News

Opposition Coalition Says Court Judgement Ordering Conduct Of Rivers State LGA Election Victory For Rivers People

Published

2 weeks ago

September 30, 2024

By Gloria Ikibah

The Spokesman of the opposition coalition in Nigeria, Rep. Ikenga Ugochinyere has described the Judgement of the High Court, Port Harcourt Division, ordering the conduct Rivers State local government council election, slated for this Saturday, October 5 as victory for people of the state.

Naijablitznews.com reports that the court’s ruling is sequel to Suit No. PHC/2696/CS/2024 ’ Between: Action Peoples Party (APP), being the Claimant and Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission, Rivers State Government and Rivers State Governor as Defendants.

The Court interlia ordered that the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are bound to make adequate provision for election into the Local Government Councils of Rivers State and to ensure that the affairs of the Local Government Councils in Rivers State are conducted by democratically elected Local Government Councils.

Reacting to the judgment, Ugochinyere said the judiciary has once again demonstrated that it is the hope of the common man and the defender of the mighty alone.

He said: “The High Court Port Harcourt Division, has put to rest the anxiety over the feasibility of this Saturday’s Rivers State Local Government election.

“The Honourable Court graciously and firmly ordered as follows: ‘THAT upon the construction of Section 7 subsection 1 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999 as amended, the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are bound to make adequate provision for election into the Local Government Councils of Rivers State and to ensure that the affairs of the Local Government Councils in Rivers State are conducted by democratically elected Local Government Councils.

“THAT in view of Section 7 subsection 1, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999 AS AMENDED, Section 5 (A) of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission Law No 2 of 2018, the Decision of the Supreme Court of Nigeria Delivered on the 11th day of July, 2024 in Suit No SC/CV/343/2024: Attorney-General of Federation Vs AttorneyGeneral of Abia State and 35 Ors and expiration of the tenure of the former Democratically elected Local Government Councils in Rivers State on the 17th day of June, 2024, the Defendants are bound to conduct Election into the Local Government Councils in Rivers State within the shortest possible time in order to comply with aforesaid Judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

“THAT it is further declared chat in view of Section 5 (a) of the Rivers State independent Electoral Commission Law No 2 of 2018, Section 9(1)(a), (4) to (6) of the Electoral Act, 2022 and the exigencies of the decision of the Supreme Court of Nigeria delivered on the 11th day of July, 2024 in Suit No SC/CV/343/2024: Attorney-General of the Federation VS Attorney-General of Abia State & 35 Ors, the 1st Defendant is entitled to utilise the National Register of Voters for the 2023 General Elections compiled by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) pursuant to Section 9(1)(a), (4) to (6) of the Electoral Act, 2022, already in custody of the 1st Defendant to conduct Election into the 23 Local Government Councils of Rivers State.

“THAT it is also declared that in view of the decision of the Federal Government of Nigeria following the said Judgment in Sult No SC/CV/343/2024 Delivered on the 11th day of July, 2024 to the effect that all states without Democratically elected Local Government Councils in place should conduct Elections into their respective Local Government Councils within three (3) months from the date of the aforesaid Judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the defendants are bound to conduct elections into Local Government Councils in Rivers State on or before the expiration of the said three (3) months period, on the 5th day of October, 2024 and to take all necessary steps towards the conduct of the said Election, including sale of forms to candidates and their parties including the Claimant who Is interested in sponsoring candidates for offices in the Local Government Councils.

“THAT an order of mandatory Injunction be and is hereby issued compelling the 2nd and 3rd Defendant by themselves, or by their agents, privies, servants or representatives and proxies to make adequate provision for election into the Local Government Council in Rivers State and to ensure that the affairs of the Local Government Councils in Rivers State are Conducted by Democratically Elected Local Government Councils.

“THAT it is further ordered that mandatory injunction be and is hereby issued compelling the 1st Defendant to conduct election into Local Government Councils of Rivers State on the 5th Day of October, 2024 or on any other date fixed by the 1st Defendant in accordance with its Electoral Guidelines in order to comply with the aforesaid Judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and to take all necessary steps towards the conduct of the said Elections including sale of forms to candidates and their parties, Including the Claimant who is interested in sponsoring candidates for offices in the Local Government Councils.

“THAT an order of mandatory Injunction be and is hereby further issued directing or commanding the 1st Defendant to utilize the National Register of Voters for the 2023 General Election compiled by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) pursuant to Section 9 (1)(a), (4) to (6) of the Electoral Act, 2022 to conduct Election into the twenty-three (23) Local Government Councils of Rivers State.

“THAT the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defense Corps, the Nigeria Army and all other Security Agencies and Paramilitary Organizations are hereby ordered to provide adequate security and ensure maintenance of peace, law and order during and after the Election”.

News

New Tax Bills Not To Merge Govt Agencies, Cause Job Losses – FIRS

Published

10 mins ago

October 17, 2024

Gloria Ikibah

By Gloria Ikibah

Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Zack Adedeji, has explained that the four new tax reform bills are meant to combine all scattered tax laws into one, making it easier to manage.

Adedeji who stated this at a meeting with the House of Representatives Committee on Finance, said the bills presented to the National Assembly were not about raising or introducing new taxes, this is even as he also clarified that the reforms will not merge any government agencies or cause job losses.

He said, “We want to harmonize all the tax laws because we have different tax laws scattered in various establishment laws. This leads to multiple taxes because each agency enforces its own tax law.”

The FIRS boss further noted that no agency is more important than another, and each must carry out its duties. This, he said was not good for the economy, which is why President Tinubu wants to combine all the tax laws into one system.

He added, “As we stand today, there is no law regulating or monitoring cryptocurrency. We can’t isolate ourselves from global developments, so one of the goals is to organize the fiscal framework efficiently.”

Adedeji also highlighted that the reform will help government spending. “For example, before the Treasury Single Account (TSA), the government could have money in one bank but still borrow from another. TSA now gives a clear picture of where government funds are”.

He further stressed the need for transparency in revenue collection, and assured that the government is not looking to tax poverty or inflation.

“We want the tax laws to be simple so that people can comply easily.

“The reforms will also update old tax laws to fit current realities. We’re still using a tax integrity test from 1939 when there was no internet or online shopping. These bills aim to align Nigeria with international standards and attract investment.”

“We will never increase the rate or number of taxes. The president believes in harmonizing the taxes we have, with fewer than 20 types of taxes”, he added.

He stated that the proposed Nigeria Tax Act will put all tax laws in one book, reducing the number of taxes, citing the example of the Education Tax Act, which collects a percentage for various funds, and said compliance has been an issue and the new act will make this simpler.

“The Nigeria Tax Administration Act will harmonize the administration of taxes, ensuring a uniform process so people don’t have to navigate different systems”, he noted.

Adedeji also discussed renaming the FIRS to Nigeria Revenue Service to reflect its role in collecting taxes for both the federal and state governments, as well as from international companies like Google and Jumia.

“The final reform is the establishment of a Joint Revenue Board to create a legal framework for resolving conflicts between states and local governments over revenue collection.

“These tax reforms will stimulate the economy and lay a foundation for the type of economy the president envisions”, he concluded.

Chairman of the Committee, James Faleke, earlier in his remarked that the meeting was to give members firsthand information on the necessity of the bills ahead of their second reading.

News

Parents Of 2-year Old Boy Killed By NDLEA Demand N2b Compensation

Published

14 mins ago

October 17, 2024

Gloria Ikibah

By Gloria Ikibah

The parents of a two-year-old boy, Ivan Omhonria, who was shot and killed, and his younger brother, Eromonsele, who was shot in the eye by officers of the Nigerian Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), are demanding N2 billion in compensation from the Agency.

Naijablitznews.com recalled that the incident took place in Delta State in 2023, when Eromonsele, who survived, was only one year old.

The father, Fidelis, who appeared before the House of Representatives Committee on Public Petitions, expressed bitterness that the NDLEA has neglected them since the tragedy occurred over a year ago. He also disclosed that Eromonsele’s health has been getting worse due to a lack of proper medical care.

The family had filed a petition against the NDLEA, and the first hearing was held on Wednesday, at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja.

During the hearing, NDLEA’s lawyer, Muniat Adeleye, stated that the Agency had agreed to pay the family N25 million, with N5 million already sent as the first installment, and that the payment was to be spread over five months.

Adeleye expressed surprise at the petition, and said, “The Agency did not expect it, as the matter had already been resolved with an agreement between both parents.”

However, when asked for the signed agreement, Adeleye, who is the Assistant Director of Prosecution and Legal Services, admitted that it had not been signed. This upset the Committee, which demanded that NDLEA Chairman, Brigadier General Buba Marwa (rtd), appear at the next hearing.

Fidelis denied any such agreement, saying, “I was shocked to hear about an agreement just now. I’m not a party to any agreement. Yes, the NDLEA Chairman called me after the incident and said he was sorry and that he would send me a token from his personal funds. He didn’t mention an amount, but later, I received N5 million in my wife’s account. That’s all. So where did the N25 million agreement come from?”

The family’s lawyer added, “We demanded N2 billion in compensation, but the NDLEA never responded. They ignored us with arrogance. A life was lost, and another child’s future is at risk because of the eye injury. We want the House to make sure the NDLEA takes responsibility and compensates the family properly.”

Chairman of the Committee, Rep. Mike Etaba, expressed the seriousness of the matter, “This is a grave issue. Nigerians and the world are watching us. At the next hearing, the NDLEA head must appear in person to explain what steps he has taken to help this family. The money sent was just a token to cover some medical costs, not part of any agreement. No one should claim there was a N25 million agreement.”

The matter was adjourned to October 22, 2024.

News

Companies Blame Host Communities For Oil Theft, Pipeline Vandalism

Published

1 hour ago

October 17, 2024

Gloria Ikibah

…seek intervention of NASS for legal framework

By Gloria Ikibah

Aieto and Nigeria Agip (now Oando) Oil companies have given different submissions before the House of Representatives’ Environment Committee, during the ongoing investigative hearing into oil theft, pipeline vandalism, and their environmental impact in oil-producing states on Tuesday in Abuja.

The hearing was occasioned by a lot of petitions from host communities affected by Aieto’s and Oando’s operations, who drew special attention on the environmental and economic concerns caused by oil spills and sabotage.

Both companies stressed the need for legislative intervention by the House of Representatives to create legal framework that discourages acts harmful to the nation’s economy and ecosystem.

Oando Team Lead, Philip Akuduro, blamed a significant portion of oil spillage on host communities, citing theft and vandalism as primary causes.

He stated, “Data by Oando on Burutu in Southern Ijaw revealed that virtually over 90% of oil theft and pipeline vandalism were perpetrated by members of the host communities, whose increasing penance and capacity to steal from the common well knows no bounds.”

“Host communities are individually and collectively sabotaging efforts of oil companies to minimize incidences of spillages in their area. Our operations, largely covering onshore and marshy areas, are easily accessible to vandals. Their activities result in spillage and pollution, as oil spills are swiftly spread by strong underwater currents.”

But members of the committee, mostly from the Niger Delta region, led by Chairman Rep. Julius Pondi (representing Ijaw South), vehemently were against the generalized accusations.

They particularly objected to the terms “increasing appetite and capacities for theft,” and therefore urged Oando to withdraw the statement, which the company did spot-on.

Chief Operating Officer of Aieto, Ewarezi Useh, who emphasised the importance of maintaining a good relationship with host communities, however noted that vested interests often lead to conflicts between oil companies and local communities.

Useh credited such clashes to the significant drop in production to 700,000 barrels per day in 2018, which later improved through the efforts of combined security stakeholders.

Rep. Julius Pondi reaffirmed the commitment of the committee to address the root causes of environmental degradation and pollution caused by oil company operations.

He disclosed that there will be an oversight visit to Oando’s operation sites in Delta State to verify their claims of cleaning up the aftermath of a May 2024 oil spill in the area.