Connect with us

News

Judiciary hurting democracy in South East — CSOs

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

A Coalition of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) domiciled in the South Eastern States have accused the judiciary of playing ignoble roles that have resulted in the lack of progress in the South East geo-political zone since the rebirth of the democracy in 1999.

The group made the accusation at a one-day symposium to mark the 10th anniversary of Southeast Democracy Clinic, a platform geared to help deepen democracy and ensure that its dividends gets to people of the region.

The group alleged that the judiciary has been in bed with “vagabonds of power ” in the zone who they claim, brazenly steal the mandate of the people and mock them with the usual refrain ‘Go To Court’, slogan.

Advertisement

They submitted that it was only the 2023 governorship election in Abia and the off-season governorship election in.Anambra State in 2022 that had a semblance of electoral credibility, and which outcomes represented the will of the people of the two states, alleging that the judiciary has not been fair in delivering justice to the people of Imo, Enugu and Ebonyi States in successive elections.

Founder of Southeast Democracy Clinic and former Resident Electoral Commissioner,Enugu State, Dr Emeka Ononamadu queried what the Imo State Election Tribunal meant when it ruled in its recent judgement that the poll was in substantial compliance with enabling statutes when issues of widespread violence, thuggery, intimidation of voters, BVAS. Issues, vote buying, manipulation of results, snatching and or destruction of ballot boxes were rife.

Ononamadu, a lawyer alleged that there was widespread violence and intimidation, electoral malpractice, ballot box snatching, vote-buying, and manipulation of results were common during the elections.

“These practices undermined the integrity of the election process. Also Logistical Problems: Delays in the delivery of electoral materials and issues with the functionality of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) led to significant disruptions and confusion at many polling stations.
“Despite the presence of security forces, there were failures in effectively securing polling units and ensuring the safety of voters and election officials, ” he said.

Advertisement

Amid these and other plethora of complaints reported by election observers Ononamadu noted that the tribunal ruled that the poll was in substantial compliance with enabling laws.

Executive Director, Peoples Rights Organization,Dr Chris Nwadigo, noted that there is no law prohibiting the admission of report of election observers in evidence in court, and wondered why the nation’s courts have failed to leverage on reports of election observers to dispense justice.

In a communique issued at the end of the symposium the participants called on the judiciary to dispense electoral justice to save Nigeria’s democracy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Dangote Group debunks NNPCL’s claim that its refinery sold petrol to it at N898/litre

Published

on

***Says, claims misleading, mischievous

By Francesca Hangeior.

 

The Dangote Group has dismissed recent claims attributed to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited spokesperson, Olufemi Soneye, that the company sold Premium Motor Spirit to the NNPC at N898 per litre.

Advertisement

In a statement, the Group’s Chief Branding and Communications Officer, Anthony Chiejina, labelled the claim as “misleading and mischievous,” stating that it seeks to undermine the company’s recent milestones in addressing Nigeria’s long-standing energy crisis.

According to Chiejina, the statement is aimed at derailing the progress achieved towards alleviating energy insufficiency and insecurity, which have plagued the country for decades.

The statement reads, “Our attention has been drawn to a statement attributed to NNPCL spokesperson, Mr Olufemi Soneye, that we sell our PMS at N898 per litre to the NNPCL.
“This statement is both misleading and mischievous, deliberately aimed at undermining the milestone achievement recorded today, September 15, 2024, towards addressing energy insufficiency and insecurity, which has bedevilled the economy in the past 50 years.
We urge Nigerians to disregard this malicious statement and await a formal announcement on the pricing, by the Technical Sub-Committee on Naira-based crude sales to local refineries, appointed by His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, which will commence on October 1, 2024, bearing in mind that our current stock of crude was procured in dollars.”

With this action, there will be petrol in every local government area of the country regardless of their remote nature.

Advertisement

“We assure Nigerians of availability of quality petroleum products and putting an end to the endemic fuel scarcity in the country,” the statement concluded.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump unhurt as gunman fires shots at Golf Course where he was playing

Published

on

By Francesca Hangeior.

 

Donald Trump is “safe following gunshots in his vicinity” at his Florida golf course Sunday, his campaign said in a statement.

The former president was playing at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach when shots were fired.

Advertisement

Officials believe an armed individual intended to target Trump, according to sources briefed on the matter. A car has been stopped in relation to the incident nearby, according to a law enforcement official.

The Secret Service said it is working with the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office to investigate a protective incident involving Trump. The Secret Service said the incident occurred shortly before 2 p.m.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are both “relieved to know” that Trump is safe and have been briefed on the security incident, according to the White House.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

IPOB: Justice Nyako hands-off from Nnamdi Kanu’s trial

Published

on

By Francesca Hangeior.

 

Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja has withdrawn from the treason trial of the self-acclaimed leader of the separatist group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

Justice Nyako announced her withdrawal on Tuesday shortly after Kanu demanded that the judge recuse herself from his trial.

Advertisement

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, September 24, Kanu’s lawyer, Alloy Ejimakor urged the court to postpone the planned commencement of trial, claiming that his client was denied the opportunity to adequately prepare for his defence.

But, before Ejimakor could conclude his submission, Kanu rose from where he sat in the dock and told his lawyer to sit down.

Kanu told his lawyer: “Sit down! I say you should sit down.” Then, turning to the judge, he said: “My lord, I have no confidence in this court anymore and I ask you to recuse yourself because you did not abide by the decision of the Supreme Court.

“I can understand it if the DSS (Department of State Services) refuse to obey a court order, but for this court to refuse to obey an order of the Supreme Court is regrettable.

Advertisement

“I am asking you to recuse yourself from this case,” Kanu said.

Prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) urged the court to ignore Kanu and proceed with the trial.

Awomolo noted that contrary to Kanu’s claim, the Supreme Court ordered that the defendant (Kanu) should be tried on the seven counts left in the 11 counts contained in the original charge on which he was first arraigned.

He said: “The Justices (of the Supreme Court) ordered this court to proceed with the hearing of the charge against the defendant.

Advertisement

“My lord, you should not recuse yourself based on this mere observation, which does not have anything to do with the Supreme Court.

“It is an incompetent observation. We urge this court to proceed with the hearing.”

Kanu, again, stood up and held out a document he claimed was the subsisting judgment of the Supreme Court.

Without seeking and obtaining the judge’s permission, Kanu proceeded to read a portion of the document where he said the Supreme Court found that actions of the trial court in the case “rendered the impartiality of the judge suspect.”

Advertisement

Kanu said: “But my lord, you know that I love you. It is just that this court is allowing the prosecution to railroad me into a trial that is at variance with every provision of the Constitution.”

The defendant then sat down, following which Justice Nyako expressed displeasure about his conduct.

Justice Nyako subsequently announced her decision to withdraw from the case, saying: “I hereby recuse myself and remit the case file back to the Chief Judge.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News