News
Couple arrested at Abuja Airport for child trafficking
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
The issue of child traficking keeps on taking different dimensiona daily in the country. it is an established fact that nearly all trafficked victims are children.
According to the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) report, more than a half of child trafficking victims are trafficked within their own country according to the new report.
It was therefore a dramatic scene that was witnessed at the Nnamdi Azikwe international airport last Wednesday, June 26th 2024, when one Mr Godfrey Ayodele Iyama and his wife Mrs Stella Iyama tried to smuggle a 6-year-old child (name withheld) away from the country without the consent of the father and in blatant disobedience of court order (contempt of court)–that the child in question should not leave the shores of Nigeria.
According to private investigator who had been put on the trail of the couple, “in order to perfect their criminal activities the identification of the innocent little girl was changed from the name is was given at birth and in the international passport I had earlier procured for her to Mr Godfrey Ayodele Iyama claiming that the father of the little girl has died while the father is still alive. The surprising things is that the little girl is having two valid passport bearing different name”.
However, if what Mr Godfrey claimed is right, why change the name of the child, which is totally different from the name on the first passport issued to her? Even if the father is dead, does that automatically change the identity of the girl in question? A lot of questions are begging for answers.
He said: “If not God and quick intervention of immigration officer and proactiveness of the local investigator at the airport they would have boarded the Qatar Airway flight going to Birmingham international airport with the child. The immigration officer at the airport after arresting and detaining them handed them over to the airport security who investigated them and established that they were guilty of child trafficking.”
He added that: “This singular incident should open our eyes as a citizen of this country Nigeria to irregularity in our data system and how those saddle with the responsibility of keeping record should be on top of their job. In a country where the system is working, how possible for same person to have two different identification, but in a country where anything goes it is very possible.”
Our correspondent met with the biological father of the child who narrated the whole story.
He said, “I got married to Shulamite November 28, 2017. We had our child in August 16, 2018. In 2021, many times I confronted her over my feelings that she was being unfaithful to me but she denied it. Finally In April of 2021, she confessed to sleeping with her ex-boyfriend. Because we haven’t slept together for over a year , we did a pregnancy test and she tested positive. A few weeks later she told me she had removed the child and when I reported the matter to the church they invited her and she ran away from my house with my three years old girl while I was still at work”.
He added, “For over a year she refused to tell me where she is with my baby. I was forced to file for custody of the child. She also filed for custody. In the court, she alleged that I use to beat her but the court found no such evidence but rather found evidence of her finger nails on my neck when she held me on the the neck while I was asleep. The judge ruled that we should both have custody of the child. That the child will be with her during school period but will be with me during holidays. And that none of us should take the baby outside Nigeria. They have failed to obey the court injunction as they have consistently denied me access to my child up till now”.
He alleged that: “In addition, my father-in-law Mr. Godfrey Ayodele Iyama conspired with his wife Stella Iyama and their daughter Shulamite Ewoma Ozo-iyama to change my daughter’s NIN and fraudulently obtained another imternational passport for her.”
All effort to talk to the Mr Godfrey Ayodele Iyama to hear his own side of the story proved abortive.
The case is now being handled by NAPTIP
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
The National Working Committee (NWC) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is preparing for a pivotal meeting today to finalize arrangements for the upcoming National Executive Committee (NEC) gathers momentum.
This meeting takes place amid escalating tensions over the party’s national secretaryship, a dispute that has deepened divisions within the PDP.
The crisis has intensified as the South-East zonal caucus has threatened to withdraw from the party unless their nominee, Sunday Ude-Okoye, is officially confirmed for the national secretary role.
At the heart of the conflict is the leadership tussle between Samuel Anyanwu and Ude-Okoye. Despite a general agreement among PDP governors to replace Anyanwu, who lost the 2023 Imo State governorship election, the matter remains unresolved.
However, a key PDP figure, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, insists that Anyanwu should be allowed to complete his tenure. Wike has even threatened legal action, warning that any communication with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)—including the notice for the NEC meeting scheduled for May 27—must bear Anyanwu’s signature.
The forthcoming NEC meeting, set for May 27, is viewed as a crucial opportunity to address the party’s internal challenges and lay the groundwork for the national convention slated for August.
To help mediate the crisis, PDP governors and stakeholders have formed a seven-member committee, led by former Senate President Bukola Saraki, tasked with finding a resolution.
Besides tackling the leadership dispute, today’s NWC meeting will also address ongoing security issues at the PDP national secretariat, Wadata Plaza in Abuja. The secretariat has been repeatedly targeted by thugs amid the secretaryship conflict, raising safety concerns among staff, some of whom have requested that meetings be held offsite in the past.
The NWC is expected to consider restructuring the security arrangements to enhance protection. The recent endorsement of acting national secretary Setonji Koshoedo by 83 PDP administrative staff underscores the urgency of resolving these matters.
Sources within the party, speaking to Daily Trust, say the NWC is committed to ensuring the NEC meeting proceeds as planned despite attempts by some factions to obstruct it.
“One faction is still working to block the NEC meeting, but the NWC is focused on getting the process started and making sure the meeting happens,” one source said.
The source added, “Security concerns are also high on the agenda. The secretariat has been invaded multiple times during the secretaryship dispute. Staff safety remains a serious issue — at one point, even the Board of Trustees had to hold meetings outside the secretariat. The NWC aims to implement a comprehensive security overhaul.”
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
As of Wednesday, May 14, 2025, the exchange rate for the US Dollar to the Nigerian Naira on the Lagos Parallel Market (commonly referred to as the black market) stands at ₦1,625 for buying and ₦1,630 for selling.
This information is based on data obtained from reliable sources within the Bureau De Change (BDC) community.
It is important to emphasize that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) does not endorse or recognize the black market. The apex bank has consistently advised individuals and businesses seeking foreign exchange to make use of official channels by contacting their respective commercial banks.
USD to NGN (Black Market) Exchange Rate
Buying Rate ₦1,625
Selling Rate ₦1,630
Official CBN Dollar to Naira Rate – May 14, 2025
USD to NGN (CBN Rate) Rate
Highest Rate ₦1,600
Lowest Rate ₦1,595
Please keep in mind that the rates listed here are subject to market fluctuations and may vary depending on the location, time of transaction, and volume of currency exchanged.
Exchange rates are constantly changing due to market dynamics. This article provides indicative rates and should not be considered as financial advice. For the most accurate and up-to-date rates, consult with your bank or a licensed Bureau De Change operator.
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
The family of Nnamdi Kanu has again demanded an outright ban of the News Agency of Nigeria, NAN from coverage of Kanu’s trial on alleged terrorism related crimes over alleged biased reportage.
In the alternative, the aggrieved family asked the court to permit live streaming of trial proceedings to guarantee fairness, transparency and accountability.
A statement signed by Prince Emmanuel Kanu for the Kanu Family, expressed the family “deep concern and outrage over what it called the continuous shameless manipulation of court proceedings by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in the ongoing trial of their son and brother, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.”
“It is now beyond question that NAN has abandoned any pretense of professional journalism. They have become the unofficial megaphone of the State Security Services (SSS) and the prosecuting authority, spreading one-sided propaganda, while deliberately ignoring crucial courtroom developments that dismantle the Government’s case.
“Today’s distortion is a case in point. Instead of reporting on the damning cross-examination of government witness PW-BBB—who embarrassingly admitted that no investigation report exists to support the charges against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, NAN chose to publish a useless story about a death certificate.
This document has zero evidentiary relevance, and its tendering was clearly a diversionary tactic to cover up the implosion of the prosecution’s case.
See also Ministerial appointment: Ignore detractors and clear Ondo nominee, groups urge Senate
“We find it unacceptable and improper that NAN is given exclusive access to report court proceedings—particularly when their reports serve only to mislead the public and undermine judicial transparency.
“We therefore call on Justice James Omotosho to immediately ban the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) from further courtroom access in this matter for repeated, unethical conduct and biased reporting;
” In the alternative, the court should permit live streaming of the trial proceedings to guarantee fairness, transparency, and accountability.
“Furthermore, we reject the spin being spread regarding DSS allegedly denying Kanu Agabi SAN access to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
What occurred in court today was a moment of statesmanship by Kanu Agabi SAN—a respected legal elder, former Senator, Attorney-General, and Minister of Justice—who chose not to expose the DSS’s misconduct openly to save the court and its officers from scandal. His restraint should not be misrepresented by a discredited press agency.
“This trial is not just about Mazi Nnamdi Kanu—it is a test of the integrity of the Nigerian judiciary, the independence of the media, and the rule of law in a democracy. Continued distortion of proceedings can only serve to deepen national division and erode public trust.
The eyes of the world are on Nigeria. Let justice be done—openly and without propaganda” the family said.
-
News22 hours agoJust in: FG receives Wigwe’s helicopter crash report from NTSB
-
Entertainment22 hours agoSAD ! Popular Nollywood actress, Monalisa Stephen is dead
-
News22 hours agoJust in: Tinubu’s son Seyi, Tops Controversial List As Lagos Guber Race Ignites Political Wahala
-
News24 hours agoPDP headache: Saraki’s Cttee signals there’s genuine intention to reconcile and resolve knotty issues -Hon Teejay Yusuf
-
News7 hours agoNNPCL failed to remit N500bn revenue in 2024 – World Bank
-
Education18 hours agoJust in: JAMB orders UTME resit for 387,000 candidates
-
News7 hours agoTinubu Endorses Establishment of Forest Guards to Counter Terrorism, Banditry
-
Opinion21 hours agoODA, ODI RALLY AGAINST INSECURITY IN OKUNLAND