Connect with us

News

Alleged Cybercrime: How Abuja Court Insisted On Sowore’s Passport Despite Police Bail Argument Flaws

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A Federal High Court in Abuja granted bail of N10 million on Thursday to human rights activist Omoyele Sowore, in connection with alleged cybercrime charges brought by the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun.

Justice Musa Liman, while ruling on the bail application, also ordered Sowore to deposit his passport with the court.

SaharaReporters reported on Wednesday that the trial judge remarked that requesting the applicant’s passport was standard procedure, noting that should there be an urgent need for the applicant to use the passport, he can approach the court.

Sowore is facing trial on a 16-count amended charge but has pleaded not guilty to all charges filed by the IGP Egbetokun.

Advertisement

On Monday, Sowore visited the Force Criminal Investigation Department to answer questions regarding his post calling the IGP “Illegal IGP.”

The police alleged that Sowore referred to Egbetokun as “the illegal IG of the Nigeria Police Force” on his X (formerly Twitter) page and captioned the IGP’s picture with: _“Mediocrity, incompetence, corruption, a country run by characterless people cannot make progress.”

During the proceedings, Sowore’s lawyer, Marshal Abubakar, filed a motion dated January 29, 2025, seeking bail on liberal terms.

“Principally, we are asking for the release of the applicant on bail on self-recognizance or the most liberal terms possible, pending the hearing and determination of the trial,” Abubakar said.

Advertisement

Abubakar argued that the court has discretionary powers regarding bail applications.

He stated that the defendant was invited by the police via a WhatsApp message, which he had honoured.

He also noted that the police had previously granted Sowore administrative bail.

However, the police counsel, M. U. Jonathan, opposed the bail application, presenting a counter-affidavit deposed to by police intelligence officer Friday Ameh.

Advertisement

“We urge the court to dismiss the bail application. Bail cannot be granted in a vacuum,” he said.

He added that if the court were inclined to grant bail, it should impose conditions that ensure Sowore’s continued appearance at trial.

He also urged the court to mandate Sowore to deposit his passport.

The judge while ruling on the bail application said that a person has the right to bail unless there are compelling reasons to deny it.

Advertisement

The judge noted that the police argued that Sowore has cronies within and outside Nigeria who could allegedly interfere with the trial.

The judge also queried the prosecution for raising objections to Sowore’s bail application after the police had granted him administrative bail. He accused them of being inconsistent, speaking in favor and against the same issue simultaneously.

However, the judge ruled that the police failed to prove how Sowore could intimidate high-ranking police officers who would testify in the case.

He further stated that the prosecution did not establish any link between Sowore and the purported cronies.

Advertisement

The judge concluded that the bail applicant deserves his personal liberty pending the outcome of the trial.

“If the applicant desires to jump bail, it is to his own peril,” the judge remarked, noting that the police had previously granted Sowore administrative bail.

“Bail is accordingly granted to the applicant in the sum of N10 million with one surety in like sum,” the judge ruled.

The judge, therefore, ordered the applicant to deposit his passport with the court.

Advertisement

The surety must be a responsible Nigerian citizen residing within the court’s jurisdiction.

The surety must submit an affidavit of means and title documents of landed property in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which must be verified by the court registrar, along with a valid means of identification.

Sowore’s lawyer, Abubakar, requested that his client be released to his legal team pending the fulfillment of the bail conditions within a few hours.

The judge granted Sowore a 24-hour extension to remain with his lawyers.

Advertisement

The case was adjourned to April 8, 2025.

News

Obi drags former political acolyte Okonkwo to court over alleged defamatory bribery claims

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

The presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has started legal action against his former political acolyte and kinsman, Kenneth Okonkwo, over allegations that he and other party leaders collected bribes from aspirants seeking elective positions.

The lawsuit marks a significant escalation in the public fallout between the two political associates, whose relationship has deteriorated in recent months following disagreements over political developments and party affairs.Politics

According to court documents filed by Obi’s legal team, the former Anambra State governor is challenging a series of statements allegedly made by Okonkwo during a public broadcast, in which he accused Obi and leaders of the NDC in the South-East of demanding illicit payments from aspirants seeking tickets to contest for seats in the House of Representatives.

The suit, dated June 9, 2026, was filed by Chief Alex Ejesieme (SAN) of Alex Ejesieme (SAN) & Co. (Madiba Chambers), who described the allegations as false, malicious, and highly damaging to Obi’s reputation.

Advertisement

According to the legal filing, Okonkwo allegedly claimed that House of Representatives aspirants were required to pay an additional ₦10 million to party leaders after paying the official expression of interest and nomination fees.

The suit quoted Okonkwo as alleging that Obi and South-East leaders of the NDC informed aspirants that payment of the additional sum was necessary to secure consideration within the party.

Obi’s lawyers further stated that Okonkwo claimed documentary evidence existed to support the allegation and that receipts had allegedly been issued for the payments.

The actor-turned-politician was also accused of alleging that Obi personally compiled the list of party candidates from a hotel room and manipulated the candidate selection process.

Advertisement

Among other assertions attributed to Okonkwo were claims that Obi travelled abroad to collect money from individuals and that he, alongside other NDC leaders in the South-East, was involved in activities amounting to criminal conduct.

Obi Describes Allegations as False and Defamatory

In the legal action, Obi’s lawyers strongly rejected the allegations, insisting that the statements were entirely fabricated and intended to tarnish the former governor’s image.

The legal team argued that the claims portrayed their client as a dishonest political figure involved in bribery, extortion, fraud, and criminal conspiracy.

Advertisement

According to the suit, the statements were capable of exposing Obi to public hatred, ridicule, contempt, and distrust among members of society.

“The above statements, in their natural and ordinary meaning and by necessary implication, falsely and maliciously represent our client as a person who demands, solicits, organises and collects bribes; who extorts, defrauds and swindles political aspirants of their money; who is a fraudster, a scammer and a dishonest political actor,” the legal team stated.

The lawyers further argued that the allegations struck directly at Obi’s reputation as a public servant and political leader.

They described the remarks as reckless and unsupported by any credible evidence.

Advertisement

Concern Over Social Media Amplification

Obi’s legal representatives also expressed concern over the manner in which the statements were allegedly disseminated.

According to the law firm, the comments were made during a live television appearance before being widely circulated across social media platforms and online channels, thereby increasing their reach and potential impact.

The legal team maintained that while freedom of expression remains a constitutional right, it does not extend to publishing statements capable of damaging another person’s reputation without factual basis.

Advertisement

They argued that the remarks went beyond the limits of political criticism and fair comment.

“Your words were not mere political commentary. They crossed the permissible bounds of fair comment and constituted a direct assault on our client’s person, integrity, image and reputation,” the lawyers stated.

Obi Demands Retraction, Apology and Compensation

As part of the reliefs sought, Obi’s legal team is demanding that Okonkwo immediately withdraw the statements in their entirety and issue a public apology.

Advertisement

The proposed apology, according to the lawyers, must be clear, unconditional, and given the same level of prominence as the original allegations.

They further requested that the apology be published across all major social media platforms, including X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.

In addition, the legal team is seeking a written undertaking from Okonkwo, committing him to refrain from making further defamatory statements against their client.

The suit also includes a demand for financial compensation for the alleged damage caused to Obi’s reputation and public standing.

Advertisement

The legal battle comes amid ongoing political realignments and public disagreements involving former allies within Nigeria’s opposition landscape, with the dispute expected to attract significant public and political attention in the coming weeks.

Continue Reading

News

NCC: Telecom operators to deploy 12,000 new sites as 75m subscribers get compensation

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

NCC moves to stop big telcos from crushing small players
The Nigerian Communications Commission, NCC, says mobile network operators will deploy over 12,000 new coverage and capacity sites nationwide, with more than 5,000 already completed, to improve service quality and expand infrastructure.

This was contained in a communiqué issued after the NCC’s 109th Board Meeting held on May 25, 2026, where the Governing Board reviewed sector developments and outlined regulatory priorities.

The commission said operators have also extended fibre connectivity to more than 700 sites, while colocation and infrastructure-sharing companies have upgraded equipment at over 2,000 Base Transceiver Stations, BTS, to strengthen network resilience and quality of service.

It noted that the ongoing expansion reflects the industry’s commitment to improving coverage, capacity, and customer experience nationwide.

Advertisement

–75m subscribers compensated–

In a major consumer protection move, the NCC revealed that more than 75 million subscribers have been compensated following its directive requiring operators to provide redress for poor quality of service in areas where standards were not met.

The commission described operators’ compliance level as substantial, adding that it is independently validating claims to ensure all eligible subscribers receive due compensation.

However, the NCC expressed concern over partial compliance by Tower Companies, TowerCos, with directives to reinvest regulatory fines into infrastructure upgrades through escrow accounts. It stressed that full compliance is needed for sustainable network improvements.

Advertisement

–Fibre growth, security challenges–

The commission also reviewed data consumption trends and noted that rising demand for broadband continues to pressure existing infrastructure.

Fibre-to-the-Home, FTTH, subscriptions rose from 84,141 in Q4 2025 to 210,065 by the end of the following quarter, reflecting growing adoption of fixed broadband.

The NCC said expanding fibre infrastructure remains critical to reducing pressure on mobile networks, lowering connectivity costs, and improving service quality.

Advertisement

The commission also raised concerns over persistent vandalism of telecom infrastructure despite its designation as Critical National Information Infrastructure, CNII. To address this, it said it is exploring a Communications Industry Security Trust Fund and stronger stakeholder collaboration.

The NCC reaffirmed its commitment to building a sustainable, resilient, and inclusive communications sector that supports Nigeria’s digital transformation and the federal government’s $1 trillion economy goal.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu orders urgent diplomatic action to bring back 300 Nigerians jailed in Ethiopia after inmates die in custody

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has ordered immediate diplomatic action aimed at securing the return of hundreds of Nigerians currently serving prison sentences in Ethiopia, following growing concerns over their welfare and reports that several inmates have died while in custody.

The move is expected to pave the way for the transfer of nearly 300 Nigerian prisoners from Ethiopian correctional facilities to Nigeria, where they would complete the remainder of their jail terms under an international prisoner-transfer arrangement.

To facilitate the process, a high-powered Nigerian delegation comprising senior government officials is set to travel to Addis Ababa to finalise negotiations with Ethiopian authorities. Members of the delegation include the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, and the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi.

Presidency had disclosed that Tinubu directed the officials to expedite discussions and conclude a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Ethiopian government that would provide the legal framework for transferring the inmates to Nigeria.

Advertisement

The intervention comes amid mounting concerns over the conditions faced by Nigerian prisoners at Ethiopia’s Kaliti Prison, where many of the inmates are reportedly serving lengthy sentences for drug-related offences.
Government sources indicated that reports of deteriorating living conditions, inadequate healthcare services, and overcrowding within the prison facility played a major role in prompting the President’s decision.

According to available estimates, close to 300 Nigerians are currently incarcerated in Ethiopian prisons, with a significant number convicted for offences linked to narcotics trafficking. However, families, advocacy groups, and legal rights organisations have repeatedly expressed concerns over the treatment of the inmates, citing poor feeding conditions, limited access to medical attention, and overcrowded detention facilities.

The issue has remained a sensitive diplomatic matter between Nigeria and Ethiopia for years, attracting growing attention from civil society groups and concerned relatives.

Calls for government intervention intensified after reports emerged that several Nigerian inmates had died while serving their sentences. The deaths sparked renewed appeals for authorities to activate an inmate-transfer agreement that would allow the prisoners to complete their sentences closer to home.

Advertisement

Families of the affected inmates have argued that relocation to Nigeria would improve access to healthcare, family support, and rehabilitation opportunities.

The matter also attracted judicial attention after a Federal High Court in Abuja reportedly directed relevant government agencies to take steps toward facilitating the inmates’ return, citing humanitarian concerns surrounding their continued detention abroad.

Prior to Tinubu’s latest directive, Nigerian and Ethiopian officials had engaged in multiple rounds of discussions over the proposed transfer arrangement. Nigerian authorities maintained that necessary domestic procedures had largely been completed and that the process was awaiting final approvals from the Ethiopian government.

Diplomatic engagements reportedly continued throughout 2025, with both countries expressing willingness to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Advertisement

Observers say the President’s latest intervention represents the most decisive effort yet to resolve the long-running issue and bring closure to concerns raised by families and advocacy groups.

If successfully concluded, the agreement would enable the affected prisoners to serve the remainder of their sentences in Nigerian correctional facilities while remaining subject to the terms of their original convictions.

Such prisoner-transfer arrangements are widely recognised under international law and are commonly used by countries seeking to promote rehabilitation, maintain family ties, and improve the welfare of convicted citizens serving sentences abroad.

Many of the Nigerians currently detained in Ethiopia were reportedly arrested while transiting through Addis Ababa’s international airport, one of Africa’s busiest aviation hubs. Although several were convicted on drug-trafficking charges, some advocacy groups continue to argue that certain individuals may have unknowingly been used as drug couriers and deserve further review of their cases.

Advertisement

The outcome of the planned negotiations in Addis Ababa is expected to determine when and how the transfer process will begin, offering hope to many inmates and their families who have long awaited a resolution to the issue.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News