over to his successor, Prof. Segun Aina, during an event on Friday.

Oloyede also defended the board’s decision to impose a three-year ban on a 2023 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) candidate, Mmesoma Ejikeme, over the manipulation of her examination result.

According to him, his years in office exposed him to situations that tested his personal values and spiritual life, leaving him convinced that he now needs time for reflection, repentance and renewed commitment to his faith.

Advertisement

Speaking at the handover ceremony, Oloyede said he would return to the classroom and devote more time to his religious activities after leaving office. He explained that his decade in public service had affected certain aspects of his spiritual life and personal principles, making it necessary for him to seek God’s forgiveness and accept responsibility for actions taken while in office.

Reflecting on his tenure, Oloyede credited the achievements recorded by JAMB to the dedication and cooperation of the board’s workforce.

He also expressed confidence that the new registrar would build on the reforms implemented during the past decade, saying the successes achieved during his administration were made possible through the collective commitment and hard work of JAMB staff. He added that he was optimistic Prof. Aina would take the board to greater heights.

Oloyede also revisited the controversy involving Mmesoma Ejikeme, maintaining that JAMB acted appropriately when it sanctioned the candidate after discovering that her UTME score had been altered from 249 to 362. He said the board’s action was aimed solely at protecting the integrity of its examination process.

Advertisement

He described Mmesoma as “our daughter” and said the board handled the matter like a responsible parent correcting a child rather than acting out of malice.

Oloyede said the board harboured no ill feelings towards the candidate, adding that its only regret was that she altered her result. He noted that although many Nigerians were initially misled into believing her claims, those who supported her accepted the truth once the facts emerged.

He further expressed regret that many people initially believed the false narrative surrounding the case because parents naturally want to trust their children. However, he said the eventual revelation of the facts vindicated JAMB’s position and affirmed the board’s actions.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News