Connect with us

News

Trump at a standstill over Iran conflict

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Having failed to clearly define an objective or exit strategy — and sell the American public on a new war in Iran — President Donald Trump finds himself at an impasse, mere weeks into the conflict.

Add to that the high-profile protest resignation of a senior US counterterrorism official on Tuesday, who said publicly that the Islamic republic posed “no imminent threat to our nation” and he couldn’t “in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran.”

Trump has repeatedly said Iran has been “decimated” by American and Israeli strikes, indicating he is in the position to declare victory.

But the Republican leader has not gone that far — and for good reason.

Advertisement

It takes both sides to end a war, unless an opponent capitulates.

Iran, though severely weakened militarily and politically by an onslaught of airstrikes that began February 28, has voiced no intention to surrender.

While Trump has said the US has destroyed the Iranian navy, its ballistic missiles and legions of its leadership, US media has reported that he failed to fully anticipate Iran’s remaining capacity for broad-ranging retaliation.

That may be where the real problem lies for Trump.

Advertisement

As the war entered its third week, oil prices soared as violence spread throughout the Middle East, from Lebanon to the Gulf — including attacks on the hard-won US embassy in Iraq.

As such, the US president is paying the price for having joined Israel’s side without a mandate, or consulting either Congress or his other global allies.

Europeans and other allies politely refused Trump’s requests for aid in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow Gulf waterway that has been effectively blocked by Iran.

On Tuesday, Trump reversed course, saying he no longer needed their help.

Advertisement

In a rare admission, Trump said Monday that he was surprised by the Iranian reprisals targeting Gulf countries — from Saudi Arabia to Qatar — despite Tehran’s repeated warnings.

“They weren’t supposed to go after all these other countries in the Middle East,” Trump said of Iran. “Nobody expected that. We were shocked.”

– Dipolomatic stalemate –
Richard Haass, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, said in a recent newsletter that “while the United States initiated this conflict on its own, it will require both Israel and Iran to sign on to stopping it.”

“The longer this war goes on, the more the balance between its costs and benefits shifts toward the former,” Haass, a former US diplomat in George W. Bush’s administration, added.

Advertisement

For the United States, beyond weakening Iran over the long-term, victory means resuming maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz to restore global oil supplies, and an end to Tehran’s attacks on its neighbors.

Many observers say this will not be possible through military force alone.

The diplomatic path has narrowed significantly, but it remains an option, and will depend in part on the Islamic republic’s goodwill.

The question remains, who will come to the table?

Advertisement

“There are no clean options at this point, only less bad ones,” Sina Toossi, a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, told AFP via email.

“The most realistic path is a negotiated de-escalation that allows all sides to save face. The US can claim it degraded Iran’s capabilities, while Iran claims it absorbed the pressure and demonstrated it can retaliate,” Toossi said.

More broadly, he added, “Persian Gulf stability ultimately requires some degree of accommodation with Iran.”

Mona Yacoubian, the Middle East program director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the region is “currently living their ‘nightmare scenario.’”

Advertisement

“Gulf governments will need to find a way forward that acknowledges Iran’s enduring regional presence,” she said.

Until then, America’s allies are not hiding their frustration.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Monday the US war against Iran is not a NATO matter, nor will Berlin join the war or help clear transit in the Strait of Hormuz.

Merz stressed talks to find a diplomatic solution can’t begin until Israel and the United States say they have achieved their military objectives.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Reps Gives MREIF Boss Final One-Week Reprieve Over Housing Fund Probe

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives Committee on Housing and Habitat has granted the management of the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund (MREIF) a one-week extension to appear before lawmakers as part of an ongoing investigation into the fund’s operations, performance and administration.

The committee had initially summoned MREIF Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Dr Armstrong Ume Takang, alongside members of the fund’s management team, to appear on Tuesday, 2 June 2026, for a comprehensive review of the initiative and several petitions submitted against it.

The Committee Chairman, Rep. Abdulmumin Jibrin, said the investigation was aimed at ensuring the fund was operating in line with the objectives set by President Bola Tinubu and delivering on its mandate.

Advertisement

According to him, the exercise seeks to determine whether the administration and performance of MREIF are meeting public expectations while also addressing concerns raised in petitions before the committee.

However, in a letter addressed to lawmakers, Dr Takang acknowledged receipt of the summons and expressed the fund’s willingness to cooperate fully with the National Assembly’s oversight responsibilities.

He explained that he was outside Abuja on an official engagement that had been scheduled before the committee’s invitation was received and requested a new date for the hearing.

The MREIF chief also assured lawmakers of the organisation’s readiness to engage constructively with the committee.

Advertisement

Responding to the request, Jibrin said the committee had agreed to postpone the hearing by one week in the interest of fairness and cooperation.

He stated that the session had now been rescheduled for Tuesday, 9 June 2026, stressing that the extension was granted specifically to allow the managing director to appear in person.

The committee maintained that Dr Takang’s personal appearance was crucial to its inquiry and could not be delegated.

Jibrin reiterated the committee’s determination to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into the management of the fund, which was established to expand access to affordable home ownership for Nigerians.

Advertisement

He said the committee remained committed to addressing all issues raised in the petitions before it while ensuring transparency, accountability and effective implementation of the housing initiative in line with the vision of the Tinubu administration.

The lawmaker further stated that the committee expects Dr Takang and the entire MREIF management team to appear before it on the new date without fail.

Continue Reading

News

FG stops three-month Pre-retirement leave for civil servants

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal Government abolished the three-month preretirement leave for civil servants.

This was contained in a circular titled “Correct Interpretation of Public Service Rule 120243 on Pre-Retirement Activities,” issued by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, and addressed to top government officials, including ministers, permanent secretaries, service chiefs, heads of agencies, and other senior public sector administrators.

According to the circular, FG directed Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to immediately discontinue the practice of placing civil servants on what is commonly referred to as a mandatory three-month preretirement leave.

Walson-Jack argued that such a provision does not exist in the Public Service Rules, adding that several MDAs had wrongly interpreted the retirement notice period as an automatic leave period, leading to the premature withdrawal of officers from active service.

Advertisement

The Public Service Rule, according to her, only requires officers due for retirement to give three months’ notice before their exit date, attend a one-month pre-retirement workshop or seminar, and use the remaining period to regularise service records and pension documentation.

Nigeria’s federal civil service retirement framework is governed by the Public Service Rules and the Pension Reform Act.

Under the rules, civil servants retire upon attaining 60 years of age or after 35 years in service, whichever comes first.

The Head of Service’s directive seeks to standardise the implementation of the Public Service Rules across government institutions and to prevent manpower losses resulting from the early disengagement of experienced officers

Advertisement

“The so-called ‘mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave’ has no basis in the Public Service Rules,” Walson-Jack stated.
She explained that Rule 120243 establishes three distinct requirements: a notice obligation, attendance at a pre-retirement seminar during the first month, and completion of retirement-related documentation during the remaining two months.
“A retiring officer must give three months’ notice before their effective date of retirement. This is a notice requirement, not a leave entitlement,” the circular stated.

Civil Service Commission

She stressed that retiring officers remain public servants throughout the notice period and are expected to continue performing their official duties unless they are attending approved retirement workshops or have been granted leave under existing regulations.

“PSR 120243 does not exempt retiring officers from official duties during the notice period, except where they are attending an approved pre-retirement workshop or seminar, or are otherwise authorised to be absent under extant leave rules,” the circular added.

Advertisement

In view of the above, all MDAs have been directed to stop compelling retiring officers to vacate their posts before their official retirement dates.

Under the new directive, ministries and agencies must ensure that retiring officers continue to discharge their responsibilities, participate in approved pre-retirement programmes, and complete all pension and service record reconciliations before leaving service.
The latest circular seeks to end that ambiguity by affirming that the three-month period is primarily a notice and administrative preparation window, rather than an automatic absence from duty.
The circular further instructed permanent secretaries, directors-general, executive secretaries, chairpersons of statutory agencies, and chief executives of government organisations to bring the directive to the attention of all staff and ensure strict compliance.

The government said it believes the measure could improve service delivery by ensuring that retiring officers continue contributing their expertise until their official exit dates while simultaneously completing documentation required for pension processing.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Six members of same family shot dead during domestic dispute in US

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Six people were killed in the US state of Iowa after a series of shootings that appeared to stem from a domestic dispute, police said.

The suspected shooter also was found dead with a self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to the Muscatine Police Department.

The victims are believed to be family members of the suspect, identified as Ryan Willis McFarland, 52, of Muscatine, the department said.

Muscatine Police Chief Anthony Kies called the shooting an “act of evil”.

Advertisement

The shootings took place on Monday at multiple locations within the city of Muscatine.

Police received a report of a shooting just after noon on Monday. When officers responded to a home, they found four people with gunshot wounds, police said.

All four victims were pronounced dead at the scene.

McFarland had left the residence before officers arrived, but officials found him shortly after on a riverfront trail near a pedestrian bridge.

Advertisement

He had a self‑inflicted gunshot wound, police said, and received medical aid, but was pronounced dead at the scene.

Detectives later found another man dead from an apparent gunshot wound in a different residence. A further search led officers to a business, where they found another victim, also dead of an apparent gunshot wound.

Online maps show a metal workshop at the address provided by police.

“Preliminary findings indicate the shootings stemmed from a domestic‑related dispute,” McFarland police said in a statement. “All victims are believed to be family members of the deceased suspect.”

Advertisement

Kies did not give the names or ages of the victims and noted that the investigation is ongoing.

He confirmed the suspect had an existing criminal record but did not share any further details.

Muscatine, in the southwest of Iowa, sits on the Mississippi River and has a population of approximately 23,500 people, according to US government data published last year.

Mayor Brad Bark wrote in a post on Facebook: “Our hearts are heavy tonight after the tragic shootings that claimed innocent lives.”

Advertisement

Source: BBC

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News