Politics
Switch to Parliamentary system : We cannot change our system of governance the way we switch from foreign football coach to local -Senator Osunbor tells advocates
…so far so good presidential system has fared better in 29years
…wonders why Senate President, Speaker, media refer to NASS as parliament
Former Governor of Edo State, Senator Oserheimen Osunbor has said the switch from presidential to Parliamentary system of governance being advanced by some Nigerians fails the test of logic and scientific analysis.
The two term senator also wondered why the Nigerian media, Senate President, Speaker refer to National Assembly as Parliament.
Osunbor, a Professor of Law made this disclosure in a chat with journalists in Abuja on Friday.
He said: “It seems to me that most of those advocating the adoption of the parliamentary system are not aware or have forgotten that Nigeria started off in 1960 with a parliamentary system .
“The weakness of that system contributed largely to the collapse of the First Republic,after only five years, in January 1966. By contrast, the presidential system has been practiced for about 29 years now. On this score alone the presidential system has obviously fared better and proved superior to the parliamentary system.
” For them to be persuasive, those calling for the return to the failed parliamentary system should show that they understand the flaws that led to the collapse of the system in the First Republic and convince Nigerians that those weaknesses will not recur.
“Unfortunately, the advocates are not engaging in such logical scrutiny but are simply being sentimental and unscientific in voicing their preference for the parliamentary system.
” The reasons commonly advanced in support of the parliamentary system are firstly , that it is cheaper to operate. Secondly, that the presidential system breeds pseudo-dictatorship as it confers too much powers on the President and Governors.
Osunbor further explained that it is the Nigerian people that make the presidential system expensive and turn executive office holders into pseudo-dictators. Even if we were to return to the parliamentary system the same elected office holders will continue to approve for themselves outrageous emoluments and bogus allowances.
“A Prime Minister and Ministers can still become autocratic if the society accepts or encourages it.
” Example of this can be drawn from some countries that operate the parliamentary system. First Republic Minister of Finance, Festus Okotie- Eboh, was reputed to be very flamboyant, if not extravagant and that was under the parliamentary system.
“Operation Wetie” in Western region and events leading to the Nigerian civil war happened under the parliamentary system.
” Or have we forgotten parliamentarians, some of them illiterate, that rode in the longest American Pontiac that guzzled petrol at 8 miles per gallon.
” I personally have strong reservation against continuous experimentation with our system of governance with attendant political Instability without sound well thought – out reasons. We should not reduce governance to our style of football administration that oscillates like a pendulum from local coach to foreign coach and back to local coach without any improvement on our performance.
“As the immediate past foreign coach G.Rohr, and others before him, have revealed, the main problem with our football performance is lack of commitment, dedication and indiscipline. It has nothing to do with the colour of the skin of the coach. It is about our attitude as Nigerians.
” On a related matter, I cannot understand why many Nigerians, including the media, now refer to our National Assembly as parliament. Even the Senate President and Senators refer to the Senate as parliament. Same with the speaker and members of the House of Representatives.
Whereas the constitution empowers them to enact an Act of the NASS, many of them assert that they’ve passed an Act of Parliament.
The 1963 Constitution , in chapter 5 , vested legislative powers in parliament created in Section 41 thereof but that constitution is now defunct. In its place we now have the 1999 Constitution which, in section 4 , vested legislative powers in a National Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives, not Parliament.
“There is no reference to “Parliament ” in our current Constitution. I cannot understand why people choose to use a name outside our constitution. The U.S. has a congress, Britain has a parliament and Nigeria has a National Assembly. Is
this too difficult to understand?
Rather than call themselves “this parliament” Senators can say “this Senate” or “this Chamber”. Members of the HoR can say “this House” or “this Chamber”.
” Referring to the National Assembly or each of its two Houses as “Parliament” creates an erroneous impression that we run a parliamentary system.
This can be confusing to many especially foreigners who are not familiar with our constitution. I have had occasion in the past to explain the correct position to a foreign expert who had been under the wrong impression that we operate a hybrid system of the French model due to the indiscriminate use of the term “Parliament” by Nigerians.
” Without changing our attitude to governance we will be perpetually going round in circles by continuously changing from one constitution to another or from one system of governance to another.
Politics
Ganduje tackles Obi as APC spokesman receives 200 death threats
The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, Dr Abdullahi Ganduje on Wednesday threw his weight behind the embattled National Publicity Secretary of the APC, Felix Morka.
Ganduje also described claims attributed to the Labour Party presidential candidate in the 2023 election, Peter Obi, as misleading, an act he said incited his online supporters to troll Morka.
He disclosed this in a statement personally signed by him in Abuja.
His clarification comes a few hours after the APC spokesman claimed that he and his family received 200 death threats over his inflammatory remarks from pro-Obi supporters.
Morka alleged that the threats were triggered by Obi’s accusation that his remarks during a Sunday interview on Arise Television constituted a threat to the Labour Party candidate’s life.
Morka’s earlier interview on Sunday sparked an outrage after he accused Obi of “crossing the line” in his criticism of President Bola Tinubu’s administration, asserting that Obi “deserved whatever came his way.”
His inflammatory remarks prompted Obi to tweet, asking Nigerians if he had truly crossed the line by attempting to the Tinubu’s administration accountable to the people.
Morka, on Wednesday, claimed that Obi’s supporters were after him, allegedly sending 400 threats, including 200 death threats.
Morka said, “Peter Obi’s allegations that my words in that interview threatened his life have triggered serious consequences.
“As of now, I have documented 400 threats, about 200 of which are explicit death threats. These are written threats that I will be submitting to law enforcement agencies.
“In these messages, individuals have detailed how they plan to harm me—threatening to shoot me, behead me, and carry out other gruesome acts. This is not mere rhetoric. It has even extended to direct threats against some members of my family. These are explicit and graphic threats, not vague insinuations.
“This entire situation is baseless and cannot be attributed to me. I did not threaten Peter Obi in any way. Those issuing these threats are acting on their own, but I trust that law enforcement will respond swiftly to bring them to justice.”
Ganduje, throwing his weight behind Morka on Wednesday, accused Obi of inciting an online mob against the ruling party.
Ganduje said, “By falsely claiming that Morka threatened his life, Mr Obi has libelled him in the extreme and incited his online supporters to issue death threats against Morka and his family.
“Morka’s comments during the interview were strictly in response to a question referencing ‘prophets of doom’ and ‘voodoo economics.’ Nothing in his statement constituted or suggested a threat to Obi or anyone else.
“Does Mr Obi expect the APC to fold its arms and allow the opposition to propagate falsehoods without any response?” Ganduje queried.
Ganduje maintained that the APC would continue to counter baseless allegations with facts against the Tinubu-led administration.
Politics
Fear grips APC spokesperson, Morka says ” family received over 400 death threats” after he allegedly threatened Obi
…wants police to arrest those threatening him
Felix Morka, the All Progressive Congress (APC) National Publicity Secretary, has revealed that he and his family have received over 400 death threats following his comments about Labour Party’s former presidential candidate, Peter Obi.
The threats were allegedly sparked by Obi’s accusation that Morka’s remarks during a Sunday interview on Arise Television posed a danger to his life.
Morka shared this in an interview on Arise News on Wednesday, stating, “Peter Obi’s allegations that my words in that interview threatened his life have triggered serious consequences.
“As of now, I have documented 400 threats, about 200 of which are explicit death threats. These are written threats that I will be submitting to law enforcement agencies.”
He continued, explaining the graphic nature of the threats: “In these messages, individuals have detailed how they plan to harm me—threatening to shoot me, behead me, and carry out other gruesome acts. This is not mere rhetoric.
“It has even extended to direct threats against some members of my family. These are explicit and graphic threats, not vague insinuations.”
Morka firmly denied any intent to threaten Obi, calling the accusations unfounded.
“This entire situation is baseless and cannot be attributed to me. I did not threaten Peter Obi in any way. Those issuing these threats are acting on their own, but I trust that law enforcement will respond swiftly to bring them to justice,” he stated.
Politics
2027: El-Rufai holds ‘strategic meeting’ with Al-Mustapha, SDP Chairman Gabam, PDP’s Segun Sowunmi
Key political figures, including former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai and allies of ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar, held a private meeting with the leadership of the Social Democratic Party in Abuja on Tuesday.
The closed-door meeting, which took place at the SDP national secretariat, has sparked speculations about potential political realignments ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Among the notable attendees were Maj. Hamza Al-Mustapha an ex-presidential candidate and former Chief Security Officer to the late Gen Sani Abacha and Atiku’s former spokesman, Otunba Segun Showunmi.
Although the specific agenda of the meeting was not disclosed, it is being described as part of a broader strategy to forge alliances among opposition figures with the aim of presenting a formidable challenge to President Bola Tinubu in the next election cycle.
Showunmi confirmed the meeting in a Facebook post, describing it as a “strategic gathering” convened by SDP Chairman, Shehu Gabam, to evaluate the state of opposition politics in Nigeria.
“You must set forth at dawn! A Strategic Meeting was called by HE Shehu Gabam, Chairman of SDP, with HE Nasir El-Rufai, Major Hamza Al-Mustapha, Otunba Segun Showunmi. The alternative to meet, greet, and review the state of opposition democratic engagement in Nigeria,” Showunmi wrote.
The SDP Chairman, Gabam, also confirmed the meeting in an interview with The PUNCH, saying it was a meeting of like-minded individuals seeking to connect with others who shared their vision for Nigeria’s progress.
Gabam stated “There is no official statement from El-Rufai or any one of them about officially joining SDP. So, as I said, they are open to conversation and negotiations for a better Nigeria. It’s not about a political party; it’s about the future of Nigeria.
“We are looking for like-minded people who believe in the future of the country so that we can work together and uplift the individual standard of Nigeria.
“It’s not just them. The attention of the media only went to them. I have received a lot of dignitaries from different political parties in the office, discussing the way forward, how to stabilise the country, and how to offer productive, progressive advice to this government so that there will not be a crisis.
“Because once the government has a crisis, it affects every Nigerian. So, part of our responsibilities is to make sure we are not facing a crisis. When the time comes, we will decide what to do about other things.
“There is an ongoing conversation. When the time comes, we will arrive at a conclusion, and we will hold an official press conference. Once we agree on what we are going to do together, we will unveil it to all Nigerians. But at the preliminary stage, we are having our own social gatherings and discussing national issues.”
Gabam described the SDP as a responsible and respectable party that engaged in constructive opposition without provocation.
“So, principally, that’s what we are doing. More like-minded people are already on board. So today, there are other heavyweights involved, with whom we are discussing. To me, it’s a normal thing, a normal routine that I go through in the office all the time.
“So, it’s a welcome development, not just for those of us that met, but for everyone willing to come on board. SDP is a responsible party by history and analysis, and we will continue to provide decent leadership for Nigeria.
“Our interest is our country first, above any other consideration. We want to have a peaceful country, a well-coordinated country, economic prosperity, political stability for investors, and so on.
“We don’t have any other objective other than that. So we are playing our role as an opposition party, just the way APC played its role and ousted PDP from power,” he added.
The meeting comes just two days after El-Rufai dismissed rumors of his defection from the All Progressives Congress to the Peoples Democratic Party.
On his verified X (formerly Twitter) account, the former governor labelled the reports as “patent lies” and indicated he had instructed his lawyers to pursue legal action against those spreading the misinformation.
“Please disregard the patent lies and rumours about my political affiliation. I have referred the lead peddlers of the fake news for further action by my lawyers,” El-Rufai posted.
A close associate of El-Rufai also refuted the claims, suggesting that such allegations were the work of mischief-makers intent on creating political uncertainty.
The involvement of prominent APC figures like El-Rufai in discussions with SDP leaders has fuelled speculation about potential cracks within the ruling party.
While El-Rufai remains a key figure in the APC, his participation in opposition-related activities is being closely watched by political analysts.
As Nigeria inches toward the 2027 elections, this meeting signals an intensifying effort among opposition groups to consolidate and strategize for a united front against the ruling APC.
-
Metro24 hours ago
Romance scam: Two US-based Nigerians face 40-year jail term
-
News20 hours ago
Elon Musk May Acquire English Premier League Giant
-
News20 hours ago
Tinubu splits Nigerian college of aviation into six campuses across Nigeria
-
News17 hours ago
UK spreads travel entry scheme to US, Canada, Australia
-
News20 hours ago
How God Turned Me From Almajiri Pupil To NNPC CEO – Mele Kyari
-
News17 hours ago
Insecurity! DHQ confirms 6 soldiers dead during ISWAP raid in Borno
-
News10 hours ago
Portugal Football Club Signs on 19-Year-Old Nigerian- born Footballer, Yaqub Usman-Malah
-
News10 hours ago
Nigeria Won’t Break Ties With France Over Niger, Others