Connect with us

News

Fake Presidential Council: HCSF Reveals Establishment Act Submitted is Fake 

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…as Gagdi take to aggressive questioning, say preliminary report out next week

…as IGP insist Adeyemi cannot be produced without court order

By Gloria Ikibah

The Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (HCSF), Mrs Esther Didi Walson-Jack, on Wednesday admitted before the House of Representatives Ad-hoc Committee investigating the alleged creation of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC) and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) that her office approved requests based on documents that have now been established as fake.

Advertisement

Appearing before the committee, Walson-Jack disclosed that the purported Establishment Act submitted by the agency was neither genuine nor an authentic Act of the National Assembly.

She said: “I requested to see the documents myself and I saw that the Establishment Act was not really an authentic Act. I have almost 30 years of legal practice experience and immediately I saw it, I knew it was not.”

“I requested to see the documents myself and I saw that the Establishment Act was not really an authentic Act. I have almost 30 years of legal practice experience and immediately I saw it, I knew it was not,” she said.

Walson-Jack also acknowledged that her office relied on documents later discovered to be fake in granting an authorised establishment and recruitment waiver to the purported agency.

Advertisement

The Head of Service explained that officials of the purported agency presented themselves as representatives of a newly established federal body during the 2025 Annual Manpower Budget Defence exercise, accompanied by what appeared to be an Establishment Act and a letter appointing a Director-General.

According to her, under established civil service procedures, newly created agencies seeking to recruit staff are expected to present an enabling Act, the appointment letter of the chief executive and other supporting documents before an authorised establishment and provisional recruitment waiver are issued.

She said her office processed the request based on the documents presented, noting that the case was unprecedented.

“We now, having seen all the facts and observed all the documents, concede that we ought to have carried out more due diligence in the discharge of the duties of the office in issuing an authorised establishment and a recruitment waiver to the PEAC/PFIPC.

Advertisement

“In over almost a century of the Federal Civil Service, we have never encountered a situation like the current one. Criminals always try to be a step ahead of law enforcement,” she told lawmakers.

She further acknowledged discrepancies in the appointment letter purportedly issued by the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President after comparing it with genuine correspondence.

“I’m not a forensic expert, but I can clearly see that the signatures are not the same,” she stated.

The committee chairman disclosed that forensic analysis by the Nigeria Police had already confirmed the signatures were entirely different.

Advertisement

“The police forensic department has already analysed the signatures and confirmed that those signatures are not the same. In fact, according to them, there was not even an attempt to imitate the signature,” the chairman said.
He added that investigations had established that the appointment letter was fake and that the purported Act establishing the agency was equally fabricated.

“You have clearly stated that you acted on false documents. You have now established, just like we have, that the letter of appointment of the so-called DG is not only forged, it is fake,” the chairman declared.

“If something is forged, there will be an attempt to imitate the signature. But in this case, the signatures are completely different. So I will not call it forged; I will say it is fake.”

The committee further alleged that the fake Establishment Act lacked all the mandatory features of a valid Act of the National Assembly.

Advertisement

“Our Acts have citation numbers, Supreme Court numbers, Gazette numbers and Gazette titles. The Act presented here has none of those features,” the chairman said.
Despite admitting lapses, Walson-Jack maintained that the approvals were granted following existing procedures based on documents presented to her office.

“Everything was done in accordance with the practice in the office. Out of the 88 ministries, departments and agencies processed, we are really surprised that we were unable to detect that PEAC/PFIPC had actually given us a false Establishment Act and what has now been proved to be a false letter of appointment.”

Speaking further, Walson-Jack pledged reforms to prevent a recurrence.”We take full responsibility and we will definitely review our processes to make them more fraud-proof,” she assured.

The committee also questioned officials from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation over the issuance of an administrative code to the purported agency.

Advertisement

Accountant-General’s Office Defends Procedure, Blames Individual Lapse

A former Director Consolidation Account, and Director Federal Projects Mr. Joshua Patmi Luka, explained that his office received what appeared to be an official request from the State House for an administrative code for the agency.

“As part of our due diligence, what we did was to convey the administrative code to the Permanent Secretary, State House, and not to the so-called agency. The idea was that if it was not genuine, the whole thing would be unravelled,” he said.

However, the committee faulted the process after evidence showed that the response letter never reached the Permanent Secretary but was instead collected by the alleged fake Director-General.

Advertisement

The chairman said investigations had revealed that the purported Directorate of Administration and Support Services referenced in the correspondence did not exist within the State House.

“There is no Directorate of Administration and Support Services in the State House. That office does not exist,” he said.

He accused the officials of allowing the suspect to intercept official correspondence addressed to the Permanent Secretary.

“You allowed the fraudulent DG to come and pick the letter from your office instead of allowing someone from the Permanent Secretary’s office to receive it. If the letter had reached the Permanent Secretary, the fraud would have been unravelled immediately,” the chairman said.

Advertisement

Responding, Luka insisted the lapse was not institutional but attributable to an individual officer responsible for dispatching the correspondence.

“The problem here was not an office lapse; it was an individual lapse. Somebody was supposed to deliver that letter to the Permanent Secretary, State House, and it was not delivered there,” he said.

The committee maintained that evidence before it showed a coordinated use of fake appointment letters, forged legislative documents and fictitious State House offices to obtain official government approvals and budgetary processes.

It said its final report would detail the findings and recommendations after concluding the investigation.

Advertisement

Representing the Inspector-General of Police, Deputy Commissioner of Police, DD NPF National Cybercrime Centre
Olufemi Akinola informed the committee that Prince Adeyemi could not be produced because he remains in lawful custody under a subsisting court order.

The police assured lawmakers of their continued cooperation with the National Assembly but explained that any production of the suspect would require an order from a court of competent jurisdiction.

“In our custody on fourth quarter, the Nigerian police force may not be able to produce a suspect as requested… in view of the subsisting warrant. The Nigerian police force has one of the constitutional oversight powers of the National Assembly and remains committed to cooperate with the committee in the discharge of its mandate.

“However, in this case, it will be appreciated if the reproduction warrant could be sought from the court of competent jurisdiction to enable police to comply with this request.

Advertisement

The hearing was characterised by several tense exchanges between the committee and senior government officials as lawmakers scrutinised the evidence before them. Throughout the proceedings, the committee chairman maintained firm control of the session, leading most of the questioning and, at times, intervening to redirect witnesses or keep discussions focused on the issues under investigation. As a result, some officials were unable to complete their explanations, while other committee members had limited opportunities to raise questions or seek further clarification.

The committee said it would conclude the clarification stage of its investigation before presenting its preliminary findings to the public next week, ahead of the submission of its final report to the House of Representatives upon resumption from recess.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

BREAKING: Heavy shake up in Nigerian Army, top officers affected

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Nigerian Army has redeployed senior officers to key command and operational positions to strengthen operational effectiveness and enhance its response to Nigeria’s evolving security threats.

The Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt.-Gen. Waidi Shaibu, approved the strategic postings, according to a statement by Col. Appolonia Anele, Acting Director, Army Public Relations, on Wednesday.

Under the new dispensation, Maj.-Gen. Ibikunle Ajose moves from Army Headquarters Department of Army Operations to Theatre Command Joint Task Force North-East, Operation HADIN KAI, as Theatre Commander.

Maj.-Gen. Abdulsalam Abubakar, former Theatre Commander, moves to the Nigerian Army Heritage and Future Centre as Dean, Faculty of Operational Research.

Advertisement

Other senior appointments include Maj.-Gen. Aminu Umar, who moves from Army Headquarters Department of Civil-Military Affairs to Army War College Nigeria as Commandant.

Maj.-Gen. GS Muhammed moves from the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) to Nigerian Army Finance Corporation as Director-General.

Maj.-Gen. Julius Osifo moves from the Nigerian Army Finance Corporation to the Military Pension Board as Chairman, while Maj.-Gen. IE Ekpenyong moves to Defence Headquarters Department of Defence Logistics as Director, Engineering Services.

The Army also announced several brigade-level appointments aimed at strengthening operational and formation commands.

Advertisement

Brig.-Gen. MS Adamu moves from Nigerian Army Women Command to the newly established 8 Brigade as Commander, while Brig.-Gen. MS Sule moves from Special Task Force Operation ENDURING PEACE to 27 Task Force Brigade.

Brig.-Gen. I. Sule moves from the Directorate of Recruitment Management to 6 Division Garrison as Commander, while Brig.-Gen. E Azenda moves from the Land Forces Simulation Centre to 2 Division Garrison.

According to the statement, the postings were designed to place the right leadership, experience and expertise in critical operational theatres and strategic appointments.

It said the exercise was part of ongoing efforts to align the Army’s command structure with the country’s evolving security environment.

Advertisement

Shaibu charged the newly appointed officers to justify the confidence reposed in them through exemplary leadership, operational innovation and professionalism.

He urged them to remain committed to defending Nigeria’s sovereignty, protecting its territorial integrity and supporting civil authority in maintaining peace and security.

The COAS said the Army remained committed to a dynamic leadership and force-employment framework that would improve operational outcomes and strengthen joint and inter-agency coordination.

He pledged to enhance its capacity to respond decisively to contemporary and emerging threats in furtherance of Nigeria’s national security objectives.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Akpabio Never Threatened Northerners Over 2027 — Senate President’s Aide Challenges Critics to Produce Evidence

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Special Adviser on Media and Publicity to the President of the Senate, Rt. Hon. Eseme Eyiboh, has dismissed as a “desperate and dangerous lie” a viral statement allegedly attributed to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, claiming he threatened that Northerners would suffer if President Bola Ahmed Tinubu loses the 2027 presidential election.

Eyiboh said Akpabio “never made such a statement” and challenged those circulating the alleged quotation to produce verifiable evidence showing where, when and before whom the Senate President supposedly made the remark.

In a statement, the aide said there was no authentic video, audio recording, speech, interview, press release, transcript or credible media report establishing that Akpabio uttered the alleged words.

He specifically challenged Engr. Ibrahim Umar Ammar, whom he identified as being associated with the Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation and ADC-NYAF in Kano State, to release the original and unedited recording of the purported statement.

Advertisement

«“Produce the original and unedited video or audio recording showing precisely where, when and before whom Senator Akpabio made the alleged statement,” Eyiboh demanded.»

He also asked those behind the allegation to identify the occasion, date and venue where the statement was supposedly made, as well as the journalists or media organisations that allegedly witnessed or reported it.

According to Eyiboh, a photograph of Akpabio with words superimposed beneath it cannot constitute credible evidence.

He described such material as “merely an allegation wearing typography” and urged anyone who merely reposted the claim to disclose its original source and provide the first publication from which it was obtained.

Advertisement

Aide Accuses Critics of Ethnic Incitement

Eyiboh accused those circulating the alleged quotation of deliberately exploiting ethnic sentiments ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“This is not legitimate political opposition. It is calculated incitement designed to manufacture fear, resentment and hostility between Northern Nigerians and a national leader from the South,” he said.

The Senate President’s aide argued that Akpabio’s political relationships and legislative record also contradict attempts to portray him as hostile to Northern Nigeria.

Advertisement

He cited Akpabio’s political relationship with Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin of Kano, the presence of Northerners among his aides and his backing for legislative measures targeted at development across Northern communities.

Among the initiatives he highlighted were the establishment of the North-West Development Commission and North-Central Development Commission, as well as the Federal Polytechnic in Rano, Kano State, and the Federal University of Health Sciences in Tsafe, Zamfara State.

Eyiboh also recalled Akpabio’s visit to Borno State following the devastating floods in Maiduguri and the National Assembly’s intervention to support victims.

He said the Senate contributed ₦74 million to the relief effort, while the two chambers of the National Assembly provided a combined ₦174 million.

Advertisement

According to him, the Senate under Akpabio has also supported legislation covering student loans, minimum wage, security, education and economic development, which he said were designed to benefit Nigerians regardless of region.

‘Produce Evidence or Withdraw the Claim’

Eyiboh urged Nigerians to verify the authenticity of politically sensitive claims before sharing them online, stressing that the burden of proof rests with those making the allegation.

“The demand is therefore straightforward and categorical: produce the original video, produce the original audio, produce an authenticated transcript, name the occasion, give the date and venue, and identify the media organisations that witnessed or reported the statement,” he said.

Advertisement

He called on political parties and their supporters to focus on records, policies, achievement

Continue Reading

News

Benue Govt Challenges Obi To Name Aide Who Led Youths To Block His Convoy

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Benue State Government has dared the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, to identify the government aide allegedly responsible for mobilising youths to block his convoy from accessing Yelewata community in Guma Local Government Area of the state.

The Chief Press Secretary to Governor Hyacinth Alia, Tersoo Kula, threw the challenge while appearing on The Morning Show, an Arise TV programme, on Wednesday.

Kula said the state government was prepared to support an investigation into the incident, insisting that anyone found to have orchestrated the obstruction should face the law.

He said Obi and the NDC should not only name the alleged aide but also provide evidence linking the individual to the incident.

Advertisement

According to him, the police had the responsibility to investigate the allegation and establish those behind the reported blockade.

“The incident was completely unknown to the government until we started seeing pictures of what was happening,” Kula said.

He added, “I challenged them that they should name that aide. They mentioned a particular aide, and we said they should go ahead and mention him. If there’s any evidence, the police commissioner should ensure that the person who directed this is arrested and brought to book.”

The governor’s spokesman maintained that Governor Alia had no reason to deploy youths to frustrate Obi’s movement, arguing that the governor does not support political thuggery.

Advertisement

Kula said if Obi’s visit posed any security or political concern to the governor, the appropriate response would have been to rely on recognised security agencies rather than mobilise youths.

“Governor Alia does not promote thuggery in Benue State. If Obi is a threat to him, or maybe he felt that Obi’s coming would cause a problem for him, the right thing to do is to get legitimate security operatives to do the needful and not to gather youths or send them to go and block him,” he stated.

The controversy followed Obi’s attempt to visit Yelewata, a community in Guma Local Government Area that suffered a deadly attack in June 2025 in which more than 200 people were reportedly killed.

Obi had accused the state government of frustrating his movement to the community after youths reportedly blocked his convoy.

Advertisement

However, the Benue State Government has repeatedly denied having prior knowledge of Obi’s visit.

Kula had earlier said neither Governor Alia nor the state’s security agencies were informed ahead of Obi’s movement to Yelewata.

He argued that as a presidential candidate, Obi should have had adequate security arrangements for his movement, particularly to a community considered sensitive because of its history of violence.

The governor’s spokesman said the police, Department of State Services (DSS) and Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), among other security agencies, ought to have been notified ahead of the visit.

Advertisement

“If you are visiting a state, the security apparatus of the state is supposed to know. The Commissioner of Police, Director of DSS, Civil Defence and others are supposed to be aware so that they can provide adequate security for you,” he said.

Kula also questioned how youths could have successfully stopped a presidential candidate if adequate security arrangements had been made for the visit.

He further said Governor Alia had not received any security briefing concerning Obi’s movement to Yelewata.

On the broader security situation in Benue, Kula acknowledged that insecurity remained a serious concern despite describing the situation in the state as having improved to what he called “relative peace.”

Advertisement

He stressed that the fact that other states were experiencing similar security challenges was not an excuse for the Benue government to become complacent.

“What is happening in Benue State in respect to insecurity is happening to other states. It’s not peculiar to Benue,” he said.

“But there is no excuse saying that because it’s happening to other states, we should be comfortable. We are not comfortable.”

Kula said Governor Alia remained concerned about insecurity and was committed to reducing attacks across the state to the barest minimum.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News