Connect with us

News

How Obasanjo and Buhari embarrased Nigeria in Paris

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Nigeria must have set another undesirable record at the International Chamber of Commerce, ICC, Paris, France, “in connection with the $2.3 billion arbitration proceedings filed against Nigeria by Sunrise Power over an alleged breach of contract by the federal government.”

The panel of arbitrators must have been embarrassed for Nigeria; because, it is quite possible that they have never had testifying before them one former President on account of a nation’s alleged breach of contract. Here was Nigeria dragging in two old men, former Presidents, who got their poor country into $2.3 billion hot water.

The first question obviously is: did Obasanjo and Buhari, individually and collectively, feel embarrassed to be sitting in front of the panel of arbitrators?

Advertisement

Let’s face it. There are some situations in which a honourable person, not to talk of a former President, should not find himself in public. For God’s sake, this is N3.68 trillion contingent liability to which Nigeria is exposed by the two former Presidents. And, they returned, without briefing the people whose funds they were about to throw away; as if nothing happened. The truth is; a lot might have happened. If the panel delivers a verdict against Nigeria, up to $2.3 billion, Nigerian assets everywhere in the world can be seized – including the Presidential jet

Every country has the government it deserves”. John de Maistre, 1753-1821.

Somebody else had warned that the people must be prepared for the punishment that results from choosing bad leaders. That, notwithstanding, is this leadership?

What have Nigerians done to deserve this sort of thing? The worst part of the whole thing lies in the fact that the two of them will get away with this act against the poor people of Nigeria.

Advertisement

Both of them being unrepentantly self-righteous will still continue to condemn corruption; as if what brought the nation to this dangerous situation was not ultimate corruption of administrative and legal processes under their governments. Like a lot of the problems facing us now in Nigeria, this one also had its origins in Obasanjo’s government, 1999-2007. Those old enough, as well as those with any sort of memory, would recollect that Obasanjo collected $13-16 billion with the stated intention to increase the nation’s power supply to 10,000MW per day by the time he left office in 2007.

His Minister of Power was Engineer Lyel Imoke. How and why a major contract, – worth $6 billion and expected to generate 3,050MW from a hydropower station situated at the Manbilla Plateau, Taraba State, was assigned to the Minister of State, our brother, Dr Olu Agunlove remains a mystery. Today, that behemoth is perhaps the biggest abandoned project in Nigeria; and it might soon set Nigeria back by N3.68 trillion. It has already sent us retro walking into the dark ages.

The original mess-up started between Obasanjo and Agunloye. After initially approving the contract, the ex-President, for reasons known to him, changed his mind and wanted the contract voided. Agunlove has since then been claiming that he received no instructions to stop it and went ahead to authorise Sunrise to proceed, only for the FG to stop it. You don’t have to be an authority on office procedures to realise that something must be fundamentally wrong and questionable in the way the President and Minister handled the matter. In my 52 years working in various organisations, 36 as staff reporting to superiors and sixteen as the Chief Executive Officer, CEO, I have been involved in situations in which instructions and approvals to commit organisation’s funds had later been rescinded by my superior officer.

Thank God, in my MBA course in Boston, it was drilled into our heads that whether issuing or receiving instructions to commit funds, a written memorandum must be sent and received. And, if the original decision is voided or altered, another memo must follow. Obasanjo, in an interview with The Cable in 2023, reportedly said that, “If a commission of inquiry is set up today to investigate the matter, I am ready to testify.” That, to me, is a classic case of medicine after death. All he needed to do all along to exonerate himself was to produce the written authority to proceed with the project and the second one asking Agunlove to stop it.

Advertisement

In one case during my career, my supervisor had instructed me, on phone, to raise a Local Purchase Order, LPO, to be issued to a company. I countered by requesting for the instruction in writing. He called to ask if I was questioning his authority. I sent another memo apologising; while stressing that I will carry out his instructions to the fullest. Six months later, the External Auditors pounced on the LPO; discovered that not only were the prices highly inflated, but, the LPO was issued to an unregistered company.

As the originator of the LPO, I was the first person issued a query. A panel had been set up to look into all the questionable expenditures.

My session lasted less than five minutes. I just presented the two memos between my boss and me. That was the end of the story, as far as I was concerned. My boss faced the music alone.

Given Obasanjo’s lengthy experience in government, starting with being appointed a Federal Commissioner (Minister) under Gowon to becoming Chief of General Staff, CGS, under Murtala, to Military Head of State and finally civilian President, it is shocking that orders issued on vital matters that must be obeyed by subordinates were not issued in writing. By the same token, it is alarming that Dr Agunlove could not also support his claims with written evidence.

Advertisement

Presidents Yar’Adua and Jonathan and their Attorney Generals and Ministers of Power committed unforgivable blunders by allowing the hot potato which Obasanjo and Agunlove left on the stove to remain there. Nigeria’s liabilities would not have been up to 25 per cent what it is now – if it was settled during those eight years.

Buhari, whose government eventually terminated the contract, had no choice over the matter.

His only mistake was procrastination which escalated the possible penalty.

To be quite candid, the panel of arbitrators must be shaking their heads; wondering how a nation with Nigeria’s abundant manpower could have been governed by such leaders.

Advertisement

Obasanjo once described late Chief Bola Ige, SAN, who served as his first Minister of Power and Steel; and failed as somebody who did not know his right hand from his left. It is doubtful if Obasanjo knew that he had hands at all and what to do with them.

News

Bill to designate official roles to Traditional Rulers scales second reading in Senate

Published

on

By

A bill which seeks to establish the National Council for Traditional Rulers with the objective of formally giving monarchs and community heads important official roles has scaled second reading in Senate.

The bill was sponsored by Senator Simon Lalong (Plateau South).

The Bill generated widespread debate among lawmakers when it was first introduced, with concerns expressed over potential conflicts between the responsibilities of traditional rulers and elected officials at the Local Government level.

But Lalong, a former Governor of Plateau State, noted that present day traditional rulers are well-educated and can provide valuable counsel on issues such as insecurity and other national matters, which could assist the government in addressing the needs of the citizens.

Advertisement

The former Director-General of the Tinubu-Shettima Campaign Council also asserted that they would be useful in the areas of security and conflict resolution in local communities.

According to him: “When there are crises and killings, the first thing people say is ‘let’s hold the traditional ruler responsible.’ It is true in their communities, they know everybody, including the criminals. But we expect them to be the ones running up and down.

“We need to charge them with responsibilities where they will be committed. But for now, you can’t hold them responsible. As the director-general of the campaign for Asiwaju and Kashim, we went around having some meetings with these traditional rulers.

“Every time we want them to participate, they ask to be given a role. So, it was also part of our (electioneering) campaign.

Advertisement

“So, I don’t see how we can jettison that when we are struggling for a constitutional amendment with respect to security. If we don’t have security, every other thing we are doing is rubbish.”

However, some senators still expressed concerns about the possibility of overlapping duties and emphasised the need for the bill to clearly delineate the roles of traditional rulers and government officials to avoid confusion.

Senate President Godswill Akpabio stressed the importance of clearly defining the functions of traditional rulers within the bill.

He also suggested holding a public hearing to gather input before the bill proceeds to a third reading.

Advertisement

Akpabio noted the value traditional rulers could bring in providing counsel on a wide range of issues that could benefit the government.

Akpabio referred the bill to the Senate Committee on Establishment and Public Service Matters for further legislative work and to report back in four weeks.

Continue Reading

News

Tax reforms Bills: Reps retain 7.5 percent VAT, snub proposal to increase it by 2030

Published

on

By

The House of Representatives has retained Value Added Tax (VAT) at 7.5%, rejecting a proposed gradual increase to 15% by 2030. The House also dismissed a proposal to reintroduce inheritance tax under the guise of taxing family income.

Submitting the report during plenary in Abuja, the Chairman of the House Committee on Finance, Rep. James Faleke, stated that the report represents a comprehensive review of the bills, incorporating extensive public input.

The report covers four key bills aimed at overhauling Nigeria’s tax framework:

Nigeria Tax Bill

Advertisement

Nigeria Tax Administration Bill

Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill

Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Bill

Key Amendments in the Tax Reform Bills

Advertisement

Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) Bill

Redefined Scope: The NRS will now focus on federal-level revenue collection, excluding individual taxpayers in states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

Board Composition: Section 7 now requires six executive directors, each appointed by the president from the six geopolitical zones on a rotational basis. Each state and the FCT will also have a representative on the board.

Secretary Qualifications: Section 13 mandates that the Secretary to the Board must be a lawyer, chartered accountant, or chartered secretary at the level of Assistant Director or higher.

Advertisement

Fixed Funding Rate: The NRS will now receive a 4% cost-of-collection rate (excluding royalties), subject to National Assembly approval.

Borrowing Powers Restricted: Section 28 now requires Federal Executive Council (FEC) and National Assembly approval before the NRS can secure any loans.

Joint Revenue Board (JRB) Bill

Tax Appeal Commissioners’ Criteria Revised: Section 25 removes the requirement that commissioners must have business management experience, as the Committee deemed it irrelevant.

Advertisement

Strengthened Tax Ombud’s Independence: Section 43 mandates that the Tax Ombud’s Office be funded directly from the Consolidated Revenue Fund, eliminating reliance on external donations.

Independent Funding for Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT): The tribunal will now operate independently of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) to prevent conflicts of interest.

Stricter Adherence to the Evidence Act: New rules ensure that tax appeal proceedings strictly follow the Evidence Act.

Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Processing: The timeline for issuing TINs has been extended from two working days to five to accommodate administrative delays.

Advertisement

Faster Tax Returns for Ceased Operations: Companies ceasing operations must now file income tax returns within three months, down from six months, to prevent revenue loss.

VAT System Adjustments: Section 22 ensures that taxable supplies are attributed to their place of consumption, addressing regional imbalances.

VAT Fiscalisation System: Section 23 introduces a new regulatory framework to improve VAT collection.

Increased Reporting Thresholds for Banking Transactions:

Advertisement

Individuals: ₦25 million → ₦50 million

Corporate Entities: ₦100 million → ₦250 million

Judicial Oversight on Asset Seizure: Section 60 mandates that tax authorities must obtain a court order before seizing movable assets.

Mandatory Electronic Taxpayer Records Access: Section 61 formalizes the government’s right to access electronically stored tax records in line with modern practices.

Advertisement

New VAT Revenue Distribution Formula:

70% distributed equally among local governments

30% based on population

General Amendments Across Tax Bills

Advertisement

VAT Rate Maintained at 7.5% – The Committee rejected the proposal to gradually increase VAT to 15% by 2030.

Petroleum Gains Tax Reduced to 30% – Section 78 revises the tax rate on petroleum gains from 85% to 30%.

Excise Duty Provisions Removed – Excise duty-related provisions were deleted due to concerns about their negative economic impact.

Higher Turnover Threshold for Small Companies: A business will now be classified as a small company if its annual turnover is ₦100 million or less (asset cap remains at ₦250 million).

Advertisement

New Penalties for Virtual Assets Service Providers (VASPs): Stricter fines and potential license suspensions for non-compliant crypto and digital asset businesses.

While submitting the report, Rep. Faleke highlighted the importance of the tax reform bills in modernizing Nigeria’s tax system, boosting revenue collection, and fostering economic growth.

“These Bills are critical to implementing a modern, transparent, and efficient tax system that will support economic growth and improve revenue collection,” he said.

He added that the review process was extensive, incorporating input from the public and key government agencies, including:

Advertisement

Nigeria Export Processing Zones Authority (NEPZA)

National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI)

National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA)

Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund)

Advertisement

“We carefully examined every submission to ensure that public opinion was reflected in our recommendations. This process involved a thorough review of existing laws proposed for repeal or amendment,” Faleke noted.

The amendments impact key laws, including:

Companies Income Tax Act (CITA)

Value Added Tax Act (VAT Act)

Advertisement

Personal Income Tax Act (PITA)

Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act

Petroleum Industry Act

Nigeria Export Processing Zones Act

Advertisement

Oil and Gas Free Trade Zone Act

The House of Representatives is expected to deliberate on the report in the coming weeks as part of its legislative process.

Continue Reading

News

APC is finished, I know those who bought ministerial appointments -El-Rufai

Published

on

By

Malam Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, has revealed that he knows individuals who paid for ministerial positions in President Bola Tinubu’s All Progressives Congress (APC) government.

In an interview with BBC Hausa, El-Rufai clarified that his departure from the party was not due to his ministerial ordeal but because the APC had drifted from its founding ideals. He explained that if the party had sacked him, it would have spared him the stress of explaining his exit. According to him, it wasn’t he who left the APC, but rather, the party had abandoned him and its original principles.

“It could have been easier for me if APC sacked me because they would save me from explaining the stress of why I left the party,” El-Rufai said.

When asked whether he thought people might believe he left due to not being appointed as a minister, El-Rufai confidently responded, “Did I seek to be minister? I know people who paid to get ministerial appointments.”

Advertisement

Although El-Rufai did not regret supporting Tinubu’s presidential campaign, he expressed his disappointment with how he had been treated. He further criticized the APC for becoming a party where personal interests overshadow the original vision, making it difficult for those who worked hard for its success to be acknowledged or rewarded.

“The APC has abandoned the ideals that led to its formation. It has abandoned the people. Everyone is now pursuing personal interests and wealth. The government has become a business enterprise where everything has a price,” he said.

El-Rufai also pointed out that key appointments in the current administration are being controlled by a select group from Lagos, reinforcing his belief that fairness and justice have been sidelined within the party.

“There is no justice. Those who worked for the party are not recognised, let alone rewarded. Appointments are now controlled by a select group from Lagos. The party is dead,” El-Rufai concluded.

Advertisement

Before making the decision to leave the APC, El-Rufai consulted several political figures, including former President Muhammadu Buhari, Tunde Bakare, Abdullahi Adamu, Adams Oshiomhole, and Bisi Akande, to seek their opinions on his situation.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News