News
$10 Billion Gas Project: National Assembly, NLNG head for showdown over contract details

The contractors handling the $10 billion NLNG Train-7 gas project in Bonny Island, Rivers State, have denied a committee of the National Assembly access to the project details, stating they are acting on instructions from the management of Nigerian LNG Limited (NLNG).
The joint committee of the National Assembly on Gas is in a running battle with Saipem Contracting Limited, an Italian-owned company, and Daewoo Engineering and Construction Limited over the project’s details.
However, the two contractors have maintained a gag order, citing a non-disclosure agreement signed with NLNG.
PREMIUM TIMES obtained documents showing that NLNG, in which Nigeria holds a 49 per cent stake, instructed the two contractors not to disclose the contract details to the lawmakers, setting up a potential showdown between the federal legislature and NLNG.
According to the documents, NLNG not only instructed the contractors not to provide the lawmakers with any information regarding the project but also questioned the committee’s power to embark on the probe.
NLNG is an incorporated joint venture owned by four entities: NNPC Limited, on behalf of Nigeria, owns 49 per cent of the company; Shell Gas B.V. holds 25.6 per cent; TotalEnergy Gaz and Electricité Holdings has 15 per cent; and Eni International N.A.N.V. S.ar.I owns 10.4 per cent. The company currently operates six LNG trains.
In 2019, the shareholders of the company made the final investment decision for the Train-7 project to expand its gas production capacity from 22 million tonnes per annum to 30 mtpa. The Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contract was awarded to a consortium of Saipem, Chiyoda, and Daewoo.
Genesis of battle
The battle between the committee, co-chaired by Jarigbe Jarigbe, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Gas, and Nicholas Mutu, the chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Gas, and NLNG started in March when the lawmakers wrote letters to all the concerned parties in the project, requesting the project details and asking them to appear before the lawmakers for an investigative hearing.
The first letter, signed by Messrs Jarigbe and Mutu and dated 27 March, was sent to NLNG, Daewoo, Saipem, the Minister of State for Gas, and others.
In the letter, the committee requested access to the contractual agreement signed with NLNG and details of the variations made on the project. The committee also scheduled a hearing for 18 April.
“The purpose of the briefing is to gain clarity on various aspects of the project, including but not limited to the contractual agreements between Daewoo Company and NLNG. Specifically, we request access to the contractual agreement signed with NLNG, as well as any variations requested and subsequently granted on the cost of the project,” the letter reads.
The committee added, “Your expertise and first-hand knowledge of the project will be invaluable as the joint committee assesses its impact on our national gas infrastructure and economy. Additionally, your input will aid us in identifying potential areas for legislative support or intervention to ensure the successful execution of this vital project.”
Highly placed sources in the committee told this paper that Saipem Managing Director Michele Poggi appeared before the committee on 21 May but refused to provide the requested information, which infuriated many lawmakers, who interpreted his (Poggi) action as disrespectful to Nigeria’s parliament and government.
The lawmakers subsequently adjourned the session until 5 June and sent another set of letters to the contractors, NLNG, the minister, and others.
In the letters, the lawmakers reiterated the demands made in the previous letters.
“Do not give committee any information” — NLNG
The contractors, through the managing directors — Mr Poggi for Saipem and TacWon Jung for Daewoo — responded to the committee in separate letters, stating they are bound by the non-disclosure agreement they signed with NLNG not to share the contents of the EPC contract with anyone, including the committee.
Meanwhile, the contractors stated that they sought NLNG’s consent to share the contract details with the committee. However, NLNG mandated them to decline the request.
PREMIUM TIMES observed that the responses from Messrs Jung and Poggi were identical—the letters were verbatim, with only the address and signature differing.
In the letter, NLNG instructed the contractors to decline the request, stating that the lawmakers’ actions “are not in accordance with the law and might trigger confidentiality concerns.”
“We respectfully reiterate that the disclosure of the EPC Contract Agreement, as well as details of any variation requests concerning the NLNG Project, is not within our sole discretion as the contract specifically contains confidentiality provisions that forbid the disclosure of its contents and other project information to the authorities without NLNG’s express written consent. In compliance with the contract provisions, we had notified NLNG of the joint committee’s request and forwarded copies of your letter to NLNG.
“However, NLNG has withheld its consent to the disclosure on the basis of a legal opinion rendered by their external solicitors, according to which the invitation and request for documents by the joint committee “are not by the law and might trigger confidentiality concerns,” the letter reads in part.
Furthermore, NLNG challenged the limits of the National Assembly’s and its committees’ investigative powers, stating that the investigative authority of the lawmakers is not unlimited.
“Moreover, according to NLNG, ‘the investigative power of the National Assembly is not at large but is circumscribed as recognised and endorsed by the courts.’
In light of the foregoing, NLNG declined to give its consent “to provide or disclose to the joint committee any information or documentation related to the NLNG project and directed us to share their concerns with the joint committee.”
Counter moves
In the letter, NLNG instructed the contractors to demand a resolution of the House and Senate that gave the joint committee the authority to investigate the project. Therefore, the contractors are asking for gazetted copies of the resolution.
“Given the above, considering the provisions of section 88 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that regulate the terms and conditions under which the National Assembly exercises its powers, we will appreciate your obliging us with the gazetted copy of such a resolution or as published in the National Assembly’s journal as prescribed by law. We believe that this may go a long way in reassuring us of the constitutionality of the powers being invoked by the joint committee.
“We are, therefore, regrettably unable to provide the relevant information, notwithstanding our general disposition to support the joint committee in its law-making efforts. We assure you of our continued commitment to operate within the ambit of the law and appreciate your understanding of our constraints in this instance,” the letter reads.
PREMIUM TIMES was unable to confirm if a motion to investigate the NLNG Train-7 project was moved in either the House or Senate.
Meanwhile, Order 20 Rule 58 of the standing rules of the House of Representatives gives the House Committee the power to oversee the NLNG.
The contractors and NLNG are scheduled to appear before the committee again on Thursday.
This paper learned from reliable sources within the committee that the last sitting was adjourned to allow the committee to adequately respond.
A committee member, who did not want to be named because he was not authorised to speak, said members are keenly watching how the co-chairmen of the committee, Messrs Jerigbe and Mutu, would respond to NLNG’s stance, stating that anything other than the full application of the legislative power of the National Assembly will be met with protest from members.
The lawmaker stated that “any attempt to sweep this investigation under the carpet will be resisted.”
The committee’s options could involve seeking the permission of the two chambers to issue a warrant of arrest against everyone involved to compel their appearance.
News
I’m not behind Elisha Abbo’s sacking from Senate – Akpabio

The Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio on Thursday, berated former lawmaker representing Adamawa North Senatorial District, Elisha Abbo, saying he has no hand in his removal from the National Assembly.
The clarification was made in a statement issued in Abuja by Akpabio’s media aide, Eseme Eyiboh.
Abbo was sacked by the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja on October 16, 2023.
The judgment delivered by a three-member panel presided over by Justice C.E. Nwosu-Iheme ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to issue a Certificate of Return to Amos Yohanna of the Peoples Democratic Party as the duly elected lawmaker representing the area at the Senate.
The appellate court vacated the tribunal judgment which had earlier affirmed Abbo of the All Progressives Congress as the winner of the senatorial election.
But speaking on a live programme on Arise Television on Wednesday, Abbo blamed Akpabio for his predicament.
The Adamawa politician also accused the Senate President of running the Red Chamber like an emperor.
This was even as he condemned the suspension of the senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who is presently battling to retain her mandate.
Reacting, Akpabio said he was shocked to hear Abbo blame him again for his ouster from the Senate barely two years after apologising to him.
He said, “It is sad and regrettable that despite publicly retracting a similar allegation in 2023—after admitting that his earlier accusation was premature and based on the available information at our disposal—Mr. Abbo has once again embarked on a campaign of misinformation and blame transfer.
“Following a discussion with the Senate President last year, Mr. Abbo himself acknowledged that Senator Akpabio had ‘no involvement’ in the judicial process that led to his removal. It is puzzling that he would now return to the same baseless allegations he once renounced.”
Continuing, Akpabio emphasised that it was the court and not him that determined his fate before he was consequently removed.
The former governor asserted that he, therefore, found it illogical and irresponsible that Abbo could turn around and allege that he influenced the judgment that he accepted at the time.
“It is there in the papers (see PUNCH Newspaper of 18th October 2023). Mr Abbo has also sought to create the impression that he was unjustly denied official benefits following his ouster. He claims entitlement to salaries, allowances, and even an official vehicle, despite the court’s declaration that his tenure was null and void ab initio.
“If any of Abbo’s claims for payment did not reach the desk of the Senate President, it is because they failed to meet these lawful standards—not because of any personal or political vendetta. It is unfortunate that instead of accepting the consequences of his legal and political failings, Abbo continues to resort to media theatrics and reckless finger-pointing.
“Akpabio remains focused on the noble task of nation-building, providing purposeful leadership in the Senate, and strengthening democratic institutions—especially the independence of the judiciary. He will not be distracted by the antics of individuals who seek to rewrite history to mask personal failures.
“We urge Mr Abbo to reflect deeply, respect the rule of law, and focus on rebuilding the confidence of his constituents if he hopes to return to public life. Nigeria’s democracy can only thrive when its actors show maturity, responsibility, and an abiding respect for the truth,” the statement added.
News
NCAA to sanction airlines over deportees maltreatment

The Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority has strongly cautioned international airlines against the increasing complaints from passengers who are transported partway to their destinations, only to be deported back to Nigeria.
The NCAA criticised this practice, emphasising that it has led to considerable distress for passengers and damaged the reputation of Nigeria’s aviation industry.
The NCAA’s Director of Consumer Protection and Public Affairs, Michael Achimugu, announced this in a signed statement on Thursday.
“These actions, which involve the refusal of boarding or denial of entry at intermediate or transit stops due to visa and travel restrictions, are completely unacceptable,” he said.
The NCAA stressed that airlines are responsible for informing passengers of any potential obstacles to their entry before their journey begins.
“Passengers should not be put in a position where they are denied entry or returned to Nigeria only upon arrival at transit stops,” Achimugu added.
Referring to the Nigeria Civil Aviation Regulations 2023 (Part 19.21.1.1), the NCAA reiterated that airlines and their agents are obligated to inform travellers of any potential entry restrictions before departure.
“Airlines must take appropriate measures to screen and provide passengers with accurate, up-to-date information regarding their travel documents and visa requirements before issuing tickets or allowing boarding,” the statement read.
In light of these issues, the NCAA has announced immediate enforcement measures.
“Effective immediately, any airline found engaging in such practices will face regulatory action, including fines, suspension of flight operations, or other penalties deemed appropriate,” Achimugu warned.
“The NCAA expects the cooperation of all airlines in maintaining the integrity and professionalism of the aviation industry, as well as ensuring the wellbeing of Nigerian passengers,” the statement read.
News
JAMB uncovers 142 Kano varsity applicants with fake results

The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board has uncovered that out of 148 A-level results presented to Bayero University Kano for Direct Entry admission, only six were valid, leaving 142 results deemed fraudulent.
In a recent weekly bulletin, JAMB revealed that one of the primary objectives of its screening process is to ensure that only legitimate documents are used for admission.
The board further emphasised the responsibility of educational institutions to verify these documents thoroughly.
To combat this issue, JAMB established the Nigeria Integrated Post-Secondary Education Data System two years ago, following concerns raised by Bayero University, Kano.
The university had reported that only six of the 148 results it verified were legitimate, with the remainder being forged.
Through NIPEDS, JAMB was able to detect fraudulent certificates, including those from foreign institutions, used in Direct Entry applications.
Recently, 13 additional fake A-level certificates were uncovered, which had been submitted for consideration by certain institutions.
Some of these institutions had already proposed admission for the candidates based on these fraudulent documents.
The individuals involved have been handed over to law enforcement agencies for prosecution, and JAMB has warned that institutions that accept candidates with fake certificates will be considered accomplices in the fraud.
While NIPEDS plays a crucial role, JAMB stressed that institutions must also carry out their own verification processes to prevent further incidents.
One particularly egregious case involved candidates submitting forged IJMBE results from ABU Zaria in an attempt to gain admission to ABU itself.
-
News17 hours ago
Natasha: Kogi PDP hammers Ododo, reiterates unfeigned support for her
-
Economy16 hours ago
SEE Black Market Dollar To Naira Exchange Rate Today 3rd April 2025
-
News24 hours ago
Rivers APC demands Fubara’s probe over ex-HoS allegations
-
News12 hours ago
Just in: “Ignore rumour mongers, there was no time I collapsed “-Wike asserts
-
News12 hours ago
CJ transfers Natasha’s case to Justice Nyako
-
News15 hours ago
Just in: INEC dumps recall petition against Sen Natasha
-
News20 hours ago
Just in: Finally, Trump imposes 14% tarriff on Nigeria oil, others
-
News9 hours ago
We’re putting together new 2025 Budget for Rivers-Ibas