Connect with us

News

MAERSK, NGELALE AND NEEDLESS DIATRIBES

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

BY BOLAJI AFOLABI

For democracy to thrive, it is imperative that various elements including opposition political parties, civil societies, faith and community-based organisations, the media, and citizens play their respective roles as watchdog of government in every way, where possible. Since Nigeria’s return to full-blown democracy in 1999, the fourth republic has witnessed the emergence and relevance of some individuals and groups who, at different times and diverse ways performed defining functions as checks to successive governments. The likes of Olisa Agbakoba, SAN; Ayo Obe; Late Yinka Odumakin; Idiat Hassan; Ene Obi; Auwalu Rafsijani; Hussein Abdu; Clement Nwankwo; Kayode Ogundamisi; Jite Ogunye; SISLAC; SERAP; CDD; PLAC; PLAN; Action Aid; Save Nigeria Group as recognized and legitimate groups and activists have succeeded in monitoring different governments. As properly constituted entities whose primary agenda is national development, they have remained largely focused by giving knocks, offering back-pats, and proffering perspectives to governments where and when necessary.

In the past few years there has been a preponderance of self-styled CSOs whose objectives and modus operandi are patently pecuniary-driven and attention-seeking. A situation like this calls to question the integrity and morality of “public policing” in democratic development. It is tragic that in most cases, these latter-day organisations are largely procured to “fight a cause” and do the bidding of certain pay masters without recourse to objectivity, sincerity of purpose and national interest. Sadly, these incongruous and derisive groups which are usually managed by one-man or few persons are by their narrow mindedness and selfish desires doing collosal damage to national growth and development. Careful analysis of the activities of CSOs during military governments, and the early years of the fourth republic when juxtaposed with what is presently obtainable reveals glaring decline. In terms of effectiveness and efficiency, these “new age” groups are shamelessly rubbishing the noble ideals of CSOs as enunciated by its progenitors such as Late Gani Fawehinmi; Late Chima Ubani; Late Beko Ransome-Kuti; Late Bala Usman and others.

Unknown to many Nigerians, in the past few days, there has been a coordinated effort by some faceless individuals and phoney CSOs to skew narratives about the injection of $600m into Nigeria’s economy by A.P. Moller-Maersk, a global maritime and shipping conglomerate. The vicious and contrived controversy generated, is patently unpatriotic, outrightly devilish, and ludicrously juvenile. Attempts to poo-pooh and demonise certain government officials notably Ajuri Ngelale, the presidential media adviser, and throw invectives at the audacious moves by the Tinubu administration in negotiating and sourcing foreign direct investment is totally uncalled for.

Advertisement

I have never met Ngelale. He was a familiar face on television before his current brief in the Tinubu scheme. I speak in this instance as a politically unaffiliated journalist and a dispassionate Nigerian. To rehash the catchphrase of former President Muhammadu Buhari in his early days, “I belong to no political party, but I belong to every well-intentioned plan to get Nigeria working.” One of the “fast food, pasta-like” CSOs procured for this insipid project has deployed vacuous tactics in its stain and spoil statement, calling for the disengagement of some government officials. The plot has clearly exposed the intentions of these purveyors of falsehood, deceit and confusion. Having had years of close interaction with activists, research, investigation, and less sensationalism should ordinarily be germane to the principles and operations of CSOs. Unfortunately, these attributes have been jettisoned by the groups and individuals involved in this anti-Ngelale plot. Their approach has been at best mischievous preposterous, insensitive, and insourciant to national interest.

In their respective bids to present skewed and rancorous agglomeration of variegated misinformation with mischievous intents, they forgot to uphold the time-tested and serially-proven operational guidelines anchored on fairness, firmness, and objectivity. They seem to have chosen the route of deliberate falsehood, targeted browbeating, and pillorying innuendos to whip up public sentiment against government. They have most probably recoursed to wrongful vilification and demagoguery of government officials to elicit a bandwagon effect among unsuspecting Nigerians. This may be a reflection of competency deficit, conceived shenanigans and intellectual indolence. After detailed and dispassionate reviews, assessment and distillation of the narratives and explanations by government and it’s accusers, one can conclude that the “CSOs and individuals” are guilty of one or more of these conjectures.

From reports in the local and foreign media, President Bola Tinubu and Mr. Robert Maersk Uggla, Chairman of A.P. Moller-Maersk, a Danish global provider of logistics and services in the maritime industry had a meeting on the sidelines of the recently concluded World Economic Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. According to the presidency, at the end of deliberations, Maersk, whose company has been operating in Nigeria’s shipping and maritime sector for over three decades reiterated it’s commitment to on-going investment drive by government towards deepening growth and development. Maersk further re-affirmed the company’s resolve to expand its investment in the Nigeria’s shipping industry which is expected to be mutually beneficial. However, in a bogus campaign to downplay this laudable development, some CSOs, social media influencers, and opinion moulders copiously refered to a “rebuttal” published in Lloyd List, one of the World’s oldest-running maritime journals. In the report, an unnamed person among other things denied knowledge of such extensive talk between Maersk and Nigeria; that the investment plans appears to be news to it’s officials.

Further extrapolation of the news report bandied by naysayers reveals yawning gaps and holes. That the celebrated online maritime publication quoted an unnamed and non-descriptive Maersk official casts doubt about the veracity of the report being circulated by mischievous elements. The report, contrary to the warped interpretation of critics emphasized that, “discussions (between Maersk and the Nigerian government) were on-going.” Reasons that the entire Maersk team was yet to get full disclosure was equally provided in the news report by the unnamed official, “….. may be by next week, we would be properly briefed.” It should be noted that at the time naysayers activated their spin arsenals, Maersk was yet to deny or contradict government’s position as released by Tinubu’s spokesman. Why “pick and choose” by these critics? Why not dwell on the entire news report and do proper inquisition if any? Why the unnecessary dust and hullabaloo? Why the wrong, pervasive vilification of Tinubu’s spokesman?

Advertisement

Findings from further research and empirical studies reveals that in February 2024 in the course of an exploratory visit to Nigeria’s Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, the A P. Maersk Terminal Chief Executive Officer, Keith Svendsen detailed the company’s $600m investment commitment to Nigeria’s economy. Svendsen, who re-affirmed Maersk’s commitment to investing more in Nigeria, clearly outlined plans to allocate “an initial $100m, with an additional half-billion dollars ($500m) earmarked for port investments in Lagos, Nigeria.” Contrary to wrong insinuations, the Riyadh meeting was another opportunity by Maersk to re-confirm it’s investment interest in Nigeria’s maritime sector. These investments are expected to support modernisation and expansion of our ports; improve trade; reduce corruption; and boost efficiency. Maersk’s interest in the sector is buoyed by government’s commitment, and to complement on-going $1bn development of seaports construction and development across Nigeria’s eastern and western ports.

In a widely published statement by Maersk that did not only expose the despicable, hideous, and vengeful intentions of traducers but explicitly described the seriousness and benefits of the company’s investment in Nigeria, Svendsen confirmed that the company has concluded plans to invest over $500m in the upgrades of Nigeria’s port facilities. He added that, “I earlier this year publicly told about the proposal to invest more than $500m that we have discussed with President Tinubu both in February, and which we further elaborated in late April. We have intensified talks with the administration and port authority to make these plans concrete and I’m pleased with the significant progress made towards implementation.” According to Svendsen, the global logistics and provider has being a critical stakeholder in Nigeria’s maritime sector with, “container terminals in Lagos, Apapa, and Onne, provision of high-quality and modern equipment, direct employment of about 2,500 people, and indirect employment of about 65,000 people.” Maersk in the words of Svendsen, “believes strongly in the future prospects for the Nigeria economy, and the long-term opportunities that the current economic reforms and invitation for international investments will generate.”

Contrary to the negative narratives floating around, Maersk, while acknowledging Nigeria as the key market in Africa, and the company’s central role in trade between Nigeria and the rest of the world, is determined to consolidate it’s position as a leading force in Nigeria’s maritime sector, and desirous to upgrading it’s greenfield terminals in Lekki and Badagry as well as other ports infrastructure across the country. Svendsen declared that, “we seek to do this under a long-term agreement with the government to support our ambition to continuously improve the import and especially export opportunities for the country, creating jobs and diversifying opportunities locally. For us, it is important that we not only operate highly efficient terminals, but also that we play a role contributing to the development of the local communities and bring opportunities for growth and new prospects in Nigeria.”

For emphasis, Nigeria and Denmark have always had a robust, and mutually beneficial business relationship spanning four decades. This relationship has involved steady exchanges of goods and services, crude petroleum, concentrated milk, non-fillet frozen fish, margarine, transportation, solar power, renewable energy, biotechnology and few others. Specifically, Maersk with over $2b existing investments in Nigerian ports and other activities has shown that it’s involvement is not just fruitful but transcends to reputable and equitable partnership with states including Ogun where a container terminal is under construction.

Advertisement

Finally, rather than resort to cheap, mindless, and fruitless public ridicule as well as unnecessary debilitating politicisation of any, every intention and programme of government that will impact positively on the country and citizens, it is incumbent on “professional naysayers” to allow objectivity to prevail. In matters of development, banal reasoning, ethnic consideration, and tribal imputation should be subsumed under national interest and true nationhood. Multi-faceted buffeting, multi-pronged chicanery, and caustic denunciation of appointees and officials of government by hirelings and sourced ranconteurs is not what Nigeria need now. Given the multi-dimensional economic challenges and corrosive poverty that Nigerians are experiencing, every human capacities should be deployed towards supporting any development-driven initiative by government. The comments of Maersk’s Chairman at the Riyadh meeting with Tinubu will suffice, “with the growth potentials of the Nigerian economy, we are very eager to invest in it, and we will continue to dialogue with the relevant Nigerian authorities to explore further investment opportunities in an economy that has the capacity and potentials to be among the best in the world.”

*Bolaji Afolabi a seasoned media practitioner, has served in the Office of Public Affairs in The Presidency and as Communications Resource Person in the House of Representatives, respectively.*

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Reps Demand Answers Over N5.3trn CBN Debt, Query OAGF on Deductions from MDAs’ Accounts

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

...probe unremitted operating surplus, questions use of statutory funds belonging to UBEC, NASENI and others

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has directed the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation (OAGF) to provide a comprehensive account of unremitted operating surplus allegedly owed to the Federal Government by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) and other revenue-generating agencies.

The committee also demanded explanations over allegations that the OAGF withdrew billions of naira from the accounts of several Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), including the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC), to finance government obligations.

Advertisement

The directives were issued on Monday when the Accountant General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Babatunde Ogunjimi, appeared before the committee during an investigative hearing at the National Assembly.

Raising concerns during the session, committee member Rep. Gboyega Nasir Isiaka said poor remittance of government revenues remained one of Nigeria’s major fiscal challenges.

“I mean, considering our GDP, you know, ours is one of the lowest on the continent, at about 16 per cent. Now, I know that business entities are meant to return about 80 per cent of their taxes, and others are between 20 per cent and 50 per cent.

“From the totality of what we are seeing, there appears to still be some backlog of remittances. Can you give some instances or some figures around this? That is one. Two, even those business entities that are returning, as a member of the economic team, how comfortable are you with the performance of some of those entities given their assets and all of that?

Advertisement

“Like CBN, SEC, NIMASA and some of those. Because it’s not just enough for us to say 80 per cent of their surpluses. What exactly is the surplus they are giving us? These are the asset base that they have in their hand. So I think it’s important for us to have a look at that, in addition to some of the revenues that they are meant to have paid but have not paid for,” Isiaka said.

In response, the Director of Revenue and Investment at the OAGF, Makinde Mogaji, disclosed that the CBN had yet to remit an alleged N5.3 trillion operating surplus to the Federal Government despite repeated recovery efforts.

“Early last year, they were owing the Federal Government N5.3 trillion for their operating surplus and despite all the effort of the PAC, N5.3 trillion CBN, and despite the effort of the PAC to recover the money, they refused to pay. 70 per cent of that money should be paid and behold, CBN refused to pay. That is CBN. And that is just one of our huge sources of revenue. Agency like FAAN, we have record of ₦473 billion paid,” Mogaji said.

On allegations that the OAGF had been making automatic deductions from the accounts of MDAs, the Accountant General defended the practice, describing it as a mechanism designed to enable government meet pressing financial obligations.

Advertisement

He added that some agencies later sought presidential intervention to reverse the deductions.

“That was an ingenious way of taking in advance what is due to government last year, and that was how we were able to rake in a lot of revenue last year.

“Let me add to that. Because when we initiated that move and were able to rake in a lot of revenue, some of these agencies went behind to seek a reversal. So, we’ve been battling with that issue because some went back to Mr President and said that was too much this and that. Some got total cancellation. Some got reduced advance.

“So we have been battling with that and that’s why we were not able to return like what we had last year to that level. And you have instances also where agencies like NNPC refused totally to cooperate… to the extent that they had to be walked out because of their non-compliance and cooperation. NNPC has agreed to some of those liabilities, some they said no they do not agree, so all of that is still being handled by a post-mortem committee,” Ogunjimi said.

Advertisement

Providing further clarification, Mogaji said the automatic deduction mechanism was intended to recover operating surplus in advance, subject to reconciliation.

“Yes, the auto deduction that was established last year has been working perfectly. Like AGF said, the auto deduction is an advance way. It’s a mechanism designed to pick the operating surplus in advance from these agencies, and at the end of the day, they will compute OPS and see whether they have excess or they have been over-deducted. We have some figures here, but they can’t be taken to be the final lists”, he added.

Committee Chairman, Rep. Bamidele Salam, however, questioned the legality of withdrawing statutory allocations from agencies established to perform specific national responsibilities.
He cited complaints received from UBEC and several other government institutions.

“There is an ongoing investigation involving UBEC and other agencies. And in the course of the investigation, the UBEC claimed that, for example, there was a shortfall. There was an authority to incur expenditure of November 2025 which was not released by the Accountant General, ₦16 billion from the Commission’s account. Another ₦15 billion from the Commission’s account which has not been refunded.

Advertisement

“And we actually wondered why these deductions from statutory payments of some of these very critical institutions of government. Not only UBEC. We had the same thing with NASENI. NASENI, was it ₦70 billion or more than that? We have different agencies and they complained. So, what is the justification, Accountant General?” Salam asked.

In response, Ogunjimi maintained that the withdrawals were temporary and carried out only after assessing whether the affected funds had remained idle.

“We have instances where, at a point in time, we have the need to take monies from some of these agencies to be able to meet critical financial obligations of government. Yes, it’s like a borrow, a loan. We are going to refund it and we have been refunding for those agencies. It’s just to meet those critical obligations.

“Sir, first and foremost, Accountant General cannot just sit and begin to pick money from accounts of these agencies. We first analyse, because the directives come from the Honourable Minister. We first analyse how long these funds have remained in the account unutilised. So, if you have this money like six months and government needs funding.

Advertisement

“So we say, let’s take it and then we refund your money when you need it. Like TETFund for instance, we took over ₦300 billion and we have refunded the whole to them. So, if you come back and tell us that we need this money now, can you give us that money, then we process and give it back to them”, he said.

The explanation failed to convince the committee chairman, who insisted that the deductions had undermined the statutory responsibilities of several agencies.

“So, which ones have you refunded? UBEC is crying, NASENI is crying, NBC too is crying. We have quite a number of them. We have more than six that are under various investigations here and that is their major claim, that they don’t know how to approach this matter. The Accountant General just gets into their accounts so they cannot have the money to use for the primary purpose they were meant for.

“Like the one in UBEC, you will agree with me that the problem we have today, including banditry and what have you, is also as a result of our neglect of basic education, especially in the northern part of the country. We have about 13.5 million out-of-school children. UBEC is to construct schools, provide infrastructure and instructional materials. They can’t do that because the fund that is statutorily meant for them is being taken for other purposes,” Salam said.

Advertisement

The committee directed the OAGF to furnish it with detailed records of outstanding operating surplus owed by government agencies, as well as evidence of deductions and refunds made to affected MDAs, as the investigation continues.

Continue Reading

News

FG announces New Framework to Reintegrate Repentant Terrorists, Bandits

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The Federal Government has introduced a new operational framework aimed at strengthening the disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) of former terrorists, bandits and other individuals who have renounced armed violence across Nigeria.

The initiative, unveiled through the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) under the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), is designed to improve coordination among government agencies and ensure a more structured approach to rehabilitating ex-combatants while promoting lasting peace in conflict-affected communities.

The National Coordinator of the NCTC, Major General Adamu Laka, disclosed this on Monday during the National Validation Workshop on the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration held in Abuja.

According to Laka, the newly developed procedures will guide the implementation of the DDR programme at the federal level and in the pilot states of Kaduna, Katsina and Zamfara.

Advertisement

He explained that the initiative forms part of the Federal Government’s broader strategy to tackle insecurity through a combination of military operations and non-military interventions aimed at addressing the root causes of violent extremism.

Laka said the Standard Operating Procedures were developed to ensure that the government’s reintegration programme is implemented in a coordinated, transparent and effective manner.

He noted that the guidelines provide practical direction for ministries, security agencies, civil institutions and other organisations involved in identifying, processing, rehabilitating and reintegrating individuals who have abandoned violence.

According to him, the framework clearly outlines the responsibilities of participating institutions, promotes accountability and strengthens collaboration among stakeholders, while eliminating overlaps in responsibilities.

Advertisement

The NCTC coordinator observed that although Nigeria already has a National DDR Framework, there was a need for detailed operational guidelines to translate policy objectives into practical actions.

“Recognising that a policy framework alone is insufficient to guide implementation, the NCTC and its partners subsequently developed a comprehensive set of Standard Operating Procedures to translate the strategic objectives of the National DDR Framework into practical guidance for implementing institutions,” Laka said.

He explained that the SOPs establish uniform standards for implementing the programme nationwide while clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of each participating agency.

Laka disclosed that the framework was developed after extensive consultations with security agencies, government institutions, peacebuilding organisations and other relevant stakeholders.

Advertisement

According to him, the procedures draw from Nigeria’s previous experiences, international best practices and the country’s unique security realities.

“These Standard Operating Procedures have been developed through extensive consultations and draw upon national experiences, international best practices, and the unique realities of the Nigerian context,” he added.

He noted that the consultations considered the experiences of communities affected by terrorism and banditry as well as lessons learned from similar rehabilitation programmes in other countries.

The Federal Government selected Kaduna, Katsina and Zamfara as pilot states for the implementation of the new framework due to the prolonged security challenges confronting the North-West region.

Advertisement

The three states have witnessed repeated attacks by terrorists, bandits and kidnappers, resulting in numerous deaths, displacement of residents and disruption of economic and social activities.

Officials said the pilot phase would enable the government to evaluate the effectiveness of the guidelines, identify implementation gaps and make necessary adjustments before extending the programme to other parts of the country.

Laka stressed that the initiative reflects the government’s belief that military operations alone cannot permanently resolve Nigeria’s security challenges.

He said effective disarmament, rehabilitation and reintegration programmes would help reduce the likelihood of former fighters returning to violent groups while also supporting reconciliation and the recovery of communities devastated by years of conflict.

Advertisement

The NCTC coordinator, however, emphasised that the success of the programme would depend on effective collaboration among government institutions, security agencies, traditional rulers, community leaders, civil society organisations and other stakeholders.

He reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to implementing comprehensive strategies aimed at restoring peace, enhancing public safety and rebuilding communities affected by terrorism, banditry and other forms of armed violence.

Continue Reading

News

Court verdict will not affect our candidates primaries elections-ADC

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…to challenge judgement

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has promised its members and supporters that the Court of Appeal verdict on the party’s congresses will not invalidate its primary elections or the candidates who emerged from them.

This was contained in a statement issued on Monday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC said the judgment only relates to the election of its ward, local government and state executive committees and has no impact on the direct primaries conducted by the party.

“The African Democratic Congress (ADC) notes the judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal in Abuja on Monday in a matter relating to party congresses for the election of ward, local government and state executive committees of the party,” the statement read.

Advertisement

The party stressed that the ruling does not invalidate the emergence of its candidates at any level.

“We wish to assure members of the party and the general public that this judgment has no effect whatsoever on the direct primaries through which the party’s candidates have emerged at all levels,” it said.

The ADC also disclosed that it had begun the process of challenging the judgment at a higher court, insisting that it disagrees with the decision.

“The party has already commenced the process of appealing the judgment, which we respectfully disagree with and consider to be legally unsustainable,” the statement added.

Advertisement

The party further said it took note of the dissenting judgment delivered by the presiding justice, describing it as more consistent with its position and the law.

We also note the dissenting judgment of the presiding Justice, which, in our view, more accurately reflects the settled position of the law and the party’s position,” it stated.

The ADC appealed to its members and supporters across the country to remain calm and focused despite the court ruling.

“We urge all party members and the millions of our supporters to remain calm, confident and focused,” the statement said.

Advertisement

The party said it would continue to pursue its goal of offering Nigerians a credible alternative through constitutional and lawful means.

“The African Democratic Congress remains committed to the task of providing Nigerians with a credible alternative and will continue to pursue that mission in accordance with the Constitution and the rule of law,” .

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News