Connect with us

News

Diezani’s suit challenging sale of assets by EFCC stalled over judge’s absence

Published

on

A suit filed by the former Minister of Petroleum, Diezani Alison-Madueke, to challenge an order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for final forfeiture of her seized assets, was stalled yesterday at a Federal High Court in Abuja.

The matter, which was before Justice Inyang Ekwo, was fixed for further mention in the day’s cause list.

But the case could not proceed because the court did not sit.

Justice Ekwo was said to be attending a seminar at the National Judicial Institute (NJI) in Abuja.

Advertisement

The matter was subsequently fixed for November 21.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the ex-minister had, through her counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), sued the anti-graft agency as sole respondent.

Alison-Madueke had sought an order extending the time to seek leave to apply to the court for an order to set aside the EFCC’s public notice issued to conduct a public sale on her property.

In the motion dated and filed on January 6, 2023, by her lawyer, the former minister sought five orders from the court.

Advertisement

The former minister, who argued that the various orders were made without jurisdiction, said these “ought to be set aside ex debito justitiae” (from or as a debt of justice).

Alison-Madueke alleged that she was not given a fair hearing in the proceedings leading to the orders.

“The various court orders issued in favour of the respondent and upon which the respondent issued the public notice were issued in breach of the applicant’s right to fair hearing, as guaranteed by Section 36 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, as altered, and other similar constitutional provisions,” she said.

The former minister argued that she was neither served with the charge sheet and proof of evidence in any of the charges nor with any other summons on the criminal charges pending against her before the court.

Advertisement

She also argued that the courts were misled into making several final forfeiture orders against her assets through suppression or non-disclosure of material facts.

“The several applications upon which the courts made the final order of forfeiture against the applicant were obtained upon gross misstatements, misrepresentations, non-disclosure, concealment and suppression of material facts, and this honourable court has the power to set aside same ex debito justitiae, as a void order is as good as if it was never made at all.

“The orders were made without recourse to the constitutional right to fair hearing and right to property accorded the applicant by the constitution.”

“The applicant was never served with the processes of court in all the proceedings that led to the order of final forfeiture,” she said, among other grounds given.

Advertisement

But in a counter-affidavit deposed to by a detective with the commission, Mr. Rufai Zaki, the EFCC urged the court to dismiss her application.

Zaki, a member of the team that investigated a case of criminal conspiracy, official corruption and money laundering against the ex-minister and some other persons involved in the case, said the investigation clearly showed that she was involved in some acts of criminality.

“We hereby rely on the charge, dated November 14, 2018, filed before this honourable court and also attached as Exhibit C in the applicant’s affidavit,” he said.

The EFCC operative said most of the depositions in Alison-Madueke’s suit were untrue.

Advertisement

He added that contrary to her deposition in the affidavit filed in support of the suit, most of the cases, which led to the final forfeiture of the contested property “were action in rem, same was heard at various times and determined by this honourable court”.

Zaki said the courts ordered the commission to do a newspaper publication inviting parties to show cause why the named property should not be forfeited to the Federal Government before the final orders were made.

The EFCC operative named Nnamdi Awa Kalu as representing the ex-minister in reaction to one of the forfeiture applications.

“We humbly rely on the judgment of Justice I. L. N. Oweibo, dated September 10, 2019, shown in Exhibit C of the applicant’s affidavit,” he said.

Advertisement

Zaki explained that contrary to her argumnet, the final forfeiture of the assets, which were subject of the present application, was ordered by the court in 2017 and that it was not set aside or upturned on appeal.

According to him, the properties have been disposed of through due process of law.

NAN recalls that Justice Ekwo had, on June 21, 2023, fixed October 23, 2023 for hearing of the suit

The judge had fixed the date after a lawyer who appeared for Alison-Madueke, Benson Igbanoi, and EFCC’s counsel, M. D. Baraya, regularised their processes in the suit.

Advertisement

The anti-corruption agency had planned to conduct a public sale of all the assets seized for being proceeds of crime, as ordered by courts, to be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.

The auctioning, conducted on the seized assets believed to include Alison-Madueke’s property, started on January 9, 2023.

The suspended EFCC Chairman Abdulrasheed Bawa had revealed that $153 million and over 80 properties had been recovered from the ex-minister.

Alison-Madueke was alleged to have escaped to the United Kingdom (UK) and remained there after her exit from public office as the Petroleum Minister, an office she held between 2010 and 2015 under the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

Advertisement

The asset-related suit is different from the one she also filed to seek N100 billion as compensation for a series of EFCC’s alleged libelous publications against her.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Oil magnate sues EFCC for unlawfully declaring him wanted

Published

on

Unidentified EFCC Operative Takes Own life

Chairman/CEO of Global Signature Hotel and Total Grace Group Limited, Dr. Henry Mobolaji Akinduro, has filed a N5 billion lawsuit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for allegedly declaring him wanted unlawfully.

In the suit filed yesterday at the Federal High Court, Lagos, Akinduro submitted that the EFCC declared him wanted without any form of judicial intervention, recourse to constitutional safeguards or order of court.

The EFCC on Friday, October 11, 2024 about 7.20pm on its official twitter handle, also known as ‘X’ declared the oil magnate ‘Wanted’. The businessman is praying the court to order the EFCC to remove his name from the wanted list published on the commission’s official website or any other related platform including Twitter (X).

Akinduro is seeking N5 billion as “general damages”.

Advertisement

On Monday, the businessman, via his counsel, Olalekan Ojo (SAN) had petitioned the Chairman of the EFCC over the unconstitutional violation of his fundamental human rights to personal liberty and human dignity by the publication of his name on the list of wanted persons on the EFCC’s website.

Ojo averred in the petition that at all times preceding the said publication, there was no order of any court of competent jurisdiction authorising the said publication and no charge had been preferred against our client before any court.

According to Akinduro’s lawyer, the Commission had allegedly made the said illegal or unlawful publication declaring him wanted upon the prompting or instigation of one Mr. Femi Olushakin who had earlier written a petition against the oil magnate in respect of a N240 million contractual dispute between them —Messrs Olushakin and Akinduro.

He affirmed that disputes had arisen from the investment agreement entered into between the two men leading to Olushakin petitioning EFCC.

Advertisement

“Our Client (Akinduro) was invited by the Commission on 4th June, 2024 and he immediately responded via letter dated 5th June, 2024 notifying the Commission of his unavailability due to medical reasons. In the said letter, it was stated therein that our Client was out of the Country receiving medical attention. He subsequently provided assurances that he would be present at the Commission as soon as he was medically cleared to travel. It is pertinent at this juncture to chronicle the genesis of the subject matter which led to the declaration of our Client Wanted by the Commission,” Ojo stated.

The Counsel disclosed that there was a business transaction between Akinduro and Olushakin which was backed by a viable collateral which included Akinduro’s Global Signature Hotel worth N500 million, three (3) 60-Seater Yutong buses valued at over N240 million and a Toyota 4Runner SUV.

Ojo claimed that Olushakin has sold the three 60-Seater Yutong buses and currently drives around the city in the Toyota 4Runner SUV which were used as collateral by Akinduro.

“It is clear from the above that this is a purely civil business transaction with no element of criminality embedded in it. Mr. Femi Olushakin maliciously petitioned the Commission after selling the 60-Seater Yutong buses and currently using the Toyota 4runner SUV for his personal use,” he stated.

Advertisement

The senior lawyer added that despite Akinduro’s medical condition overseas, he has maintained close communication with the Commission.

He said: “Our Client regularly sends his Legal Officer to the Commission, affirming his willingness and desire to appear before the Commission upon due confirmation of his being fit to travel by his doctors. There was no further request by the Commission inviting our Client before the unlawful publication.

“It is to be further noted that on 11 October, 2024, our Client’s Legal Officer was physically present at the office of the Commission around noon to submit a correspondence to the Commission and he also reassured the Operatives of the Commission of our Client’s desire and willingness to cooperate with the investigation by the Commission upon his arrival in Nigeria.

“It is regrettable that despite the repeated reassurances of our Client to cooperate with the investigation upon his arrival in Nigeria, the Commission proceeded to declare our Client ‘Wanted’ later that same day at about 7.20pm without an order of Court and in the absence of a valid charge in a Court of law.

Advertisement

“The Commission published our Client’s name and photograph depicting our Client as a fugitive from the law and branded him “WANTED” without any evidence of evading investigation. This action of the Commission has not only defamed our Client but also violated our Client’s right to freedom of movement without the order of the Courts.

“The Commission has also by the unlawful publication subjected our Client to public humiliation and ridicule thus causing our Client loss of personal and business relationships as well as reputational damage. It is our instruction that since the publication, our Client has been inundated with calls, Whatsapp messages from his business associates all over the world who had read the post expressing their disgust and dismay at the defamatory publication, and the said publication has also caused our Client emotional trauma and distress.”

Akinduro, through his lawyer, said he considered it imperatively necessary to put the records straight with a view to showing that the fraud allegations are trumped-up allegations aimed at causing incalculable damage to his hard earned but richly deserved reputation.

“It is pertinent to state that the petition against Dr. Henry Akinduro was an ignoble attempt to criminalize purely contractual disputes that had arisen from the investment agreement between Dr. Henry Akinduro and the Petitioner, Mr. Femi Olushakin.”

Advertisement

Ojo stated that the commercial or contractual disputes had earlier been referred to the competent Court by the parties before Olushakin resorted to lodging the fraud allegations against the oil magnate for reasons best known to him.

Continue Reading

News

EFCC an unlawful organisation, Agbakoba writes National Assembly

Published

on

Legal luminary, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has described the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as an “unlawful organisation” that was “unconstitutionally established.”

Agbakoba made this claim in October 14 letters to the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu.

They are the Chairmen of the Adhoc Committee on the review of the Constitution in both chambers of the National Assembly.

In his letter titled: “Re: Urgent legislative constitutional reforms relating to law enforcement agencies and anti-corruption efforts,” Agbakoba drew the attention of the National Assembly to constitutional issues related to law enforcement agencies and factors inhibiting the government’s objective of abolishing corruption as stated in Section 13 of the Constitution.

Advertisement

He said: “I very strongly believe the EFCC is unconstitutionally established.

“The powers under which it was established go beyond the powers of the National Assembly.

“The EFCC is an unlawful organisation.”

Agbakoba, a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, said he was delighted to note that many states had finally taken it upon themselves to challenge the constitutionality of the EFCC.

Advertisement

“This will put to rest the question relating to the validity of the EFCC.”

The letter to the Deputy Senate President, reads in part: “I write to draw attention to certain constitutional issues on matters related to law enforcement agencies. As you are obviously aware, the fundamental objective of the government is to abolish corruption.

“But from my observation, there is no harmony amongst law enforcement agencies on corruption. They all appear to be working at cross purposes.

“This has been confirmed by the Supreme Court in so many cases. The Supreme Court has consistently sanctioned the EFCC for its conduct and questioned if the EFCC can in fact validly do what it does.

Advertisement

“I will go further to say that I very strongly believe the EFCC is unconstitutionally established.

“The powers under which it was established go beyond the powers of the National Assembly. The EFCC is an unlawful organisation.

“I am very delighted to note that many states have finally taken it upon themselves to challenge the constitutionality of the EFCC.”

“This will put to rest the question relating to the validity of the EFCC.

Advertisement

“Whilst we await the decision of the Supreme Court as the final court on the matter, I respectfully request that the Senate convene a public hearing to consider these constitutional issues.

“Such a hearing would provide an invaluable platform for stakeholders to discuss the reforms needed to strengthen Nigeria’s legal and institutional frameworks for law enforcement and anti-corruption, which will meet the stated and laudable objective of the government to abolish corruption as stated in Section 13 of the Constitution.

“I trust that, under your capable leadership, the Senate Constitution Review Committee will give these matters urgent attention in the interest of our nation’s development.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Fed Govt, Labour meet over fuel price hike

Published

on

The Federal Government yesterday engaged the Labour over the new petrol price regime.

The meeting was held at the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), with representatives from both government and Labour in attendance.

It was learnt that the meeting discussed the consequential adjustment of the new minimum wage, and the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) initiative, among others.

Government representatives at the meeting were National Security Adviser (NSA) Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, Minister of Labour Nkeiruka Onyejeocha, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy Wale Edun, Minister of Information Mohammed Idris, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil) Heineken Lokpobiri, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Gas) Ekperikpe Ekpo and representatives of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL).

Advertisement

Labour representatives included Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) President Joe Ajaero, Deputy President Kabiru Ado Sani, General Secretary Emma Ugboaja, Deputy President of the Trade Union Congress (TUC) Dr. Tommy Okon, Secretary General Nuhu Toro and President of the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT), also a Deputy President of the NLC.

Also present were Benjamin Anthony, Vice President of NLC, and Comrade Deborah Yusuf, Deputy Women leader of NLC.

NLC had decried the hike in the price of petrol, demanding a reversal and accusing the government of betrayal.

Idris, who addressed reporters after the meeting, described it as ‘normal engagement with labour to interact on national issues’.

Advertisement

He said the government does not believe there must be tension before an interaction.

“The government is always desirous of engaging with labour. This is one of such engagements.

“We’ll continue to interact with them. We don’t wait until there is tension about anything before we engage Labour,” he said.

His Budget and Economic Planning counterpart, Abubakar Bagudu, assured Nigerians that the country’s economy is on the path to recovery, despite current challenges.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News