News
Just in: Despite hunger, FIRS Orders all Banks To Start Taking N50 Compulsory Electronic Money Transfer

…levy On Every N10,000 Transfer
Despite hunger in Nigeria, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has directed all banks in Nigeria to enforce a mandatory N50 levy on electronic money transfers exceeding ₦10,000.
This directive aligns with the provisions of the Finance Act, which introduced the Electronic Money Transfer Levy (EMTL) as part of the government’s revenue generation efforts.
The EMTL is a fixed charge applied to qualifying transactions, and its implementation is expected to boost federal and state government revenues.
According to the FIRS, the levy is applicable to all forms of electronic transfers, including internet banking, mobile money platforms, and Point-of-Sale (POS) transactions.
The responsibility for collecting and remitting the levy lies with financial institutions, which must ensure compliance with the directive.
What Does This Mean for Bank Customers?
For every electronic transfer exceeding ₦10,000, bank customers will now pay an additional ₦50. For instance, if a customer transfers ₦20,000, a total of ₦20,050 will be debited from their account. This levy is separate from any service fees charged by banks for processing transactions.
Reactions from Stakeholders
The directive has sparked mixed reactions among Nigerians. While some view it as a minor inconvenience, others see it as an additional financial burden in a country already grappling with economic challenges. Critics argue that the levy could discourage cashless transactions, contradicting the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) drive for a cashless economy.
However, the FIRS maintains that the levy is essential for funding critical public services and infrastructure projects. “This levy is not new. It is part of the Finance Act, and the banks are simply implementing what has already been approved by law,” an FIRS spokesperson stated.
Implications for the Economy
The introduction of the EMTL is expected to generate significant revenue for the government. Under the Finance Act, revenue collected from the levy is shared between the federal and state governments, with 15% allocated to the federal government and 85% to the states.
Economists argue that while the levy could enhance government revenue, its success depends on proper management and transparency in fund utilization. There are also concerns about the potential impact on the informal sector, which relies heavily on electronic transfers for business transactions.
As the FIRS pushes for the implementation of the N50 levy on electronic money transfers, Nigerians are adjusting to the reality of an additional cost on their financial transactions. While the policy aims to increase government revenue, its long-term impact on the cashless economy and financial inclusion remains to be seen.
Bank customers are advised to stay informed about how the levy affects their transactions and to factor in the additional charge when making transfers.
News
Just in: Another major headache as 3 PDP senators defect to APC

Another major headache as three Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senators from Kebbi, on Tuesday, defected to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
According to reports, their letters of defection were read separately on the floor of the chamber by Deputy Senate President, Jibrin Barau, who presided over the plenary.
The senators are: Adamu Aliero (Kebbi Central); Yahaya Abdullahi (Kebbi North) and Garba Maidoki (Kebbi South).
Details…
News
Court Jails Two Six Months for Naira Abuse in Lagos

The Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday, May 8, 2025, secured the conviction and sentence of the duo of Babatunde Peter Olaitan and Tobilola Olamide to six months imprisonment each for mutilation of the Naira notes.
They were jailed by Justice Alexander Owoeye of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.
The convicts were arraigned on a separate one-count charge of tampering with the Naira notes and spraying, to which they each pleaded “guilty”.
The charge against Olaitan reads: “That you, BABATUNDE PETER OLAITAN, on 8th April 2025, at 23, Macdonald Road, Ikoyi, Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, whilst dancing during a social event, tampered with funds in the denomination of N200 (Two Hundred Naira) issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria by spraying it, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 21(1) of the Central Bank Act, 2007.”
The charge against Olamide reads:”That you, TOBILOLA OLAMIDE A.K.A TobiNation, on 8th April 2025, at 23 Macdonald Road, Ikoyi, Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, whilst dancing during a social event, tampered with funds in the denomination of N200 (Two Hundred Naira) issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria by spraying it, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 21(1) of the Central Bank Act, 2007.”
In view of their pleas, prosecution counsel, C.C. Okezie and H.U.KofarNaisa, respectively, reviewed the facts of the cases through Ibrahim Bukar, an investigative officer with the EFCC.
In his evidence, Bukar specifically told the court that the Commission, on April 10, 2025, generated an intelligence-driven investigation on TikTok, where Olaitan, also known as TDollar, was seen spraying Naira notes.
He also told the court that “Upon the approval of the intelligence by the Zonal Director, a letter of investigation was sent to the defendant, requesting him to make a statement regarding the video.
“The defendant reported to the Special Operations Team, SOT, on May 5, 2025 and his statement was recorded under caution.
“He stated that he went to a night club on April 8, 2025 and met some of his fans sharing money.
“ He also said that a fan, in the process, gifted him a bundle of N200 notes, which he sprayed on some of his other fans.
“He was shown a video of him spraying the money and he made a statement regarding it.”
Consequently, the defendants’ extrajudicial statements and video recordings were rendered and admitted in evidence by the court.
Okozie and KofarNaisa, therefore, respectively prayed the court to convict and sentence the defendants accordingly.
Justice Owoeye convicted and sentenced both Olaitan and Olamide to six months imprisonment each, with an option of fine in the sum of N200,000 (Two Hundred Thousand Naira.
The convicts’ road to the Correctional Centre started when they were arrested by operatives of the EFCC for Naira abuse. They were charged to court and convicted.
News
$1.43m scam: Ajudua on the run as Supreme Court orders his return to prison

The Supreme Court has ordered the immediate remand of Lagos-based businessman and socialite, Fred Ajudua, in connection with a $1.43 million fraud case dating back over three decades.
In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the apex court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal, which had earlier granted Ajudua bail.
The court held that the appellate court erred in its judgment and directed that Ajudua be returned to correctional custody without delay.
It was learned that Ajudua is now in hiding following the court’s decision.
“Ajudua escaped after the Supreme Court ordered that he should be returned to prison,”, a source disclosed and its currently unclear if he is still in Nigeria.
The case, which has spanned more than 30 years, stems from allegations that Ajudua defrauded a German company of $1.43 million through an advance fee fraud scheme—commonly referred to as a “419” scam in Nigeria.
A letter dated August 26, 1993, from the Embassy of the State of Palestine accused Ajudua of obtaining the funds under false pretence from one Ziad Abu Zalaf, a Palestinian businessman based in Germany. The funds were allegedly siphoned under the pretext of business transactions with Nigerian government agencies.
It was gathered that Ajudua and his accomplice, Mr. Joseph Ochunor, fraudulently collected sums of $268,000 and $225,000 from Zalaf on April 2 and May 12, 1993, respectively. They forged official documents, including receipts from the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, to make the transactions appear legitimate.
Following an extensive investigation, a 12-count charge was filed against Ajudua before the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja. Initially arraigned before Justice Josephine Oyefeso, the case was later reassigned to Justice Mojisola Dada following a refiling of charges.
Ajudua’s lawyer, Olalekan Ojo (SAN), later approached the Court of Appeal, where a panel led by Justice Mohammed Garba granted bail on the grounds of constitutional rights and allowed the businessman to continue under his existing bail terms.
However, In its decision on appeal number SC/CR/51/2019, the Supreme Court, through Justice Chioma Nwosu-Iheme, ruled that the Court of Appeal acted outside its jurisdiction by granting bail after striking out Ajudua’s brief of argument for incompetence. The apex court held that any judgment or relief stemming from such a defective brief was legally void.
The Supreme Court further ordered that trial resume before Justice Dada of the Lagos State High Court without further delay.
-
News23 hours ago
Go home to face corruption probe, protesters in London tell Kyari (Photos)
-
News19 hours ago
UK unions slam Govt’s decision to end care worker visas
-
News9 hours ago
US revokes governor’s visa
-
News38 minutes ago
Just in: Another major headache as 3 PDP senators defect to APC
-
News10 hours ago
2nd Anniversary: Tinubu to commission Abuja International Conference Centre – Wike
-
News18 hours ago
SAD! Woman, child electrocuted in Edo
-
Metro9 hours ago
Tension in Ondo community as herdsman dies in clash with vigilance group
-
News9 hours ago
Taraba Woos Global Investors Ahead of Landmark Economic Summit