Opinion
The Sundiata Post Model (3): The Dual Engine Architecture
- /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IMG-20260628-WA00132-1000x600.jpg&description=The Sundiata Post Model (3): The Dual Engine Architecture', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 72
https://naijablitznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IMG-20260628-WA00132-1000x600.jpg&description=The Sundiata Post Model (3): The Dual Engine Architecture', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Max Amuchie | The Sunday Stew
In the 7 June 2026 article which marked the formal unveiling of the Decoupling Sovereignty Index (DSI), I articulated a defining institutional proposition. The launch of the DSI was presented not merely as the introduction of a new analytical instrument, but as another milestone in the evolution of Sundiata Post into what I described as a dual engine architectural powerhouse. That statement marked an important transition. It signalled that Sundiata Post was no longer to be understood solely as a digital news platform, but as an institution consciously integrating journalism, strategic intelligence and scholarly research within a single operational framework.
The proposition advanced on that occasion was straightforward. On the front end, Sundiata Post would continue to function as a digital-first, high-velocity news organisation, reporting events, investigating public issues, analysing developments and informing citizens through timely, credible journalism. On the back end, the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU) would operate as a proprietary knowledge engine, generating original research, developing analytical frameworks, curating datasets, publishing working papers and preserving institutional knowledge through globally recognised scholarly repositories.
This series develops that proposition into a formal institutional architecture.
The first part in this series argued that the newsroom of the twenty-first century must evolve beyond the production of daily news to become a knowledge institution. The second situated that proposition within a broader intellectual tradition, demonstrating through the works of Walter Lippmann, Hannah Arendt, Nnamdi Azikiwe and Obafemi Awolowo that journalism has historically served not merely as a conveyor of information but as a builder of public reason, democratic culture and national development.
Having established the philosophical foundations, we now turn to the question of institutional design. Every enduring institution requires more than a compelling vision; it requires an architecture capable of translating principles into sustained practice. Ideas alone do not create institutions. Institutions endure because they are deliberately designed to produce consistent outcomes, preserve organisational memory, adapt to changing environments and outlive their founders.
The Sundiata Post Model is therefore built upon what I call the Dual Engine Architecture. Simply stated, the Dual Engine Architecture is an institutional design in which a Media Operations Engine generates public value through journalism while a Knowledge Operations Engine transforms that journalistic enterprise into a permanent system of knowledge production.
The first engine is the Media Operations Engine—the visible newsroom that performs the essential functions of journalism through reporting, verification, investigation, editing, publication and audience engagement. The second is the Knowledge Operations Engine—the institutional infrastructure through which research is conducted, theories are formulated, datasets are curated, policy knowledge is generated and intellectual assets are systematically preserved.
These engines are neither parallel organisations nor competing departments. They are interdependent components of a single institutional system. Journalism supplies the observations, evidence and questions that shape the research agenda. Research, in turn, enriches journalism with deeper context, analytical rigour and conceptual innovation. The output of one continuously strengthens the other, creating an institutional intelligence cycle in which news informs knowledge and knowledge improves news.
The significance of this architecture extends beyond Sundiata Post itself. It offers a framework for reimagining the modern newsroom in an era defined by rapid technological change, information overload and declining public trust. Rather than treating journalism as a transient response to the daily news cycle, the Dual Engine Architecture positions the newsroom as the public-facing component of a broader knowledge enterprise—one that simultaneously informs the present, preserves the past and contributes original ideas to the future.
The Media Operations Engine
The first pillar of the Sundiata Post Model is the Media Operations Engine. This is the institution’s public-facing operational system—the visible enterprise through which Sundiata Post fulfils its journalistic, commercial and public engagement responsibilities. It represents the front end of the organisation, integrating editorial excellence with audience development, revenue generation and public-facing institutional activities.
At its core, the Media Operations Engine performs the traditional functions of a professional news organisation. It identifies stories of public importance, deploys reporters to the field, verifies facts through rigorous editorial procedures, produces multimedia content, provides analysis and commentary, and disseminates information across digital platforms. These activities remain the foundation of the institution’s commitment to informing society accurately, independently and responsibly.
Beyond the newsroom, however, the Media Operations Engine encompasses the broader business of media. It includes advertising and brand partnerships, digital marketing, audience growth strategies, subscription and membership initiatives where applicable, commercial publishing, multimedia production, and other revenue-generating activities necessary to sustain editorial independence. Within the Sundiata Post Model, commercial operations are not peripheral to journalism; they are carefully managed institutional functions that provide the financial capacity required for long-term public-interest reporting and knowledge production.
The engine also extends the institution’s public engagement beyond daily news publishing. Conferences, annual lectures, policy dialogues, public forums, media masterclasses, leadership summits and other convening platforms become integral components of the media enterprise. These engagements transform the organisation from a publisher of information into a convener of ideas, creating spaces where journalists, scholars, policymakers, business leaders and citizens can deliberate on issues of national and continental importance. In doing so, the Media Operations Engine strengthens the institution’s civic presence while simultaneously generating new networks, partnerships and editorial opportunities.
Within the Sundiata Post Model, the Media Operations Engine performs an additional function that distinguishes it from conventional news organisations. It serves as the institution’s principal observational system. Every news report, investigative assignment, interview, audience interaction, conference discussion and field observation constitutes more than a discrete media product. Collectively, they generate the empirical evidence, public conversations and emerging questions that feed the institution’s knowledge infrastructure.
In many conventional media organisations, these valuable intellectual assets dissipate with the passing of the news cycle. The Sundiata Post Model rejects this linear conception of journalism. Instead, every verified report, public engagement and editorial initiative is regarded as a potential contribution to a cumulative institutional intelligence system.
Accordingly, the Media Operations Engine performs four interconnected functions. First, it informs the public through credible journalism. Second, it sustains the institution through commercially responsible media operations. Third, it convenes society by creating platforms for dialogue, learning and policy engagement. Fourth, it continuously generates the empirical observations and strategic questions that become the raw material for the Knowledge Operations Engine.
The Media Operations Engine is therefore far more than a newsroom. It is the institution’s interface with society—observing events, engaging audiences, building relationships, generating revenue and producing the empirical foundation upon which the Sundiata Post Model’s broader knowledge enterprise is constructed.
The Knowledge Operations Engine
If the Media Operations Engine is the public face of the Sundiata Post Model, the Knowledge Operations Engine is its intellectual core. It is the institutional infrastructure through which information is transformed into knowledge, knowledge into analytical frameworks, and analytical frameworks into enduring intellectual assets. While the front end responds to the immediacy of events, the back end seeks to understand their underlying structures, causes and long-term implications.
The Knowledge Operations Engine is anchored by the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), which serves as the institution’s research and strategic intelligence hub. It is responsible for designing and executing research programmes, developing original concepts and theories, constructing analytical indices, curating datasets, producing policy papers, publishing working papers and peer-reviewed scholarship, maintaining institutional standards for methodology, research quality and knowledge governance, and preserving institutional knowledge through globally recognised academic repositories.
In this architecture, research is not an adjunct to journalism but an integral institutional function.
Unlike conventional newsroom research desks, whose work is often confined to supporting daily editorial production, the Knowledge Operations Engine pursues an independent programme of knowledge creation. It identifies recurring patterns across time, interrogates complex governance and security challenges, develops explanatory models, and subjects those models to empirical testing. The objective is not merely to explain individual events but to contribute original intellectual frameworks capable of advancing scholarly and policy debates.
The engine is also responsible for the stewardship of institutional memory. Research datasets, methodological notes, interview archives, conceptual papers, technical documentation and analytical outputs are systematically organised, preserved and made retrievable. Rather than allowing institutional knowledge to disappear with personnel changes or the passing of the news cycle, the Sundiata Post Model treats these materials as strategic assets that accumulate value over time. This commitment to preservation transforms the institution from a producer of content into a custodian of knowledge.
A defining characteristic of the Knowledge Operations Engine is its commitment to openness and scholarly engagement. Where appropriate, research outputs are deposited in recognised academic repositories, enabling scrutiny, replication, citation and further development by the global research community. By exposing its analytical frameworks and datasets to independent examination, the institution embraces the principle that durable knowledge grows stronger through critical evaluation rather than institutional isolation.
The Knowledge Operations Engine therefore performs four interconnected functions. First, it converts empirical observations into structured knowledge through rigorous research and analysis. Second, it generates original intellectual products—including theories, indices, policy frameworks and methodological innovations—that extend beyond the immediate demands of journalism. Third, it preserves and manages the institution’s intellectual capital as a permanent strategic resource. Fourth, it projects African or Global South scholarship into global academic and policy ecosystems, ensuring that ideas developed within the newsroom contribute to international conversations on governance, security, development and media innovation.
The Knowledge Operations Engine is therefore not simply a research department. It is the institutional mechanism through which journalism acquires permanence, evidence is transformed into understanding, and a media organisation evolves into a knowledge-producing institution. Together with the Media Operations Engine, it completes the Dual Engine Architecture that lies at the heart of the Sundiata Post Model.
If the preceding sections explain how the Sundiata Post Model works, an equally important question remains: Is this architecture unique to Sundiata Post, or can it become a framework for journalism more broadly?
Beyond Sundiata Post
The Sundiata Post Model is proposed as a universal institutional framework for twenty-first-century journalism. Although it originated within Sundiata Post, it is not conceived as an organisation-specific model. Rather, it offers a general institutional architecture that can be adapted by news organisations operating in diverse economic, technological, political and cultural environments.
In this formulation, Sundiata Post is not the model; it is the founding implementation and proof of concept—a living institutional demonstration that such an architecture is both practicable and sustainable. The relationship is similar to the Toyota Production System, which began inside a single company but evolved into a global management framework adopted by organisations far beyond the automotive industry. Likewise, the Sundiata Post Model is intended to transcend the organisation in which it was first developed.
Its long-term significance will therefore be determined not solely by its success at Sundiata Post, but by its capacity to be tested, adapted, replicated and refined by media organisations across different societies. The true measure of any institutional model is not that it works for its originator, but that it enables others to build stronger institutions of their own. If the Sundiata Post Model ultimately proves capable of helping news organisations across Africa, the Global South and beyond become enduring knowledge institutions, then its greatest contribution will not be what it achieved for Sundiata Post, but what it made possible for journalism itself.
Trust is sacred. Stay seasoned.
•Dr. Max Amuchie is a Scholar-Journalist, Media CEO, Lead Researcher at the Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), and an Expert Member and Peer Reviewer at ScienceOpen. He is the architect of The Insecurity Triad framework for African security analysis as well as the Trinity of Sovereignty Decay (formerly Trinity of State Decay) theory, and the Decoupling Sovereignty Index (DSI)—original frameworks for understanding, categorising, and measuring conflict, state decay, and sovereignty in the Global South.
X: @MaxAmuchie | Email: [email protected]
Opinion
Death Be Not Proud: Publisher Dotun Oladipo and the Tolling Bell
By Max Amuchie | The Sunday Stew
At just 56, Dotun Oladipo has left us far too soon.
John Donne, the 17th-century English poet and cleric, wrote words more than four centuries ago that seem almost written for a moment such as this:
“No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main; and if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were; any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
Those words have stayed with me since I first encountered them. I have returned to them at moments of profound loss, including the tragedy of the Bellview Airlines crash in October 2005. But I never imagined that I would one day find myself returning to them to make sense of the death of Dotun Oladipo.
For whom, indeed, does the bell toll?
It tolls for Dotun. But it also tolls for all of us.
It tolls for the journalists who worked with him, for the publishers he mentored, for the members of the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP) whom he served and strengthened, for the readers who encountered his journalism, and for the many people whose lives he touched in ways that perhaps became fully apparent only after his death.
It tolls for me too.
The first time I invoked the title of Donne’s famous meditation, ‘Death Be Not Proud’, was in October 2005, in a reflective article on the October 22, 2005, Bellview Airlines Boeing 737-200 crash.
On Sunday, October 23, my family was about driving out to go to church when a call came from Eniola Bello, then Editor of ThisDay. Bellview Airlines had crashed the previous day, Saturday, and I was needed immediately in the office to lead the reportorial team to the crash site in a remote village in Ogun State.
I was Features Editor at the time and, as is typical of journalism, like military service, one must obey the editor’s order.
I got to the ThisDay office in Apapa, Lagos that morning and the Chairman, Nduka Obaigbena, had made his personal car available for the trip. We drove to the forest in Lisa village in Ifo Local Government Area of Ogun State, where the crashed aircraft had been buried deep in the earth.
There was hardly any visible trace of the aircraft. No recognisable piece of it could be seen, except for the little smoke rising from the earth and the tree branches that had been cut or shattered by the impact.
All 111 passengers and six crew members perished.
There were many responders — the Red Cross and the Ogun State Government team led by the then Commissioner for Health, Dr Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello, among them. The atmosphere was sombre. Everyone could feel the enormity of the calamity, the scale of the human tragedy.
Journalists are trained to be emotionally detached from the stories they cover.
I managed to apply that principle, but I also had to write a reflective piece on a tragedy whose scale was almost unimaginable.
In writing that article, I reached for John Donne’s ‘Meditation XVII’, from his 1624 Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, the meditation that inspired the title of Ernest Hemingway’s 1940 novel, For Whom the Bell Tolls. I had first written about Donne’s famous meditation some five years earlier, following the Kenya Airways Flight 431 crash of January 30, 2000, which I was assigned to coverat the Murtala Muhammed Airport, Lagos, where relations of the crash victims had besieged the airline, desperately seeking information about their loved ones.
The plane, carrying almost exclusively Nigerian passengers, had crashed into the Atlantic Ocean shortly after take-off from the Félix Houphouët-Boigny International Airport, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.
Dr Francis Enemuo, a highly respected political scientist and senior lecturer at the University of Lagos, and Rev. Fr. (Prof.) Edmund Ikenga-Metuh, an eminent Catholic priest and renowned professor of African Traditional Religion, were among the casualties of the Kenya Airways crash.
And now, more than two decades later, I am confronting that same bell again.
Penultimate Tuesday, I found myself in a reverie, ruminating about the immortal words of that 17th-century writer.
It was evening, and I had casually picked up my phone, which was being charged, to check if there were fresh messages. Suddenly, I saw a pop-up on the GOCOP WhatsApp platform. It was from Danlami Nmodu, mni, our president.
I saw the name Dotun Oladipo on the pop-up and decided to open the message.
What I saw did not make sense to me.
I had actually just woken up from sleep, so I cleared my eyes to be sure that I had read the message correctly.
Our own Dotun Oladipo had died?
I checked my WhatsApp messages.
Dotun had sent his news bulletin to me at 2:50 p.m. that same day.
Is this a joke?
It was incomprehensible.
I called Danlami. When I could not reach him immediately, I called Olumide Iyanda, our vice president. He confirmed it.
Then Danlami returned my call and confirmed it.
By then, Gabriel Akinadewo was already at Dotun’s house that night. I called him. He said he was spending the night there.
Very understandable.
Tragedy had just befallen GOCOP.
The Weight of His Example
I began to play in my mind my personal journey with Dotun.
But everyone who had the privilege of encountering Dotun had a personal journey with him. He left something of himself in the lives of the people he met.
As I read the testimonies of our members on the GOCOP platform, I started crying.
Journalists are trained to manage emotion. For an editor, the more tragic, bizarre or extraordinary a story is, the more compelling it becomes as news. We learn to stand at a certain distance from the events we cover, however devastating they may be.
But this was different.
Reading the comments, tributes and testimonies on our platform melted that professional distance. I became misty-eyed and could not help myself.
How can anyone who knew Dotun closely not testify to the rarity of his candour, the strength of his character and the depth of his selflessness?
There was something unusual about him. His frankness was not the convenient sort that says only what is safe to say.
His selflessness was not performed for applause. It was simply the way he lived.
And perhaps that is why the grief has been so profound.
We mourn people when they die. But sometimes, the death of a person forces us to confront the value of a life we had perhaps taken for granted while that person was still with us.
Dotun was one of those people.
I recall that around 2019, when Dotun was President of GOCOP, I had decided to help raise funds for one of our members, the late Ben Bright-Mkpuma, who was suffering from kidney failure.
Dotun saw how intentional I was about the effort. He could have simply commended it, as many people would. Instead, he decided that whatever I raised, GOCOP would match it, so that we could make it ₦1 million donation to the Bright-Mkpuma family.
At the time, there was no constitutional provision that obliged GOCOP to do this. Dotun was under no obligation to deploy the weight of the organisation behind my personal initiative. Yet he did.
From my own effort, I raised about ₦600,000. True to his word, GOCOP matched it. ₦1 million was eventually sent to the Bright-Mkpuma family.
And when Bright-Mkpuma eventually passed on, Dotun ensured that GOCOP was officially represented at his burial.
That was Dotun.
He did not merely speak about solidarity; he practised it. He understood that an organisation is not just a structure of offices, titles and meetings. It is, above all, a community of people who must stand by one another when life becomes difficult.
I experienced that same generosity personally in 2025, when my parents died and were to be buried.
Dotun rose to the occasion.
He did not wait for me to ask. He galvanised our friends to contribute and kick-started the process himself by making a personal donation.
That gesture has remained with me.
There are people who offer sympathy when tragedy comes. There are others who show up.
Dotun showed up.
And sometimes, that is the most profound definition of friendship.
The Eagle Online
Dotun was among the professional journalists who saw the potential of online publishing after a glorious career in the traditional media.
The Eagle Online, which he set up, became one of the most successful online news platforms in Nigeria, making Dotun a role model and mentor to not a few online publishers.
But what distinguished him was that he did not see his success as something to be guarded jealously. He was always willing to share what he knew.
As President of GOCOP, he mobilised members and worked to ensure that they benefited from programmes and opportunities that could make their businesses more sustainable. At GOCOP conferences, he regularly shared ideas about what The Eagle Online had done to make a difference in Nigeria’s online media space. More importantly, he encouraged other publishers to come forward and share their own ideas for the collective benefit of members.
I remember that as we were preparing for the annual conference in Lokoja, Kogi State, in 2024, I had casually spoken about exploring opportunities for the low-hanging fruits in sustaining online news businesses. Dotun immediately suggested that I prepare a paper on the subject for presentation and discussion at the conference.
That was another side of Dotun: he recognised possibilities in other people and gave them room to develop those possibilities.
When ‘The Sunday Stew’ column was launched and I announced that it would be syndicated, Dotun was among the first to indicate his interest in joining the syndication loop.
Up until the time of his death, The Eagle Online never missed an edition of the column.
I think about that now.
Every Sunday, my words travelled to the readers of The Eagle Online. And behind that simple act of syndication was a man who had, once again, opened a door for another journalist.
That was Dotun.
He built his own platform, but he also helped others build theirs. He understood that the success of one publisher did not diminish the prospects of another. If anything, he believed that the online media ecosystem became stronger when publishers shared knowledge, opportunities and audiences.
In an industry where competition can sometimes make people protective of information and opportunities, Dotun chose generosity.
And that, too, was his legacy.
A Different Kind of The Sunday Stew
This is the most difficult edition of ‘The Sunday Stew’ I have had to write since the column debuted in March.
I have struggled with the inconceivability of writing about Dotun Oladipo in the past tense. Even now, the words do not sit comfortably with me. My mind keeps returning to the Dotun who was still here — sending his bulletin, sharing ideas, encouraging colleagues and going about the business of journalism.
Even the story of his passing and the reactions from individuals and organisations was difficult for the SundiataPost to publish. There are stories journalists report because they must, even when every instinct in them wishes the story were not true.
This has been one of those stories.
So this is a different kind of ‘The Sunday Stew’.
There is no cleverness here, no attempt to manufacture a profound ending.
There is only the painful duty of remembering a man who mattered.
I began this piece with John Donne because his words have accompanied me through other moments of loss:
“Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”
The bell has tolled for Dotun.
And yet, as I write this, I still cannot quite bring myself to say goodbye.
Perhaps because Dotun’s final bulletin arrived on my phone at 2:50 p.m. that day, Tuesday, 25 August 2026 before the news came that he was gone.
Perhaps because, in journalism, we are accustomed to deadlines, editions and bulletins — but there is no edition that prepares you for the final bulletin.
And perhaps because some people do not leave us entirely when they die. They remain in the things they built, the people they helped, the doors they opened, the ideas they shared and the memories they left behind.
Dotun left much behind.
His burial begins with a service of songs on Thursday, 10 September 2026 at Daystar Christian Centre Headquarters, Oregun, Ikeja, Lagos. And he will be laid to rest on Friday, 11 September2026, from 10:00 am to 11:00 am at the same venue.
But I will not say goodbye.
I will simply say: thank you, Dotunfor giving us the shelter of your example to dwell in.
You thought of no other name for your news platform but The Eagle Online. Perhaps that was because you appreciated the strength of the eagle and the power of its wings. With those wings, you have left us an imperishable legacy and flown to a higher, more glorious realm.
May the angels of heaven grant you Godspeed in that realm, as you rest in His bosom.
Fare thee well, Dotun Oladipo.
Trust is sacred. Stay seasoned.
•Max Nwabueze Amuchie, a member of GOCOP, is CEO & Theorist-In-Chief, Sundiata Post and Lead Researcher, Sundiata Post Intelligence Unit (SPIU), Abuja.
Opinion
90,000 km fiber and the digital divide
By Sonny Aragba-Akpore
An ambitious 90,000 km optic fiber network is in the offing by the government of Nigeria.
When actualised,it’s expected to boost coverage and expand network connectivity taking services to unserved and underserved areas of the 774 council areas in the country.
With necessary funding secured and Special Purpose Vehicle in Place,Bosun Tijani,Nigeria,s Communications,Innovation and Digital Economy Minister is optimistic that the race to Bridge the digital divide has begun.
The 90,000 km optic fiber ring being proposed will augment the existing 35,000 network infrastructure.
The funding which was secured by different sources will build the new infrastructure round the country and take services to underserved and unserved areas of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria.
The Minister is quoted as saying that “by the time we are done, it’s going to be either the third or second longest fibre-optic network on the African continent, somewhere between what we have in South Africa and Egypt. And this is a project that is starting implementation in October. We have raised the funding for it,” the Minister said.
“To ensure comprehensive coverage”he explained that “the infrastructure strategy combines terrestrial fiber, mobile towers, and satellite technology. While presidential approval includes installing telecom towers in underserved locations, the government will deploy satellite connectivity in hard-to-reach or terrain-impracticable areas to guarantee network access for over 20 million currently unserved citizens.”
The Government has incorporated Bridge Open Access (Bridge OA), an independent Special Purpose Vehicle established under Project BRIDGE to execute and manage the infrastructure backbone. Confirming that necessary funding has been secured, the Minister noted that President Bola Tinubu approved the project to aggressively deepen broadband penetration across the country.
The Scheduled roll out is in October 2026 at an estimated cost of $2 billion, funded via public-private partnership (PPP) combining debt from development finance institutions and equity from private companies.
The Federal Government holds a minority stake between 25% and 49%.
It extends Nigeria’s total fiber backbone from roughly 35,000 km to 125,000 km, making it one of the longest networks in Africa.
It aims to connect every state, local government area, ward, and over 200,000 social, educational, and healthcare institutions.
The advisory, structural, and funding partnerships driving the Project BRIDGE SPV include several major technical and development entities.These include
Strategic Advisory & Procurement Partners like
Bluechip Technologies Limited that was appointed as the Lead Partner in the consortium awarded the ₦451.8 million advisory contract by the Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy (FMCIDE). They are tasked with designing the implementation-ready supply chain and procurement strategy for the entire network rollout.
Bluechip Communications Limited is acting as the Member Partner alongside Bluechip Technologies within the Joint Venture while Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) is Providing the standardized Model Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Agreement framework to align legal, structural, and risk allocations with global best practices.
Core Funding & Technical Design Partners are in charge of the
project design, technical studies, and financial structures closely tied to a working group of global development financial institutions (DFIs) co-led by the Nigerian government while
African Development Bank Group (AfDB) Co-leads the working group and approved $200 million for the Digital Value Chain Infrastructure project under Project BRIDGE.
The World Bank Group is backing the initiative with a foundational $500 million financing agreement.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has also committed a $100 million investment while European Union (EU)is Providing a €22 million direct grant.
Operational Delivery & Deployment Partners will handle the
Project Implementation Unit (PIU) Composed of experienced telecom and legal experts from both the private and government sectors managing the preliminary activities.
Government also formed the National Broadband Alliance for Nigeria (NBAN)to unify local telecom infrastructure providers, civil society, and state agencies to handle the local, middle-mile distribution once the main backbone is laid.
The core procurement strategy designed by Bluechip Technologies will harness local internet service providers (ISPs) to hook into this open-access wholesale network.
The Board of Directors of ADB Group approved a $200 million loan to the government of Nigeria to advance a flagship initiative to deploy the 90,000 kilometres of open-access fibre nationwide, expand digital skills, and drive job creation across the country.
Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and West Africa’s largest market, and with the digital economy increasingly a major contributor to GDP, the Digital Value Chain Infrastructure for Boosting Employment (D-VIBE) Project is expected to close connectivity gaps and support productivity and job creation. It will achieve this by extending Nigeria’s national fibre backbone from around 35,000 km to about 125,000 km, connecting all 774 Local Government Areas – including schools, health facilities, agro-industrial zones, rural communities and commercial hubs – to high-speed broadband and establishing cross-border links with neighbours Benin, Cameroon, Niger, and Chad.
D-VIBE, also known as Project BRIDGE, is structured as a public-private partnership through a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), with public ownership capped between 25% and 49% and private sector participation between 51% and 75%, helping address rollout constraints such as high construction and Right-of-Way costs.
The African Development Bank Group is providing a $200 million loan as part of an $800 million sovereign financing package for the project, alongside $500 million from the World Bank and $100 million from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Total project financing is estimated at $2 billion, and includes an EU grant of €22 million, a $2.6 million Multilateral Cooperation Center for Development Finance (MCDF) project preparation grant, and at least $1.2 billion of investment from the private sector.
“Nigeria has the talent, the market, and the ambition; what it has lacked is the backbone infrastructure to connect that potential to opportunity. D-VIBE changes that. From the north to the south, from farms to factories to classrooms, this investment will make high-speed connectivity a reality for every Nigerian community and give young people the tools to build their futures digitally,” said Abdul Kamara, Director General, African Development Bank Group Nigeria Office.
The project is supported through a working group of development finance institutions, co-led by the Nigerian government and the African Development Bank Group, that will align design choices, technical studies and financing.
Beyond infrastructure, the project aims to address demand-side barriers to digital use with affordable devices, large-scale skills development and support for digital platforms in priority sectors. It will also support enabling cybersecurity and market competition policies while applying criteria – including increased use of hybrid and renewable power – to build resilience.
D-VIBE is expected to support creation of up to 2.8 million jobs over its lifecycle and raise national broadband penetration from 45% to around 70% by 2030.
The project aligns with Nigeria’s Vision 2050, its National Development Plan and Renewed Hope Development Plan (2026-2030), the African Union’s Agenda 2063, and the African Development Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy (2024-2033).
“I think our sector has been extremely fortunate. Mr. President has given us quite a number of things that the sector has been demanding for a long time. Whether it’s the Critical National Infrastructure designation for all digital infrastructure, the slight adjustment in tariff, or the tax harmonisation, these are reforms the industry has long requested.
“I think it’s probably the sector that is most appreciative of this government because when we came in, the sector was contributing between 16 and 18 per cent to our GDP, but today it is tracking close to 21 per cent. That represents significant growth,” he said.
The minister was quoted as saying that the reforms had also improved the financial performance of major operators in the telecommunications sector.
On efforts to bridge the digital divide, Tijani disclosed that the government would begin deploying about 3,700 telecommunications towers from October to provide network coverage for more than 20 million Nigerians currently living in underserved communities without access to telecom services.
He said the President had approved the project after months of capital mobilisation and planning.
“Today we’re at a point where, before the end of the year, we’ll also start to deploy close to 3,700 towers. It’s taken a lot to put this project together and raise the required capital, but we are now ready to begin deployment around October,” he said.
Side by side with this, the minister also announced that Nigeria would officially launch an alphanumeric postcode system on October 1, a move he said would place the country among a select group of nations operating an advanced digital addressing system.
“Nigeria will be amongst maybe 10 or 15 countries in the world with an alphanumeric postcode. It’s the latest design in postcode systems, where we can identify every property in this country. We’re hoping to launch that on the 1st of October,” he said.
Tijani explained that the new system would assign a unique address to every property nationwide, enhancing logistics, accelerating e-commerce, improving emergency response and strengthening public service delivery.
“Inability to locate places comes at a cost. You can imagine what this will do for e-commerce. It means goods can now be delivered in record time,” he said.
He added that integrating the postcode system with existing government identity databases would improve security and make public services more efficient.
“Our alphanumeric postcode is unique because it allows us to assign a unique address to every property. In many countries, such as the UK, postcodes cover clusters of buildings. What we are introducing will uniquely identify every building, and that will be a game changer for Nigeria in terms of security, commerce and public service delivery,” the minister stated.
When actualised,internet connectivity will improve significantly with an equal boost to broadband availability and speeds.
Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) said active subscribers connected to the internet through various technology channels deployed by the Nigerian service providers, reached 157,405,351, as of May 2026.
The statistics released showed that there has been a major surge and that with improved infrastructure more people will be connected.
Agency reports say
broadband penetration rose to 56.11 per cent with 121,643,718 subscriptions in May 2026, after recording 55.67 per cent penetration with 120,684,625 subscriptions in April 2026.
“From the 157,405,351 internet subscribers recorded in May this year, subscribers that connect to the internet via the Mobile GSM technology provided by mobile operators like MTN, Airtel, Globacom, and T2, were 157,021,888. Next to it, is the internet connectivity via the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology, which recorded 225,538 internet subscribers as at May this year, followed by Fixed Wired technology provided by traditional Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like Spectranet, Swift Networks, and Cobranet, which recorded 157,925 internet subscribers in May this year.”
By NCC’s statistics, Mobile GSM technology has maintained the lead position in internet connectivity in the last one year.
The statistics say that as at October 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 142,004,662, followed by VoIP, which recorded 239,672 and ISPs, which recorded 73,778.
“In November 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 144,151,655, followed by VoIP, which recorded 238,496 and ISPs, which recorded 83.417.
Internet& Telecom
“In December 2025, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 147,519,262, followed by VoIP, which recorded 232,284 and ISPs, which recorded 101,667.
“In January 2026, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 150,912,474, followed by VoIP, which recorded 225,236 and ISPs, which recorded 103,722.
“In February 2026, internet subscribers that connected to the internet via Mobile GSM technology, were 152,476,943, followed by VoIP, which recorded 219,741 and ISPs, which recorded 124,590.
Opinion
INEC as the Greatest Threat to the 2027 Election and Nigeria’s Democracy
By Emmanuel Thomas
Democracy is sustained not merely by the physical act of casting a ballot, but by public trust in the institutions tasked with safeguarding the vote.
When the institution mandated to act as an impartial referee repeatedly displays technical opacity, administrative clumsiness, and institutional evasiveness, it ceases to be a guarantor of democratic expression and becomes its greatest threat.
As Nigeria prepares for the 2027 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) finds itself locked in a crisis of credibility that threatens the survival of the country’s constitutional order.
The latest manifest of this systemic rot was laid bare following the August 15, 2026, Osun State governorship election. Prominent economist, civic leader, and founder of the Anap Foundation, Atedo Peterside, issued a scathing critique targeting the integrity of INEC’s electronic infrastructure.
Peterside raised three fundamental, data-backed questions regarding the operation of the INEC Result Viewing (IReV) portal on election night:
Why did result transmission freeze completely for nearly three hours (between 20:48 hrs and 23:42 hrs), only for an unprecedented dump of 236 polling unit results to hit the server in less than 60 seconds immediately afterward?
Why were 51 polling unit results uploaded only after a winner had already been declared by the returning officer?
Why did 11 polling unit results remain entirely unaccounted for on the IReV portal days after the exercise concluded?
These queries are not mere technical nitpicking; they strike at the heart of the “triangle of compromise” currently eroding Nigerian statehood. Peterside’s observations prove that despite legislative overhauls, billions of naira in budgetary allocations, and repeated institutional promises,
INEC’s technological infrastructure remains vulnerable to unexplained outages that consistently coincide with critical moments of collation.
A Pattern of Institutional Evasion
The technical glitches highlighted in the Osun gubernatorial contest are part of a broader, systemic failure. Rather than operating as an independent body dedicated to transparency, INEC has established a pattern where digital platforms—introduced specifically to eliminate manual rigging—are compromised at crucial junctures.
Electoral integrity is predicated on predictability. When the digital transmission pipeline freezes without explanation, public suspicion fills the void. A sudden dump of 236 results in under a minute following a three-hour blackout suggests manual batching or administrative intervention rather than automated real-time transmission.
Furthermore, declaring an election winner while scores of polling unit results remain offline—or uploading them post-declaration—renders the IReV portal a retrospective archive rather than a real-time verification tool.
This behavior directly fuels voter cynicism. As former INEC officials, civil society organizations, and international observers have repeatedly noted, when citizens believe the referee is compromised, the incentive to participate vanishes.
Elections are reduced to performative rituals where outcomes are perceived to be manufactured in administrative corridors rather than determined at polling stations.
Replicating the Mistakes of the Past
The dangerous trajectory toward 2027 mirrors the institutional failures that damaged public faith during the 2023 general elections.
The non-transmission of presidential election results in real time on the IReV portal shattered public trust and cast a shadow over the judicial petitions that followed. Rather than treating that failure as an emergency requiring radical reform, INEC’s conduct in subsequent off-cycle elections indicates an entrenchment of bad practice.
Civic leaders across the political spectrum have sounded the alarm. The recurring narrative of “technical hitches”—conveniently occurring during the collation of high-stakes results—has transformed INEC from an agent of democratic consolidation into a vector of political instability.
When citizens lose faith in the ballot box, the alternative is often street protests, political apathy, or a slide toward total lawlessness.
The Implication for 2027
Nigeria cannot afford an electoral umpire whose operations invite perpetual litigation and civil unrest.
A general election involves the simultaneous processing of tens of thousands of polling units across 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. If INEC cannot manage real-time result transmission and full transparency in a single-state off-cycle election like Osun, its capacity to conduct a credible, peaceful, and transparent nationwide election in 2027 is doubtful.
The commission’s persistent refusal to offer transparent forensic logs, clear operational explanations, or account for missing polling unit data reinforces the perception that it operates above public accountability. In a democracy, institutional silence in the face of mathematical and operational anomalies is an admission of failure.
If Nigeria’s democratic experiment is to survive past 2027, INEC must be subjected to immediate, independent technical audits and structural reform.
The electoral body must understand that its primary duty is not to declare winners, but to protect the integrity of the process.
Until INEC provides clear answers to the questions raised by Atedo Peterside and addresses its systemic technological flaws, it remains the single greatest institutional threat to Nigeria’s democracy.
-
News23 hours agoSee Black Market Dollar to Naira exchange rate today 11th September, 2026
-
News21 hours agoCustoms Starts Final Recruitment Screening Of Candidates
-
News21 hours agoFG promises to decrease transport fares nationwide from October 1
-
News18 hours agoBREAKING: Fear, Anger as Sokoto Residents Storm Streets Over Kidnappings, Attacks
-
News19 hours agoAlleged genocide: Provide verifiable evidence of El-Rufai’s involvement -Dalung tasks Defence minister
-
News17 hours agoSad: Four Mobile Policemen, eight residents killed in Benue invasion
-
News17 hours agoAfter over 20 years, FG settles N18bn outstanding severance payment to ex-Nigeria Airways staff(Photos)
-
News12 hours agoEmployment: Mbah Urges Enugu Youths to Seize Federal Opportunities (Photos)
