Connect with us

Foreign

‘Evil’ Southport killer jailed for minimum 52 years

Published

on

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana has been sentenced to a minimum of 52 years for the “sadistic” murders of three young girls in an attack described as “shocking” and “pure evil”.

Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, Bebe King, six, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, died while eight other children and two adults – dance class leader Leanne Lucas and businessman Jonathan Hayes – were seriously wounded.

The 18-year-old refused to come into the courtroom as he was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court, having been removed from the dock earlier due to disruptive behaviour – which included demands to see a paramedic and shouts of “I feel ill”.

Sentencing him, judge Mr Justice Goose said: “Many who have heard the evidence might describe what he did as evil, who could dispute it?”

Advertisement

Earlier, the details of Rudakubana’s crimes were laid out in court for the first time in graphic detail – including CCTV and dashboard camera footage from outside the Hart Space studios on Hart Street.

The court heard how, just after 11:45 BST on 29 July, Rudakubana moved through the sold-out Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop, organised by Ms Lucas, “systematically” stabbing young girls as they sat making friendship bracelets and singing along to Swift’s music.

Prosecutor Deanna Heer KC also described how Rudakubana gloated about the attacks as he was escorted through Copy Lane police station after his arrest – saying he was “glad the children were dead”.

The teenager had booked a taxi to take him to Hart Street after leaving his home in Old School Close, Banks, west Lancashire, at 11:10 BST, the court was told.

Advertisement

Ms Heer played footage of Rudakubana asking the driver to point him to the address of the dance class – before getting out without paying.

The driver’s dashboard camera also captured Rudakubana walk up the stairs of the Hart Space building to the first-floor studio which had 26 children, Ms Lucas, and her colleague and friend Heidi Liddle inside.

Seconds later, the sounds of screaming children filled the courtroom and the footage showed girls streaming out of the Hart Space dance studio.

The families of the victims cried in the public gallery as Ms Heer played footage of three of the girls staggering into the street and collapsing – including two of the survivors and Alice.

Advertisement

Unlike Bebe and Elsie Dot, Alice had managed to get out of the building despite her grave injuries, but collapsed by the car of a woman who had arrived to pick up her daughter.

Inside the studio, Bebe had been subjected to 122 knife wounds, while Elsie Dot had 85.

Ms Liddle and one other child were hiding in a locked toilet on a landing outside – Ms Liddle later describing how she realised that some of the children had not escaped when she heard them begging Rudakubana to stop.

The police arrived at Hart Street shortly before 11:59 BST – three officers and a member of the public, window-cleaner Joel Verite, charged up those stairs to find Rudakubana stood over the body of Bebe King holding a knife.

Advertisement

Police body-camera footage showed him tackled to the floor as Mr Verite shouted in utter shock and horror at the injuries he saw had been inflicted on Bebe.

A short time later Ms Liddle and the child hiding with her were seen sobbing in terror and relief as the police told them it was safe to emerge.

‘We were easy prey’

One of the survivors, a seven-year-old girl referred to as Child A, had been pulled back inside the building by Rudakubana as she tried to escape and was stabbed repeatedly, before managing to stagger into the street where she fell to the ground.

Advertisement

A statement written by the mother of Child A, read by Ms Heer, said her father had been “broken” by what happened to his daughter.

“Our daughter has not only experienced the most violent, frenzied attack on her body, but she’s witnessed so much horror too.”

The leader of the dance class, Ms Lucas, who read her statement in court, looked around the packed courtroom at the family members of fellow victims and survivors as she spoke.

She said: “He targeted us because we were women and girls, vulnerable and easy prey.

Advertisement

“To discover that he had always set out to hurt the vulnerable is beyond comprehensible.

“For Alice, Elsie, Bebe, Heidi and the surviving girls, I’m surviving for you.”

Victim impact statements were also read out by Ms Heer, in which the grieving families of two of the murder victims branded their daughters’ killer as “pure evil” and said his actions had have left them in “continuous pain”.

Stan Reiz KC, mitigating, told the court Rudakubana had appeared to have been a “normal child” until he reached 13.

Advertisement

Mr Reiz said: “There is no psychiatric evidence before the court that could suggest that a mental disorder contributed to the defendant’s actions.

“However, he did make a transition from a normal, well-disciplined child to someone who was capable of committing acts of such shocking and senseless violence.”

In his sentencing remarks, Justice Goose said: “I am sure Rudakubana had the settled determination to carry out these offences and had he been able to, he would have killed each and every child – all 26 of them.”

Justice Goose confirmed the offences did not reach the legal definition of terrorism because he did not kill to further a political, religious or ideological cause.

Advertisement

However, he told the packed courtroom that whether the “motivation was terrorism or not misses the point”.

“What he did on 29 July last year has caused such shock and revulsion to the whole nation, that it must be viewed as being at the extreme level of crime”, the judge said.

“His culpability, and the harm he caused and intended, were at the highest.”

Rudakubana was sentenced for three counts of murder, 10 of attempted murder, one of producing the biological toxin ricin and one of possession of an Al Qaeda training manual, an offence under the Terrorism Act.

Advertisement

In a statement after the hearing, Elsie’s family offered their gratitude to the emergency services who responded to the incident.

“We are so thankful for their bravery, compassion and strength which should serve as an inspiration to everybody,” they said.

The family also thanked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, King Charles and the Prince and Princess of Wales for arranging private meetings where they offered their condolences.

Earlier, the prime minister said “the thoughts of the entire nation” were with the families of Rudakubana’s victims.

Advertisement

Sir Keir said: “I want to say directly to the survivors, families and community of Southport – you are not alone. We stand with you in your grief.

“What happened in Southport was an atrocity and as the judge has stated, this vile offender will likely never be released.

“After one of the most harrowing moments in our country’s history we owe it to these innocent young girls and all those affected to deliver the change that they deserve.”

Credit: BBC

Advertisement

Foreign

Trump defends plan to use Qatari luxury jet for Air Force One

Published

on

By

US President Donald Trump has defended the White House plan to receive a luxury jumbo jet from Qatar to be used as America’s Air Force One presidential plane.

“They’re giving us a gift,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday, adding that he would be “a stupid person” if he did not accept it.

In an earlier statement, a Qatari spokesman said it would be “inaccurate” to refer to the plane as a gift. He said the transfer of an aircraft for “temporary use” was under discussion between the two countries.

The news comes as Trump is set to visit Qatar this week as part of the first major foreign trip of his second term.

Advertisement

Speaking on Monday, Trump said that the US had helped the other country “a lot over the years in terms of security and safety” and that he had “a lot of respect for the leadership” of the country.

He went on to say it would be a “very nice gesture” if Qatar provided the US with a Boeing jet while his government continued to wait for two new ones to be provided directly by Boeing itself.

The potential value of the plane and its handling has raised legal and ethical questions among critics on the political left and right.

The US Constitution has a provision known as the Emoluments Clause, which restricts what gifts US presidents can accept from foreign governments. It was designed to prevent leaders from becoming beholden to foreign governments.

Advertisement

On social media, Democratic Senator Adam Schiff from California quoted a section of the US Constitution that said no elected official could accept “any present… of any kind whatever” from the leader of a foreign state without congressional approval.

Congressman Ritchie Torres, a New York Democrat, called on the Government Accountability Office to investigate, saying the plane could “constitute the most valuable gift ever conferred on a president by a foreign government”.

But there was criticism, too, from some of Trump’s staunchest supporters.

Daily Wire podcaster Ben Shapiro lambasted the plane deal on Monday as “skeezy”.

Advertisement

“Is this good for President Trump?” Shapiro said. “Is it good for his agenda? Is it good for draining the swamp and getting things done? The answer is no, it isn’t.”

Far-right influencer Laura Loomer also criticised the move. She posted to say she would “take a bullet” for the president, but that any decision to accept the jet would be “such a stain” on the administration.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Sunday that “any gift given by a foreign government is always accepted in full compliance with all applicable laws. President Trump’s administration is committed to full transparency”.

The White House’s current fleet includes two Boeing 747-200B planes customised for presidential use with special communications equipment and features like a state room, office and conference room. The planes have been in use since 1990 and 1991.

Advertisement

Qatar is said to be offering a version of a Boeing 747-8, a much newer model that ABC News reports has been upgraded into a “flying palace”.

The plane, reported to be worth about $400m (£303m), would not be ready for use right away if provided to the US, as it would need to be retrofitted and cleared by security officials, sources told CBS, the BBC’s US partner.

Boeing has already been contracted to directly provide the White House with two 747-8s directly, but Trump complained earlier this year that the firm was behind schedule.

His team negotiated to receive these during his first term in office, though Boeing has cautioned that they will not be available for two or three more years.

Advertisement

Qatar – a country with which Trump has long had a positive relationship – has also previously given private jets as gifts to other countries, including Turkey.

This would not be the first Trump-related deal with Qatar. Last month, his company signed a deal to build a luxury golf resort there, marking its first foreign deal since the Republican returned to office in January.

According to CBS, the plane that Trump could acquire would be donated at the end of his term to his presidential library, which is a collection of artefacts related to a US leader’s time in office.

Air Force One planes usually carry over to other administrations. According to the National Archives, only the presidential library for Ronald Reagan has an Air Force One jet.

Advertisement

Trump, a businessman-turned-president, has been no stranger to conflict-of-interest accusations since taking office in 2017. During his first term, critics accused him of enriching himself in a number of ways, including through his hotel in Washington DC. A lawsuit followed, but was never concluded.

Commenting on the potential transfer of the plane, David Super, a law professor at Georgetown University, told the BBC: “It certainly stinks, but formally it’s a transfer to the [US] government, not the office holder.”

However, the jet could be viewed as an illegal personal gift to Trump if he is able to use it in his private life after leaving office, Prof Super added.

As for who could protest such a move – Congress could pass a resolution denouncing it, said Prof Super, albeit this would be unlikely given the Republican dominance on Capitol Hill, and it would not stop the actual transfer.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Foreign

Why Popes Change Their Name and What Is the Significance of Leo XIV

Published

on

By

The world watched as white smoke rose from the Sistine Chapel, signaling the election of a new pope: Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, now known as Pope Leo XIV. While the ceremonial elements of his ascension were rich in tradition, one symbolic gesture stood out—the choice of his papal name.

The decision to adopt a new name upon becoming pope is far more than a formality. It is a profound act rooted in centuries of Catholic history, carrying theological, historical, and pastoral significance. As the Church welcomes its new leader, attention turns to the name Leo XIV, and what it could mean for the future of global Catholicism.

Why Do Popes Change Their Names?

Though not mandated by Church law, changing one’s name upon papal election has become a long-standing tradition in the Roman Catholic Church. The practice began in 533 AD when Pope John II renounced his birth name, Mercurius, which had pagan roots.

Advertisement

Key reasons popes change their names:

Symbolic rebirth as the spiritual head of the Catholic Church
A chance to align with a legacy or emulate a previous pope or saint
To communicate the themes and direction of their papacy

Much like biblical figures—such as Saul becoming Paul or Simon renamed Peter—the new name represents a divine calling and transformation.

 Historical Origins of Papal Name Changes

Advertisement

The first recorded instance of a papal name change, by Pope John II, set a precedent for future pontiffs. Over time, the tradition became entrenched as a way for popes to:

Distance themselves from controversial associations
Embrace names that resonate with spiritual reform
Adopt titles that offer reassurance during turbulent times

Fewer than 10 popes have retained their birth names. For instance, Pope Marcellus II in 1555 and Adrian VI in 1522 are rare examples who did not alter theirs.

The Significance of the Name “Leo XIV”

Advertisement

The newly elected pope’s decision to take the name Leo XIV is rich with meaning and draws directly from Pope Leo XIII, a pivotal figure in Church history.

Key Associations with the Name Leo:

Pope Leo I (Leo the Great): Strengthened papal authority and defended Rome from invaders
Pope Leo XIII: Known for championing social justice, workers’ rights, and engaging with the modern world through the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum

By aligning with this legacy, Pope Leo XIV signals an intention to:

Advertisement

Address global inequality and labor conditions
Tackle modern ethical dilemmas, such as artificial intelligence and climate change
Foster dialogue within the Church and across faiths

His name implies a strong, reform-driven leadership, rooted in both tradition and progress.

Who Is Pope Leo XIV?

Born Robert Francis Prevost in Chicago, USA, Pope Leo XIV is the first American pope in the history of the Catholic Church.

Advertisement

Background Highlights:

Born in 1955, former Augustinian priest
Served as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, where he advocated for indigenous rights and pastoral outreach
Most recently led the Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops, overseeing global bishop appointments

His selection reflects a shift towards a more globally representative papacy, echoing the reach of Pope Francis, his immediate predecessor.

Are Any Papal Names Off-Limits?

Advertisement

While there is no official list of banned names, tradition discourages certain choices.

The name Peter II has never been used, out of reverence for Saint Peter, the first pope, and due to apocalyptic prophecies suggesting “Peter the Roman” will be the last pope.
Names associated with controversial historical figures, like Urban VIII (linked to the persecution of Galileo), are also typically avoided.
 How the Name Is Announced

Following the conclave’s decision, the senior cardinal deacon appears on the central balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica to deliver the iconic Latin phrase:

“Habemus Papam – We have a pope!”

Advertisement

The full announcement includes:

The pope’s baptismal name, translated into Latin
His newly chosen papal name
The traditional final word: “Franciscum” (or the new name, in Latin)

In the case of Pope Leo XIV:

“Robert Francis Prevost” was presented in Latin as Robertum Franciscum
His papal name was announced as Leo Quartus Decimus
📊 Most Popular Papal Names in History

Advertisement

Some names carry more weight due to frequent use and historic success:

Papal Name Number of Popes
John 21
Gregory 16
Benedict 15
Leo 14 (with Leo XIV)
Innocent 13

The name Francis, chosen uniquely in 2013, marked the first usage in papal history, breaking a pattern that had lasted over 1,000 years.

What This Means for the Church

Advertisement

Pope Leo XIV is expected to prioritize:

Social justice and protection of the poor
Ethical debates around technology and artificial intelligence
Greater involvement of the Global South in Church leadership
Environmental stewardship and climate action

His papacy begins at a time of profound challenge and transformation for the Church, and his name hints at a bold, reformist agenda balanced by theological consistency.

Conclusion: A Name That Signals Direction

Advertisement

The name Leo XIV is more than a formality—it’s a powerful declaration of intention, alignment, and inspiration. As Pope Leo XIV steps into one of the world’s most influential spiritual roles, his choice pays homage to the Church’s past while casting a hopeful vision for its future.

From American roots to global responsibilities, his leadership may well define Catholicism’s engagement with the modern world for decades to come.

Continue Reading

Foreign

Pope Leo XIV, celebrates first Mass, wants Church to be beacon of light

Published

on

By

Pope Leo XIV celebrated his first Mass on Friday in the Sistine Chapel where he was elected less than 24 hours earlier, warning of the dangers caused by a lack of faith and hoping the Catholic Church could be a beacon lighting the world’s “dark nights”.

Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost and the first U.S. pope, looked calm as he delivered the Mass in the famous, frescoed chapel with the same cardinals who chose him to be the 267th pontiff and the successor to Pope Francis.

Dressed in relatively simple white and gold vestments, Leo, who was born in Chicago but spent two decades as a missionary in Peru, said a few words in English before continuing his homily in fluent Italian.

In the homily, Leo, 69, painted a picture of the Church he would like to see, saying he would seek to serve as the “faithful administrator” for the Church as a whole.

Advertisement

The new pope, who leads 1.4 billion Catholics around the world, acknowledged that the Christian faith is sometimes “considered absurd” and the preserve of “the weak and unintelligent”.

“A lack of faith is often tragically accompanied by the loss of meaning in life, the neglect of mercy, appalling violations of human dignity, the crisis of the family and so many other wounds that afflict our society,” he said.

MAY 18 INAUGURATION
An inauguration Mass for Leo will be held in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday May 18, the Vatican said.

World and religious leaders are invited to the inauguration, which marks the formal launch of a papacy. Pope Francis’ inauguration in 2013 attracted a crowd estimated at 200,000 people.

Advertisement

The new pope will also leave senior Vatican officials in their roles for the time being, giving him time to decide before making definitive appointments, the Vatican said.

All Vatican senior officials, appointed for five-year terms, serve at the pleasure of the pope. A new pontiff usually rolls over existing mandates at least initially before deciding whether to change key positions.

The pope was elected at the end of a two-day conclave that was wrapped up on Thursday evening when white smoke billowed from the chimney on the Sistine Chapel.

Item 1 of 8 Pope Leo XIV conducts Mass in the Sistine Chapel at the Vatican, May 9, 2025. Vatican Media/Simone Risoluti ­Handout via REUTERS

Advertisement

Given the nature of the conclaves, when cardinals are shut away from the world and sworn to secrecy, little or nothing is likely to emerge – at least for now – about how Leo obtained the required two-thirds majority of the vote so swiftly.

The successor to Pope Francis, who died last month at the age of 88, inherits a number of major challenges, ranging from a budget shortfall to divisions over whether the Church should be more welcoming towards the LGBT community and divorcees, and should let women play a greater role in its affairs.

He will also have a packed agenda, with the Vatican celebrating a Holy Year that brings millions of additional tourists to Rome.

THE FIRST US POPE
Before Leo’s election, U.S. cardinals had largely been written off as papal contenders because of a widespread assumption that the global Church could not be run by a superpower pope.

Advertisement

However, he also holds Peruvian citizenship, meaning that he has deep knowledge of both the West and less developed nations.

U.S. President Donald Trump was quick to congratulate Leo. However, the new pope has a history of criticizing Trump and Vice President JD Vance’s policies, according to posts on the X account of Robert Prevost.

Leo worked for decades in the north of Peru, first as a missionary and later as Bishop of Chiclayo from 2015 to 2023. Catholics took to the streets of the small city in northwestern Peru, and church bells rang out to celebrate the election of a man who they embrace as one of their own.

One of the clues to what kind of a Church leader Leo will be was in his choice of name. The last pope with this name was Leo XIII, who led the Church from 1878-1903. He was known for his devoted focus to social justice issues.

Advertisement

Prevost became a cardinal only in 2023. He has given few media interviews and is known to have a shy personality.

Francis brought him to Rome two years ago to head the Vatican office in charge of choosing which priests should serve as Catholic bishops, meaning he has had a hand in selecting many of the world’s bishops.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News