Connect with us

Opinion

MAERSK, NGELALE AND NEEDLESS DIATRIBES

Published

on

BY BOLAJI AFOLABI

For democracy to thrive, it is imperative that various elements including opposition political parties, civil societies, faith and community-based organisations, the media, and citizens play their respective roles as watchdog of government in every way, where possible. Since Nigeria’s return to full-blown democracy in 1999, the fourth republic has witnessed the emergence and relevance of some individuals and groups who, at different times and diverse ways performed defining functions as checks to successive governments. The likes of Olisa Agbakoba, SAN; Ayo Obe; Late Yinka Odumakin; Idiat Hassan; Ene Obi; Auwalu Rafsijani; Hussein Abdu; Clement Nwankwo; Kayode Ogundamisi; Jite Ogunye; SISLAC; SERAP; CDD; PLAC; PLAN; Action Aid; Save Nigeria Group as recognized and legitimate groups and activists have succeeded in monitoring different governments. As properly constituted entities whose primary agenda is national development, they have remained largely focused by giving knocks, offering back-pats, and proffering perspectives to governments where and when necessary.

In the past few years there has been a preponderance of self-styled CSOs whose objectives and modus operandi are patently pecuniary-driven and attention-seeking. A situation like this calls to question the integrity and morality of “public policing” in democratic development. It is tragic that in most cases, these latter-day organisations are largely procured to “fight a cause” and do the bidding of certain pay masters without recourse to objectivity, sincerity of purpose and national interest. Sadly, these incongruous and derisive groups which are usually managed by one-man or few persons are by their narrow mindedness and selfish desires doing collosal damage to national growth and development. Careful analysis of the activities of CSOs during military governments, and the early years of the fourth republic when juxtaposed with what is presently obtainable reveals glaring decline. In terms of effectiveness and efficiency, these “new age” groups are shamelessly rubbishing the noble ideals of CSOs as enunciated by its progenitors such as Late Gani Fawehinmi; Late Chima Ubani; Late Beko Ransome-Kuti; Late Bala Usman and others.

Unknown to many Nigerians, in the past few days, there has been a coordinated effort by some faceless individuals and phoney CSOs to skew narratives about the injection of $600m into Nigeria’s economy by A.P. Moller-Maersk, a global maritime and shipping conglomerate. The vicious and contrived controversy generated, is patently unpatriotic, outrightly devilish, and ludicrously juvenile. Attempts to poo-pooh and demonise certain government officials notably Ajuri Ngelale, the presidential media adviser, and throw invectives at the audacious moves by the Tinubu administration in negotiating and sourcing foreign direct investment is totally uncalled for.

Advertisement

I have never met Ngelale. He was a familiar face on television before his current brief in the Tinubu scheme. I speak in this instance as a politically unaffiliated journalist and a dispassionate Nigerian. To rehash the catchphrase of former President Muhammadu Buhari in his early days, “I belong to no political party, but I belong to every well-intentioned plan to get Nigeria working.” One of the “fast food, pasta-like” CSOs procured for this insipid project has deployed vacuous tactics in its stain and spoil statement, calling for the disengagement of some government officials. The plot has clearly exposed the intentions of these purveyors of falsehood, deceit and confusion. Having had years of close interaction with activists, research, investigation, and less sensationalism should ordinarily be germane to the principles and operations of CSOs. Unfortunately, these attributes have been jettisoned by the groups and individuals involved in this anti-Ngelale plot. Their approach has been at best mischievous preposterous, insensitive, and insourciant to national interest.

In their respective bids to present skewed and rancorous agglomeration of variegated misinformation with mischievous intents, they forgot to uphold the time-tested and serially-proven operational guidelines anchored on fairness, firmness, and objectivity. They seem to have chosen the route of deliberate falsehood, targeted browbeating, and pillorying innuendos to whip up public sentiment against government. They have most probably recoursed to wrongful vilification and demagoguery of government officials to elicit a bandwagon effect among unsuspecting Nigerians. This may be a reflection of competency deficit, conceived shenanigans and intellectual indolence. After detailed and dispassionate reviews, assessment and distillation of the narratives and explanations by government and it’s accusers, one can conclude that the “CSOs and individuals” are guilty of one or more of these conjectures.

From reports in the local and foreign media, President Bola Tinubu and Mr. Robert Maersk Uggla, Chairman of A.P. Moller-Maersk, a Danish global provider of logistics and services in the maritime industry had a meeting on the sidelines of the recently concluded World Economic Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. According to the presidency, at the end of deliberations, Maersk, whose company has been operating in Nigeria’s shipping and maritime sector for over three decades reiterated it’s commitment to on-going investment drive by government towards deepening growth and development. Maersk further re-affirmed the company’s resolve to expand its investment in the Nigeria’s shipping industry which is expected to be mutually beneficial. However, in a bogus campaign to downplay this laudable development, some CSOs, social media influencers, and opinion moulders copiously refered to a “rebuttal” published in Lloyd List, one of the World’s oldest-running maritime journals. In the report, an unnamed person among other things denied knowledge of such extensive talk between Maersk and Nigeria; that the investment plans appears to be news to it’s officials.

Further extrapolation of the news report bandied by naysayers reveals yawning gaps and holes. That the celebrated online maritime publication quoted an unnamed and non-descriptive Maersk official casts doubt about the veracity of the report being circulated by mischievous elements. The report, contrary to the warped interpretation of critics emphasized that, “discussions (between Maersk and the Nigerian government) were on-going.” Reasons that the entire Maersk team was yet to get full disclosure was equally provided in the news report by the unnamed official, “….. may be by next week, we would be properly briefed.” It should be noted that at the time naysayers activated their spin arsenals, Maersk was yet to deny or contradict government’s position as released by Tinubu’s spokesman. Why “pick and choose” by these critics? Why not dwell on the entire news report and do proper inquisition if any? Why the unnecessary dust and hullabaloo? Why the wrong, pervasive vilification of Tinubu’s spokesman?

Advertisement

Findings from further research and empirical studies reveals that in February 2024 in the course of an exploratory visit to Nigeria’s Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, the A P. Maersk Terminal Chief Executive Officer, Keith Svendsen detailed the company’s $600m investment commitment to Nigeria’s economy. Svendsen, who re-affirmed Maersk’s commitment to investing more in Nigeria, clearly outlined plans to allocate “an initial $100m, with an additional half-billion dollars ($500m) earmarked for port investments in Lagos, Nigeria.” Contrary to wrong insinuations, the Riyadh meeting was another opportunity by Maersk to re-confirm it’s investment interest in Nigeria’s maritime sector. These investments are expected to support modernisation and expansion of our ports; improve trade; reduce corruption; and boost efficiency. Maersk’s interest in the sector is buoyed by government’s commitment, and to complement on-going $1bn development of seaports construction and development across Nigeria’s eastern and western ports.

In a widely published statement by Maersk that did not only expose the despicable, hideous, and vengeful intentions of traducers but explicitly described the seriousness and benefits of the company’s investment in Nigeria, Svendsen confirmed that the company has concluded plans to invest over $500m in the upgrades of Nigeria’s port facilities. He added that, “I earlier this year publicly told about the proposal to invest more than $500m that we have discussed with President Tinubu both in February, and which we further elaborated in late April. We have intensified talks with the administration and port authority to make these plans concrete and I’m pleased with the significant progress made towards implementation.” According to Svendsen, the global logistics and provider has being a critical stakeholder in Nigeria’s maritime sector with, “container terminals in Lagos, Apapa, and Onne, provision of high-quality and modern equipment, direct employment of about 2,500 people, and indirect employment of about 65,000 people.” Maersk in the words of Svendsen, “believes strongly in the future prospects for the Nigeria economy, and the long-term opportunities that the current economic reforms and invitation for international investments will generate.”

Contrary to the negative narratives floating around, Maersk, while acknowledging Nigeria as the key market in Africa, and the company’s central role in trade between Nigeria and the rest of the world, is determined to consolidate it’s position as a leading force in Nigeria’s maritime sector, and desirous to upgrading it’s greenfield terminals in Lekki and Badagry as well as other ports infrastructure across the country. Svendsen declared that, “we seek to do this under a long-term agreement with the government to support our ambition to continuously improve the import and especially export opportunities for the country, creating jobs and diversifying opportunities locally. For us, it is important that we not only operate highly efficient terminals, but also that we play a role contributing to the development of the local communities and bring opportunities for growth and new prospects in Nigeria.”

For emphasis, Nigeria and Denmark have always had a robust, and mutually beneficial business relationship spanning four decades. This relationship has involved steady exchanges of goods and services, crude petroleum, concentrated milk, non-fillet frozen fish, margarine, transportation, solar power, renewable energy, biotechnology and few others. Specifically, Maersk with over $2b existing investments in Nigerian ports and other activities has shown that it’s involvement is not just fruitful but transcends to reputable and equitable partnership with states including Ogun where a container terminal is under construction.

Advertisement

Finally, rather than resort to cheap, mindless, and fruitless public ridicule as well as unnecessary debilitating politicisation of any, every intention and programme of government that will impact positively on the country and citizens, it is incumbent on “professional naysayers” to allow objectivity to prevail. In matters of development, banal reasoning, ethnic consideration, and tribal imputation should be subsumed under national interest and true nationhood. Multi-faceted buffeting, multi-pronged chicanery, and caustic denunciation of appointees and officials of government by hirelings and sourced ranconteurs is not what Nigeria need now. Given the multi-dimensional economic challenges and corrosive poverty that Nigerians are experiencing, every human capacities should be deployed towards supporting any development-driven initiative by government. The comments of Maersk’s Chairman at the Riyadh meeting with Tinubu will suffice, “with the growth potentials of the Nigerian economy, we are very eager to invest in it, and we will continue to dialogue with the relevant Nigerian authorities to explore further investment opportunities in an economy that has the capacity and potentials to be among the best in the world.”

*Bolaji Afolabi a seasoned media practitioner, has served in the Office of Public Affairs in The Presidency and as Communications Resource Person in the House of Representatives, respectively.*

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Fate of Critical National Infrastructure protection

Published

on

By

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore

On June 24,2024,President Bola Ahmed Tinubu signed an Executive Order for the protection of information and communications technology (ICT) equipment in order to build a robust economy.

Captioned DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION OF CRITICAL NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE ORDER, (CNII)2024, the order derives its power from Cybercrime Act of 2015.

Specifically, this is In exercise of the powers conferred on the President by section 3 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act, 2015 (as amended), and all other powers enabling him in that behalf.

Advertisement

“The objectives of this Order are to designate certain Information and Communications Technology systems (ICT), networks and infrastructure operating in Nigeria, as Critical National Information Infrastructure (CNII) , develop cohesive measures and strategies for the security and protection of CNII, and ensure their continued operation .

The order specifies adoption and proactive holistic approach in the identification, security and protection of CNIl; reduce to the barest minimum, incidences capable of damaging, disrupting, or interfering with the operation, functionality, or integrity of CNII .

The order is essentially to ensure the effective functioning of ICT systems, networks, and infrastructure, which are critical to driving national imperatives, economic development, national security and defense, public health and safety, and government operations.

It lists Computer systems, networks, and communication infrastructures acquired, installed, deployed, and operated in sectors of the Nigerian economy as in the Schedule to this Order as critical and are hereby designated as CNII.
But beautiful as the document is,its impact is yet to be felt.

Advertisement

Inspite of the good intentions thereto, not much has been done or heard in this regard as it appears the document appears confined to government archive as one of those policies that have good intentions but remain slow in implementation.

Strangely, nobody is even talking about it and industry players are worried.
As for the Cybercrime Act from where this order was derived, very little has come from there too except pockets of arrests and prosecution especially of persons who may have alleged to have carried out cyberstalking and others.

The CNII order requires strong implementation especially if we intend to build a resilient and robust economy and sustain and protect telecommunications infrastructure, grow the ICT sector to improve on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) among others.

Not much has been heard or implemented since 2024 when the order was signed and it is worrisome that such a beautiful policy is allowed to rot away in the back waters of governance.

Advertisement

CNII refers to interconnected systems; networks that are indispensable for the functioning of the nation’s economy, security, public health, and general safety. These information infrastructures ensure seamless communication, data storage, and operational continuity in both private and public sectors.

Examples of CNII include telecommunications networks, financial systems, transportation management systems, national power grids, national identity management system among others.
Disruption to any of these systems could result in significant economic losses and distress.

Legal experts explain that Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA )is tasked with leading efforts to protect CNII by collaborating with relevant stakeholders to establish a Trusted Information Sharing Network (TISN) that would encourage the exchange of information across various sectors of the Nigerian economy.

The Order also empowers the ONSA to conduct regular audits and inspections of CNII to ensure compliance with applicable laws, guidelines, and rules.

Advertisement

Additionally, the ONSA in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders is required to develop and implement a Critical National Information Infrastructure Protection Plan (CNIIPP) and other measures to prevent unauthorized access, theft, vandalism, destruction, and unlawful interference with the operation of CNII.

This is to minimize risks and reduce incidents that could disrupt or compromise the functionality of this CNII.
Pursuant to the Act, individuals who commit offences against CNII, specifically, unauthorized access, tampering, or interference with CNII, shall upon conviction be liable to imprisonment for up to 10 years. Where such acts result in grievous bodily harm to individuals, the imprisonment terms extend up to 15 years. In cases where such offences lead to the loss of life, offenders are liable to life imprisonment.

The designation of telecom infrastructure as a critical national infrastructure may not address the challenges of vandalism except the government displays the political will to enforce the Order.
The immediate past government had approved and also directed that necessary physical protective measures be put in place to safeguard telecommunications infrastructure deployed across the country.

The presidential directive, mandated Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), Defence Headquarters (DHQ), Nigeria Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS), and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC),to ensure protection of the infrastructure and were properly notified of the President’s directive and were expected to enforce same as directed.

Advertisement

But very little was done because this had no impact as vandalism of the infrastructure remained a daily occurrence across the country to date.

That is why this government should sum up the political will to implement this Executive Order, safeguard the infrastructure and fuel the economy.

Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy Minister, Bosun Tijani explained at the advent of the document that “the order is a significant step that would strengthen and protect investments in the ICT sector by reducing incidences capable of damaging the operations and functionality of the country’s technological systems, infrastructure, and networks.”

The Minister added that designating telecom infrastructure as CNII would help improve the quality of telecoms services, which has often been affected by disruption and intentional damage.

Advertisement

“This gazette now makes it an offence to wilfully damage assets such as telco towers/sites, switch stations, data centres, satellite infrastructure, submarine & fibre optic cables, transmission equipment, e-government platforms, databases among many others,” adding that government would continue to work to create an enabling and supportive environment and policies for the digital economy to thrive.

The Order identifies areas that are critical for protection as: power and energy sectors of the economy, water; information, communication, science and technology ;banking, finance and insurance ;health ;public administration; education ;defense and security transport; food and agriculture; safety and emergency services; industrial and manufacturing; and mines and steel.

The order states that the National Security Adviser (NSA) may, with the approval of the President, update the list of sectors in the Schedule to this Order, taking into consideration emerging technologies and platforms, in line with the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act (“the Act”), and the National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (“the Policy”).

And any update made pursuant to the listed areas shall be published in the Federal Gazette.

Advertisement

“The Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) shall, in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders, develop a comprehensive Critical National Information Infrastructure Protection Plan (CNIIPP) ; and guidelines, specifying minimum standards, rules, and procedures for the protection, preservation and general management of designated CNII,for the approval of the President.”

“The ONSA shall, in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders, establish a Trusted information Sharing Network (TISN), as a multidisciplinary framework, comprising owners and operators of CNII ;representatives from relevant Ministries, Departments, and Agencies of government (MDAs) ; and identified private sector organisations, to build and execute awareness campaigns on risks to CNII, share information and techniques required to assess and mitigate risks in a decentralised manner across sectors of the economy, and implement capacity building initiatives to strengthen and mainstream resilience and protection of the infrastructure and networks.”

Members and entities within the TISN shall collaborate and share information on threats and vulnerabilities, and develop strategies and solution to mitigate known and evolving risks.
How much of this has been implemented across board leaves us guessing.

Before the Presidential intervention,it has been a tale of woes by stakeholders in the Nigerian ICT sector who have been calling on the government to designate telecom infrastructure as a critical national infrastructure to address the challenges of persistent attacks on the infrastructure across the country.

Advertisement

In March 2024,the Operators reiterated the call as Nigeria suffered an internet outage due to damage to some fibre optic cables.

“In 2023 alone, MTN Nigeria suffered more than 6,000 cuts on its fiber cable. The operator relocated 2,500 kilometres of vulnerable fiber cables between 2022 and 2023, at a cost of more than N11bn —enough to build 870 kilometres of new fiber lines in areas without coverage.”

Early in August 2024 ,Chief Executive Officer of Airtel Nigeria, Carl Cruz, while speaking during an industry forum, said the telecom company had been recording an average of 1,000 cases of fibre cuts every month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Opinion

Reflections of Victor Oluwafemi Walsh in development communication, policy innovation in Africa

Published

on

By

Victor Walsh Oluwafemi is not your typical journalist. His work transcends traditional media, merging development consulting, storytelling, and policy education into a powerful vehicle for societal change. His office is a moving stage, sometimes a radio booth, other times a rural health centre or a muddy road where he films barefoot entrepreneurs solving real-world problems.Rooted in development consulting, Victor began his professional journey advising public sector organisations, NGOs, and donor agencies. His early work focused on training design and evaluation across education, health, and youth development sectors. These formative years granted him a systemic understanding of governance failures and community resilience. “It gave me a systems view of what works and, more importantly, what doesn’t,” he reflects.

Driven by a desire to fill the gaps he observed, Victor transitioned into development journalism. His mission: to amplify African voices and make policy accessible to everyday citizens. His analytical and people-centred writing has graced African and international platforms, covering corruption in extractive industries, governance and accountability, climate justice, rural livelihoods, trade, youth entrepreneurship, and tech innovation. “We need media that interrogates power but also celebrates innovation,” he says.

“That balance is vital for African development.”Expanding his reach, Victor ventured into documentary storytelling. His short films, including Leaders, Lies or Legacies, The Corporate Mavericks, and Beyond Gender Wars, have been praised for their sharp insights and compelling narratives. His work does not merely tell stories; it sparks conversations about leadership, gender equity, and innovation in African societies.Podcasting offered another avenue for citizen engagement. Through programs like Bala Blu Republic and The Policy Pod, Victor demystifies complex governance and policy issues for ordinary citizens. His approach builds vital access points for populations often excluded from elite discussions, blending satire, education, and activism.Victor’s influence extends into policymaking circles. He founded The Policy Pod, a platform that produces plain-language breakdowns of intricate policy frameworks. His policy briefs covering urban poverty, adaptive leadership, and youth-focused social policies inform ministries, civil society organisations, and international donor agencies.Recognising the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) accountability, Victor launched Souq Nexus, an ESG storytelling initiative. He helps corporations report real community impacts and push beyond performative sustainability narratives. “ESG shouldn’t be a PR tool,” he insists. “It should be about transparency, justice, and sustainability.”Victor’s contributions are not confined to the media alone. As an Executive Director and Senior Trainer at the Africa Development Studies Centre (ADSC), he develops and delivers capacity-building programs for senior government officials, NGO leaders, and private sector executives.

His training in strategic communication, systems thinking, emotional intelligence, and adaptive leadership is reshaping how public policies are designed and implemented.Victor’s expertise has made him a sought-after consultant for numerous Nigeria’s National Assembly committees. His policy consultancy work spans education reform, health system strengthening, youth entrepreneurship, and climate adaptation strategies. His insights have influenced legislative reviews, policy drafts, and national development blueprints.His active role as a planning committee member and event contributor for international conferences further cements his leadership. From moderating panels at events like ICSBTIRM 2022 to shaping discussions at ICSPDEG 2021 and ICETTDM 2027, Victor has consistently bridged policy, academia, and community realities.Victor is also a media entrepreneur. He founded Isle 104.9 FM, Nigeria’s first business-focused development radio station, which broadcasts on good governance, entrepreneurship, civic education, public health, and environmental sustainability. “Capital must be conscientious,” he notes. We must fund what we believe in, responsible media, decent jobs, short films and movies, and local content.”Parallel to Isle FM, he launched Souq News TV, a digital platform covering African markets, innovation, and grassroots enterprises. Souq News TV fills a critical gap, providing sharp, locally anchored analysis of Africa’s economic and social development trends. “We created Souq News TV because there was a vacuum—mainstream media and global financial outlets were ignoring African SMEs, informal economies, and local innovators,” Victor explains.Beyond media ownership, Victor strategically invests in sectors that align with his development vision. He backs social enterprises, start-ups, and inclusive finance initiatives, advocating for responsible economic growth and equity in Nigeria.Victor’s philosophy is deeply pragmatic: storytelling must inspire and transform systems. His work exemplifies a shift from passive hope to active proof, creating platforms, building access, and ensuring that African voices are central to narratives about the continent’s future.”We don’t need more saviours,” he concludes. “We need more informed citizens and responsive systems. That’s what drives my work.”Through relentless innovation, an expansive media footprint, policy influence, and investment in social infrastructure, Victor Walsh Oluwafemi is redefining development communication for a new African century—one where citizens are informed, systems are responsive, and stories ignite tangible change.Orovwuje is a Lagos-based international development consultant and public affairs analyst who writes on policy, governance, migration, and inclusive development in Africa.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Opinion

THOUGHTS ON CONSTITUENTS DEVELOPMENT IN OBIO-AKPOR

Published

on

By

BY BOLAJI AFOLABI

Democracy, generally described as the best form of government is anchored on three planks; the executive, legislature, and judiciary. In any nation that practices democratic government, each of these arms exists, functions, and operates independently but they relate with one and another; where necessary for the general well-being of the society. Indeed, the legislature can be described as the fulcrum of democracy. Without it, there is no democratic governance. In Nigeria, the legislature is saddled with the responsibilities of Law making; Oversight, and Representation. In the constitution (as amended), Section 4 gives the legislature the power to make laws for peace, order, and good government of the Federation or any part thereof. Sections 88 and 89 empowers the legislature to ensure that there is transparency, accountability, and good governance in Nigeria. Though not explicitly stated, Sections 51, 66, and 4 collectively imply that legislators are elected to serve the interests of their constituents; addressing the needs of their people through constituency representation.

Somehow, the majority of people who are constituents of legislators do not bother about their law making, and oversight functions. The focus seems to be constituency representation. On a regular basis, with audacious demands, and ferocious requests, legislators are bombarded by their constituents. It has gone terribly bad that many people are either entirely oblivious of the main duties of legislators or deliberately play “deaf and dumb.” Legislators, are mostly rated by “what they bring back home” by way of constituents empowerment and constituency development. Law making and oversight; which are their main duties, is gradually edged to the backwaters. Sadly, the wrong characterisation of the legislature is on a free fall. Given the vagaries of national challenges including monstrous hunger; pervasive hardship; disabling unemployment; accentuating insecurity; corrosive poverty, and more the legislators are at the receiving ends of their constituents. Oftentimes harassed, blackmailed, and subjected to different theatrics and tantrums, some legislators stretch out of their “terms of reference” to be free from barrages of attacks, vilification, and insults hauled by some constituents.

December, being the last month in every year is reputed for festivities and celebrations. Across the country, days of the month witness various merriment and programmes. From weddings to house warming and burial ceremonies and numerous other events, there are always something or the other that make people coalesce at centres and venues. Politicians, particularly elected are not left out. Leveraging on the mass-movement of people from the urban centres to rural communities, politicians organize one thing or the other that will benefit their constituents and constituencies. During this period, particularly in the Southern zones and Middle Belt, constituents regal in enthusiasm and ecstasy as they warmly jubilate over the commissioning of projects, distribution of materials, and provision of services from legislators. Commonly described as dividends of democracy, for many constituents it is seen as visible proof that they are being represented effectively by their respective legislators.

Advertisement

In most cases, the thrills, frills, and fun literally dry out as the yuletide season grinds to a halt. For many people, including legislators the first three months of the new year are times for reality check. Many explore the first quarter as months for recovery, recuperating, and rearranging themselves. Though many constituents may pretend to be oblivious of this “home-truth” but few reasonable ones do not expect interventions from their legislators anytime soon. Sadly, legislators, being the “government” that constituents can easily relate with, are daily bombarded by tonnes of requests. Every attempt to explain their inadequacies are roundly rejected by many people. Perhaps, one may not blame Nigerians. Overtime, the ostentatious, expensive, and expansive lifestyles of some legislators have led to collateral damage for few others.

Without prodding and pressures, the reverse is the case in the Obio-Akpor federal constituency. Literally, the rains have continued to fall on the constituents. Since the first few days of the year up till now, there has been a deluge of programmes and projects; facilitated by their representative, Chinda Kingsley geared towards communal development and the personal growth of constituents. According to verifiable records, Chinda, who has been impacting constituents since 2011, continued in the same positive trajectory. Recall that from mid-2023, many people from across different communities in the 17 Wards of the constituency have benefitted from various initiatives. These non-partisan, all-inclusive, and fair-to-all intervention programmes, with special focus on education, health, agriculture, skills development, and more have largely impacted the people. Mr. Ephraim Nedum, a serial entrepreneur confessed that, “initially, I didn’t believe all the talks about intervention programmes in the first quarter of the year. After proper checks, and confirmation from some beneficiaries within my neighborhood, I will like to commend Chinda for keeping to his word. He is a man of honour and integrity.”

Conscious of the imperatives of education to the totality of human existence, particularly in a cosmopolitan setting like Obio-Akpor, an adult education scheme was initiated. For weeks, both illiterate and semi-literate constituents; including elderly men and women, and others were exposed to the basic rudiments of learning. From testimonies, the programme had far-reaching impacts on the beneficiaries. Mr. Godwin Ibe, a trader explained, “though I didn’t continue my education after junior secondary school, the programme was very useful and timely for me. I have decided to write WAEC, and NECO next year.” To improve capacity building, about 150 teachers have been enrolled for the University of Buckingham (UOB) International Diploma of Education programme. One of the beneficiaries, Mr. Darlington Goodness admitted that, “this is a laudable initiative, as one is going to have global certification at the end of the programme. The benefits are immeasurable.” In continuation of the distribution of desks, teachers tables, and other equipment, Comprehensive Secondary School, Rumuokwurusi, Community Boys Secondary School, Elelenwo, and other secondary schools benefitted from the Phase 3 of the programme which ended a few weeks back.

Cognizant that the growth of the informal and semi-formal sectors are necessary for the promotion of trade and commerce, as well as realistic economic growth in the constituency, and Rivers, diverse training programmes were facilitated. Many people, including indigenes, residents, and non-indigenes participated in various capacity building initiatives in agriculture, transportation, welding, and other vocations. Many of whom got buses, working materials, start-up packs, and other empowerment packages. Mr. Nurudeen Ambali a commercial bus driver was surprised that, “non-indigenes were not only included in the training programme but few also benefitted from the buses.” Mallam Jubril Mohammed, Hausa community leader, affirmed that, “in my over three decades in Rivers, this is the first time that our people are benefitting largely from programmes initiated by any lawmaker.” Comrade Destiny Fynecountry, a Youth Leader emphasized that, “the AgriBusiness capacity building programme was an eye-opener, and life-changing experience for youths. We now know the extensive value of chain opportunities and possibilities in the sector.” Corroborating, Ms. Magdalene Wakama reiterated that, “for many of us, we have started our respective journeys towards being self-reliant, and emerging as agriculture entrepreneurs.”

Advertisement

Mindful about the glaring healthcare deficits in various communities, and the challenges the government is facing towards addressing this all-important sector, Chinda facilitated a three-day free medical outreach. The programme was not restricted to constituents but also included people from contiguous communities. Elderly men and women, nursing mothers, youths, and others had interactions, and treatments on various health issues which were anchored by quality, and experienced medical professionals. Mr. Valentine Dominic, applauded the initiative, “though I am not from the PDP but Chinda should be commended for insisting that everybody benefitted from the medical outreach. Fact is, I know many people who are members or supporters of rival political parties that participated.” For Elder Kevin Nedum, “I am very happy that, in my lifetime I am benefitting from a medical outreach. The ease with which I was invited to the programme, examined by doctors, and given recommended glasses shows that good things can be done if the right people are elected to offices.” Madam Philomena Emele declared that, “with proper checks, and provision of medications, I am experiencing improvement in the health challenges that I had before now.”

Somehow, there is a unanimity of opinion within the Obio-Akpor federal constituency, and across neighbouring communities that Chinda has done well. Similar endorsements are echoed in some other areas across the state. That these commendations are broad-based; across party lines, ethnicity, religion, and different persuasion speaks volumes about the all-embracing impacts of these interventionist programmes. Chief Chidera Obiozor, a community leader stressed that, “it is heart warming that he has given life to his campaign promises which was anchored on ‘I Win, You Win.’ One hopes that he will continue with this, and more.”

For Mrs. Queen Chiazom, an opposition party women leader, asserted that, “the various programmes are adding value to the people of the constituency, irrespective of party affiliation. I was happy when I heard that Chinda always insists that these programmes are for everybody. This is the type of leader that people desire.” Indeed, Rivers has been fortunate with the calibre of legislators they have at the National Assembly. From available records, their commitment to constituency development, and constituents empowerment has been encouraging. Amidst the positive narratives, and commendations, people are hopeful that Chinda (and other legislators) will keep the rain of performances falling.

* BOLAJI AFOLABI, a Development Communications specialist was with the Office of Public Affairs, The Presidency, Abuja.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News