News
Academic researches should solve local problems – TETFund
The Executive Secretary of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, Sonny Echono, has called on academics in the country to focus on researches that would solve local problems.
This was as he urged the government to invest more in research, saying it is the way to the future of the country.
Echono made the call on Wednesday while delivering the keynote address at the 2024 Research and Innovation Fair of the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State.
He spoke on the theme: ‘The Rise of Research in Driving Sustainable Development’.
Represented by a former OAU Vice Chancellor, Prof. Michael Faborode, the TETFund boss said, “The academics need to work more on products and policies that can impact our lives. Research by itself is not enough. It is when research becomes innovation and products that it can impact the nation.
“Our research must be geared towards solving our local problems in a way that will be compatible with international expectations in terms of quality and meeting the global standard and we must be committed to this.”
Echono called on the government to prioritise investment in research and harness the potential of the youth.
He said, “Research is the only way for us to be able to make progress in this country, not food palliative or protest. Let us harness the huge potential and energy of the youths. Our youths should not use their knowledge for Internet fraud.
“The research fair is a good step because the concern is why our research has not been going out to impact society for sustainable development.
“We are not investing enough in research in Nigeria because we don’t seem to appreciate the value of research. We just believe things happen but development doesn’t happen like that. What we are enjoying today is a product of one research or the other.
“The government must realise that these things have to be funded. If you don’t fund research, you cannot get the products of research and you cannot continue to depend on other countries, otherwise, we will continue to be an import-oriented country and a consumer of innovation and technology and no country can move forward with that.”
In his goodwill message, the Osun State Commissioner for Education, Dipo Eluwole, said the state government would leverage research to boost food security in the state.
News
The Battle for Integrity at FUHSO: Why Idoma Must Not Remain Silent
By Edwin Adakole.
The Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo (FUHSO), once hailed as a symbol of promise and progress for the Idoma people, now teeters on the edge of institutional collapse. In what should be a time of growth and development, FUHSO is instead embroiled in a crisis driven by lawlessness, disregard for protocol, and, alarmingly, silence from key figures within the Idoma community.
This ongoing crisis centers around the imposition of Prof. Ediga Agbo, who, despite not being a staff member or a Deputy Vice-Chancellor (DVC), was appointed Acting Vice-Chancellor (VC) in violation of the clear directives set forth by the National Universities Commission (NUC). This disregard for established protocols not only tarnishes FUHSO’s reputation but also erodes the foundational principles upon which the university was built.
The Disregard for NUC Protocols: A Blow to Institutional Integrity
The National Universities Commission (NUC) has mandated a clear protocol for leadership transition across Nigerian universities: when a VC’s term ends, they must hand over to the most senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor. In the case of FUHSO, Prof. Stephen Abah, an accomplished academic and bonafide son of Idoma, holds the position of DVC (Academics) and ranks highest in seniority. His appointment as Acting VC was, therefore, not only rightful but also aligned with NUC guidelines.
FUHSO is no ordinary university. It was established as a specialized institution dedicated to the health sciences—a vital part of Nigeria’s higher education landscape, and a stepping stone for Idoma’s future in medical and scientific excellence. It’s a university whose primary mandate is to produce medical professionals, and its standards must reflect that specialized purpose. Yet, in a shocking turn of events, Prof. Ediga Agbo—neither a member of FUHSO’s staff nor a qualified medical professional was imposed on the university as Acting VC.
This act was not just a violation of protocol; it was a direct affront to due process and transparency. How can an unqualified leader hope to sustain or improve an institution that is already struggling with its own growth and development?
The Ripple Effect of Negligence and Impunity
The consequences of Agbo’s leadership reach far beyond administrative challenges. Agbo’s tenure thus far has included the removal of respected faculty members from critical meetings, the seizing of official vehicles from staff without justification, and even the locking of university gates in an attempt to prevent rightful university leaders from entering. Reports indicate that police and hired thugs now roam the campus, harassing and intimidating any staff members perceived as loyal to the legitimately reinstated Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Innocent Ujah.
This hostility and lawlessness have turned FUHSO from a sanctuary of learning into a militarized zone where students and faculty alike live in fear. Campus facilities remain virtually abandoned due to the fear of violence. Every day the crisis persists, Idoma loses one more step toward self-reliance, development, and a brighter future.
Crisis in Leadership: How FUHSO’s Governing Council Threatens Its Future
Governing councils are meant to guide universities towards growth and stability, but at the Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo (FUHSO), the council under Engr. Ohieku Abdulsalami has brought about chaos instead.
Rather than respecting established protocols, the council appears to be running amok, blurring lines of authority and encroaching on daily operations in ways that threaten FUHSO’s core mission and integrity.
This overreach has manifested in decisions that defy both protocol and law. The appointment of Prof. Ediga Agbo as Acting Vice-Chancellor, despite him not being a staff member or the institution’s most senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor, starkly violates National Universities Commission (NUC) protocols, which require an outgoing VC to hand over to the most senior DVC. At FUHSO, this is Prof. Stephen Abah, DVC (Academics), who was rightfully elected by the university senate. Yet the council bypassed him, imposing Agbo and creating a leadership crisis that has sparked tension and disrupted campus life.
The effects of this turmoil are undeniable. Faculty and students operate under fear of reprisal, classrooms stand empty, and security forces now patrol a campus once dedicated to research and teaching. FUHSO’s mission—to advance health sciences and serve as a beacon for Idoma and the nation—is jeopardized by this instability. The governing council’s actions are not merely administrative missteps; they are active threats to the institution’s future.
It’s time for accountability. The FUHSO governing council must answer for these disruptive actions, which risk not only the university’s reputation but its very ability to function. Silence from community leaders and stakeholders is no longer an option. FUHSO’s future depends on a return to order, respect for university governance, and a commitment to its foundational mission. Anything less risks destroying what this university stands for.
The Targeted Attacks on Prof. Stephen Abah: A Tribal Undercurrent
Prof. Stephen Abah’s character and qualifications make him a natural leader for FUHSO, an institution that serves as a beacon for the Idoma people. Yet, his ascension to Acting VC has made him a target. It’s been noted that Prof. Abah, an “Enone”—a sub-clan within Idoma—faces attacks from those who deem leadership within FUHSO the exclusive domain of “Enochi.” The caste-driven conflict is preventing an Idoma institution from fostering unity and excellence, damaging the credibility of a university that should be a pillar for all Idoma, not a select few.
Agbo’s appointment and the ensuing attacks on Prof. Abah represent more than just a leadership crisis; they signify a perilous tribal and political power struggle. This struggle, bolstered by a wealthy “Enochi” financier, has fostered an environment in which due process is subverted, unity is eroded, and impunity reigns.
The Dire Consequences of Silent Complicity
This unchecked lawlessness poses severe consequences for FUHSO, the Idoma people, and Nigeria’s higher education landscape. Without urgent action to restore order, FUHSO will be unable to fulfill its mission as a specialized health sciences institution.
Here’s what Idoma stands to lose:
1. Credibility in Health Sciences Education:
Allowing an unqualified Acting VC to lead FUHSO risks diluting the university’s focus on health sciences, hindering its ability to attract qualified staff and deliver top-tier education.
2. Threat to Students and Staff Safety:
The administration’s use of thugs and police to intimidate those supporting Prof. Abah has created a climate of fear on campus. Reports of harassment, gate lockouts, and confrontations have left the campus desolate, disrupting academic activities and posing a threat to students and faculty alike.
3. Erosion of Idoma’s Legacy:
FUHSO was built to serve as a lasting legacy for the Idoma people—a source of pride and a pathway for the next generation of medical and scientific professionals. Failure to uphold due process and unity erodes this legacy, reducing FUHSO to a mere pawn in personal and political agendas.
4. Stifling of Idoma’s Growth and Unity:
Silence from Idoma’s leaders in the face of such blatant injustice does more than allow chaos to continue; it implies acceptance. This crisis represents a critical moment for Idoma leadership, a chance to assert the value of integrity, unity, and excellence over division and impunity.
A Call for Accountability: Idoma’s Leaders Must Speak Up
The current trajectory of FUHSO’s administration, enabled by silence from within Idoma, puts the institution’s survival at risk. Idoma leaders—cultural, political, and community figures alike—must rise to the occasion. By remaining silent, they tacitly allow FUHSO’s future to be dictated by outsiders and undermine the very institution built to empower their youth.
The law, the NUC’s mandate, and the will of the FUHSO community unequivocally recognize Prof. Stephen Abah as the legitimate Acting VC. Agbo’s imposition, lacking any legal or ethical grounding, must be contested by all who value the rule of law.
This crisis is a defining moment for FUHSO and for Idoma itself. Will its leaders defend the principles of unity and integrity, or will they allow the erosion of a vital educational institution? Silence is not neutrality; it is complicity in the destruction of an institution that could empower generations.
(Adakole, President of Idoma Integrity Network, writes from Otukpo)
News
Boxing world split as 58-yr-old Tyson goes back to ring 19yrs after retirement
Nearly 40 years after his professional debut, and 19 years after retiring, 58-year-old Mike Tyson will return to the ring on Friday in a Netflix-backed bout that has stirred widespread condemnation in the boxing world.
Tyson, who dominated the heavyweight division in the late 1980s, will lace up the gloves once more to face YouTuber Jake Paul, 27, in an officially sanctioned fight at AT&T Stadium, home of the Dallas Cowboys, in Arlington, Texas.
The bout, set for eight two-minute rounds, was initially scheduled for July but was postponed in May when Tyson required medical treatment after vomiting blood on a flight from Miami to Los Angeles due to a bleeding ulcer.
The incident has fuelled criticism of Friday’s fight, with many condemning it as a macabre spectacle that poses undue risk for Tyson, who last appeared in a professional ring in 2005, ending in a technical knockout loss after quitting on his stool against Irish journeyman Kevin McBride.
‘It Shouldn’t Be Happening’
“Mike Tyson retired from boxing 20 years ago and was already worn out,” British promoter Eddie Hearn said this week.
“If anyone thinks Mike Tyson should be in a ring at this age, you either have absolutely no concern for him, or you’re being reckless. This shouldn’t be happening.” Punch
News
Court Gives Falanas, January Date To Prove Case Against VDM
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
A Lagos High Court has adjourned the defamation suit brought by Femi Falana and his son against social media influencer, Vincent Otse, also known as VeryDarkMan, until January 23, 2025.
The case was brought by human rights activist Femi Falana and his son, Folarin, popularly known as Falz.
VeryDarkMan arrived in court dressed in a red native outfit, accompanied by fans who cheered him on, but the Falanas were not present.
The case could not proceed as several applications filed by the parties were still not included in the court file. As a result, the court decided to adjourn the hearing until January 23, 2025.
On October 14, Justice Matthias Dawodu ruled on an ex-parte application filed by the Falanas, granting them legal protection from defamation. The judge ordered that VeryDarkMan remove a defamatory video he posted on September 24, 2025, which targeted the senior lawyer and his son. Additionally, the court prohibited VeryDarkMan from posting or sharing any defamatory content about them on his social media accounts until the matter is resolved.
The Falanas had filed separate lawsuits seeking N500 million each in damages, claiming that VeryDarkMan posted a video accusing them of accepting N10 million from Idris Okuneye, also known as Bobrisky, to influence a legal matter.
They argued that VeryDarkMan knew the allegations were false but chose to spread them, causing harm to their reputations. The Falanas further pointed out that the video continues to circulate online, further damaging their reputations.
In response, VeryDarkMan applied to the court for permission to appeal the ruling.
He argued that refusing his request would be an injustice, as the case involves significant legal questions that require further examination. He stated, “A refusal to grant leave may result in the enforcement of a decision that does not reflect a correct application of the law, leading to outcomes that may be detrimental not only to the parties involved but also to the administration of justice as a whole. The appellate court’s role in clarifying and, where necessary, correcting trial court decisions is vital in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.”
-
News14 hours ago
Trump picks ex-Democrat Tulsi Gabbard as US Intel Chief
-
News14 hours ago
JUST IN: Govt Declares Friday As Public Holiday
-
News14 hours ago
NNPC Carries Out Leadership Shakeup, Appoints Adedapo Segun As New CFO
-
News13 hours ago
Umahi Frowns At Slow Pace Of Suleja-Minna Road Construction
-
News14 hours ago
Abia Assembly orders Deputy Governor, Emetu to apologise over assault on House member
-
News13 hours ago
NYSC announces date for ‘2024 Batch C’ registration
-
News22 hours ago
Stop importation of fake fuel to Nigeria, professionals in Europe tell Tinubu
-
News14 hours ago
NNPC, Dangote Sign GSPA Agreement To Boost Local Production, Revamp Industrial Growth