ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Hajiya Asiya El-Rufai, wife of ex- Kaduna State Governor, has told President Bola Ahmed Tinubu that her husband does not deserve the treatment he is currently receiving.

Recalling the role he played in the buildup to the 2023 presidential election, the politician’s wife demanded fair treatment for the former governor.

Hajia Asiya, who was flanked by El-Rufai’s other wife, Aichatou, was reacting to the arrest of her husband’s personnel physician, Prof Bello Abubakar, as confirmed by the ICPC on Tuesday.

The wife also alleged that her husband, who she said was diagnosed of High Blood Pressure and High Blood Sugar level, was denied access to medical treatment.

Speaking with newsmen at her residence in Abuja, Asiya El-Rufai said the family was not asking the President to interfere with the judicial process or halt the prosecution of El-Rufai, but to ensure that he enjoys the constitutional rights available to every Nigerian, including access to medical care, family members, lawyers and bail on reasonable terms.

“Mr. President Sir, I campaigned for you. I stood up and went to every nook and cranny of Kaduna State for you. My husband stood by your side. Is this what our family deserves?” she asked.

“The ball is in your court, Mr. President. All these can stop if you say a word. We believe that you are a father and we know you can empathise.

“Please let him go free. I am not asking you to tell them not to prosecute him, but we are asking you to allow him the basic human rights that the Constitution you swore to uphold and defend guarantees. Let them give him the bail that he can afford. If he is guilty, let the court decide; if he is innocent, let the court decide.”

She alleged that El-Rufai’s continued detention and denial of access to his doctors and relatives had left the family traumatised.

“We, the family, are traumatised. We live in constant fear that we will wake up and hear some bad news,” she said.

Describing the situation as psychological pressure on both her husband and the family, she added: “I honestly think that what they are doing is more about psychological warfare against Malam and against his family. If they humiliate us, dehumanise us and put us in constant fear, they feel that affects Malam.”

Asiya also questioned the reported decision to deny El-Rufai’s personal physician access to him.

“We were told that orders from ‘above’ said Professor Bello Abubakar cannot have access to anybody for 24 hours. Who is the ‘above’?” she asked.

She further alleged that El-Rufai had been denied regular access to his personal doctors, while visits by relatives had become increasingly restricted.

The woman also expressed concern over a medical report purportedly issued by the National Hospital, Abuja, saying questions surrounding the document’s authenticity and the circumstances under which it was issued should be properly investigated through the consultant whose name appeared on it.

According to the family, the restrictions have made it difficult for the former governor to adequately prepare his defence.

“We do not shy away from defending ourselves, but we want a fair trial. We want an opportunity to be heard. Malam cannot adequately prepare for his defence while he remains in custody and has limited access to his lawyers.”

“We are only asking that he be given the basic human rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Let him be granted bail on reasonable terms. If he is guilty, let the court decide. If he is innocent, let the court also decide,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has ordered an investigation into the alleged inclusion of a non-existent government agency, the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC), in the 2026 Appropriation Framework, amid claims that the body has no legal basis for its existence.

The House also set up an ad hoc committee to unravel how the agency allegedly found its way into the federal budget despite lacking an Act of the National Assembly establishing it.

The resolution followed the adoption of a motion of urgent public importance moved by Yusuf Gagdi during Wednesday’s plenary.

Opening the debate, Gagdi told lawmakers that records available to the National Assembly showed there was no law creating the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, even though the organisation reportedly operated from the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja between November 2024 and October 2025 and dealt with several government institutions.

He noted that the Federal Government had since distanced itself from the council, while allegations of forgery and impersonation linked to the organisation are already before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

According to the lawmaker, the entity allegedly relied on documents claiming it was established under an Act codified as Chapter N2117 of the Laws of the Federation, despite no such legislation existing.

“The nearest existing law is the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC) Act, which the purported council appeared to duplicate,” he said.

Gagdi said reports indicating that more than N1.3 billion connected to the entity had been captured in the 2026 budget framework raised serious questions about the integrity of the nation’s budget process.

He warned that the development exposed potential loopholes in budget preparation and legislative scrutiny, adding that it could point to the existence of other fictitious agencies within previous or current appropriation frameworks.

To establish how the alleged insertion occurred, the House constituted an ad hoc committee with a four-week mandate to trace the budget provision from the Executive’s proposal through the legislative process and determine the stage at which the disputed agency was introduced.

The committee is also expected to summon the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning and the Director-General of the Budget Office to explain the procedures used to verify new agencies before they are admitted into the national budget.

Lawmakers further directed the panel to verify all Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) listed in the 2025 and 2026 appropriation frameworks against their respective legal instruments of establishment. It is also expected to receive briefings from relevant security and anti-corruption agencies without interfering with the ongoing court proceedings.

The House also urged the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation to ensure that no funds are released or payment warrants honoured in favour of the disputed entity pending the conclusion of the investigation.

To prevent a recurrence, lawmakers resolved that the Budget Office should, from now on, submit alongside every Appropriation Bill a comprehensive list of all MDAs proposed for funding, clearly stating the legal instrument establishing each agency.

Backing the motion, Chairman of the House Committee on National Security and Intelligence, Ahmed Satomi, described the development as a serious threat to the credibility of Nigeria’s budgeting process.

“This is a nationally important issue. We must investigate it thoroughly because it affects the sanctity of our budget process and the confidence Nigerians have in Parliament,” Satomi said.

Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu also threw his weight behind the investigation, revealing that his office had unknowingly engaged officials of the purported council after receiving what appeared to be an authentic letter carrying the Presidency’s insignia.

Kalu disclosed that the correspondence, dated 2 May 2025, bore the logos of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, while also listing an office address within the Federal Secretariat Complex and a government website.

He explained that his office carried out preliminary checks, confirmed that the organisation occupied the stated office and subsequently granted its officials an audience.

According to him, rather than discussing constitutional amendment and investment matters as outlined in their letter, the delegation appeared more interested in taking photographs.

“The experience shows that a letterhead bearing the Presidency or an office in the Federal Secretariat is no longer sufficient proof that an organisation is legally established,” Kalu said.

He stressed that Parliament must establish how the organisation gained access to key government institutions and allegedly secured a place in the national budget.

Following overwhelming support from members, Speaker Abbas Tajudeen put the motion to a voice vote, and it was unanimously adopted, clearing the way for the investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The Senate on Wednesday dumped a motion seeking a comprehensive investigation into the budgetary allocation, operations and controversy surrounding the alleged Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).

The motion was sponsored by the senator representing Kano South, Senator Suleiman Kawu, who raised it under a point of order during plenary.

Relying on Order 9 and Rule 9(c) of the Senate Standing Orders (2026), Kawu presented a motion titled, “Urgent Need to Investigate the Budgetary Allocation, Operations and Controversy Surrounding the Purported Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) to Safeguard the Integrity of the Senate and the Federal Government.” While presenting the motion, the lawmaker expressed concern over the growing public controversy surrounding the council, saying the issue had generated widespread allegations and conflicting claims.

According to him, the Senate needed to examine the matter to protect the credibility of both the National Assembly and the Federal Government. However, the Deputy President of the Senate, Barau Jibrin, who presided over the plenary, ruled that the motion should not be debated.

Jibrin explained that the Executive had already initiated action on the matter, noting that President Bola Tinubu had directed the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission to investigate the controversy. He urged lawmakers to allow the anti-corruption agency to complete its investigation before the Senate considers any further legislative action.

The ruling effectively halted debate on the motion, leaving the ongoing ICPC investigation as the primary official inquiry into the alleged activities of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council.