News
Obasa’s removal constitutional – Mamora, ex-Lagos Speaker
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffb27/ffb27855de16213a7699be6f9784379435b04a29" alt=""
Former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, and a Minister, Olorunnibe Mamora, has described the removal of the immediate past Speaker of the Lagos Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, as constitutional.
This is coming on the heels of Obasa maintaining that his removal as Speaker was unconstitutional, saying that the due process was not followed.
Mamora was the former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, from 1999 to 2003. He represented Lagos East Senatorial District from 2003 to 2011, Minister of State for Health from 2019 to 2022, and the Minister of Science and Technology from 2022 to 2023 under the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari.
Recall that Obasa was removed by 35 out of the 40 members of the assembly on January 13, 2025 over allegations of misconduct and mismanagement of funds and replaced with his former Deputy, Mojisola Lasbat-Meranda.
Obasa, spoke on Saturday amid cheers from members of Mandate Movement and politicians from some local governments in the state at the official residence of the Lagos Speaker in GRA, Ikeja.
The former speaker stressed that the allegations made against him by the lawmakers could not be substantiated, and that he is the most experienced lawmaker in the assembly having been elected six times since 2003.
Mamora speaks
Speaking exclusively with Vanguard, Mamora explained, “He who must come to equity must come with clean hands. That’s my position. I like legislature a lot.
“Let me correct the impression. I have heard people say this in media discourse. If you look at the constitution you would not find impeachment. What you find is removal. There is difference between removal and impeachment.
“Impeachment connotes bringing allegations of wrong doing formally, in presenting before an offending public officer that is impeachment.
“That is when a formal presentation of allegations of wrong doing is presented to a public officer that is impeachment.
“But allegation do not necessary amount to guilt. It only says that these are the allegations that have been brought formally, which the officer has to respond to, that is impeachment.
“If you are now convicted on the basis of allegations and a kind of sentence is passed. They may be spurious, that is they can not be really established. So, they remain allegations.
But when allegations are established leading to kind of sentence, then it may lead to removal. Allegations brought against you through impeachment may not necessary lead to remobval.
For example, President Clinton was impeached over Lewinsky, was he removed. No. He was impeached not removed. By their own constitution it’s the house that will bring impeachment notice, But, the final stage will be by the Senate. It got to the Senate it ws defeated.
But our own constitution does not talk of impeachment in any case, what we have is removal of the President, governor or the Speaker.
The removal of a Speaker in the House of Assembly is or the National Assembly or Senate President is simple.
“What I mean by that is that once members bring a motion that is supported by the two third of members then the speaker or at thje national level vacate the seat, that’s all. It does not even say you should explain. It is just a simple process.
“Because, the speaker, is just first among equals. That is why the process for the removal of the Speaker or Senate President is different from the removal of Mr. Governor, deputy Governor or President, or Vice President.
“Because in the case of the Governor, it is the whole state that voted to put him in office that is why the procedure for his or her removal is a complex process.
The allegations must be supported by one third to be brought and served notice on the holder of the office, wait for his or her response. set up a panel, report comes back to the house and the house come with a two third majority of the house. So you see it’s a complex process.
“But for the speaker, you just sat down, because the speaker is elected by simple majority but the constitution says by two third majority of the house, Speaker can be removed. The Constitution does not even say you should state the allegations.
It only says if you have the support of not less than two third majority of the members, in support of the motion for the removal of the speaker supported by not less than two third, and the speaker vacates. It dis not even say yiu should confront him with the allegations.
Impeachment on Obasa, Constitutional
“Obasa was impeached and removed because there was a presentation which I watched on television. There was presentation of allegations against him. And it was on the basis of the allegations that the house decided to remove him.
“We need to get it clear. What we do here is that we use the word impeachment and removal inter-changeably as they are the same. I need to correct that.
“There could be impeachment without removal. The constitution under section 92, sub section two or thereabout talks of removal that the speaker shall vacate if a motion is presented supported by two third of members. That’s all.
So, allegations were presented against Obasa and on that basis the members went ahead to remove him in consonant with the section 92 of the constitution. So, the removal of Obasa is constitutional.
“If the allegations as read out on the floor of the assembly were true,, am not in the position to determine the veracity because am not a member of the assembly, but as presented by movers of that motion, if they were right then they would be justified to do what they did.
Disrespecting the office of Governor
“I heard of the allegation of Obasa disrespecting the office of the governor and of its true it won’t be right to do that. The Governor remains the number one person of the state as the chief executive. I would not expect the speaker to be rude or show disrespect to the governor of the state no matter what.
But I can not deny the knowledge of a meeting by the GAC, am not a member of GAC, of the Speaker showing disrespect to the Governor. That will not be right of the speaker if you ask me to disrespect the Governor.”
News
Bodija Explosion: Makinde receives committee report
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02f54/02f5468599d08a5c6acbd464cb9944028b0bd356" alt=""
Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State, on Wednesday, received the report of the Committee on the Management/Disbursement of the Bodija Explosion Relief Fund, noting that the state government will look into the recommendations and implement them as appropriate.
Makinde, who was represented by the Deputy Governor, who also doubles as the chairman of the relief fund committee, Abdulraheem Lawal, said the event that led to the setting up of the committee was sad and avoidable.
The governor noted that the state government responded to the explosion by putting in place several measures, including emergency services and post-explosion support services.
He added that the state had to dig deep into the root cause of the explosion, admonishing residents of the state to continue to be security-conscious and alert. The governor assured that the committee’s report would be implemented to support victims of the explosion and bring some relief to them.
He said: “Immediately the explosion happened at Deji Oyelese Close, Bodija, the Oyo State Government moved in to mitigate the level of damage.
“It also became important for the state government to dig into the root cause of the explosion, which was an unusual incident, particularly in the area where it occurred.
“No one knew that such monumental damage could occur around that high-brow area of Oyo State in Bodija. Nevertheless, we keep learning every day. This is why we must not take for granted the issue of security around us.
“The government put this committee in place, of which I am the Chairman. Let me say clearly that my Principal agreed that I must receive this report and that the government will act on the report.
“So, on behalf of His Excellency, I want to assure you that this report will be looked into quickly and the recommendations therein will be implemented.
“We know that we do not have the luxury of further delay in implementation. We will put in all the efforts required for quick implementation so that victims of the explosion will be assuaged and assisted without further delay.
“I have to thank the committee members for giving their time. The Oyo State Government really appreciates you for the yeoman’s job.”
Speaking earlier, CP Fatai Owoseni (rtd), a member of the committee who stood in for the chairman to present the committee’s report, said the report was in four volumes.
He said: “I stand here on behalf of the chairman of this committee to present the report on the disbursement and management of the Bodija Explosion Relief Fund.
“It would be recalled that His Excellency inaugurated this committee on the 24th of December, 2024. And as the name implies, the committee came up with recommendations on the disbursement and management of the Bodija Explosion Relief Fund.
“Your Excellency, the committee, in its deliberations, factored its work on the report prepared by the trilateral meeting of the Dejo Oyelese Vigilance Group (DOVG), the Bodija Estate Residents Association (BERA), and other experts.
“The report that is being presented to Your Excellency this morning by the committee has four volumes. Volume 1, which is the main report, is divided into eight chapters, and these represent the deliberations and recommendations of the committee.
“Volume 2 of the report represents the trilateral meeting of the DOVG, BERA, and the Nigerian Society of Engineers on the framework for the distribution of government financial support pledged to the affected persons.
“Volume 3 is a reflection of the breakdown of money apportioned to support respective affected persons, while Volume 4 of the report is a detailed pictorial representation and description of damages recorded during the explosion.
“The committee would like to express its gratitude to Your Excellency for the opportunity and the confidence reposed in its members.
“I believe that this report would, aside from being beneficial to affected persons, also serve as a proper guide to the government in the disbursement of the support that has been pledged by His Excellency.”
Also speaking, the president of the Bodija Estate Residents Association, Pastor Muyiwa Bamgbose, said the committee proposed support for different categories of victims, including those who lost loved ones, buildings, vehicles, and other valuables.
He added that the relief fund is a support and not compensation, noting, however, that if the committee’s recommendations are implemented, they will go a long way in assisting the victims.
He said: “We proposed support for different categories of people—for the families of those who lost their lives and those who lost buildings, vehicles, and the rest. So, it varies.
“We recommended different figures depending on what we perceived was the level of effect on each of these people.
“Our expectations are that, like His Excellency said, the implementation will be expedited. We have done due diligence, and what we are presenting will be ready to go.
“We appreciate the expediency that made the state government agree that the Deputy Governor himself should stand in for the governor.
“So, our expectation is that the implementation will be done with expediency.
“On the relief fund, if what we recommended is implemented, there is no doubt that it will help. And don’t forget that it is called support. So, you can’t complain. If it was compensation, you could claim what you lost, but this is a kind of support, and it is something that should be appreciated.
“I know that for those who will receive it, whatever they get will be well appreciated.
“We have shown appreciation to our governor for the treatment of those who were affected during the incident. Our roads are now being done. If we are going to have development, there will be complaints.
“We appreciate what the government has done so far.”
News
FG gives IBEDC 7 days to reinstate 3,000 sacked workers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f821/0f82109a12c1533d70c6eae933ded5c8cc9d113d" alt=""
A seven-day ultimatum has been set by the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment for the management of the Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company (IBEDC) and its outsourcing agency to revisit the decision to dismiss 3,000 workers.
This directive was announced by Mr. Festus Igbinosun, the Oyo State Comptroller of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, after a meeting that involved the management of IBEDC, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), the outsourcing firm, and representatives of the dismissed employees.
Igbinosun said resolving the issues within the time frame would strengthen the industrial harmony in the state.
According to the Oyo State NLC Chairman, NLC, Kayode Martins, the sacking of the workers did not follow due process.
Martins urged IBEDC and the outsourcing firm to reinstate the sacked workers during the renegotiation.
Responding, the representatives of IBEDC and the outsourcing firm agreed to renegotiate the sacking of the workers within the stipulated time.
News
Alleged assault on DSS personnel: Court grants bail to three Lagos Assembly workers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dfcb/6dfcb4646f36353363fa588ad8a2be2dc16a1253" alt=""
Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court in Lagos granted bail on Wednesday to three employees of the Lagos State House of Assembly who are facing charges of assaulting operatives from the Department of State Services (DSS) during the leadership crisis at the assembly complex on February 17.
The accused individuals, Ibrahim Olanrewaju, Adetu Adekunle, and Fatimoh Adetola, received bail after their attorney, Mr. Frank Eke, submitted and argued a motion following their arraignment and subsequent plea of not guilty.
The judge set the bail amount at N3 million for each defendant, stipulating that one surety is required for each.
The sureties must be employees of either the Lagos State or Federal Government, holding a minimum grade level of 12, and all documents submitted must be verified by the court registrar.
The DSS had arraigned the three Assembly staff in case FHC/L/273C/2025 before the court.
The three defendants and others still at large, were alleged to have conspired among themselves to assault officers of the State Security Service while they were performing their official duties, without any reasonable excuse.
They were also alleged to have on February 17, 2025, aided and abetted by obstructing the officers of State Security Service while performing their official duty without any reasonable cause.
The three defendants were further accused of cyberstalking amongst themselves by recording and sending false information to social medial circulating same to the whole country for the purpose of causing a breakdown of law and order amongst the people without any justification.
In particular, the DSS accused them of committing felony, by willful misdirecting electronic massages to social media for the purpose of embarrassing the State Security Service and its officials.
The duo of Ibrahim Olanrewaju, and Adetu Adekunle were accused of using Iphone 12 promax and Techno POP 8 to record false information and sent same to social media for circulation with the intention to cause an embarrassment to State Security Services, in order to cause breakdown of law and order to the public.
The offences, according to the prosecutor, Barrister M. O. Bajela, contravened sections 516 of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as well as sections 27(1)(b), 24(1)(b), 24(c)(i), and 11 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015 (as amended), 2024. charges bordering on conspiracy
However the three defendants denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty to the charge when it was read to them.
Following their not guilty plea, the prosecutor, Barrister Bajela asked the court for a trial date.
However, the defendants’ lawyer, Mr. Frank Eke, informed the court that he had filed their bail applications and same have been served on the prosecutor.
The lawyer described the prosecution of his clients as “collateral damages”.
He pleaded with the court to admit them to bail in the most liberal terms.
Responding, the prosecutor informed the court he was served with the bail application while in court today. He however, told the court that he leave the bail issues to court’s discretion.
Ruling on the bail application, Justice Osiagor admitted each of the defendants to N3 million with one surety each. The judge also ordered that the surety must be a Grade Level 12 and above.
The judge thereafter adjourned the defendants’ trial to June 24.
-
News21 hours ago
Citizenship for sale as Trump announces “Gold Card” Immigration Plan, $5M
-
News21 hours ago
SAD! Lady Loses 3-Year-Old Son Hours After Allowing Father Take Him for Weekend Visit
-
News16 hours ago
Amaewhule, 26 Other Lawmakers Never Defected To APC, Rivers Chair Confirms
-
Opinion22 hours ago
ITU and autonomous Artificial Intelligence
-
News16 hours ago
Heavy security beef up as APC holds NEC Meeting in Abuja
-
Foreign24 hours ago
Denmark to ban mobile phones in schools
-
News14 hours ago
Senate committee on health invites stakeholders to a one-day public hearing on 3 major Bills
-
News16 hours ago
Ex-President, Buhari, El-Rufai, Amaechi Absent As APC Holds NEC Meeting