News
Trump signs executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship
President Donald Trump directed U.S. government agencies to no longer issue citizenship documentation to babies born in the United States to parents who lack legal status, one of several immigration-related orders he signed in the Oval Office on Monday evening after his inauguration.
Trump’s order seeks to reinterpret the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which grants citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil, a change legal scholars say is illegal and will be quickly challenged in the courts. The birthright order was part of a burst of immigration-related directives aimed at undoing Biden administration policies and wielding obscure presidential powers to launch a broad crackdown along the border and across immigrant communities.
Trump said during his inaugural speech that he will invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime authority, to deploy the “full and immense power of federal and state law enforcement” to eradicate foreign gangs and criminals from the United States. The act has been deployed only three times during conflicts, most recently during World War II, when U.S. officials forced 120,000 Japanese Americans and others to live in prison camps.
“I have no higher responsibility than to defend our country from threats and invasions,” Trump said. “We will do it at a level that nobody has ever seen before.”
He declared a national emergency at the southern border to restart border wall construction and direct the armed forces to provide troops, detention space, transportation, including aircraft, and other services to boost border security.
“All illegal entry will be halted,” he said.
Asylum seekers who made appointments to come to the U.S. border Monday afternoon were blocked at international crossings after Trump officials halted use of the CBP One mobile app, which the Biden administration used as a scheduling tool. Trump also ended all “categorical” parole programs that under President Joe Biden allowed 30,000 migrants per month to enter the country via U.S. airports, bypassing the border, for applicants from Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti and Nicaragua.
Lawmakers gave Trump’s agenda an additional boost Monday evening as a dozen Democratic senators joined Republicans to approve the Laken Riley Act. The bill, named for a Georgia nursing student whose murder by a Venezuelan migrant last year became a cause célèbre for Trump’s campaign, will require U.S. authorities to jail immigrants accused of minor property crimes such as shoplifting. The measure is now headed to the House, where it is expected to pass, and it will probably be the first piece of legislation Trump signs into law.
Trump said that the armed forces have “played a long and well-established role in security U.S. borders,” and he directed the defense secretary to deliver a plan within 10 days that assigns U.S. Northern Command, which oversees operations in the North America, to “seal the borders and maintain the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security of the United States.”
Additional orders directed officials to restart the “Remain in Mexico” policy of Trump’s first term, and to designate drug cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations. Another order suspended refugee admissions — a pause Trump officials said will be in place for four months.
Trump’s rapid-fire decrees have been crafted to immediately put immigration advocates and other opponents on their heels, his aides say. They view his November win as a mandate to order sweeping changes to the U.S. immigration system and said the record influx of unlawful crossings in the first three years of the Biden administration demands bold action.
But lawyers say they have been preparing for months, and many stayed up late Monday night to consider challenges to his orders on birthright citizenship and other issues.
“This is hallmark Trump, doing what he wants, when he wants, how he wants, the U.S. Constitution be damned,” said California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) in an interview Monday. “That’s not how it works in our democracy.”
Trump officials provided few details Monday about how the new policies would correspond with existing federal law, international treaties and ongoing federal litigation. An official also declined to specify when U.S. troops would be sent to the southern border, how many will be involved and the rules of engagement for possible military activity against foreign drug cartels. The official said those details would be worked out by the secretaries of defense and state.
Attempt to end birthright citizenship
The move to end birthright citizenship fulfills a goal long held by conservative groups that say too many migrants are crossing into the United States illegally to have U.S. citizen children. Trump’s order would stop the State Department from issuing passports and direct the Social Security Administration to no longer recognize the babies as U.S. citizens. The order will take effect in the next 30 days.
It is unclear how many U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants are in the United States or are born each year. About 4.4 million U.S.-born children under 18 were living with an undocumented parent in 2022, according to the Pew Research Center. At least 1.4 million adults have parents who are undocumented.
In 2018 and 2019, Trump threatened to sign an order revoking birthright citizenship, but he never did. The Congressional Research Service said then that prevailing legal interpretations held that children of undocumented immigrants are citizens. But the service cautioned that the Supreme Court “has not firmly settled the issue in the modern era.”
The Washington Post analyzed more than 4.1 million U.S. immigration court records from the past decade to find out where migrants come from and where they live once they arrive in the country.
Sending troops to the border
Defense Department officials held discussions last week that sought to keep active-duty forces out of any kind of law enforcement role, a cultural and political land mine that senior military officials have long been keen to avoid because of the damage it could do to the U.S. military as an institution. Defense officials will follow legal orders from the new president, according to one Pentagon official, but must adhere to the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of active-duty troops in domestic law enforcement.
During his first administration, Trump sought to invoke the Insurrection Act to use active-duty forces to help quell domestic unrest after the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Doing so would allow the new Trump administration to use active-duty troops more broadly — and would also immediately be controversial.
Defense officials have typically seen the invocation of the Insurrection Act as a last resort, to be used only when other options are insufficient. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992 to quell rioting in Los Angeles after the acquittal of police officers who had been recorded beating Rodney King.
Shutting down asylum program at southern border
Although illegal border crossings soared to record levels during Biden’s first three years in office, averaging 2 million per year, his team eventually devised a system of incentives and deterrents to encourage more migrants to seek to enter the United States legally by expanding what it called “lawful pathways.”
Biden officials paired those measures with the harshest crackdown along the border by any Democratic administration in memory. They worked with Mexican authorities to arrest migrants traveling north to the U.S. border, and they issued rules essentially barring access to the U.S. immigration system for anyone who entered illegally.
Those policies produced dramatic results in the final year of Biden’s term. Illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border dropped more than 80 percent in 2024. Over the past few weeks, the number of migrants taken into custody along the border has fallen to roughly 1,000 per day, a level far lower than when Trump left office four years ago.
The latest U.S. Customs and Border Protection data shows more migrants seeking to enter at official border crossings, known as ports of entry, than the number apprehended by Border Patrol after crossing illegally.
Among those seeking lawful entry are the roughly 1,450 people per day who have been using the CBP One mobile app to schedule an appointment to make a humanitarian claim. A notice posted Monday to the agency’s website said future appointments have been canceled. The cancellations will affect about 30,000 people, according to two CBP officials not authorized to discuss the change.
Moments after Trump was sworn in, migrants waiting for their appointments on the border bridge between Ciudad Juárez and El Paso logged on to the app and saw this message: “Existing appointments are no longer valid.”
Increasing deportations
During his speech, Trump said his administration will launch a historic deportation campaign and “begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came.” No government estimates have ever published such a number.
Trump aides said the president’s mass deportation campaign would unfold nationwide, targeting immigrants with criminal records and suspected gang ties. Both categories have long been Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s top priorities, but the officials said Trump’s orders will once more give officers broad discretion to arrest anyone living in the United States illegally.
Trump pledged to immediately deport millions of immigrants when he took office in 2017, but he didn’t come close to that goal. ICE carried out 271,000 deportations during the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, the highest total in a decade.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents gather in Alexandria, Virginia, on October 4, 2022 prepare for a pre-dawn raid. (Tom Brenner for The Washington Post)
The Washington Post examined which groups of immigrants could be at higher risk of deportation under the second Trump administration, and what logistical and financial obstacles stand in the way.
Resuming ‘Remain in Mexico’ program
Trump created Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), known as “Remain in Mexico,” in January 2019 amid a surge of migrants arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border without permission, crowding border jails and thwarting his promises to limit migration.
The next year, migration plunged amid the global pandemic, though Republican lawmakers have frequently credited MPP for regaining control over the southern border. Biden considered the program inhumane and suspended it on his first day in office, but Republicans fought in court to reinstate it, though their efforts failed once Mexico refused to take people back.
The Department of Homeland Security said the Biden administration had not enrolled any new border-crossers in the program since August 2022, and it gradually admitted those who were awaiting their hearings into the United States.
On Feb. 6, 2023, weeks after a federal judge in Texas ordered the Biden administration to restart MPP, Mexico ended the debate by announcing that it would no longer participate in the program.
“Regarding the possible implementation of this policy for the third time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on behalf of the Government of Mexico, expresses its rejection of the U.S. government’s intention to return individuals processed under the program to Mexico,” the ministry said in a statement.
News
TUC proposes N2.5m threshold for personal income tax waiver
The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria has called for an increase in the tax exemption threshold from N800,000 to N2.5m per annum to ease economic challenges faced by low-income earners.
The union stressed that this measure would increase disposable income, stimulate economic activity, and provide much-needed relief to workers and their families.
The president of the union, Festus Osifo, made the call in a statement on Tuesday.
He said, “We still have two items that we strongly believe should be reviewed in the tax bills that will immensely benefit Nigerians.
“The threshold for tax exemptions should be increased from the current N800,000 per annum, as proposed in the bill, to N2,500,000 per annum. This will provide relief to struggling Nigerians within that income bracket, easing the excruciating economic challenges they face by increasing their disposable income.”
On the proposed transfer of royalty collection to the Nigeria Revenue Service, the TUC president warned of potential revenue losses and inefficiencies due to the lack of technical expertise in oil and gas operations within the NRS
He said, “The proposed bill assigning royalty collection to the Nigeria Revenue Service appears beneficial on the surface but would most likely result in significant revenue losses for the government. Royalty determination and reconciliation require specialised technical expertise in oil and gas operations, which NUPRC possesses but NRS lacks, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments and enforcement issues.
“Additionally, this shift would create regulatory burdens, increase compliance costs for industry players, and reduce investor confidence due to overlapping functions and inefficiencies between NUPRC and NRS.”
Osifo reiterated that allowing the VAT rate to remain at 7.5 percent was the best for the country.
“Allowing the Value Added Tax rate to remain at 7.5% is in the best interest of the nation, as increasing it would place an additional financial burden on Nigerians, many of whom are already struggling with economic challenges.
“At a time when inflation, unemployment, and the cost of living are rising, imposing higher taxes would further strain households and businesses, potentially slowing economic growth and reducing consumer purchasing power,” Osifo said.
Osifo noted that the union welcomed the inclusion of a derivation component in VAT distribution among the three tiers of government, describing it as a step toward reducing dependence on oil revenues and encouraging sub-national productivity.
He said, “On a general perspective, we welcome the inclusion of a derivation component in the Value Added Tax distribution amongst the three tiers of government. When passed into law and properly implemented, it will encourage productivity at the sub-national level, thereby moving us gradually from a total rent-seeking economy to a derivation-based system that will stimulate economic activities.”
The TUC president said the continued existence of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund and the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure would bring about progress to the nation’s education as well as engender economic development in the country.
He said, “It is also good to note that both TETFUND and NASENI will remain a going concern, as these institutions have greatly impacted the country through their respective mandates. Both have respectively been instrumental in improving our tertiary education and the adoption of homegrown technologies to enhance national productivity and self-reliance. Their continued existence is vital for sustaining progress in education, technology, and economic development across the country.”
However, the union president urged the Federal Government to adopt equitable tax policies that prioritise the welfare of citizens.
He said, “ While we deeply appreciate the Federal Government’s efforts to listen and adjust to our advocacy, we still advocate that the above concerns be considered and adopted in the Tax Reform Bill, they will be highly beneficial to the Government and Nigerian populace.
“The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria has a shared responsibility to promote policies that improve the lives of Nigerians amongst whom are workers. We believe that proactive measures, when implemented, are for the maximum good of the citizens and are evidence of great and sincere leadership. As the conversations around the Tax Reform Bill continue, it is our expectation that the focus would be equitable economic growth and improved living conditions for all Nigerians.”
News
C’River Assembly proposes 50 appointees for LG chairmen
The Cross River State House of Assembly has commenced the process of amending the Local Government Law 2007.
The proposed amendment seeks to increase political appointments across the local government areas.
Sponsored by the lawmaker representing Abi State Constituency, Davies Etta,on Tuesday in Calabar, the bill proposed to raise the number of appointees in each LGA to 50, including 16 Special Adviser positions and the creation of a new cadre of officials known as Ward Relation Officers.
The bill proposes that “The Chairman of Council may appoint such number of Special Advisers to assist him in the discharge of his duties, provided that appointments, when added to other statutory appointments, shall not exceed a total number of 50.”
According to the provisions of the amended law, Ward Relation Officers will hold ranks equivalent to Special Advisers and will report directly to the LG chairman of the respective local government areas.
The lawmaker explained that initiative aims to enhance grassroots engagement and governance at the ward level.
The bill also seeks to elevate the office of the Head of Local Government Administration to the status of a Permanent Secretary in the state public service.
It proposed that“The office of the HOLGA shall be equivalent to the Office of a Permanent Secretary of the State Public Service and shall enjoy all rights and privileges of the Permanent Secretary, including pensions.”
Additionally, the amendment stipulated that appointments to the position of HOLGA must not be made from outside the local government service of the state.
The bill, which has already passed its first and second readings in the House, has been referred to the Joint Committee on Local Government Affairs, Judiciary, and Public Accounts for further deliberations and stakeholders’ inputs.
Speaking on the bill, the Speaker of the Cross River State House of Assembly, Elvert Ayambem, said it aimed to strengthen local government administration by fostering inclusivity and empowering grassroots leaders to contribute more effectively to governance.
“This amendment is about bridging the gap between local governments and the people by making governance more accessible and impactful,” he stated.
Meanwhile, the Assembly, on Tuesday, urged the Ministry of Environment and relevant animal control agencies to address the issue of unrestrained domestic animals within the Calabar metropolis.
The House emphasised the need for owners to take responsibility for restraining their animals to prevent them from roaming the streets.
This resolution followed a motion presented by Ovat Agbor, representing Obubra 1 State Constituency.
Agbor called for the sanitisation of the city, lamenting that stray animals such as goats, sheep, and cattle pose a nuisance by littering streets, destroying gardens, and defacing greenery intended to beautify the state.
Agbor also highlighted the dangers posed by stray animals, citing a recent incident where a stray dog attacked a schoolboy, inflicting severe injuries.
He stressed that it is the owners’ responsibility to care for and confine their animals.
Hillary Bisong, representing Boki 2 State Constituency, supported the motion, and described the trend as detrimental to the state’s tourism potential.
Other lawmakers echoed similar concerns and urged swift action to control the situation.
In his remarks, the Speaker described the motion as timely and reaffirmed the House’s commitment to maintaining Calabar’s status as Nigeria’s cleanest city.
News
Court denies El-Rufai’s ex-Chief of Staff Saidu bail
A Federal high court in Kaduna State has rejected a bail request from Bashir Saidu, who served as chief of staff and Finance Commissioner under former Governor Nasir El-Rufai.
Police arrested Saidu on January 2nd, 2025, moving him to the Kaduna correctional centre. He faces 10 charges of money laundering, embezzlement, and stealing public funds from the Kaduna State Government.
According to Channels TV report, when Saidu appeared before Justice Isa Aliyu on Tuesday, he denied all charges. The prosecution claims Saidu sold $45 million of state funds at N410 per dollar instead of the market rate of N498, causing the government to lose N3.9 billion. They say this happened in 2022 while he managed Kaduna’s finances under El-Rufai. Prosecutors argue Saidu laundered this N3.9 billion difference, breaking Section 18 of the Money Laundering Act 2022.
Saidu’s lawyer, M I Abubakar, pressed for bail, noting his client had spent 21 days in custody. But prosecutor Professor Nasiru Aliyu fought back, saying the law gives prosecutors seven days to answer bail requests.
Justice Aliyu agreed with the prosecution, granting them time to respond. The court will hear the bail application on January 23rd, 2025.
-
News18 hours ago
Court orders immediate arrest of Access Bank’s Ag MD, others for theft, contempt
-
News17 hours ago
Barron Trump: Meet 18-year-old ‘possible heir’ to US President’s dynasty
-
News19 hours ago
Israeli far-right minister thanks Trump for revoking US sanctions on settlers
-
News15 hours ago
Just in: Police nab pastor after discovering python, buried casket in church altar
-
Metro17 hours ago
Ex-convict caught with human skull in Ogun burial ground
-
News9 hours ago
Reps Reject Coastal Guard Proposal, Call for Enhanced Navy Funding
-
News9 hours ago
Finance Ministry Seeks Upward Review Of N25bn In 2025 Budget Allocation
-
News18 hours ago
WHO calls for dialogue as Trump announces US withdrawal