Opinion
The Sundiata Post Model (7): A Philosophical Triad and the Language of 21st-Century Journalism
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/IMG-20260726-WA00381.jpg&description=The Sundiata Post Model (7): A Philosophical Triad and the Language of 21st-Century Journalism', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/IMG-20260726-WA00381.jpg&description=The Sundiata Post Model (7): A Philosophical Triad and the Language of 21st-Century Journalism', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Max Amuchie | The Sunday Stew
Language does more than describe reality. It shapes how we perceive it.
Every enduring discipline eventually develops its own vocabulary. Law has its language. Medicine has its language. Economics, engineering, diplomacy and computer science all possess conceptual vocabularies that enable practitioners to describe phenomena with greater precision than ordinary language permits.
Journalism is no exception.
Yet the vocabulary of journalism has largely remained rooted in the 20th century. We continue to speak of newsrooms, reporters, editors, publishers, news cycles and audiences—concepts that remain important but no longer fully capture the realities of a profession transformed by digital technology, artificial intelligence, data science and knowledge production.
If journalism itself is changing, then its language must also evolve.
Throughout this series, I have argued that the 21st century newsroom should no longer be understood merely as a producer of news but as a knowledge-producing institution. That institutional transformation inevitably requires a corresponding conceptual transformation. New realities require new language.
A Note on the Definition of the Sundiata Post Model
In Part 1 of this series, I defined the Sundiata Post Model as an institutional framework for media-based knowledge production. The development of the Model across the subsequent parts has, however, clarified its institutional character and conceptual architecture. I therefore refine that original definition here and assert the following as the canonical definition:
The Sundiata Post Model is an institutional model for media-based knowledge production in which an independent newsroom systematically integrates journalism, original research, conceptual innovation, and scholarly dissemination to produce original analytical constructs that contribute to public understanding, academic inquiry, and policy discourse within the global knowledge ecosystem. Its conceptual framework sets out the principles, structures, processes and mechanisms through which such a newsroom can become a knowledge-producing institution and sustain that capacity over time.
The Sundiata Post Model (SPM) therefore proposes not simply an institutional model but also a vocabulary through which its conceptual framework can be understood and communicated.
This vocabulary should not be viewed as rigid terminology imposed upon the profession. Language evolves through use rather than decree. Some concepts will prove useful. Others may be revised or replaced. Ultimately, the value of any terminology lies not in its novelty but in its capacity to illuminate reality more clearly.
What follows is therefore an emerging lexicon for 21st century journalism. It gives language to the ideas developed throughout this series.
Knowledge-Producing Institution
Perhaps the central concept within the SPM is the Knowledge-Producing Institution.
Traditional media organisations produce journalism. A knowledge-producing institution produces journalism while simultaneously generating research, analytical frameworks, datasets, policy knowledge and institutional memory. It informs today’s public while contributing to tomorrow’s understanding.
This distinction represents the philosophical foundation upon which the entire model rests.
Dual Engine Architecture
The Dual Engine Architecture describes the internal structure through which journalism and knowledge production become mutually reinforcing.
The Media Operations Engine generates journalism, public engagement and commercial activity.
The Knowledge Operations Engine converts that journalistic activity into research, intellectual frameworks, datasets, publications and institutional knowledge.
Together they create a continuous cycle in which journalism enriches research and research strengthens journalism.
Media Operations Engine
The Media Operations Engine is the institution’s public-facing operational system.
It encompasses reporting, editing, verification, multimedia production, audience engagement, commercial publishing, conferences, public events and other activities through which the institution serves society while generating the resources necessary to sustain its mission.
Knowledge Operations Engine
The Knowledge Operations Engine is the institution’s intellectual infrastructure.
It conducts research, develops theories, constructs analytical frameworks, curates datasets, preserves institutional memory and maintains standards for methodology, research quality and knowledge governance. It transforms information into enduring knowledge.
Institutional Intelligence Cycle
The Institutional Intelligence Cycle describes the continuous movement of knowledge between journalism and research.
Reporting generates observations.
Observations generate questions.
Research transforms those questions into structured knowledge.
That knowledge subsequently enriches journalism, producing deeper reporting and more informed public discourse.
The cycle then begins again.
Knowledge therefore accumulates rather than disappears.
Institutional Memory
Institutions do not become enduring simply because they survive. They become enduring because they remember.
Institutional Memory refers to the organised preservation of knowledge generated through journalism, research, governance and public engagement. It ensures that experience accumulates across generations rather than disappearing with personnel changes, the passing of news cycles or successive algorithmic transformations.
Knowledge Stewardship
Creating knowledge is only the beginning.
Knowledge Stewardship concerns the responsibility to preserve, organise, govern and transmit that knowledge responsibly across generations.
It treats intellectual assets not as temporary outputs but as permanent institutional resources.
Knowledge Governance
If knowledge is to become an institutional asset, it must also be governed.
Knowledge Governance refers to the principles, systems and standards through which institutions ensure methodological integrity, research quality, documentation, accessibility, preservation and responsible use of knowledge.
It provides order to institutional intelligence.
Realm of the Long Term
Every institution eventually reaches the point where immediate performance gives way to long-term stewardship.
The Realm of the Long Term describes that stage in institutional development.
Here, management shifts its attention from short-term success to enduring relevance.
Leadership becomes stewardship.
Growth becomes continuity.
Performance becomes permanence of purpose.
The Seven Pillars
The Seven Pillars constitute the institutional foundations upon which the Realm of the Long Term rests:
- Financial Sustainability
- Human Capital and Leadership
- Knowledge Stewardship
- Governance
- Innovation and Adaptation
- Trust and Reputation
- Mission Continuity
Together they provide a practical philosophy for institutional endurance.
The Logic of the Long Term
The Logic of the Long Term is the principle that enduring institutions are sustained not by isolated organisational strengths but by the interaction of mutually reinforcing capabilities. Within the SPM, it explains why the Seven Pillars operate as an integrated institutional system rather than as independent functions.
Institutional Success
Within the SPM, institutional success extends beyond commercial performance. It encompasses four progressively deeper levels.
Operational Success measures present performance.
Institutional Success measures organisational endurance.
Civilisational Success measures the institution’s enduring contribution to society’s accumulated stock of knowledge.
Legacy measures Generational Influence—the extent to which an institution’s ideas, values, methods and contributions continue shaping future generations.
Success is therefore measured not only by what institutions produce, but ultimately by what continues because the institution existed.
The Triple Institutional Architecture
The SPM is not only an institutional model. Its development has also generated an emerging institutional architecture through which its principles can be expressed in practice.
That architecture consists of three complementary institutions: Sundiata Post Media Ltd., the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), and the Sundiata Post Foundation.
Sundiata Post Media Ltd. constitutes the media and public-information institution. Its primary function is journalism: reporting, investigation, verification, public engagement and the dissemination of knowledge to society. The Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU) constitutes the research and knowledge institution. Its function extends beyond journalism into original research, conceptual innovation, analytical constructs, datasets, policy research and scholarly dissemination. The development of The Insecurity Triad, the Trinity of Sovereignty Decay (TSD) and the Decoupling Sovereignty Index (DSI) demonstrates the potential for this research function to generate original intellectual contributions rather than merely reproduce existing knowledge.
The Sundiata Post Foundation constitutes the social-impact and civic-engagement institution within the wider ecosystem.
Together, these institutions form a Triple Institutional Architecture:
Media—Knowledge—Social Impact
The three institutions are distinct in function but complementary in purpose. Their differentiated institutional roles create distinct but mutually reinforcing pathways for sustaining public value.
This architecture also extends the Dual Engine Architecture of the SPM beyond the internal structure of a newsroom. The Media Operations Engine and Knowledge Operations Engine remain the core internal mechanisms of the knowledge-producing institution, while the Triple Institutional Architecture shows how those functions can connect to a wider institutional ecosystem in which journalism, research and social impact reinforce one another.
The four original constructs developed through the Sundiata Post intellectual project provide an initial proof of concept for the knowledge-producing capacity underlying this architecture.
The Triad demonstrates the capacity to develop an original analytical lens. The TSD demonstrates theoretical innovation. The DSI represents an attempt to translate theory into an empirical measurement system. The SPM itself provides the institutional model through which such knowledge can be generated, preserved and disseminated.
The significance, therefore, lies not in the existence of four ideas or three institutions independently, but in their interaction.
The constructs demonstrate intellectual production.
The institutions provide organisational embodiment.
The architecture connects knowledge production to public value.
Beyond Journalism: Strategic Management and Organisational Theory
The SPM sits at the intersection of journalism and media studies, organisational theory, and strategic management.
From journalism and media studies, it draws on the tradition of public service—a profession dedicated to informing society, strengthening democracy, and contributing to public understanding.
From organisational theory, it draws on the study of how institutions are designed, governed, sustained and renewed over time, emphasising organisational structure, institutional memory, culture, stewardship and long-term continuity.
From strategic management, it draws on the principles of institutional endurance—financial sustainability, governance, human capital development, innovation, knowledge stewardship and mission continuity.
These are not separate concerns. The SPM argues that journalism cannot fulfil its public purpose without institutional strength, and that institutional strength cannot be built without understanding journalism’s unique mission.
This interdisciplinary foundation is reflected throughout the Model—in its Dual Engine Architecture, its Seven Pillars, its measures of institutional success, and its proposed vocabulary. Each element integrates the concerns of both fields, offering a framework that is both mission-driven and institutionally grounded.
A Living Vocabulary
No vocabulary is ever complete.
The language proposed in this series should therefore be understood as a living intellectual framework rather than a finished dictionary. As journalism evolves, new concepts will emerge. Existing concepts will be refined. Some terms may disappear altogether while others become widely adopted. That is how intellectual traditions develop.
History reminds us that new ways of understanding the world often begin when someone gives language to a previously unnamed reality. Once that language gained acceptance, the underlying ideas became easier to understand, debate and improve.
The SPM aspires to make a similar contribution. Its value will not be determined by whether every term survives unchanged, but by whether this vocabulary helps journalists, scholars, media executives and researchers think more clearly about what the newsroom of the 21st century can become.
If that conversation continues beyond these pages—if these concepts are questioned, tested, adapted and applied—then the language will have served its purpose.
Because institutions are built with systems.
Ideas are built with language.
The future of journalism will require both.
Across these seven parts, I have defined the problem, formulated a new institutional model, proposed its architecture, articulated its guiding principles, developed measures of success, and finally given it its own vocabulary. Together, these elements give the SPM its internal coherence and completeness.
A Philosophical Triad of Enduring Influences
With humility, drawing on decades of experience at the forefront of the African media industry, a fellowship at the highest level of the Chartered Institute of Human Resource Management (CIHRM), foundational membership in the Institute of Strategic Management Nigeria, and from my desk at Sundiata Post in Abuja, I release these ideas—the Sundiata Post Model—into the world. Their future is no longer mine to determine. If they endure, it will not be because I insisted upon their importance, but because others found them worth questioning, testing, adapting and building upon.
For many years, my life journey and the arc of my interdisciplinary thinking have been shaped by a philosophical triad of enduring influences. The first is Sigmund Freud’s insight that “immortality means being known by many anonymous people”—which, to me, revealed the possibility that ideas can outlive their creators and that the truest measure of intellectual work lies not in personal recognition but in the enduring life of ideas.
The second is Edward Said’s vision of the intellectual as one who engages society’s most pressing questions with independence, integrity, and moral courage.
The third is Antonio Gramsci’s conception of the organic intellectual, which helped me see journalism as far more than the reporting of events. It reframed journalism for me as an intellectual vocation—one that interprets reality, organises knowledge, frames public understanding, and contributes to society’s accumulated stock of learning.
Together, these three influences have shaped my conception of journalism not merely as a profession, but as an intellectual vocation and a means of creating knowledge that can outlive its creator.
If, through the development of four original constructs—The Insecurity Triad, the Trinity of Sovereignty Decay, the Decoupling Sovereignty Index, and now the Sundiata Post Model—I have made a meaningful contribution in that tradition, I am content to leave the judgment to history and to those who engage with these ideas in the years ahead.
This series is concluded.
Trust is sacred. Stay seasoned.
•Dr Max Nwabueze Amuchie is an African scholar-practitioner and framework builder whose original intellectual work spans insecurity, sovereignty, institutional development, and journalism as knowledge production. His frameworks include the Insecurity Triad, the Trinity of Sovereignty Decay, the Decoupling Sovereignty Index, and the Sundiata Post Model. He is the CEO & Theorist-In-Chief of Sundiata Post, Lead Researcher at the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), and an Expert Member and Peer Reviewer in Behavioural and Social Sciences at ScienceOpen.
Opinion
Death Be Not Proud: Publisher Dotun Oladipo and the Tolling Bell
By Max Amuchie | The Sunday Stew
At just 56, Dotun Oladipo has left us far too soon.
John Donne, the 17th-century English poet and cleric, wrote words more than four centuries ago that seem almost written for a moment such as this:
“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main; and if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were; any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
Those words have stayed with me since I first encountered them. I have returned to them at moments of profound loss, including the tragedy of the Bellview Airlines crash in October 2005. But I never imagined that I would one day find myself returning to them to make sense of the death of Dotun Oladipo.
For whom, indeed, does the bell toll?
It tolls for Dotun. But it also tolls for all of us.
It tolls for the journalists who worked with him, for the publishers he mentored, for the members of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) whom he served and strengthened, for the readers who encountered his journalism, and for the many people whose lives he touched in ways that perhaps became fully apparent only after his death.
It tolls for me too.
The first time I invoked the title of Donne’s famous meditation, ‘Death Be Not Proud’, was in October 2005, in a reflective article on the October 22, 2005, Bellview Airlines Boeing 737-200 crash.
On Sunday, October 23, my family was about driving out to go to church when a call came from Eniola Bello, then Editor of ThisDay. Bellview Airlines had crashed the previous day, Saturday, and I was needed immediately in the office to lead the reportorial team to the crash site in a remote village in Ogun State.
I was Features Editor at the time and, as is typical of journalism, like military service, one must obey the editor’s order.
I got to the ThisDay office in Apapa, Lagos that morning and the Chairman, Nduka Obaigbena, had made his personal car available for the trip. We drove to the forest in Lisa village in Ifo Local Government Area of Ogun State, where the crashed aircraft had been buried deep in the earth.
There was hardly any visible trace of the aircraft. No recognisable piece of it could be seen, except for the little smoke rising from the earth and the tree branches that had been cut or shattered by the impact.
All 111 passengers and six crew members perished.
There were many responders — the Red Cross and the Ogun State Government team led by the then Commissioner for Health, Dr Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello, among them. The atmosphere was sombre. Everyone could feel the enormity of the calamity, the scale of the human tragedy.
Journalists are trained to be emotionally detached from the stories they cover.
I managed to apply that principle, but I also had to write a reflective piece on a tragedy whose scale was almost unimaginable.
In writing that article, I reached for John Donne’s ‘Meditation XVII’, from his 1624 Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, the meditation that inspired the title of Ernest Hemingway’s 1940 novel, For Whom the Bell Tolls. I had first written about Donne’s famous meditation some five years earlier, following the Kenya Airways Flight 431 crash of January 30, 2000, which I was assigned to coverat the Murtala Muhammed Airport, Lagos, where relations of the crash victims had besieged the airline, desperately seeking information about their loved ones.
The plane, carrying almost exclusively Nigerian passengers, had crashed into the Atlantic Ocean shortly after take-off from the Félix Houphouët-Boigny International Airport, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.
Dr Francis Enemuo, a highly respected political scientist and senior lecturer at the University of Lagos, and Rev. Fr. (Prof.) Edmund Ikenga-Metuh, an eminent Catholic priest and renowned professor of African Traditional Religion, were among the casualties of the Kenya Airways crash.
And now, more than two decades later, I am confronting that same bell again.
Penultimate Tuesday, I found myself in a reverie, ruminating about the immortal words of that 17th-century writer.
It was evening, and I had casually picked up my phone, which was being charged, to check if there were fresh messages. Suddenly, I saw a pop-up on the GOCOP WhatsApp platform. It was from Danlami Nmodu, mni, our president.
I saw the name Dotun Oladipo on the pop-up and decided to open the message.
What I saw did not make sense to me.
I had actually just woken up from sleep, so I cleared my eyes to be sure that I had read the message correctly.
Our own Dotun Oladipo had died?
I checked my WhatsApp messages.
Dotun had sent his news bulletin to me at 2:50 p.m. that same day.
Is this a joke?
It was incomprehensible.
I called Danlami. When I could not reach him immediately, I called Olumide Iyanda, our vice president. He confirmed it.
Then Danlami returned my call and confirmed it.
By then, Gabriel Akinadewo was already at Dotun’s house that night. I called him. He said he was spending the night there.
Very understandable.
Tragedy had just befallen GOCOP.
The Weight of His Example
I began to play in my mind my personal journey with Dotun.
But everyone who had the privilege of encountering Dotun had a personal journey with him. He left something of himself in the lives of the people he met.
As I read the testimonies of our members on the GOCOP platform, I started crying.
Journalists are trained to manage emotion. For an editor, the more tragic, bizarre or extraordinary a story is, the more compelling it becomes as news. We learn to stand at a certain distance from the events we cover, however devastating they may be.
But this was different.
Reading the comments, tributes and testimonies on our platform melted that professional distance. I became misty-eyed and could not help myself.
How can anyone who knew Dotun closely not testify to the rarity of his candour, the strength of his character and the depth of his selflessness?
There was something unusual about him. His frankness was not the convenient sort that says only what is safe to say.
His selflessness was not performed for applause. It was simply the way he lived.
And perhaps that is why the grief has been so profound.
We mourn people when they die. But sometimes, the death of a person forces us to confront the value of a life we had perhaps taken for granted while that person was still with us.
Dotun was one of those people.
I recall that around 2019, when Dotun was President of GOCOP, I had decided to help raise funds for one of our members, the late Ben Bright-Mkpuma, who was suffering from kidney failure.
Dotun saw how intentional I was about the effort. He could have simply commended it, as many people would. Instead, he decided that whatever I raised, GOCOP would match it, so that we could make it ₦1 million donation to the Bright-Mkpuma family.
At the time, there was no constitutional provision that obliged GOCOP to do this. Dotun was under no obligation to deploy the weight of the organisation behind my personal initiative. Yet he did.
From my own effort, I raised about ₦600,000. True to his word, GOCOP matched it. ₦1 million was eventually sent to the Bright-Mkpuma family.
And when Bright-Mkpuma eventually passed on, Dotun ensured that GOCOP was officially represented at his burial.
That was Dotun.
He did not merely speak about solidarity; he practised it. He understood that an organisation is not just a structure of offices, titles and meetings. It is, above all, a community of people who must stand by one another when life becomes difficult.
I experienced that same generosity personally in 2025, when my parents died and were to be buried.
Dotun rose to the occasion.
He did not wait for me to ask. He galvanised our friends to contribute and kick-started the process himself by making a personal donation.
That gesture has remained with me.
There are people who offer sympathy when tragedy comes. There are others who show up.
Dotun showed up.
And sometimes, that is the most profound definition of friendship.
The Eagle Online
Dotun was among the professional journalists who saw the potential of online publishing after a glorious career in the traditional media.
The Eagle Online, which he set up, became one of the most successful online news platforms in Nigeria, making Dotun a role model and mentor to not a few online publishers.
But what distinguished him was that he did not see his success as something to be guarded jealously. He was always willing to share what he knew.
As President of GOCOP, he mobilised members and worked to ensure that they benefited from programmes and opportunities that could make their businesses more sustainable. At GOCOP conferences, he regularly shared ideas about what The Eagle Online had done to make a difference in Nigeria’s online media space. More importantly, he encouraged other publishers to come forward and share their own ideas for the collective benefit of members.
I remember that as we were preparing for the annual conference in Lokoja, Kogi State, in 2024, I had casually spoken about exploring opportunities for the low-hanging fruits in sustaining online news businesses. Dotun immediately suggested that I prepare a paper on the subject for presentation and discussion at the conference.
That was another side of Dotun: he recognised possibilities in other people and gave them room to develop those possibilities.
When ‘The Sunday Stew’ column was launched and I announced that it would be syndicated, Dotun was among the first to indicate his interest in joining the syndication loop.
Up until the time of his death, The Eagle Online never missed an edition of the column.
I think about that now.
Every Sunday, my words travelled to the readers of The Eagle Online. And behind that simple act of syndication was a man who had, once again, opened a door for another journalist.
That was Dotun.
He built his own platform, but he also helped others build theirs. He understood that the success of one publisher did not diminish the prospects of another. If anything, he believed that the online media ecosystem became stronger when publishers shared knowledge, opportunities and audiences.
In an industry where competition can sometimes make people protective of information and opportunities, Dotun chose generosity.
And that, too, was his legacy.
A Different Kind of The Sunday Stew
This is the most difficult edition of ‘The Sunday Stew’ I have had to write since the column debuted in March.
I have struggled with the inconceivability of writing about Dotun Oladipo in the past tense. Even now, the words do not sit comfortably with me. My mind keeps returning to the Dotun who was still here — sending his bulletin, sharing ideas, encouraging colleagues and going about the business of journalism.
Even the story of his passing and the reactions from individuals and organisations was difficult for the SundiataPost to publish. There are stories journalists report because they must, even when every instinct in them wishes the story were not true.
This has been one of those stories.
So this is a different kind of ‘The Sunday Stew’.
There is no cleverness here, no attempt to manufacture a profound ending.
There is only the painful duty of remembering a man who mattered.
I began this piece with John Donne because his words have accompanied me through other moments of loss:
“Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
The bell has tolled for Dotun.
And yet, as I write this, I still cannot quite bring myself to say goodbye.
Perhaps because Dotun’s final bulletin arrived on my phone at 2:50 p.m. that day, Tuesday, 25 August 2026 before the news came that he was gone.
Perhaps because, in journalism, we are accustomed to deadlines, editions and bulletins — but there is no edition that prepares you for the final bulletin.
And perhaps because some people do not leave us entirely when they die. They remain in the things they built, the people they helped, the doors they opened, the ideas they shared and the memories they left behind.
Dotun left much behind.
His burial begins with a service of songs on Thursday, 10 September 2026 at Daystar Christian Centre Headquarters, Oregun, Ikeja, Lagos. And he will be laid to rest on Friday, 11 September2026, from 10:00 am to 11:00 am at the same venue.
But I will not say goodbye.
I will simply say: thank you, Dotunfor giving us the shelter of your example to dwell in.
You thought of no other name for your news platform but The Eagle Online. Perhaps that was because you appreciated the strength of the eagle and the power of its wings. With those wings, you have left us an imperishable legacy and flown to a higher, more glorious realm.
May the angels of heaven grant you Godspeed in that realm, as you rest in His bosom.
Fare thee well, Dotun Oladipo.
Trust is sacred. Stay seasoned.
•Max Nwabueze Amuchie, a member of GOCOP, is CEO & Theorist-In-Chief, Sundiata Post and Lead Researcher, Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), Abuja.
Opinion
90,000 km fiber and the digital divide
By Sonny Aragba-Akpore
An ambitious 90,000 km optic fiber network is in the offing by the government of Nigeria.
When actualised,it’s expected to boost coverage and expand network connectivity taking services to unserved and underserved areas of the 774 council areas in the country.
With necessary funding secured and Special Purpose Vehicle in Place,Bosun Tijani,Nigeria,s Communications,Innovation and Digital Economy Minister is optimistic that the race to Bridge the digital divide has begun.
The 90,000 km optic fiber ring being proposed will augment the existing 35,000 network infrastructure.
The funding which was secured by different sources will build the new infrastructure round the country and take services to underserved and unserved areas of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria.
The Minister is quoted as saying that “by the time we are done, it’s going to be either the third or second longest fibre-optic network on the African continent, somewhere between what we have in South Africa and Egypt. And this is a project that is starting implementation in October. We have raised the funding for it,” the Minister said.
“To ensure comprehensive coverage”he explained that “the infrastructure strategy combines terrestrial fiber, mobile towers, and satellite technology. While presidential approval includes installing telecom towers in underserved locations, the government will deploy satellite connectivity in hard-to-reach or terrain-impracticable areas to guarantee network access for over 20 million currently unserved citizens.”
The Government has incorporated Bridge Open Access (Bridge OA), an independent Special Purpose Vehicle established under Project BRIDGE to execute and manage the infrastructure backbone. Confirming that necessary funding has been secured, the Minister noted that President Bola Tinubu approved the project to aggressively deepen broadband penetration across the country.
The Scheduled roll out is in October 2026 at an estimated cost of $2 billion, funded via public-private partnership (PPP) combining debt from development finance institutions and equity from private companies.
The Federal Government holds a minority stake between 25% and 49%.
It extends Nigeria’s total fiber backbone from roughly 35,000 km to 125,000 km, making it one of the longest networks in Africa.
It aims to connect every state, local government area, ward, and over 200,000 social, educational, and healthcare institutions.
The advisory, structural, and funding partnerships driving the Project BRIDGE SPV include several major technical and development entities.These include
Strategic Advisory & Procurement Partners like
Bluechip Technologies Limited that was appointed as the Lead Partner in the consortium awarded the ₦451.8 million advisory contract by the Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy (FMCIDE). They are tasked with designing the implementation-ready supply chain and procurement strategy for the entire network rollout.
Bluechip Communications Limited is acting as the Member Partner alongside Bluechip Technologies within the Joint Venture while Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) is Providing the standardized Model Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Agreement framework to align legal, structural, and risk allocations with global best practices.
Core Funding & Technical Design Partners are in charge of the
project design, technical studies, and financial structures closely tied to a working group of global development financial institutions (DFIs) co-led by the Nigerian government while
African Development Bank Group (AfDB) Co-leads the working group and approved $200 million for the Digital Value Chain Infrastructure project under Project BRIDGE.
The World Bank Group is backing the initiative with a foundational $500 million financing agreement.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has also committed a $100 million investment while European Union (EU)is Providing a €22 million direct grant.
Operational Delivery & Deployment Partners will handle the
Project Implementation Unit (PIU) Composed of experienced telecom and legal experts from both the private and government sectors managing the preliminary activities.
Government also formed the National Broadband Alliance for Nigeria (NBAN)to unify local telecom infrastructure providers, civil society, and state agencies to handle the local, middle-mile distribution once the main backbone is laid.
The core procurement strategy designed by Bluechip Technologies will harness local internet service providers (ISPs) to hook into this open-access wholesale network.
The Board of Directors of ADB Group approved a $200 million loan to the government of Nigeria to advance a flagship initiative to deploy the 90,000 kilometres of open-access fibre nationwide, expand digital skills, and drive job creation across the country.
Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and West Africa’s largest market, and with the digital economy increasingly a major contributor to GDP, the Digital Value Chain Infrastructure for Boosting Employment (D-VIBE) Project is expected to close connectivity gaps and support productivity and job creation. It will achieve this by extending Nigeria’s national fibre backbone from around 35,000 km to about 125,000 km, connecting all 774 Local Government Areas – including schools, health facilities, agro-industrial zones, rural communities and commercial hubs – to high-speed broadband and establishing cross-border links with neighbours Benin, Cameroon, Niger, and Chad.
D-VIBE, also known as Project BRIDGE, is structured as a public-private partnership through a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), with public ownership capped between 25% and 49% and private sector participation between 51% and 75%, helping address rollout constraints such as high construction and Right-of-Way costs.
The African Development Bank Group is providing a $200 million loan as part of an $800 million sovereign financing package for the project, alongside $500 million from the World Bank and $100 million from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Total project financing is estimated at $2 billion, and includes an EU grant of €22 million, a $2.6 million Multilateral Cooperation Center for Development Finance (MCDF) project preparation grant, and at least $1.2 billion of investment from the private sector.
“Nigeria has the talent, the market, and the ambition; what it has lacked is the backbone infrastructure to connect that potential to opportunity. D-VIBE changes that. From the north to the south, from farms to factories to classrooms, this investment will make high-speed connectivity a reality for every Nigerian community and give young people the tools to build their futures digitally,” said Abdul Kamara, Director General, African Development Bank Group Nigeria Office.
The project is supported through a working group of development finance institutions, co-led by the Nigerian government and the African Development Bank Group, that will align design choices, technical studies and financing.
Beyond infrastructure, the project aims to address demand-side barriers to digital use with affordable devices, large-scale skills development and support for digital platforms in priority sectors. It will also support enabling cybersecurity and market competition policies while applying criteria – including increased use of hybrid and renewable power – to build resilience.
D-VIBE is expected to support creation of up to 2.8 million jobs over its lifecycle and raise national broadband penetration from 45% to around 70% by 2030.
The project aligns with Nigeria’s Vision 2050, its National Development Plan and Renewed Hope Development Plan (2026-2030), the African Union’s Agenda 2063, and the African Development Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy (2024-2033).
“I think our sector has been extremely fortunate. Mr. President has given us quite a number of things that the sector has been demanding for a long time. Whether it’s the Critical National Infrastructure designation for all digital infrastructure, the slight adjustment in tariff, or the tax harmonisation, these are reforms the industry has long requested.
“I think it’s probably the sector that is most appreciative of this government because when we came in, the sector was contributing between 16 and 18 per cent to our GDP, but today it is tracking close to 21 per cent. That represents significant growth,” he said.
The minister was quoted as saying that the reforms had also improved the financial performance of major operators in the telecommunications sector.
On efforts to bridge the digital divide, Tijani disclosed that the government would begin deploying about 3,700 telecommunications towers from October to provide network coverage for more than 20 million Nigerians currently living in underserved communities without access to telecom services.
He said the President had approved the project after months of capital mobilisation and planning.
“Today we’re at a point where, before the end of the year, we’ll also start to deploy close to 3,700 towers. It’s taken a lot to put this project together and raise the required capital, but we are now ready to begin deployment around October,” he said.
Side by side with this, the minister also announced that Nigeria would officially launch an alphanumeric postcode system on October 1, a move he said would place the country among a select group of nations operating an advanced digital addressing system.
“Nigeria will be amongst maybe 10 or 15 countries in the world with an alphanumeric postcode. It’s the latest design in postcode systems, where we can identify every property in this country. We’re hoping to launch that on the 1st of October,” he said.
Tijani explained that the new system would assign a unique address to every property nationwide, enhancing logistics, accelerating e-commerce, improving emergency response and strengthening public service delivery.
“Inability to locate places comes at a cost. You can imagine what this will do for e-commerce. It means goods can now be delivered in record time,” he said.
He added that integrating the postcode system with existing government identity databases would improve security and make public services more efficient.
“Our alphanumeric postcode is unique because it allows us to assign a unique address to every property. In many countries, such as the UK, postcodes cover clusters of buildings. What we are introducing will uniquely identify every building, and that will be a game changer for Nigeria in terms of security, commerce and public service delivery,” the minister stated.
When actualised,internet connectivity will improve significantly with an equal boost to broadband availability and speeds.
Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) said active subscribers connected to the internet through various technology channels deployed by the Nigerian service providers, reached 157,405,351, as of May 2026.
The statistics released showed that there has been a major surge and that with improved infrastructure more people will be connected.
Agency reports say
broadband penetration rose to 56.11 per cent with 121,643,718 subscriptions in May 2026, after recording 55.67 per cent penetration with 120,684,625 subscriptions in April 2026.
“From the 157,405,351 internet subscribers recorded in May this year, subscribers that connect to the internet via the Mobile GSM technology provided by mobile operators like MTN, Airtel, Globacom, and T2, were 157,021,888. Next to it, is the internet connectivity via the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology, which recorded 225,538 internet subscribers as at May this year, followed by Fixed Wired technology provided by traditional Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like Spectranet, Swift Networks, and Cobranet, which recorded 157,925 internet subscribers in May this year.”
By NCC’s statistics, Mobile GSM technology has maintained the lead position in internet connectivity in the last one year.
The statistics say that as at October 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 142,004,662, followed by VoIP, which recorded 239,672 and ISPs, which recorded 73,778.
“In November 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 144,151,655, followed by VoIP, which recorded 238,496 and ISPs, which recorded 83.417.
Internet& Telecom
“In December 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 147,519,262, followed by VoIP, which recorded 232,284 and ISPs, which recorded 101,667.
“In January 2026, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 150,912,474, followed by VoIP, which recorded 225,236 and ISPs, which recorded 103,722.
“In February 2026, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 152,476,943, followed by VoIP, which recorded 219,741 and ISPs, which recorded 124,590.
Opinion
INEC as the Greatest Threat to the 2027 Election and Nigeria’s Democracy
By Emmanuel Thomas
Democracy is sustained not merely by the physical act of casting a ballot, but by public trust in the institutions tasked with safeguarding the vote.
When the institution mandated to act as an impartial referee repeatedly displays technical opacity, administrative clumsiness, and institutional evasiveness, it ceases to be a guarantor of democratic expression and becomes its greatest threat.
As Nigeria prepares for the 2027 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) finds itself locked in a crisis of credibility that threatens the survival of the country’s constitutional order.
The latest manifest of this systemic rot was laid bare following the August 15, 2026, Osun State governorship election. Prominent economist, civic leader, and founder of the Anap Foundation, Atedo Peterside, issued a scathing critique targeting the integrity of INEC’s electronic infrastructure.
Peterside raised three fundamental, data-backed questions regarding the operation of the INEC Result Viewing (IReV) portal on election night:
Why did result transmission freeze completely for nearly three hours (between 20:48 hrs and 23:42 hrs), only for an unprecedented dump of 236 polling unit results to hit the server in less than 60 seconds immediately afterward?
Why were 51 polling unit results uploaded only after a winner had already been declared by the returning officer?
Why did 11 polling unit results remain entirely unaccounted for on the IReV portal days after the exercise concluded?
These queries are not mere technical nitpicking; they strike at the heart of the “triangle of compromise” currently eroding Nigerian statehood. Peterside’s observations prove that despite legislative overhauls, billions of naira in budgetary allocations, and repeated institutional promises,
INEC’s technological infrastructure remains vulnerable to unexplained outages that consistently coincide with critical moments of collation.
A Pattern of Institutional Evasion
The technical glitches highlighted in the Osun gubernatorial contest are part of a broader, systemic failure. Rather than operating as an independent body dedicated to transparency, INEC has established a pattern where digital platforms—introduced specifically to eliminate manual rigging—are compromised at crucial junctures.
Electoral integrity is predicated on predictability. When the digital transmission pipeline freezes without explanation, public suspicion fills the void. A sudden dump of 236 results in under a minute following a three-hour blackout suggests manual batching or administrative intervention rather than automated real-time transmission.
Furthermore, declaring an election winner while scores of polling unit results remain offline—or uploading them post-declaration—renders the IReV portal a retrospective archive rather than a real-time verification tool.
This behavior directly fuels voter cynicism. As former INEC officials, civil society organizations, and international observers have repeatedly noted, when citizens believe the referee is compromised, the incentive to participate vanishes.
Elections are reduced to performative rituals where outcomes are perceived to be manufactured in administrative corridors rather than determined at polling stations.
Replicating the Mistakes of the Past
The dangerous trajectory toward 2027 mirrors the institutional failures that damaged public faith during the 2023 general elections.
The non-transmission of presidential election results in real time on the IReV portal shattered public trust and cast a shadow over the judicial petitions that followed. Rather than treating that failure as an emergency requiring radical reform, INEC’s conduct in subsequent off-cycle elections indicates an entrenchment of bad practice.
Civic leaders across the political spectrum have sounded the alarm. The recurring narrative of “technical hitches”—conveniently occurring during the collation of high-stakes results—has transformed INEC from an agent of democratic consolidation into a vector of political instability.
When citizens lose faith in the ballot box, the alternative is often street protests, political apathy, or a slide toward total lawlessness.
The Implication for 2027
Nigeria cannot afford an electoral umpire whose operations invite perpetual litigation and civil unrest.
A general election involves the simultaneous processing of tens of thousands of polling units across 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. If INEC cannot manage real-time result transmission and full transparency in a single-state off-cycle election like Osun, its capacity to conduct a credible, peaceful, and transparent nationwide election in 2027 is doubtful.
The commission’s persistent refusal to offer transparent forensic logs, clear operational explanations, or account for missing polling unit data reinforces the perception that it operates above public accountability. In a democracy, institutional silence in the face of mathematical and operational anomalies is an admission of failure.
If Nigeria’s democratic experiment is to survive past 2027, INEC must be subjected to immediate, independent technical audits and structural reform.
The electoral body must understand that its primary duty is not to declare winners, but to protect the integrity of the process.
Until INEC provides clear answers to the questions raised by Atedo Peterside and addresses its systemic technological flaws, it remains the single greatest institutional threat to Nigeria’s democracy.
-
News24 hours agoThree casualties, 20 injured in Osun auto crash
-
News20 hours agoAwujale throne: Fusengbuwa ruling house insists it remains united, alleges sabotage
-
News8 hours ago“I’ll Crash Petrol, Cooking Gas, And Jet Fuel To ₦200 In 12 Months!” – SDP’s Adewole Adebayo Drops 2027 Presidential Bombshell
-
News20 hours ago2027 Presidency: No Candidate, Including Peter Obi, Can Fix Nigeria — Datti
-
News19 hours agoMan Who Caught Wife Cheating With Robot Vacuum Camera Jailed for Privacy Breach
-
News18 hours agoLagos Police Probe Viral Clash Between Officers, Youths in Surulere
-
News22 hours agoHartland Nigeria Completes 41 Projects, Reaffirms Commitment To Infrastructure Delivery
-
Opinion21 hours agoDeath Be Not Proud: Publisher Dotun Oladipo and the Tolling Bell
