Connect with us

News

Fresh fears of higher petrol price as crude hits $114 per barrel

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

There are fresh fears in the country of higher petrol price as crude hit $114 per barrel, yesterday, following dangerous escalation in the United State and Israel war on Iran. Already, petrol is sold for between N1200 and N1400 per litre in parts of the country.

The Middle East conflict escalated on Wednesday following Israeli strikes on Iran’s South Pars gas field, the world’s largest natural gas deposit, prompting Iranian retaliatory attacks on energy facilities in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, a development that is viewed as a major escalation in the war.

Following the attacks, the US President, Donald Trump, threatened to ‘entirely’ blow up the South Pars if the country continues to attack energy facilities in Qatar.

Consequently, energy prices soared, rising from $66 pb to $114pb by as much as five per cent across markets.

Advertisement

Vanguard checks, yesterday, showed that Brent crude oil price rose by 6.24 per cent to $114.08 per barrel, the highest since May 2022, while the United States West Texas Intermediate crude rose by 0.97 per cent to $96.33 a barrel.

However, the price of liquified petroleum gas, otherwise known as cooking gas, remained stable as at yesterday in the domestic market.

In Abuja and Lagos, checks by Vanguard revealed that the price of cooking gas remained stable despite volatility in the interntional market. Checks at two major retail outlets – NIPCO Gas and Shore Gas – showed that rates remained at N1,100 per kilogram and N1,150 per kilogram respectively. But in the South-East and South-South, gas went up to N1500 to N1800 per kg.

Recall that the supply disruption, triggered by the Middle East war, had affected petrol prices in Nigeria with prices ranging between N1,267 and N1,300 per litre depending on the fuel station and location as against N730-N880 per litre at the start of the war on February 28.

Advertisement

Similarly, Dangote Refinery Plc on March 13, raised the ex-gantry price of its petrol to N1,175 per litre, arguing that it is not immune to the global development as it secures its crude on international benchmarks.

Following the increase in gantry price of petrol by Dangote Refinery, retail outlets in Abuja raised petrol pump on March 3, 2025 with NNPC Retail dispensing at N975 from N875 per litre, while AYM Shafa sold at N960 from N880 per litre.

The marketers adjusted the pump price upwards three days later with NNPC selling at N1,068, while AYM Shafa sold at N1,098 per litre.

A further increase in gantry price by Dangote Refinery triggered a double hike by the marketers on Monday March 9, 2025.

Advertisement

While NNPC raised its pump price to N1,161 per litre in the morning, a further increase was implemented later in the day with rates at N1,267 per litre. Also, AYM Shafa increased its pump price to N1,230 in morning and closed the day N1,300 per litre.

Petrol price, however, dropped two days later with NNPC selling at N1,161 per litre and AYM Shafa dispensing at N1,230 per litre. However, three days later, pump price went up again with rates back at N1,267 per litre at NNPC Retail and N1,300 at AYM Shafa.

Iran threatens to destroy region’s energy facilities if attacked

Amidst the surging prices, Iran’s military renewed its threat to destroy the region’s energy infrastructure were its facilities to be attacked again during the US-Israel war with the Islamic republic, further fueling uncertainty in the market.

Advertisement

“We warn the enemy that you made a major mistake in attacking the energy infrastructure of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the response is underway and not yet finished,” the military’s operational command Khatam Al-Anbiya said in a statement carried by Fars news agency.

“If it is repeated, subsequent attacks against your energy infrastructure and that of your allies will not stop until their complete destruction, and our response will be far more severe than last night’s attacks.

Meanwhile, in a bid to ease the impact of surging energy prices, the US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, said that Washington might “unsanction” Iranian oil that is already being shipped.

Bessent added in the interview that the US government could also release more oil from its strategic reserves. US President Trump’s administration has been scrambling to rein in rocketing energy costs after US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Trump temporarily waived a century-old maritime shipping law in an attempt to help ease energy prices.

Recently, the US also temporarily allowed the sale of sanctioned Russian oil that is at sea.

US mulls deploying thousands of troops in Iran in next phase of war

Reuters, meanwhile, reported that the Trump administration was weighing the option of deploying thousands of American troops to bolster its war against Iran in what could be a new phase of the conflict.

Advertisement

Citing sources familiar with the development, including US officials, Reuters reported that the deployment would help secure safe passage for oil tankers through the Straits of Hormuz, a mission that would be accomplished primarily through air and naval forces. Iranian navy ships and navy submarines have been among the primary targets of US strikes.

However, securing the Straits could also mean deploying US troops to Iran’s shoreline and ground forces to the country’s Kharg Island, the hub for 90 percent of Iran’s oil exports, the sources were quoted to have said.

One of the officials said such an operation would be very risky as Iran has the ability to reach the island with missiles and drones.

The sources added that Trump’s administration officials have also discussed the possibility of deploying US forces to secure Iran’s stocks of highly enriched uranium.

Advertisement

Trump has said his goals go beyond degrading Iran’s military capabilities and could include securing safe passage through the Strait and preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

No timeframe for war on Iran as Pentagon asks for $200bn – Hegseth

In line with its plan to scale up its military campaign, the Pentagon is seeking an additional $200 billion from Congress to fund the war, a conflict Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, warned had no “timeframe” for ending.

Asked about the figure, yesterday, Hegseth did not directly confirm the amount but said that it could change.

Advertisement

“As far as $200 billion, I think that number could move. Obviously, it takes money to kill bad guys. We’re going back to Congress and folks there to ensure that we’re properly funded for what’s been done, for what we may have to do in the future,” he said.

Hegseth, said that Washington was on track to achieving the objectives of th war. He, however, declined to set a timeline for ending the war.

“We wouldn’t want to set a definitive timeframe,” Hegseth told a news conference, adding “we’re very much on track” and that Trump will be the one to decide when to stop.

“It will be at the president’s choosing, ultimately, where we say, ‘Hey, we’ve achieved what we need to.”

Advertisement

12 Arab, Islamic states call on Iran to stop strikes

In what marked a deviation from their cautious stance since the war started, the foreign ministers of 12 Arab and Islamic states called on Iran to immediately halt its attacks on the Gulf states and respect international law, even as Saudi Arabia warned that “trust in Tehran has completely collapsed” and that it will consider military action if necessary after Tehran fired missiles during the Gulf ministers’ meeting.

This is even as the European leaders have urged the US and Iran to engage in ceasefire negotiations amid growing concern about the long-term, global impact of the war in the Middle East.

Meanwhile, rising from their meeting, yesterday, the Arab foreign ministers also warned that attacks on energy facilities threaten global security.

Advertisement

In the statement on behalf of ministers representing Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, they denounced Iran’s attacks on the Gulf states, Jordan, Azerbaijan and Turkey, which they said had targeted “residential areas, civilian infrastructure, including oil facilities, desalination plants, airports, residential buildings and diplomatic premises.” The ministers also condemned Israel’s attacks on Lebanon and “reaffirmed support for the security, stability and territorial integrity of Lebanon.”

Saudi Arabia warns of military action

Reacting to the attack, the Saudi Defence Ministry said that four ballistic missiles targeting Riyadh were intercepted, with debris landing near a refinery south of the city.

Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, said shortly after the meeting said that targeting Riyadh while diplomats were in session is the clearest signal of how Iran views diplomacy. “What little trust remained in Iran has now collapsed. Iran’s pressure will backfire politically and morally. We reserve the right to take military action if deemed necessary.”

Advertisement

He added, “The Kingdom and neighbouring states possess strong military capabilities ready for immediate deployment. Our patience is not infinite. We won’t reveal our cards in advance—whether Iran has a day, two, or a week. “We hope Iran judges the situation wisely and stops attacking neighboring countries. Whether they possess such wisdom is questionable,” he said.

Also, reacting, Sultan Al Jaber, UAE’s Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology, stated: “This is not a military confrontation but an attack on a peaceful nation that has tirelessly pursued diplomacy. A long-term political agreement must address all threats: Iran’s nuclear programme, ballistic missile capabilities, and its regional proxy networks.”

He emphasised the need to negotiate restrictions on Iran-backed groups like Yemen’s Houthis, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and Iraqi militias. A senior Gulf official added, “The only acceptable war outcome is to weaken Iran so it can never endanger neighbours again.”

Some Gulf officials believe the only way to reopen the Straits of Hormuz is for the US to occupy Kharg Island, which handles 90 per cent of Iran’s oil exports.

Advertisement

European leaders urge US-Iran ceasefire talks

French President Emmanuel Macron told journalists Wednesday’s exchange of fire was a reckless escalation as he arrived for EU talks at the EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, yesterday.

He added that if Middle Eastern energy “production capacities themselves are destroyed, this war will have a much more lasting impact.”

Macron called for direct US-Iran talks, expressing a wish for everyone to “come to their senses.”

Advertisement

European Commission Vice President Kaja Kallas, also in Brussels, described Iran’s attacks on Qatar as causing further chaos.

“It’s clear that we need an exit from this war, not escalation.”

Kallas emphasised the connection between the conflicts in both the Middle East and Ukraine, saying that “Russia is gaining from the war in the Middle East.”

Ahead of the EU summit, German Chancellor, Friedrich ‘ Merz, suggested his private correspondence with Donald Trump indicated the US president was ready to halt the military action.

Advertisement

Merz told reporters he is “expressly grateful” for what he called Trump’s signal he is prepared to “bring the fighting to an end.”

NATO Secretary-General, Mark Rutte, said ongoing discussions between the US and NATO allies are prioritising the security issue in the Strait of Hormuz.

“I’m confident that allies, as always, will do everything in support of our shared interests, as we always do,” Rutte said.

Until we are independent

Advertisement

in all spheres, this cycle continues. We possess abundant raw materials for innovation, yet lack forward-thinking leadership to harness these resources independently. To ease our people’s lives without reliance on international programs or “colonized” systems, we must establish a localized economic structure that directly impacts every citizen and fosters true continental self-sufficiency.

—Oyetola Olawale, Entrepreneur

Predicting the U.S.Israel–Iran conflict’s duration is difficult, so Nigeria must act proactively. The government should prioritize capital expenditure for fiscal discipline and save surplus oil revenue to buffer future shocks. Diversifying into agriculture is essential to reduce oil reliance, while targeted support for vulnerable households will mitigate the rising costs of fuel and transportation for all citizens.

—Chizoba Akunne, NEC Topple

Advertisement

High commodity prices and petrol hikes exceeding ¦ 200 per litre have made life unbearable for Nigerians. The Federal Government must provide transportation palliatives to cushion this impact. Additionally, reducing crude oil exports will ensure local refineries receive adequate supply, lowering petrol prices for citizens. Nigeria must survive by prioritizing domestic needs over international markets to achieve economic stability.

—Peter Ige, Entrepreneur

To mitigate the US Israel–Iran conflict’s impact, Nigeria must stabilize food prices and protect vulnerable citizens, mirroring COVID-era interventions. Fiscal discipline is vital to manage oil price volatility. Long-term, Nigeria must diversify by investing in agriculture, manufacturing, and its burgeoning tech sector. Incentivizing local production and startups will reduce oil dependence, fostering sustainable growth and economic independence.

—Oluwatoyin N. Taiwo-Ojo,Legal practitioner

Advertisement

To cushion the US–Israel–Iran conflict’s impact, Nigeria must proactively strengthen domestic resilience. Key strategies include diversifying energy, increasing local production, and building strategic fuel reserves. Enhanced fiscal policies, targeted subsidies, and SME support will stabilize prices. Furthermore, engaging in international diplomacy and investing in agriculture, technology, and renewables will shield the Naira and ensure long-term economic stability.

—Romoke Olisa, Entrepreneur

Nigeria must urgently address the US-Iran conflict’s economic impact by reactivating local refineries to boost petroleum production. This critical step will reduce transportation costs for goods and commuters. This war serves as a vital lesson for Nigeria and Africa to scale up local production, ensuring economic stability and reducing the vulnerability caused by global geopolitical volatility.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

UK Backs National Assembly Security Dialogue as Push for State Policing Gathers Momentum

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

UK Backs National Assembly Security Dialogue as Push for State Policing Gathers Momentum

By Gloria Ikibah

The UK Government-funded Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRiNG) Programme has thrown its weight behind the National Assembly Security Roundtable, describing the initiative as a timely platform to advance security sector reforms, strengthen institutional accountability and accelerate discussions on state policing.

In a statement issued ahead of the roundtable, scheduled for Wednesday as part of the National Assembly Open Week 2026, it said that the engagement will bring together Nigeria’s top security chiefs, lawmakers and governors to review the country’s security challenges and identify the legislative and budgetary measures needed to improve the nation’s security architecture.

Advertisement

The meeting, to be held at the Conference Hall of the National Assembly Library Trust Fund, is expected to examine the support required by security agencies while also advancing constitutional reforms relating to state policing.

Among those expected at the event are the National Security Adviser, Chief of Defence Staff, Inspector-General of Police,  Ministers of Defence, Interior and Police Affairs, as well as the governors of Kaduna, Katsina, Plateau and Benue — the four focal states of the SPRiNG Programme — alongside their counterparts from Kwara, Zamfara, Niger and Borno states.

Speaking on the significance of the dialogue, the Head of Development Cooperation at the British High Commission in Abuja, Cynthia Rowe, said lasting security can only be achieved through strong and accountable institutions.

She said: “Sustainable security requires strong, accountable institutions that are responsive to the needs of the people. The UK Government remains committed to supporting Nigeria’s legislative frameworks to ensure that security interventions are transparent, well-resourced, and firmly rooted in respect for human rights. This roundtable is a commendable step towards codifying reforms that will protect vulnerable communities and foster long-term stability.”

Advertisement

According to the statement, the roundtable’s agenda aligns closely with the SPRiNG Programme’s security sector reform objectives, with discussions expected to focus on banditry, kidnapping, farmer-herder conflicts, inter-agency collaboration, technology-driven security operations and modern approaches to community engagement.

The Team Leader of the SPRiNG Programme, Ukoha Ukiwo, said experience from the programme’s work across participating states had shown that peacebuilding efforts require solid legal backing to succeed.

“Our work across our state compacts has continually highlighted that operational peacebuilding must be backed by robust legal frameworks. The focus of this roundtable on state policing, security funding, and accountability is incredibly timely. By bridging the gap between grassroots realities and legislative action, we can ensure that informal and formal security architectures work cohesively to build formidable resilience in communities across Nigeria”, he said.

The meeting is expected to produce a comprehensive communiqué outlining priority security reforms, including recommendations on the implementation of state policing and other public safety initiatives.

Advertisement

It added that the SPRiNG Programme would continue to support engagements with relevant stakeholders to ensure that resolutions reached at the dialogue are translated into concrete policy actions.

Continue Reading

News

Political Party Pulls Out Of 2027 Presidential Race, Gives Reasons

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) has has given reasons why it failed not to upload the name of a presidential candidate to the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) nomination portal for the 2027 general election followed its endorsement of President Bola Tinubu for a second term.

The party said the absence of a presidential candidate on the portal was not the result of an administrative failure or inability to meet INEC’s requirements, but a deliberate political decision taken by its National Executive Committee.

APGA’s National Publicity Secretary, Mazi Ejimofor Opara, disclosed this while speaking with Vanguard amid growing public interest over the party’s position ahead of the 2027 election.

According to him, the party’s NEC reached the decision after extensive consultations and resolved to support Tinubu’s re-election bid, which it described as being in the national interest.

Advertisement

“We have not uploaded a presidential candidate because the National Executive Committee of the party has already taken a decision to support President Bola Tinubu’s re-election in 2027,” Opara said.

The publicity secretary, however, clarified that APGA remained fully involved in the electoral process and had successfully submitted the names of all its candidates for the National Assembly and state Houses of Assembly elections.

“However, I can confirm that APGA has successfully uploaded all its candidates for the National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly elections to the INEC portal,” he added.

Opara said all the required documentation for APGA candidates seeking seats in the Senate, House of Representatives and state legislatures had been submitted within the period stipulated by the electoral commission.

Advertisement

He stressed that the party’s alliance with the ruling All Progressives Congress at the presidential level should not be interpreted as a withdrawal from the 2027 general election.

According to him, APGA intends to contest legislative elections across the country and strengthen its representation at both the federal and state levels.

Opara maintained that the absence of an APGA presidential candidate from INEC’s nomination portal should not be misconstrued as a failure by the party to fulfil electoral obligations.

He explained that it was a calculated political decision arising from the party’s earlier endorsement of the President.

Advertisement

The spokesman said APGA believed that supporting Tinubu’s second-term ambition at the presidential level would not affect its identity or its determination to expand its influence in the National Assembly and state Houses of Assembly.

He added that the party remained committed to deepening Nigeria’s democracy by presenting candidates capable of providing quality representation.

Opara said APGA’s immediate political focus was to win more legislative seats and build a stronger presence in the Senate, House of Representatives and state assemblies.

He noted that legislative representation remained critical to advancing the party’s programmes, protecting the interests of its supporters and contributing meaningfully to national development.

Advertisement

The party, he said, would continue to mobilise Nigerians around its candidates and promote its political agenda despite its decision not to contest the presidential election.

The APGA spokesman urged members and supporters of the party to remain united and intensify mobilisation for its legislative candidates ahead of the elections.

He also called on them to support President Tinubu’s re-election bid in line with the decision of the party’s National Executive Committee.

The clarification followed questions over why APGA had no presidential candidate listed on INEC’s nomination portal despite submitting candidates for other elective positions.

Advertisement

Opara insisted that the omission was intentional and reflected the party’s adopted strategy for the 2027 elections rather than any problem with the nomination process.

Continue Reading

News

Angry Wife Bites Husband’s Manhood After Filing Her Teeth To Make It Sharper

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A jealous wife bit off her husband’s manhood after sharpening her own teeth in what medics described as a “guaranteed” act of revenge.

The horror reportedly happened in Moscow, Russia, after the 39-year-old wife found a message on her 41-year-old husband’s phone from another woman.

The text from the woman described an explicit erotic dream about having s£x with him on a beach.

Instead of confronting her husband, the wife is said to have meticulously planned her attack.

Advertisement

Medical professional Dr Artur Valvachev, who commented on the case, said she even filed down her teeth to make them sharper and “guarantee her plan would work”.

He described how she set a trap by cooking dinner for her husband before the pair drank alcohol together.

“His wife cooked dinner, they sat down, drank, ate, drank some more, and then went to the bed, where she started giving him oral s£x,” Dr Valvachev said.

He added, as reported by the Sun: “And at that moment, she bit off his penis with her teeth.”
He said she then spat it out and told him: “It’s your own fault, now you can’t do it with anyone else.”

Advertisement

The husband briefly lost consciousness from the pain and hypovolemic shock. When he came round, he was bleeding heavily.

Dr Valvachev said the man managed to place the severed organ into a glass, added saline solution he had at home, and called an ambulance. Paramedics attempted to reattach it, but Dr Valvachev said they were unable to restore any functionality.

The husband has reportedly been left unable to achieve an erection.

“He hasn’t been able to find a new partner yet,” the doctor said, adding that the only remaining option is “a penile prosthesis – an internal penile prosthesis with a pump”, the Sun reported.

Advertisement

The husband has strongly denied ever being unfaithful.

Under Russian privacy laws, the couple’s names have not been released due to the sensitive medical details and the criminal case.

This month – July 2026 – the woman was sentenced to five years in a Russian women’s penal colony for intentional grievous bodily harm.

The husband is now raising their seven-year-old child alone.

Advertisement

In a final twist, the woman is reportedly now suffering from rotten teeth which her estranged husband believes is “karma”.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News