Connect with us

Entertainment

One Billion Users, But Controversies Mount Up For TikTok

Published

on

TikTok’s breakneck rise from a niche video-sharing app to a global social media behemoth has drawn intense scrutiny, particularly over its links to China.

In Washington, the platform has been accused of espionage.

The European Union suspects it was used to sway Romania’s presidential election in favour of a far-right candidate.

And now Albania has banned it for a year, Prime Minister Edi Rama calling it the “thug of the neigbourhood”.

Advertisement

Here are the main controversies surrounding TikTok:

Albania: minimum one-year ban

Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama said Saturday the government would shut down social network TikTok for at least a year from 2025.

The move came less than a month after a 14-year-old student was killed and another injured in a fight near a school in Tirana.

Advertisement

The fight had developed from an online confrontation on social media.

Romania: suspected influence campaign

The EU is probing whether far-right presidential candidate Calin Georgescu’s surprise victory in the first round of Romania’s presidential election was aided by Russian meddling and “preferential treatment” by TikTok.

It is the third investigation the commission has launched against TikTok, which risks fines of up to six percent of its global turnover.

Advertisement

The platform said it had taken “robust actions” to tackle election-related misinformation. Russia has denied interfering in the vote.

US: sell-off pressure

The United States in April passed a law obliging TikTok’s Chinese owner ByteDance to sell off the platform by January 19 on the grounds it allowed China to access data on US users.

If not, the platform would be banned in the United States — denying TikTok its claimed 170 million users in the countries.

Advertisement

TikTok admitted ByteDance employees in China had accessed Americans’ data but it has denied giving data to the Chinese authorities.

To protect data, the US government, the European Commission and Britain’s government had already banned TikTok from their employees’ work devices in 2023.

Australia: teenage ban

TikTok was among the many platforms targeted by a landmark law passed in Australia in November banning under-16s from accessing social media.

Advertisement

Social media firms that fail to comply with the law face fines of up to Aus$50 million (US$32.5 million) for “systemic breaches”.

TikTok said it was “disappointed” by the Australian legislation, claiming it could push young people to the “darker corners of the internet”.

Nearly a third of TikTok users are between 10 and 19 years old, according to the Wallaroo agency.

EU: engagement feature ditched

Advertisement

In August, the company, under pressure from EU regulators, was forced to ditch a feature in its TikTok Lite spinoff in France and Spain rewarding users for time spent in front of their screens.

In that rewards programme, users aged 18 and over could earn points to exchange for goods like vouchers or gift cards by liking and watching videos.

It was accused by the EU of potentially having “very addictive consequences”.

TikTok’s editing features and powerful algorithm have kept it ahead of the game, attracting an army of creators and influencers as well as creating many of its own.

Advertisement

TikTok and ByteDance employees also manually increase the number of views on certain content, according to a report in Forbes.

TikTok has said manual promotion only affects a tiny fraction of recommended videos.

Disinformation

The app is regularly accused of putting users in danger with the spread of hazardous “challenge” videos.

Advertisement

Several children have reportedly died while trying to replicate the so-called blackout challenge, which involves users holding their breath until they pass out.

And around one-fifth of videos on topical issues such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine were found to be fake or misleading in a study by misinformation group NewsGuard.

AFP, along with more than a dozen fact-checking organisations, is paid by TikTok in several countries in Asia and Oceania, Europe, the Middle East and Spanish-speaking Latin America to verify for internal moderation videos that potentially contain false information. The videos are removed by TikTok if the information is shown to be false by AFP teams.

AFP

Advertisement

Entertainment

Peter Okoye takes a swipe at his family after testifying against Jude

Published

on

By

By Francesca Hangeior

Singer Peter Okoye, one half of the now-defunct music duo P-Square, has openly criticised his family after testifying against his elder brother, Jude Okoye, who is currently facing money laundering charges.

Jude and Northside Music Limited are being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over allegations of laundering N1.38 billion, $1 million, and £34,537.59.

In a post shared via his Instagram story on Tuesday, Peter said he prioritises his mental health above all else, questioning the real meaning of family. 

Advertisement

He insisted that true family bonds should be rooted in love, loyalty, and trust—not manipulation, betrayal, or theft.

Peter described toxic family dynamics as exhausting and disgraceful, declaring that he would no longer sacrifice his peace of mind for anyone.

He wrote: “Don’t let ‘family’ be the reason you’re drowning in silence. I did – for over 20 years plus. And it almost cost me everything,” the 43-year-old wrote.

“But now I know better – love doesn’t manipulate, loyalty doesn’t betray and family does not steal from you. Family that steals and breaks you isn’t family at all.

Advertisement

“Real family doesn’t drain you, shame you, discriminate against you or ignore your pain. My sanity matters. My mental health is a priority. If it costs my mental health, then it’s too expensive”.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Defamation: Court dismisses VeryDarkMan’s objection against Falana, Falz’s N1bn

Published

on

By

By Francesca Hangeior
 
A Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja has struck out the preliminary objection in the defamation suit filed by human rights lawyer Femi Falana, (SAN), and his son, popular musician Folarin Falana, also known as Falz, against social media personality Vincent Otse, popularly called VeryDarkMan.

Justice Mathias Dawoodu struck out the suit following his discovery that the substantive suit was already before another court, rendering further proceedings before him unnecessary.

Neither the Falanas nor Otse was present at the hearing. However, counsel to the defendant, N.O. Alagbe, appearing on behalf of lead counsel Marvin Omorogbe, informed the court that an application dated April 11, 2025, and filed on April 14, 2025, had been brought to stay proceedings, pending judgment by Justice Azeez in a parallel matter.

Justice Dawoodu responded that the said application was not before his court and questioned why he was being troubled with the matter when the substantive suit was already before another court.

Advertisement

Counsel to the Falanas, Omotayo Olatunbosun, told the court that although he received the application at 4:15 pm late on Monday afternoon, the preliminary objection was properly scheduled and ready for hearing.

He accused the defence of attempting to stall the case and cited a Supreme Court decision which held that courts are not bound to act on applications not yet in their files.

He therefore urged the judge to proceed with the business of the day.

After listening to the submissions of counsel, Justice Dawoodu ruled that after considering the matter at hand, the new application filed by defence but not in his file does not warrant going ahead with the suit.

Advertisement

“Consequently, this suit is hereby struck out,” the judge held.

The Falanas had filed the N1bn defamation suit against Otse, demanding N500m each in damages over a video posted on his social media platforms.

In the video, Otse allegedly claimed that Femi Falana demanded N10m, from controversial crossdresser Idris Okuneye, popularly known as Bobrisky, to pervert the course of justice.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Court grants Portable N1m bail in Saheed Osupa defamation suit

Published

on

By

By Francesca Hangeior

Controversial singer, Okikiola Badmus, popularly known as Portable, has been granted bail in the sum of ₦1 million by an Upper Area Court in Ilorin, Kwara State.

This followed his arraignment on charges including criminal defamation, intimidation, inciting public disturbance, and cyberstalking.

The court also ruled that his bail is conditional upon the provision of two sureties in like sum.

Advertisement

One of which must be either the Chairman or Secretary of the Performing Musicians Association of Nigeria, while the other must possess a landed property within a Government Reserved Area, backed by a valid Certificate of Occupancy.

More details to follow.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News