News
Tinubu, AGF, Akpabio dragged to court over removal of CCT chair, Danladi Umar
President Bola Tinubu, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, and Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, have been dragged before a Federal High Court in Abuja over the alleged unlawful removal of Justice Danladi Umar as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).
The President and 10 others were sued by two civil society groups, Community Rescue Initiative and Toro Concerned Citizens Relief Foundation, as well as an Abuja based lawyer, Comrade Nasir Bala.
The three plaintiffs are praying the court to restrain the Clerk of the National Assembly from transmitting to Tinubu, the concurrent resolution of the Senate and House of Representatives which removed Umar as Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal.
They are also praying the court to stop the President from giving effect to the resolution of the two chambers of the National Assembly, on the grounds that clear provisions of the law, especially the 1999 Constitution, were not followed in the purported removal of the CCT boss.
Among others, the plaintiffs are seeking seven declarative reliefs against the President and the other defendants.
The suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1796/2024, was instituted on behalf of the plaintiffs by Mahmoud M. Maidoki Esq., A.G Salisu Esq., Jibrin S. Jibrin Baq., and Abubakar S. Idris Bag.
In faulting the action of the National Assembly, the plaintiffs asked the Federal High Court to determine the following:
“Whether by virtue of the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3) , 6(5), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third Schedule thereof, the purported removal of the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by the 4th Defendant is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever same having been made pursuant to the provisions of section 157 (1) of the 1999 Constitution or any other law for that matter.
“Whether by virtue of the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3) , 6(5), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third Schedule thereof, the purported concurrence by the 6” Defendant with the decision/resolution of the 4 Defendant purportedly removing the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal taken at 4th Defendant’s plenary of the 20th November 2024 or any other date for that matter which said concurrence was taken at the 6th Defendant’s Plenary of 26th November 2024 is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever same having been founded on a faulty legal foundation and in breach/violation of section 22 (3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau & Tribunal Act and paragraph 17 (3) of the 5th Schedule of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
“Whether by virtue of the provisions of Paragraph 17 (1) of the 5th Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), Section 20 (1) and (4) of the Code of Conduct Bureau & Tribunal Act and the subsistence of the occupation of the office of the Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar, the purported appointment and subsequent confirmation of the 10th or 11th Defendants into the same office by the 1st and 4th Defendants, respectively, is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect same having been done in clear breach of the applicable provisions of the 1999 Constitution (Supra) and the Code of Conduct and Tribunal Act (Supra).
“Whether the purported removal of the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal in the person of Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar as done by the 4th Defendant based on the motion and submission founded by distinguished Senator Opeyemi Bamidele during its plenary of 20th November 2024 and the subsequent concurrence by the 6th Defendant on 26th November, 2024 at its plenary has occasioned/amounted to a breach of Section 36(1) and Section 6 (5) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as the allegations of misconduct among others which formed the basis of the resolution/decision in issue has not been proved/established in the manner prescribed by law.”
The plaintiffs noted that if the above questions are answered in the affirmative, the court should declare
that by virtue of the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3), 6(6), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third Schedule thereof, the purported removal of the Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by the 4th Defendant is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever, same having been made pursuant to the provisions of section 157 (1) of the 1999 Constitution or any other law for that matter.
Other declarations and orders sought by the plaintiffs are:
“A DECLARATION that by virtue of the provisions of Sections 1(1) and (3), 6(6), 153 (1) (e) & (i) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as well as Paragraph 13 (a) (vii) and (b) of the Third – Schedule thereof, the purported concurrence by the 6th Defendant with the decision/resolution of the 4th Defendant purportedly removing the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal taken at 4tj Defendant’s plenary of the 20th November 2024 or any other date for that matter which said concurrence was taken at the 6th Defendant’s Plenary of 26th November 2024 is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect whatsoever same having been founded on a faulty legal foundation and in breach/violation of section 22 (3) of the Code of Conduct Bureau & Tribunal Act and paragraph 17 (3) of the 5® Schedule of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
“A DECLARATION that by virtue of the provisions of Paragraph 17 (1) of the 5th Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), Section 20 (1) and (4) of the Code of Conduct Bureau & Tribunal Act and the subsistence of the occupation of the office of the Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal by Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar, the purported appointment and subsequent confirmation of the 10th or 11th Defendants into the same office by the 1st and 4th Defendants, respectively, is illegal, void, unconstitutional and of no effect same having been done in clear breach of the applicable provisions of the 1999 Constitution (Supra) and the Code of Conduct and Tribunal Act (Supra).
“A DECLARATION that the purported removal of the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal in the person of Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar as done by the 4’th Defendant based on the motion and submission founded by distinguished Senator Opeyemi Bamidele during its plenary of 20th November 2024 and the subsequent concurrence by the 6th Defendant on 26th November, 2024 at its plenary has occasioned/amounted to a breach of Section 36(1) and Section 6 (6) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) as the allegations of misconduct among others which formed the basis of the resolution/decision in issue has not been proved/established in the manner prescribed by law.
“AN ORDER restraining the 7th Defendant from communicating the resolution’ of the 4th and 6th Defendants removing the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal in person of Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar to the 1st Defendant the removal having been done without following the due process of law.
“AN ORDER restraining the 8th and 9th Defendants from considering any person including the 10th or 11th Defendant for appointment by the 1st Defendant and subsequent confirmation by the 4th and 6th Defendants during, the subsistence of term of office of Hon. Justice Danladi Yakubu Umar.”
Meanwhile Justice James Omotosho, who is to adjudicate in the matter, has ordered that the process in respect be served by substituted means through pasting at the notice board of the court, the APC secretariat and Office of Secretary to the Government of the Federation.
The court further adjourned the suit to January 14, 2025, for hearing.
News
EFCC re-arraigns Bauchi Accountant-General, BDC operator over N1.63bn fraud case
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has re-arraigned Bauchi State Accountant General, Sirajo Muhammad Jaja, and an unlicensed Bureau de Change operator, Aliyu Abubakar of Jasfad Resources Enterprises, before Justice O. A. Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The duo were re-arraigned on Tuesday, 28 April 2026, on an amended five-count charge bordering on the conversion of public funds belonging to the Bauchi State Government and money laundering to the tune of N1,635,270,350.9k (One billion, six hundred and thirty-five million, two hundred and seventy thousand, three hundred and fifty naira, nine kobo).
DAILY POST reports that they were earlier arraigned on April 7, 2025, with Jaja as the first defendant, while Abubakar was the second.
However, in the amended charge, marked FHC/ABJCR/101/2025, dated January 5, 2026, and filed on the same date, Abubakar, trading under the name of Jasfad Resources Enterprises, became the first defendant and Jaja the second.
Early in the proceedings, prosecution counsel, Abba Muhammed, SAN, informed the court that the prosecution had filed a second amended charge and prayed the court for the defendants to take their plea.
Count two of the charge reads, “That you Aliyu Abubakar (trading under the name and style of “Jasfad Resources Enterprises,” a purported Bureau de Change operator), Sirajo Muhammad Jaja (Accountant General of
Bauchi State), Abubakar Muhammad Hafiz (at large), between 29 October, 2024 and 31st December, 2024 within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did commit an offence to wit: money laundering by converting the sum of One Billion, Two Hundred and Ninety Million, One hundred and Fifty four thousand, Three hundred and Thirty seven Naira, Two kobo (N1, 290,154,337.2) of public funds, belonging to Bauchi State Government which you transferred from the Bauchi State Sub-Treasury Account, domiciled in United Bank for Africa with account number 1018819396 into the bank account of Jasfad Resources Enterprise domiciled in United Bank for Africa with account number 1023444660 and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(b) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”
Count three reads; “That you Aliyu Abubakar (trading under the name and style of “Jasfad Resources Enterprises,” a purported Bureau de Change operator), Sirajo Muhammad Jaja (Accountant General of Bauchi State), Abubakar Muhammad Hafiz (at large), Ari Manga (at large), and Muhammad Aminu Bose (at large), between 3rd January, 2025 and 14th March 2025, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did commit an offence to wit: money laundering by converting the sum of Four hundred and twenty-six million, One hundred and sixteen Thousand, Thirteen Naira, Seven kobo (N426, 116,013.7) of the public funds, belonging to Bauchi State Government which you transferred from the Bauchi State Sub-Treasury Account, domiciled in the United Bank for Africa with account number 1018819396 into bank account of Jasfad Enterprise, domiciled in United Bank for Africa with account number 1023444660 and thereby, committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(b) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”
They pleaded “not guilty” to the charges, following which counsel to the first and second defendants, Gordy Uche, SAN, and Chris Uche, SAN, respectively, applied for the defendants to continue to enjoy the bail earlier granted by the court, which was not opposed by the prosecution counsel.
The first defendant’s counsel further moved a motion challenging the competence of the charge and asked the judge to strike out counts two, three, four and five for allegedly being a duplicity of action and to save the defendants from suffering double jeopardy.
This found support from counsel to the second defendant, Chris Uche, SAN, while it faced opposition from the prosecution counsel.
The court, however, reserved a ruling on the contention until the end of trial, citing Section 395 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.
In continuation of the trial, the prosecution called its first witness, Prosecution Witness One (PW1), Abimbola Williams, a compliance officer with the United Bank for Africa (UBA) with 20 years’ experience.
She informed the court that the bank, in February 2025, received a request from the EFCC for details of some of its clients.
“The request asked for the bank statements of Jaspa Resources account, Bauchi State Sub-treasury account and the documents were printed and copies given to EFCC,” she said.
The banker, who said that the documents were certified by her, tendered them through the prosecution, and they were admitted in evidence by the court and marked as exhibits.
Although the defence lawyers raised an objection, they said their objection would be expounded in their written addresses.
Further in her testimony, PW1 narrated to the court how money running into multi-million naira, belonging to Bauchi State, was allegedly moved from the Bauchi State Sub-Treasury Account number: 1018819396 to Jasfad Resources Enterprises account number: 1023444660, domiciled in UBA.
She told the court that on October 29, 2024, there was a debit transfer from the Bauchi State Sub-Treasury Account to Jasfad Resources to the tune of N13,144,500. Also that “On October 29, 2024, we have a debit transfer of 1N7,196,300. On October 30, 2024 there were two debit transfers from Bauchi Sub-treasury account to Jasfad Resources Enterprise, first for N50 million and the second for N7, 321,000,” he said.
The witness further disclosed that there were 18 other instances, on different dates within the period, when transfers were made from the Bauchi State Sub-Treasury Account to Jasfad Resources.
Following the conclusion of PW1’s evidence-in-chief, Justice Egwuatu adjourned the matter until 12 May for continuation of trial.
News
Security operatives foil bandit attack in Katsina
Security operatives have foiled a bandit attack on a community watch and hunters’ base in Sukunkumi village, Kankia Local Government Area of Katsina State.
Security sources said the incident occurred around 7:30 pm on March 26, when about 15 heavily armed bandits on motorcycles attempted to overrun the facility.
According to counter-insurgency expert Zagazola Makama, the sources said security teams quickly moved to the area and engaged the attackers in a gun duel, forcing them to flee into nearby bushes.
The sources added that three motorcycles were recovered at the scene, including two that had earlier been taken from hunters during the clash.
They further stated that a Community Watch member, Yusuf Ibrahim, 30, sustained a gunshot wound to his left leg and was taken to General Hospital Kankia for treatment.
The sources also said patrols and clearance operations have been stepped up in the area to track down the fleeing suspects and prevent further attacks.
News
Ex-Zamfara Senator Marafa Joins NDC, Citing Court Cases Within ADC
Former Senator representing Zamfara Central Senatorial District, Senator Kabir Garba Marafa, formally defected to the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) on Tuesday, along with his supporters. This move marks his second party switch in under a month.
Senator Marafa, who served in the Senate from 2011 to 2019, was welcomed by the NDC National Leader and Senator for Bayelsa West, Seriake Dickson, at Dickson’s residence in Abuja. The NDC National Chairman, Senator Moses Cleopas, and other party stakeholders were also present.
The defection comes just three weeks after Marafa joined the African Democratic Congress (ADC) on 8th April 2026. He had previously resigned from the All Progressives Congress (APC) on 28th August 2025, citing internal disputes within the ruling party.
Speaking to journalists shortly after receiving his NDC membership card, Marafa explained that his departure from the ADC was prompted by concerns over numerous ongoing legal challenges and the limited time remaining before critical electoral deadlines set by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“The point of joining a political party is to provide an opportunity to contest and serve your people. If I were to ask you, what are the chances of the ADC succeeding?” Marafa questioned.
He stressed that his decision wasn’t motivated by ill will towards the ADC. “I’m not wishing them anything bad, as they are my friends and partners. We are united in this struggle. However, considering the number of legal cases pending and the limited time left, anyone intending to contest an election in Nigeria needs to be a member of a substantial political party by, at the latest, 9th May,” he said.
Marafa expressed doubt about the ADC’s ability to resolve its legal issues before key dates for party primaries and candidate registration. “How many court cases are we waiting for to determine the ADC’s fate? Let’s be honest and fair to ourselves. We’re awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court, knowing that the outcome could be evenly split, potentially leading to further litigation.”
He warned that prolonged legal battles could leave him and his supporters without a viable platform. “If that happens, where would we begin? By the time registration closes, what will I tell my people? That I waited in the ADC hoping for a favourable resolution, which isn’t even in their control?”
The former Senator said the decision to move to the NDC followed extensive consultations with his political base and legal advisors. “This is the main reason I met with my supporters to brainstorm and engaged experienced lawyers to assess the situation and advise us. Their advice led me and my supporters to join the NDC.”
Marafa pledged his loyalty to the NDC’s leadership and internal processes. “Therefore, whatever decision my new party, the NDC, takes regarding its presidential candidate when the time comes, we will respect it,” he said.
Senator Dickson described Marafa as a seasoned politician whose arrival would strengthen the NDC, particularly in Zamfara State and the wider North-West geopolitical zone. He urged Marafa to utilise his grassroots network to mobilise support and help address insecurity in the region.
“I welcome and recognise the distinguished delegation you’ve brought with you. Marafa is a significant figure, hailing from the Savannah region of Nigeria,” Dickson said. “This isn’t simply about joining a political party; it’s about a commitment to service, leadership, and delivering results for the people. The NDC is a party for everyone, including the less privileged and those who are hungry and insecure. That’s why our motto is service to the people.”
NDC National Chairman, Senator Moses Cleopas, added that the party is founded on a people-oriented agenda centred on inclusion, service delivery, and national renewal. He noted that the NDC is positioning itself as a credible alternative platform for women, young people, and people with disabilities as political activity intensifies ahead of the 2027 general election.
Marafa’s defection is considered a boost to the NDC’s efforts to expand its presence in the North-West, a region considered crucial in national elections.
-
Economy22 hours agoSEE Dollar To Naira Exchange Rate – Tuesday, April 28, 2026
-
News18 hours agoJust in: Tinubu Picks APC Nomination Forms For 2027 Re-Election Bid
-
News22 hours agoOver 29 Feared K!lled in Adamawa Community Attack on Football Spectators- Gov Fintiri confirms
-
News18 hours ago2027: Campaign Quietly Underway as Tinubu Secures APC Forms
-
News17 hours agoCourt orders MTN, AIRTEL to resume airtime lending services
-
Metro6 hours agoGunmen invade Ekiti church, k!ll pastor, abduct members during revival
-
News16 hours ago2027: FOH Endorses Okowa, Says Delta North Needs Him
-
News6 hours agoEx-Zamfara Senator Marafa Joins NDC, Citing Court Cases Within ADC

You must be logged in to post a comment Login