Connect with us

Opinion

MAERSK, NGELALE AND NEEDLESS DIATRIBES

Published

on

BY BOLAJI AFOLABI

For democracy to thrive, it is imperative that various elements including opposition political parties, civil societies, faith and community-based organisations, the media, and citizens play their respective roles as watchdog of government in every way, where possible. Since Nigeria’s return to full-blown democracy in 1999, the fourth republic has witnessed the emergence and relevance of some individuals and groups who, at different times and diverse ways performed defining functions as checks to successive governments. The likes of Olisa Agbakoba, SAN; Ayo Obe; Late Yinka Odumakin; Idiat Hassan; Ene Obi; Auwalu Rafsijani; Hussein Abdu; Clement Nwankwo; Kayode Ogundamisi; Jite Ogunye; SISLAC; SERAP; CDD; PLAC; PLAN; Action Aid; Save Nigeria Group as recognized and legitimate groups and activists have succeeded in monitoring different governments. As properly constituted entities whose primary agenda is national development, they have remained largely focused by giving knocks, offering back-pats, and proffering perspectives to governments where and when necessary.

In the past few years there has been a preponderance of self-styled CSOs whose objectives and modus operandi are patently pecuniary-driven and attention-seeking. A situation like this calls to question the integrity and morality of “public policing” in democratic development. It is tragic that in most cases, these latter-day organisations are largely procured to “fight a cause” and do the bidding of certain pay masters without recourse to objectivity, sincerity of purpose and national interest. Sadly, these incongruous and derisive groups which are usually managed by one-man or few persons are by their narrow mindedness and selfish desires doing collosal damage to national growth and development. Careful analysis of the activities of CSOs during military governments, and the early years of the fourth republic when juxtaposed with what is presently obtainable reveals glaring decline. In terms of effectiveness and efficiency, these “new age” groups are shamelessly rubbishing the noble ideals of CSOs as enunciated by its progenitors such as Late Gani Fawehinmi; Late Chima Ubani; Late Beko Ransome-Kuti; Late Bala Usman and others.

Unknown to many Nigerians, in the past few days, there has been a coordinated effort by some faceless individuals and phoney CSOs to skew narratives about the injection of $600m into Nigeria’s economy by A.P. Moller-Maersk, a global maritime and shipping conglomerate. The vicious and contrived controversy generated, is patently unpatriotic, outrightly devilish, and ludicrously juvenile. Attempts to poo-pooh and demonise certain government officials notably Ajuri Ngelale, the presidential media adviser, and throw invectives at the audacious moves by the Tinubu administration in negotiating and sourcing foreign direct investment is totally uncalled for.

Advertisement

I have never met Ngelale. He was a familiar face on television before his current brief in the Tinubu scheme. I speak in this instance as a politically unaffiliated journalist and a dispassionate Nigerian. To rehash the catchphrase of former President Muhammadu Buhari in his early days, “I belong to no political party, but I belong to every well-intentioned plan to get Nigeria working.” One of the “fast food, pasta-like” CSOs procured for this insipid project has deployed vacuous tactics in its stain and spoil statement, calling for the disengagement of some government officials. The plot has clearly exposed the intentions of these purveyors of falsehood, deceit and confusion. Having had years of close interaction with activists, research, investigation, and less sensationalism should ordinarily be germane to the principles and operations of CSOs. Unfortunately, these attributes have been jettisoned by the groups and individuals involved in this anti-Ngelale plot. Their approach has been at best mischievous preposterous, insensitive, and insourciant to national interest.

In their respective bids to present skewed and rancorous agglomeration of variegated misinformation with mischievous intents, they forgot to uphold the time-tested and serially-proven operational guidelines anchored on fairness, firmness, and objectivity. They seem to have chosen the route of deliberate falsehood, targeted browbeating, and pillorying innuendos to whip up public sentiment against government. They have most probably recoursed to wrongful vilification and demagoguery of government officials to elicit a bandwagon effect among unsuspecting Nigerians. This may be a reflection of competency deficit, conceived shenanigans and intellectual indolence. After detailed and dispassionate reviews, assessment and distillation of the narratives and explanations by government and it’s accusers, one can conclude that the “CSOs and individuals” are guilty of one or more of these conjectures.

From reports in the local and foreign media, President Bola Tinubu and Mr. Robert Maersk Uggla, Chairman of A.P. Moller-Maersk, a Danish global provider of logistics and services in the maritime industry had a meeting on the sidelines of the recently concluded World Economic Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. According to the presidency, at the end of deliberations, Maersk, whose company has been operating in Nigeria’s shipping and maritime sector for over three decades reiterated it’s commitment to on-going investment drive by government towards deepening growth and development. Maersk further re-affirmed the company’s resolve to expand its investment in the Nigeria’s shipping industry which is expected to be mutually beneficial. However, in a bogus campaign to downplay this laudable development, some CSOs, social media influencers, and opinion moulders copiously refered to a “rebuttal” published in Lloyd List, one of the World’s oldest-running maritime journals. In the report, an unnamed person among other things denied knowledge of such extensive talk between Maersk and Nigeria; that the investment plans appears to be news to it’s officials.

Further extrapolation of the news report bandied by naysayers reveals yawning gaps and holes. That the celebrated online maritime publication quoted an unnamed and non-descriptive Maersk official casts doubt about the veracity of the report being circulated by mischievous elements. The report, contrary to the warped interpretation of critics emphasized that, “discussions (between Maersk and the Nigerian government) were on-going.” Reasons that the entire Maersk team was yet to get full disclosure was equally provided in the news report by the unnamed official, “….. may be by next week, we would be properly briefed.” It should be noted that at the time naysayers activated their spin arsenals, Maersk was yet to deny or contradict government’s position as released by Tinubu’s spokesman. Why “pick and choose” by these critics? Why not dwell on the entire news report and do proper inquisition if any? Why the unnecessary dust and hullabaloo? Why the wrong, pervasive vilification of Tinubu’s spokesman?

Advertisement

Findings from further research and empirical studies reveals that in February 2024 in the course of an exploratory visit to Nigeria’s Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, the A P. Maersk Terminal Chief Executive Officer, Keith Svendsen detailed the company’s $600m investment commitment to Nigeria’s economy. Svendsen, who re-affirmed Maersk’s commitment to investing more in Nigeria, clearly outlined plans to allocate “an initial $100m, with an additional half-billion dollars ($500m) earmarked for port investments in Lagos, Nigeria.” Contrary to wrong insinuations, the Riyadh meeting was another opportunity by Maersk to re-confirm it’s investment interest in Nigeria’s maritime sector. These investments are expected to support modernisation and expansion of our ports; improve trade; reduce corruption; and boost efficiency. Maersk’s interest in the sector is buoyed by government’s commitment, and to complement on-going $1bn development of seaports construction and development across Nigeria’s eastern and western ports.

In a widely published statement by Maersk that did not only expose the despicable, hideous, and vengeful intentions of traducers but explicitly described the seriousness and benefits of the company’s investment in Nigeria, Svendsen confirmed that the company has concluded plans to invest over $500m in the upgrades of Nigeria’s port facilities. He added that, “I earlier this year publicly told about the proposal to invest more than $500m that we have discussed with President Tinubu both in February, and which we further elaborated in late April. We have intensified talks with the administration and port authority to make these plans concrete and I’m pleased with the significant progress made towards implementation.” According to Svendsen, the global logistics and provider has being a critical stakeholder in Nigeria’s maritime sector with, “container terminals in Lagos, Apapa, and Onne, provision of high-quality and modern equipment, direct employment of about 2,500 people, and indirect employment of about 65,000 people.” Maersk in the words of Svendsen, “believes strongly in the future prospects for the Nigeria economy, and the long-term opportunities that the current economic reforms and invitation for international investments will generate.”

Contrary to the negative narratives floating around, Maersk, while acknowledging Nigeria as the key market in Africa, and the company’s central role in trade between Nigeria and the rest of the world, is determined to consolidate it’s position as a leading force in Nigeria’s maritime sector, and desirous to upgrading it’s greenfield terminals in Lekki and Badagry as well as other ports infrastructure across the country. Svendsen declared that, “we seek to do this under a long-term agreement with the government to support our ambition to continuously improve the import and especially export opportunities for the country, creating jobs and diversifying opportunities locally. For us, it is important that we not only operate highly efficient terminals, but also that we play a role contributing to the development of the local communities and bring opportunities for growth and new prospects in Nigeria.”

For emphasis, Nigeria and Denmark have always had a robust, and mutually beneficial business relationship spanning four decades. This relationship has involved steady exchanges of goods and services, crude petroleum, concentrated milk, non-fillet frozen fish, margarine, transportation, solar power, renewable energy, biotechnology and few others. Specifically, Maersk with over $2b existing investments in Nigerian ports and other activities has shown that it’s involvement is not just fruitful but transcends to reputable and equitable partnership with states including Ogun where a container terminal is under construction.

Advertisement

Finally, rather than resort to cheap, mindless, and fruitless public ridicule as well as unnecessary debilitating politicisation of any, every intention and programme of government that will impact positively on the country and citizens, it is incumbent on “professional naysayers” to allow objectivity to prevail. In matters of development, banal reasoning, ethnic consideration, and tribal imputation should be subsumed under national interest and true nationhood. Multi-faceted buffeting, multi-pronged chicanery, and caustic denunciation of appointees and officials of government by hirelings and sourced ranconteurs is not what Nigeria need now. Given the multi-dimensional economic challenges and corrosive poverty that Nigerians are experiencing, every human capacities should be deployed towards supporting any development-driven initiative by government. The comments of Maersk’s Chairman at the Riyadh meeting with Tinubu will suffice, “with the growth potentials of the Nigerian economy, we are very eager to invest in it, and we will continue to dialogue with the relevant Nigerian authorities to explore further investment opportunities in an economy that has the capacity and potentials to be among the best in the world.”

*Bolaji Afolabi a seasoned media practitioner, has served in the Office of Public Affairs in The Presidency and as Communications Resource Person in the House of Representatives, respectively.*

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

CBN 2024 financial performance an indicator Cardoso’s twerking yielding results

Published

on

By

By Dr. Ibrahim Modibbo

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under the able leadership of Governor Yemi Cardoso has released the apex bank’s 2024 financial statements. The results reflect the bank’s commitment to economic stability, sound policy implementation, and strategic financial management. The financial performance further highlights improvements in external reserves, asset quality, cost efficiency and overall bottom-line improvement.

An indicator of Cardoso’s policy direction being on the right track is manifested by the CBN posting in its latest financial statement showing the country’s external reserves growing from $36.6billion in 2023 to $38.8billion in 2024.

This is phenomenal achievement is largely attributable to the apex bank’s improvement in accretion to external reserves from portfolio investors, diaspora remittances and the federal government receipts following improved confidence in the Nigerian economy, facilitated by better coordination with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) and diaspora engagement strategies.

Advertisement

Another contributory factor is the proper investment management decisions taking by the CBN governor, aimed at boosting the reserves of the bank. This glowing performance reflects the CBN’s firm commitment to external sector stability, ensuring Nigeria is better positioned to meet its international obligations, stabilize the naira, and boost macroeconomic confidence.

Remarkably, the CBN fianancial statement also showed that the bank’s bottom-line improved from a deficit position of ₦1.3trillion in 2023 to a surplus of ₦165billon in 2024. This turnaround is attributable to a direct consequence of apex bank’s effective containment of expenditure, gains on investments made by the bank and increased income from foreign exchange transactions under the Cardoso regime.

The financial statement further showed a notable reduction in loans and receivables from ₦16.1trillion to ₦11.9trillion, due primarily to significant recoveries from earlier intervention lending programmes; a deliberate policy shift away from previous intervention lending and monetary financing through ways and means in line with the bank’s new stance on allowing market mechanisms to drive credit allocation and financial sector development.

To reflect Cardoso’s enthroning of a cost-conscious culture at the CBN, the apex bank adopted a strategy of optimizing and streamlining it’s operating expenses in 2024, through strategic cost rationalization initiatives, including reduction in non-essential spending and streamlined operations across regional branches and departments.

Advertisement

Furthermore, in line with the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) regulatory requirement on ICFR, it is worthy to note that the Central Bank was able to carry out an assessment of its internal controls which was further certified effective by the joint external audit team. This approach resulted in enhanced transparency and accountability in financial reporting, strengthening institutional governance and internal risk controls, and aligning with international best practices in central bank operations

As a testament to the effectiveness of this initiative, the joint external auditors issued an independent assurance report declaring the CBN’s ICFR framework to be “effective” for the 2024 reporting period. However, it wasn’t all cheering news all the way because while the Central Bank of Nigeria’s 2024 financial results reflect operational improvements, some expenditure lines posed challenges.

One of the notable upticks in the apex bank’s expenses in 2024 was related to liquidity management operations. These costs rose to ₦4.5trillion from ₦1.5trillion in 2023. This increase can be traceable to the tightening monetary policy stance adopted by the CBN governor to combat inflationary pressures throughout the year.

In pursuit of that objective, the CBN conducted more frequent and higher-value Open Market Operations (OMO) to mop up excess liquidity arising from fiscal injections at a significant cost. This is a huge responsibility CBN is carrying out on behalf of the federation, whereas in some jurisdictions, this cost is borne by the government.

Advertisement

The financial statements also reflect an increase in the loss on settled derivative contracts during the year from ₦6.3trillion in 2023 to ₦13.9trillion in 2024. This development is a direct consequence of the high volume of derivative contracts settled by the apex bank in 2024. These are legacy transactions which the Cardoso management met on resumption of office.

This proactive settlement effort was undertaken as part of management’s broader strategy to reduce outstanding foreign exchange liabilities, thus lowering its FX exposure, boost net foreign reserves, thereby improving Nigeria’s external buffer and investor confidence, restoring credibility to Nigeria’s forward markets and address legacy obligations transparently.

It can be said that the improved performance of the Central Bank of Nigeria in 2024 is not coincidental but a product of deliberate, and strategic management efforts undertaken by Governor Cardoso. The bank’s leadership has reinforced governance and accountability, instilling operational discipline in the running of the CBN. It has also pursued a balanced monetary policy stance, ensuring price and financial system stability.

These reforms enunciated by Governor Cardoso since his appointment by President Bola Tinubu have collectively repositioned the CBN as a credible monetary authority, with its 2024 financial results serving as proof of its unwavering resolve to support the economic recovery programme of the current administration, safeguard financial stability, and build public trust.

Advertisement

Dr. Ibrahim Modibbo is a public affairs analyst and writes from Abuja.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Olorunyomi, Nigeria’s most decorated journalist, takes another award

Published

on

By

By Omoniyi Ibietan

For the umpteenth time, Oyekunle Oyedapo Olorunyomi, publisher of Premium Times, possibly contemporary Nigeria’s most honoured journalist, was garlanded earlier today, with the Hallmarks of Labour Foundation (HLF) Award.

Olorunyomi, popularly called Dapsy, famous for his public spiritedness, brilliance, grit and vision, and particularly renowned for his pragmatism and love for investigative and interpretive reporting, media independence, accountability as well as advocacy for public interest journalism, in his words ‘journalism of relevance’, received the HLF-Christopher Kolade Award for Excellence in Leadership and Professionalism in the Media at an event in Lagos.

Reckoning Dapo Olorunyomi’s journalistic antecedents and the trailblazing Premium Times Media Group – which houses the Premium Times newspaper (an online newspaper), Dubawa (a fact-checking entity), the Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (a tech-oriented knowledge production centre instituted to empower and support African media), and Premium Times Books (a book publishing arm) – the Hallmarks Foundation found a repository to draw form and content that gave expression to professionalism and leadership.

Advertisement

As captured by Premium Times, this award celebrates Dapsy’s “established track record” in championing media independence, accountability journalism, and ethical standards.

An incurable believer in the promise of newspapering for the promotion of freedom and democracy, a leading light of avant garde, innovative journalism in the service of society, iconoclastic and radical, I first took note of Dapsy as a social actor in the Nigerian space after reading the cover story of the African Concord newsmagazine titled, “Has IBB Given up?” an exceptionally objective unsparing analysis of the Babangida regime. The publication’s factuality and poignancy was so stinging as to precipitate the sealing of the premises of the medium for six months and its proscription in 1992 by the military regime.

Unbeknownst to me, Dapsy and I have a deeper historical connection. For instance, he was in the league of student leaders of the early 1980s who pitched their tent in the left pole of the ideological spectrum. It was he and his comrades who drafted the Charter of Demands of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), a document that would become a consequential duty of my generation of student leaders to implement.

Born in Kano, educated at Ife, Oxford, Washington and across the world, ever since Dapsy enrolled at the then University of Ife where he obtained a bachelor’s degree in English and a Master’s in Literature, he has been on the famished road of knowledge production, journalistic rectitude, organised, conscious self and collaborative activities of social action and uncommon charity. As a student at Ife, he spent his holidays working PRO BONO as a press officer at the South Africa’s African National Congress Office in Lagos, and he continued to live a life marked by ecumenism and charitableness.

Advertisement

Exactly two years ago, precisely on January 11, 2023, I published a tribute to honour him when he was announced the first African fellow of the Poynter Institute, alongside 26 other global media entrepreneurs and actors for the 2023 Media Transformation Challenge (MTC) programme. The Poynter Fellowship had recorded 350 alumni as of 2023, and Dapsy broke the jinx by becoming Africa’s first alumnus.

In 2020, the International Press Freedom Award was presented to him. Earlier, in 1995, the World Press Review garlanded him as the International Editor of the Year. In 1996 he was awarded the Freedom to Write Award by the PEN Center, as well as Press Freedom Award by the National Association of Black Journalists in New York. For his involvement in reporting on the Panama Papers, he won a joint Pulitzer Award in 2016. The Global Investigative Journalism Network also honoured him with the Global Shining Award in 2017. Still in 2017, he carted away both the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) Press Freedom Award and the a distinguishing fellowship of the Nigerian Institute of Journalism (NIJ). Olorunyomi equally received the Diamond Awards for Media Excellence’s Lifetime Award.

He had worked for The Herald newspapers, was an editor at Radio Nigeria, African Guardian, and the African Concord before co-founding TheNews magazine, Tempo, as well as AM and PM News. He became the Enterprise Editor and head of investigation at the Timbuktu Media, publishers of 234Next. Olorunyomi has served on the board of many international organisations including Panos Institute West Africa, Norbert Zongo Cell for Investigative Journalism (a United Nations initiative) and he continued to serve on the jury or as chair or African analyst for many media initiatives or country surveys.

He was the Director Nigeria Project for Freedom House (FH), during which I worked with him as FH’s Regional Media Researcher for the Niger Delta. Freedom House is America’s oldest NGO focused on curating the state of press freedom in over 190 nations and territories. While at FH, he founded the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism (now Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism). He was Director for Policy and Chief of Staff to Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, when the latter was Executive Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. It was he who essentially developed crime prevention and education policy at EFCC.

Advertisement

He was on exile for a while when the Abacha regime launched a serial crackdown on activists and journalists. He returned to Nigeria at the onset of Nigeria’s renascent democracy and continued his works without ceasing as a dedicated Nigerian patriot. In 2021, he was arrested ostensibly for publishing a libellous story about former Army Chief Buratai, an incident that suffered a natural fate as cases of unsubstantiated allegations.

The Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Commission aptly described Olorunyomi as ‘Akinkanju’ (the Valiant man) of Nigerian journalism. His story continues to serve as an unvarnished reminder of the value of focus, love for man and country, determination, selflessness, and living for others.

Dr. Omoniyi Ibietan is the Head of Media Relations, Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC).

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Opinion

Fate of Critical National Infrastructure protection

Published

on

By

By Sonny Aragba-Akpore

On June 24,2024,President Bola Ahmed Tinubu signed an Executive Order for the protection of information and communications technology (ICT) equipment in order to build a robust economy.

Captioned DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION OF CRITICAL NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE ORDER, (CNII)2024, the order derives its power from Cybercrime Act of 2015.

Specifically, this is In exercise of the powers conferred on the President by section 3 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act, 2015 (as amended), and all other powers enabling him in that behalf.

Advertisement

“The objectives of this Order are to designate certain Information and Communications Technology systems (ICT), networks and infrastructure operating in Nigeria, as Critical National Information Infrastructure (CNII) , develop cohesive measures and strategies for the security and protection of CNII, and ensure their continued operation .

The order specifies adoption and proactive holistic approach in the identification, security and protection of CNIl; reduce to the barest minimum, incidences capable of damaging, disrupting, or interfering with the operation, functionality, or integrity of CNII .

The order is essentially to ensure the effective functioning of ICT systems, networks, and infrastructure, which are critical to driving national imperatives, economic development, national security and defense, public health and safety, and government operations.

It lists Computer systems, networks, and communication infrastructures acquired, installed, deployed, and operated in sectors of the Nigerian economy as in the Schedule to this Order as critical and are hereby designated as CNII.
But beautiful as the document is,its impact is yet to be felt.

Advertisement

Inspite of the good intentions thereto, not much has been done or heard in this regard as it appears the document appears confined to government archive as one of those policies that have good intentions but remain slow in implementation.

Strangely, nobody is even talking about it and industry players are worried.
As for the Cybercrime Act from where this order was derived, very little has come from there too except pockets of arrests and prosecution especially of persons who may have alleged to have carried out cyberstalking and others.

The CNII order requires strong implementation especially if we intend to build a resilient and robust economy and sustain and protect telecommunications infrastructure, grow the ICT sector to improve on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) among others.

Not much has been heard or implemented since 2024 when the order was signed and it is worrisome that such a beautiful policy is allowed to rot away in the back waters of governance.

Advertisement

CNII refers to interconnected systems; networks that are indispensable for the functioning of the nation’s economy, security, public health, and general safety. These information infrastructures ensure seamless communication, data storage, and operational continuity in both private and public sectors.

Examples of CNII include telecommunications networks, financial systems, transportation management systems, national power grids, national identity management system among others.
Disruption to any of these systems could result in significant economic losses and distress.

Legal experts explain that Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA )is tasked with leading efforts to protect CNII by collaborating with relevant stakeholders to establish a Trusted Information Sharing Network (TISN) that would encourage the exchange of information across various sectors of the Nigerian economy.

The Order also empowers the ONSA to conduct regular audits and inspections of CNII to ensure compliance with applicable laws, guidelines, and rules.

Advertisement

Additionally, the ONSA in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders is required to develop and implement a Critical National Information Infrastructure Protection Plan (CNIIPP) and other measures to prevent unauthorized access, theft, vandalism, destruction, and unlawful interference with the operation of CNII.

This is to minimize risks and reduce incidents that could disrupt or compromise the functionality of this CNII.
Pursuant to the Act, individuals who commit offences against CNII, specifically, unauthorized access, tampering, or interference with CNII, shall upon conviction be liable to imprisonment for up to 10 years. Where such acts result in grievous bodily harm to individuals, the imprisonment terms extend up to 15 years. In cases where such offences lead to the loss of life, offenders are liable to life imprisonment.

The designation of telecom infrastructure as a critical national infrastructure may not address the challenges of vandalism except the government displays the political will to enforce the Order.
The immediate past government had approved and also directed that necessary physical protective measures be put in place to safeguard telecommunications infrastructure deployed across the country.

The presidential directive, mandated Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), Defence Headquarters (DHQ), Nigeria Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS), and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC),to ensure protection of the infrastructure and were properly notified of the President’s directive and were expected to enforce same as directed.

Advertisement

But very little was done because this had no impact as vandalism of the infrastructure remained a daily occurrence across the country to date.

That is why this government should sum up the political will to implement this Executive Order, safeguard the infrastructure and fuel the economy.

Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy Minister, Bosun Tijani explained at the advent of the document that “the order is a significant step that would strengthen and protect investments in the ICT sector by reducing incidences capable of damaging the operations and functionality of the country’s technological systems, infrastructure, and networks.”

The Minister added that designating telecom infrastructure as CNII would help improve the quality of telecoms services, which has often been affected by disruption and intentional damage.

Advertisement

“This gazette now makes it an offence to wilfully damage assets such as telco towers/sites, switch stations, data centres, satellite infrastructure, submarine & fibre optic cables, transmission equipment, e-government platforms, databases among many others,” adding that government would continue to work to create an enabling and supportive environment and policies for the digital economy to thrive.

The Order identifies areas that are critical for protection as: power and energy sectors of the economy, water; information, communication, science and technology ;banking, finance and insurance ;health ;public administration; education ;defense and security transport; food and agriculture; safety and emergency services; industrial and manufacturing; and mines and steel.

The order states that the National Security Adviser (NSA) may, with the approval of the President, update the list of sectors in the Schedule to this Order, taking into consideration emerging technologies and platforms, in line with the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act (“the Act”), and the National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy (“the Policy”).

And any update made pursuant to the listed areas shall be published in the Federal Gazette.

Advertisement

“The Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) shall, in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders, develop a comprehensive Critical National Information Infrastructure Protection Plan (CNIIPP) ; and guidelines, specifying minimum standards, rules, and procedures for the protection, preservation and general management of designated CNII,for the approval of the President.”

“The ONSA shall, in collaboration with relevant CNII stakeholders, establish a Trusted information Sharing Network (TISN), as a multidisciplinary framework, comprising owners and operators of CNII ;representatives from relevant Ministries, Departments, and Agencies of government (MDAs) ; and identified private sector organisations, to build and execute awareness campaigns on risks to CNII, share information and techniques required to assess and mitigate risks in a decentralised manner across sectors of the economy, and implement capacity building initiatives to strengthen and mainstream resilience and protection of the infrastructure and networks.”

Members and entities within the TISN shall collaborate and share information on threats and vulnerabilities, and develop strategies and solution to mitigate known and evolving risks.
How much of this has been implemented across board leaves us guessing.

Before the Presidential intervention,it has been a tale of woes by stakeholders in the Nigerian ICT sector who have been calling on the government to designate telecom infrastructure as a critical national infrastructure to address the challenges of persistent attacks on the infrastructure across the country.

Advertisement

In March 2024,the Operators reiterated the call as Nigeria suffered an internet outage due to damage to some fibre optic cables.

“In 2023 alone, MTN Nigeria suffered more than 6,000 cuts on its fiber cable. The operator relocated 2,500 kilometres of vulnerable fiber cables between 2022 and 2023, at a cost of more than N11bn —enough to build 870 kilometres of new fiber lines in areas without coverage.”

Early in August 2024 ,Chief Executive Officer of Airtel Nigeria, Carl Cruz, while speaking during an industry forum, said the telecom company had been recording an average of 1,000 cases of fibre cuts every month.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News