Connect with us

News

Money goes to them directly,’ Nigerian governor denies tampering with LG funds

Published

on

Governor Umo Eno of Akwa Ibom State, South-south Nigeria, has denied interfering with funds meant for local government areas in the state.

He, however, said he was interested in knowing what local councils do with the money.

“I stand here to say I have not interfered with their businesses. As their money comes, it goes to them, but we also want to know what they do with the money, that is the only thing we do.”

Mr Eno stated this last week at Uyo Township Stadium while delivering his first-anniversary speech.

Advertisement

“The chairperson of the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria (ALGON) is here. But they’ve been doing their work. We just ensured we worked with them to ensure they deliver on their mandate,” the governor said.

Funds meant for local government areas in the Federation Account are channelled to them via state and local government joint accounts, where governors have controlling powers over the amount of money that should be released to the local councils in their states.

The practice, which has existed for decades, has prevented local governments from functioning as an independent tier of government and has triggered calls for local government autonomy.

But Governor Eno, who just marked his first year in office, claimed “he allowed local governments to run on their own”.

Advertisement

“Their money goes to them directly,” Mr Eno said. “We just ensure we work with them, to make sure they deliver on their mandate,” he added, suggesting that the third tier of government is not completely independent of his control.

Mr Eno made the statement a few days after the federal government filed a suit at the Supreme Court against the 36 state governments. The suit is seeking the enforcement of full autonomy for the 774 local government areas in the country.

The plaintiff in the suit – the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice – is asking the court to issue an order preventing state governors from embarking on unilateral, arbitrary, and unlawful dissolution of democratically elected officials at the local government areas.

It also prayed the court to make an order permitting funds standing in credits of local governments to be paid to them directly from the Federation Account in line with the provisions of the Constitution as against the “unlawful” joint accounts created by the governors.

Advertisement

Some states in the country, including Akwa Ibom, at the expiration of the tenure of the elected council officials, set up a caretaker committee to oversee the affairs of the council pending when elections would be conducted.

Governor Eno’s administration has just extended for six months the tenure of the caretaker administration in the local government areas in Akwa Ibom.

In the suit, the Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, among other requests, is asking the Supreme Court to stop governors from further setting up caretaker committees at the local government levels in violation of the constitutionally recognised democratic system.

Mr Fagbemi further prayed the court to issue an injunction restraining governors, their agents and privies from receiving, spending or tampering with funds released from the Federation Account for the benefit of local governments where no democratically elected officials exist in the areas, PREMIUM TIMES reported.

Advertisement

The local government, as a third tier of government, is meant to cater for the people at the grassroots, but the performance of the local leaders is generally poor across the country because of the overbearing influence of state governors who tampers with funds meant for them, a development that has crippled governance at the grassroots.

Former President Muhammadu Buhari, in December 2022, accused state governors of pilfering funds meant for local governments.

The Nigerian Senate last December urged the federal government to stop the allocation of funds to local governments run by caretaker committees.

PREMIUM TIMES has reported how state governors fought against a move by the Nigeria Financial Intelligent Unit to abolish joint accounts where governors exercise powers over funds meant for local governments.

Advertisement

Because the Akwa Ibom governor, like his counterparts in other states, has great influence over the election or appointment of local political leaders, local council officials are always reluctant to publicly admit that the governor tampers with funds meant for local councils.

People familiar with how the state and local government joint account in Akwa Ibom is being operated said the state government has been taking credits for many projects executed with the local government funds.

The Akwa Ibom State Government, for instance, takes credit for free education at the primary school level even when local government funds are used to pay the salary of primary school teachers.

The state government also takes credit for purchasing SUVs for paramount rulers in the various local government areas of the state, even when the money for such purchases is deducted from the local council’s funds.

Advertisement

Also, the state government appoints members of the Local Government Service Commission, whose salaries are paid with local government funds. The functions of the commission include the recruitment, promotion, and transfer of local government workers.

We gathered that these monies are deducted during the meeting of the joint account, after which whatever is left is then shared with the local government councils.

A council official, who preferred to be anonymous, said that “generally acceptable deductions” are made during joint account meetings.

“The money they deducted – centrally, (are) for payment of local government teachers’ salaries, pensions and gratuities. After all these payments, including traditional rulers and some other things, what is left is what they hand over to you.”

Advertisement

The official said the practice began during the administration of former Governor Godswill Akpabio (now Senate President), where Victor Antai (now Executive Director, Project NDDC) served as commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

“Members of ALGON moved a motion that because some local governments are insolvent – for example, the number of primary schools in Uyo Local Government Area, the funds that come to Uyo will not be able to pay teachers entitlements.

“They moved a motion that all local governments be taken into consideration. For instance, a place like Esit Eket Local Government Area that has huge allocation but with very few bills to pay will have too much excess money, while Uyo and Ikot Ekpene local government areas will not have.

“So, they put (allocations of the 31 LGAs in the state) in a pool, use certain indices to make sure that every central payment is being handled at the state level, including salaries, pensions and gratuities of primary schools teachers, local governments staff members and traditional rulers as would have been paid by the local governments.

Advertisement

“They remove it at (the) source and pay directly to prevent a situation where some local governments would pay while others do not. It is after all these deductions that they now tell you that after these deductions, this is what is left, and they now handed it over to you to run your council,” the official said.

“It is not given on an equal basis. There are certain indices because what also comes in is not equal,” the official said when asked if what is left is shared equally by local governments.

The sharing strategy, as explained by the council official, suggests that the practice of lumping the federal allocations accruing to the 31 local governments in a pool for central deductions places local government areas like Uyo and Ikot Ekpene in an advantageous position.

The two local government areas, apparently non-oil producing, do not get as much money from the federation account as some local government areas in the oil-rich Akwa Ibom.

Advertisement

However, these two cities are densely populated and enjoy more revenues from businesses than other local governments, particularly those in rural areas, which do not, a development that renders the practice of making general deductions from the pool a disadvantage to other local government areas.

Also, as stated by the official, Uyo and Ikot Ekpene local government areas have the largest number of primary schools as well as teachers population, making payment of salaries a burden to them, particularly when the state government takes credit for free education at primary school level but uses local government funds to pay teachers entitlements.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Afenifere demands for unconditional release of Farotimi

Published

on

The pan-Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, has intervened in the ongoing face-off between legal luminary, Chief Afe Babalola and activist, Dele Farotimi, calling for unconditional release of the activist.

The organisation at a World Press Conference held at the residence of its leader, Chief Ayo Adebanjo in Lagos said while it was not talking about the merit or demerit of the case, the procedure and manner of arrest of the activist was condemnable.

Deputy Leader of the Group, Oba Oladipo Olaitan who addressed the press conference expressed concern over the continued incarceration of Farotimi over a bailable offence.

Farotimi, a member of the National Caucus of Afenifere, was arrested on Tuesday December 3, 2024 in his office in Lekki Lagos by plain-clothed police officers from Ekiti State Police Command over a petition by Babalola.

Advertisement

Babalola had claimed he was defamed in the book written by Farotimi titled, “Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System.”

The Chief Magistrate Court in Ekiti has reserved a ruling on his bail application until December 20.

But Afenifere Deputy Leader criticised the chief magistrate, Abayomi Adeosun, for denying bail, describing the charges as bailable.

He stated that what is happening to Farotimi represented a script playing out as the charges are bailable and should have been granted bail on self-recognisance.

Advertisement

“It is Dele Farotimi today, it could be you tomorrow,” the Deputy Leader added.

“Afenifere believes that Chief Afe Babalola, like every citizen, has a right to defend his reputation if injured to the full extent of the law but not outside the strictures of the law. Therefore, Dele Farotimi must have his day in court. He cannot be unjustly incarcerated. His rights must be similarly protected,” he said.

The group called for an end to using the police from other states to arrest citizens, saying, “The increasing practice of arresting people in a state and transporting (rendering) them out of state often without the knowledge of the relatives of those arrested and also charged in a state other than the state of normal residence of the suspect need to be stopped.

“The practice exerts undue mental agony and expense on the accused person and their families who are often left wondering for hours or days about the safety and whereabouts of their loved ones. The Police must stop this practice.

Advertisement

“It is a loophole that can be exploited by criminals who may be tempted to disguise their crimes by acting out their nefarious activities by imitating the rogue police operations.”

Oba Olaitan added that the delay in granting bail to Mr. Farotimi “has confirmed the fears of well-meaning people all over the world that these processes are driven by extraneous considerations outside the facts and laws in respect of the petition on which the Police and the Chief Magistrate in Ekiti are hinging their actions.”

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FCT High CourtG admits ex Gov. Bello to N500m bail

Published

on

The Federal Capital Territory High Court, on Thursday, granted the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, bail in the sum of N500 million with three sureties in like sum.

Justice Maryann Anenih had, on December 10, refused the ex-governor’s bail application, saying it was filed prematurely.

While delivering the initial ruling, she said, having been filed when the 1st defendant was neither in custody nor before the court, the instant application was incompetent.

There was, however, room for the governor’s lawyers to file a fresh application for bail and apply for hearing date.

Advertisement

The former governor is facing an alleged money laundering trial to the tune of N110bn, along with two others.

He had pleaded not guilty to the 16-count charges brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

When the case was called for hearing, on Thursday, Counsel for the former governor, Joseph Daudu, SAN, informed the court that the defence counsels had filed a further affidavit in response to the counter affidavit filed and served by the prosecution counsels.

He, however, applied to withdraw the further affidavit, saying, “We do not want to make the matter contentious.”

Advertisement

There was no objection from the prosecution counsel, Olukayode Enitan, SAN. The court, therefore, granted the application for withdrawal, striking out the further affidavit.

Daudu, SAN, also informed the court that discussions had taken place with the leader of the prosecution counsels, resulting in an agreement to ensure a speedy trial.

In light of this understanding, Daudu urged the court to grant the bail application.

He further requested that if the court would graciously grant the Defendant bail, the court should kindly review the bail conditions for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd defendants.

Advertisement

He urged the court to broaden the scope of property to be used as bail sureties to include locations across the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), rather than limiting the location solely to Maitama.

The prosecution counsel, Enitan SAN, acknowledged that Daudu SAN had been in talks with the prosecution team.

In accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), the EFCC Counsel gave assurance of their cooperation in expediting the trial.

He said, “I confirm the evidence given by the distinguished member of the bar that is leading the Defence, J.B. Daudu, SAN, that he has been in conversation with the leader of the prosecuting team.

Advertisement

“As with the legal tradition that we should cooperate with members of the bar when it does not affect the course of justice, we have decided not to make this contentious, bearing in mind that no matter how industrious the defence counsel might be in pushing forward the application for bail and no matter how vociferous the prosecution counsel can argue against the bail application, your lordship is bound by your discretion to grant or not to grant the application.

“We are therefore leaving this to your lordship’s discretion.”

Delivering her ruling, Justice Anenih acknowledged that the offence the 1st Defendant was charged with was a bailable one and granted the ex-governor bail in the sum of N500 million, with three sureties in like sum.

The sureties must be notable Nigerians with landed property in Maitama, Jabi, Utako, Apo, Guzape, Garki, and Asokoro.

Advertisement

The 1st Defendant was also asked to deposit his international passport and other travel documents with the court.

He is to remain at Kuje Correctional Centre until the bail conditions are met.

The court also granted the application to vary the bail conditions for the 2nd and 3rd Defendants, Umaru Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu, respectively.

They were granted bail in the sum of N300 million, with two sureties who must own landed property in Maitama, Jabi, Apo, Garki, Wuse, or Guzape. The location was initially restricted to Maitama.

Advertisement

They are to deposit their international passports and other travel documents with the court.

The 2nd and 3rd Defendants are to remain at the Kuje Correctional Centre pending the fulfilment of their bail conditions. [Daily Review Online]

Continue Reading

News

SEE NAIRA Rates Against The USD, GBP, EURO Today December 19, 2024

Published

on

WHEN we look at this month, USD was traded at ₦ at the beginning of this December on Monday, December 2, 2024. As at today with USD being traded at ₦1,665 we see a % for United States Dollar to Naira exchange rate for this month.

On this page, we are primarily focusing on the Black Market Dollar To Naira Exchange Rate Today, the USD to Naira currency pair are the most traded currency in the FX market.

Black Market Exchange Rates
Buying Rate
Selling Rate
Dollar to Naira 1665 1650
Pounds to Naira 2120 2090
Euro to Naira 1725 1690
Canadian Dollar to Naira 1176 1158
Rand to Naira 52 43
Dirham to Naira ‎0 0
Yuan to Naira 62 62
G.Cedi to Nair 70 50
CFA F. (XOF) To Naira 0.83 0.81
CFA F. (XAF) To Naira 0.74 0.74

Having full knowledge how much USD to NGN black market exchange rate today will give you a better opportunity to plan and make informed decisions.

Advertisement

Nairatoday.com

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News