News
Kekere-Ekun Set To Emerge Nigeria’s Second Female CJN
Barring any last-minute change, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun of the Supreme Court is set to emerge as the next chief justice of Nigeria (CJN).
If she assumes the office, Kekere-Ekun would become the second female justice in Nigeria to hold the exalted position after Mariam Aloma Mukhtar, who was CJN between July 2012 and November 2014, spending 28 months in office.
The current occupant of the office, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, who assumed office on June 27, 2022, will formally bow out on Thursday, August 22, 2024, after attaining the mandatory retirement age of 70 years.
As the most senior justice of the Supreme Court after Ariwoola, Justice Kekere-Ekun is favoured to clinch the position.
The incoming CJN, who is 66 years old, may stay up to four years compared to the average of two years most of her predecessors held the position.
After 11 years at the Supreme Court, Justice Kekere-Ekun will not only become the next CJN but also head the National Judicial Council (NJC), which oversees the appointment, promotion, and discipline of judges across the country.
Justice Kekere-Ekun was born on May 7, 1958 and obtained her LL. B in 1980 from the University of Lagos and LL.M from the London School of Economics and Political Science in November 1983. She was called to the Nigerian Bar on 10th July, 1981.
From 1985 to 1989, she was in private practice and was later appointed a Senior Magistrate Grade II, Lagos State Judiciary in December 1989. She was appointed a judge of the High Court of Lagos State on July 19, 1996. She served as the chairman of the Robbery and Firearms Tribunal, Zone II, Ikeja, Lagos, from November 1996 to May 1999.
Kekere-Ekun was elevated to the Court of Appeal on 22nd September, 2004, where she served in various Divisions and as the presiding justice of two Divisions of the appellate court (Makurdi and Aku) in 2011 and 2012, respectively.
She was elevated to the Supreme Court of Nigeria as the fifth female justice of the apex court and sworn in on Monday, July 8, 2013.
She has attended numerous courses and seminars within and outside Nigeria and received several merit awards.
Justice Kekere-Ekun is also a life Bencher, a member of the International Association of Women Judges and its president.
LEADERSHIP Sunday reports that the judiciary has been in the eye of the storm, notably since the country returned to democratic rule in 1999.
With Justice Kekere-Ekun assuming office in the next few weeks, the succession battle in the Supreme Court may be rancour-free for the first time in five years.
Justice Walter Onnoghen, who served as CJN between 7th March, 2017 and 25th January 2019, left controversially after he was accused of failing to declare his assets.
His successor, Justice Tanko Muhammad, who assumed office on 25th January, 2019, followed almost the same pattern after his fellow justices accused him of unfair treatment, particularly in the area of their welfare. He voluntarily resigned on the grounds of ill-health on 27th June, 2022.
The CJN is the head of the government’s judicial arm. He presides over the country’s Supreme Court and the National Judicial Council.
The outgoing CJN (Ariwoola) was appointed acting CJN on 27th June, 2022 upon Justice Tanko Muhammad’s resignation and was confirmed by the Nigerian Senate on 21st September, 2022.
The Supreme Court of Nigeria is the highest, and its decisions are final. The president nominates the CJN upon the recommendation by the NJC, and is subject to confirmation by the Senate.
The CJN holds office at the pleasure of the Nigerian constitution and can only be removed from office due to death or on attainment of age 70, whichever comes first, or by impeachment by the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which requires a super majority of the Senate members.
Short Stay In Office Based On Rules – Senior lawyers
In the last 15 years, seven CJNs have presided over the affairs of the nation’s judiciary, which is about an average of two years each for the occupants of that office.
Lawyers have, however, lamented the short stay in office of the CJNs.
According to them, an average of two years in office is not enough to bring about the needed reforms in the country’s judiciary.
However, some senior lawyers who spoke to LEADERSHIP Sunday were quick to assert that the CJN’s office is not a political appointment.
According to them, it is regulated by law.
A former attorney-general and commissioner for justice in Imo state, Chief Chukwuma-Machukwu Ume (SAN), said the apex court is not a political party whose programmes and policies are personal.
According to him, the CJN is an administrator and is not expected to bring his agenda to run the court.
“The court is regulated by law, and the law is the law; there is nothing you can do about it. The Supreme Court is not a political party where one man is expected to bring his agenda to the table after winning election,” he said.
Another lawyer, Barrister Abdul Balogun, said rules for succession to the CJN’s office have already been laid down.
“Laws and rules guide the judiciary, and any attempt to deviate from them is a call to lawlessness, which will negatively impact the country’s judiciary.
“In the judiciary as a whole, it is a laid down rule that the most senior assumes office upon a vacancy in the leadership of any court from the customary court to the Supreme Court. So, any attempt to deviate from that is a call for chaos in the system,” he said
In the last 15 years, the country has produced seven CJNs. While some of them left an indelible mark in office and in the minds of Nigerians with their policies and reforms to the country’s judiciary, others had their tenures characterised by controversies.
Aloysius Iyorgyer Katsina-Alu (2009- 2011)
From his very first day in office, there was controversy after he was sworn in by his predecessor. He was the first CJN to be sworn in by his predecessor, Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi (rtd), due to the unavailability of the then ailing President Umaru Yar’Adua, who did not hand over powers to then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan.
Yar’Adua never returned to the country until his death. Justice Katsina-Alu’s tenure as the CJN was also marked by his controversial battle with the then President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Isa Ayo Salami (rtd), who the NJC later suspended.
Dahiru Musdapher (2011-2012)
His tenure as CJN was crisis-free; rather, he brought some reforms that impacted positively on the judiciary. Some of his reforms are still being implemented today. The Jigawa State-born Musdapher was appointed Chief Justice Nigeria on August 27, 2011, and sworn in by former President Goodluck Jonathan on August 29, 2011.
He served as Chief Judge of Kano State between 1979 and 1985.
Musdapher, a native of Babura town, served as a member of the Court of Appeal between 1985 and 2003 and later joined the Supreme Court.
During his tenure, he admitted that the judiciary needed radical surgical reforms and called on all Nigerian judges to rise above the daunting challenges by restoring hope and confidence in the judicial system.
MARIAM ALOMA MUKHTAR (2012 – 2014)
Justice Mukhtar could be described as a judge who came, who saw and, to an extent, reinvigorated the fervor to stamp out the burden of corruption that has, in no small measure, weighed down the scale of justice in Nigeria.
She spent barely 28 months in office. She took over from Justice Dahiru Musdapher on July 15, 2012.
Undisputedly, no administration in the judiciary ever attempted to fight corruption like Mukhtar, during whose short regime about seven judges were sacked.
Remarkably, no woman had attained that position since 1963, when the Federal Republic of Nigeria was proclaimed, and Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe became its first President.
The situation deteriorated to the extent that an ex-CJN and a sitting president of the Court of Appeal publicly poked themselves over an alleged plan to subvert justice in a gubernatorial dispute involving Sokoto State.
Consequently, on July 11, 2012, while answering questions from the Nigerian Senate, Justice Mukhtar admitted the presence of bad eggs at the top echelon of the judicial arm of government, even as she vowed to fight and expose such persons before her exit from office.
A few days after she assumed duties, Justice Mukhtar reviewed 337 petitions filed against judicial officers before the NJC.
Hence, it was not surprising that seven justices were sacked within two years of her tenure.
MAHMUD MOHAMMED (2014 – 2016)
Justice Mohammed was also less controversial in his about two years in office as CJN.
He was born on November 10, 1946, in Jalingo, Taraba State.
He studied for his Bachelor’s degree in Law (LL.B) at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, graduating in 1970. After that, he attended the Nigerian Law School in Lagos and was subsequently called to the Bar in 1971.
He began his career in the public service with the Ministry of Justice of the defunct North-eastern and Gongola States and served on the Gongola Bench.
WALTER ONNOGHEN (2017 – 2019)
Justice Onnoghen began his tenure as CJN on a controversial note and ended it on the same note. When he was appointed in acting capacity, it appeared that former President Muhammadu Buhari never wanted him to become the substantive CJN as it took him several months to confirm his appointment.
In fact, it was Professor Yemi Osinbajo (SAN), the former vice president who acted as president when Buhari was away on a medical trip, that confirmed Onnoghen’s appointment.
Midway into his tenure as CJN, he was accused of corruption and removed from office after he was asked to resign.
His resignation from office followed the recommendation of the NJC for his early retirement. The recommendation was sent to Buhari, who readily accepted it.
Justice Onnoghen faced trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal over allegations of false declaration of assets.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) also accused the former CJN of receiving illicit payments and bribes from lawyers. He denied all the allegations.
Not a few Nigerians read political undertone in his tribulation, especially as the 2019 general elections were fast approaching.
IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD (2019 – 2022)
Like his predecessor, Justice Tanko Muhammad assumed office on a controversial note and also exited under questionable circumstances.
After Justice Onnoghen was eased out, many believed it was to prepare Justice Muhammad to become the CJN. Some believed the former president tainted Onnoghen with a corruption tag to make way for Muhammad, also a northerner.
Like Onnoghen, he could not finish his tenure, but due to ill health.
There was confusion in the media over his resignation. However, after many weeks of denial and confusion, it was later confirmed that he resigned as CJN on health grounds.
Shortly before his resignation, he officially reacted to the allegations of uncaring attitude levelled against him by his fellow justices in the apex court.
In his first official reaction, he admitted that the Supreme Court, like any other establishment in the country, had been hit by a devastating economic crunch and the court’s leadership under him could no longer meet some of its obligations to the justices, especially in welfare.
OLUKAYODE ARIWOOLA (2022 -2024)
Justice Ariwoola took the oath of office as the acting CJN at the Presidential Villa in Abuja on June 27, 2022.
He is, arguably, one of the finest CJNs the country has produced with his policies and programmes for the judiciary. However, like some of his predecessors, his tenure is fraught with controversies, especially as the judiciary under him came to be seen as being in the pockets of the political class.
In fact, retiring Supreme Court justices in his tenure used their valedictory speeches to lampoon the judiciary under his watch and so many Nigerians have lamented that the present judiciary dispenses judgement rather than justice.
Whoever takes the mantle after Ariwoola will have a herculean task repairing the battered image of the judiciary in order to restore the confidence of the people in that arm of government.
Credit: LEADERSHIP
News
Government In Defence Of Crime
*By Basil Okoh*
When an important public office holder is held for high crime, government media systems go on overdrive. Instead of dwelling on crime committed, government media organs automatically go on the defensive, redirecting public attention and anger, looking for who else to blame other than the culprit. They look for who reported the crime, who petitioned the police or who leaked incriminating documents or evidence to EFCC or police.
People are then distracted from the enormity of the crime. They make the public focus instead on how the crime was leaked, not how it was committed. The persons from whom information about the crime was gotten are presented as villains and the criminal himself becomes the pitiful victim.
That is how Dr. Ifeanyi Okowa is now being presented. He is the victim of detractors who reported him to EFCC over a possible theft of N1.3 Trillion in DESOPADEC. Government media men have changed the narrative and Okowa is now the victim. But these detractors being presented in bad light did not arrest Okowa and had nothing to do with the missing money at DESOPADEC. No one in the media can possibly rubbish the integrity of Ifeanyi Okowa if Ifeanyi Okowa himself does not rubbish the integrity of Ifeanyi Okowa by his own actions.
Not a single one of the government defenders is talking about the missing funds discovered by EFCC. That is by the way. Only the safety and integrity of Okowa matters. And it appears no one is betting on the investigative skills of the financial crime agency and their capability to discover such a big crime without the aid of petitioners and informants.
Mr. Olisa Ifeajika, erstwhile Chief Press Secretary of the Dr. Ifeanyi Okowa’s administration, did so well in his manipulation of public information and the reversal of roles by presenting Okowa as victim. He describes the petitioners and informants in so many disparaging bugaboo. They are: “dubious elements”, “diabolical”, “mischievous”, “traducers” and so on … ad nauseum.
But then the facts of the matter are simple:
1. EFCC arrested Dr. Ifeanyi Okowa.
2. EFCC gave reasons for his arrest.
3. EFCC kept him in detention for a week.
So what did “detractors” do to Okowa to earn abuse by Ifeajika?
EFCC stated plainly that Okowa was arrested to explain the issues observed in DESOPADEC finance and mentioned the loss of 1.3 Trillion. The “traducers” didn’t invent that figure. But Ifeajika wasted everybody’s time writing a rehash of Government finances for eight years. Was anybody questioning government finances for the period? Was Okowa arrested because of Government finances or the finances of the agency DESOPADEC? Why was he busy answering to questions that no one asked him? Does anyone even believe his figures?
In any other nation people praise the patriotism of crime informants. The Police establishment work with them or use them to help solve high crime in society. Their works are recognized as civic duties. Here in Nigeria, they are vilified and made to appear as evil people out to settle a grudge, hence the popular use of the catchphrase “disgruntled elements”. How can anyone not be disgruntled when N1.3 trillion of public wealth is alleged to have been stolen by one man?
Mr. Ifeajika spent his entire time abusing everybody without throwing light on the alleged crime. Those involved in informing EFCC of a crime in DESOPADEC and all of us involved in reporting and publicly expressing our opinions about it were roundly abused.
If Ifeajika doesn’t know, let him be told that the arrest of a public figure is valid news and the loss of humongous public money is also valid news. They are part of public accounting. These were all breaking news emanating from EFCC. Ifeajika is not abusing the EFCC for breaking the news but the media for reporting it to the public. Neither the media nor the public are involved in the arrest or detention of Dr. Ifeanyi Okowa for the alleged theft of N1.3 Trillion. Journalists perform a public and constitutional duty by reporting news and expressing opinion about public affairs. By abusing people who are not involved in the arrest or detention of Okowa, leaving the issues of the theft of N1.3 Trillion unaddressed, Ifeajika deflects and engages in mischief. Delta citizens should be deeply concerned about Ifeajika’s deflection of information and the mischief that it implies. All of us aught to commit ourselves to finding the truth in EFCC’s accusations. It must be an effort in winning back our social equilibrium and the moral compass of the state.
By activating public concern about it, we are engaging in a duty demanded by the Nigerian constitution in it’s freedom of information enactment. Mr. Ifeajika cannot stop us, no matter how hard he tries. Government can hide it’s secrets all it wants, but it is the professional duty of the journalist to find that secret and reveal it to the public.
It is therefore the journalists guaranteed professional obligation to pry into public affairs, report news and publish commentary on it. Ifeajika was taking swings at the onlookers and the media and left the alleged crime unattended. In his desperation to defend an alleged crime that has not yet been charged, he was trying too hard to make himself an accessory after the crime. He was rolling out figures and statistics, the very tools deployed by governments to lie to the public. Pray, who can vouch for the figures spewed out by Mr. Ifeajika?
The Government media team is already putting a spin on the news, telling us it is wild speculation to expect the erstwhile governor to steal as much as N1.3 Trillion. But we have had many governors charged for stealing billions of dollars of state funds. So how is this case in Delta different?
Ifeajika was careful not to broach the idea of an independent audit to verify his claims or to determine the underlying facts of the financial situation at DESOPADEC. Delta state is an open society. The staff of the agency know a few facts which they retell to family and friends. We’ve been regaled with stories of the complete breakdown of form and order in DESOPADEC for decades. We have heard stories of one man taking out N100 million every month in the agency. If it comes to it, there are people who can give EFCC all the information they need to prosecute and win criminal cases in the agency. There are people who can point out where funds are hidden.
Let it therefore be known that Petitions alone do not cause arrests and detentions for one full week if there are no tactile violations of the laws involved. Police cannot keep such a high profile citizen in detention in violation of the laws if there are no hard questions to answer arising from the petitions. We should be mindful that the EFCC are not staffed by illiterates but by professionals and that they study petitions and engage in gathering evidence before moving in to arrest and detain suspects for one week.
We have an obligation to make all public officers accountable for the huge sums that pass through government during eight year tenures. It is not their money. It is money belonging to the public, the patrimony of the more than 6 million citizens of Delta State. We will not be bamboozled or shy away from the responsibility of informing the public about their money no matter the names government call writers and reporters. We know the games they play to cover crime. They will deploy abuses and name calling to blackmail journalists into silence, from not demanding rectitude and accounting from the man under whose authority Ifeajika himself admitted that over 3.2 billion of our funds were spent.
The people of Delta State have the right to demand an independent audit of DESOPADEC finances for these past years. The state has been crawling in pain, not meeting the basic duties of state to its citizens but we continually hear of humongous sums coming into state coffers every month. The state gets poorer all the time while those who run its affairs are getting richer, fiddling with funds that they can never use in many life times.
And yet these men and women burn incense and spend eternity in religions observances, dividing their times between the Christian church, fetish rituals and the demonic practices of the occult. Enough should be enough. Let Delta State be true to its citizens.
@basilokoh.
News
BREAKING: NJC finally nails Rivers, Anambra High Court Judges
The National Judicial Council (NJC) has suspended Justice G. C Aguma of the High Court of Rivers State and Justice A.O Nwabunike of the Anambra State High Court from performing judicial functions.
“They were both suspended for the period of one year without pay and placed on watch list for two years thereafter,” according to a Channels Television breaking news this Friday morning, November 15, 2024.
The decision, says the report, was taken at the 107th Meeting of the NJC chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, on 13 and 14 November 2024.
News
Late COAS Lagbaja To Be Laid To Rest In National Military Cemetery Today
By Kayode Sanni-Arewa
Final rites have been made for the burial of the late Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Taoreed Lagbaja, who passed away last week after a protracted illness.
His remains, which arrived at Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport on Thursday at 12:18 pm, will be laid to rest on Friday at the National Military Cemetery in Abuja.
The funeral rites began Thursday with a Service of Songs at Mogadishu Cantonment, attended by prominent officials from various security agencies.
During the ceremony, Maj.-Gen. Kelvin Aligbe, Commander of the Training and Doctrine Command, paid a heartfelt tribute to the late army chief, praising his leadership and dedication.
Aligbe, speaking on behalf of the 39 Regular Course of the Nigerian Defence Academy, described Lagbaja as a natural leader whose dedication and service were evident from the beginning.
“He was a born leader who exemplified unwavering commitment to Nigeria’s unity and service to the nation.
His contributions were immeasurable, and we must continue to uphold his values,” Aligbe said.
Bilikisu Ibrahim, representing the Nigerian Army Officers’ Wives Association, also paid tribute, highlighting Lagbaja’s deep faith and commitment to his duties. “He was a protector and a source of strength, always facing life’s challenges with profound spirituality,” Ibrahim said.
The nation continues to honor the life and legacy of a revered military leader as the funeral proceedings unfold today.
-
News19 hours ago
SAD! Popular gospel film producer Baba Gbenro passes on
-
News10 hours ago
Wike opens underbelly of PDP, says personal ambitions cause of internal sabotage
-
Sports21 hours ago
Boxing world split as 58-yr-old Tyson goes back to ring 19yrs after retirement
-
News10 hours ago
EFCC Invitation: Okowa challenges critics, receives Delta monarchs’ support over his travails
-
News24 hours ago
It’s wrong to arrest individuals in place of suspects — Says PSC chairman
-
News23 hours ago
Court Gives Falanas, January Date To Prove Case Against VDM
-
News24 hours ago
READ 8 Facts About New Lakurawa Terror Group in North West
-
News9 hours ago
Okpebholo freezes bank accounts, orders CP to end cult clashes