Connect with us

News

How Obasanjo and Buhari embarrased Nigeria in Paris

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Nigeria must have set another undesirable record at the International Chamber of Commerce, ICC, Paris, France, “in connection with the $2.3 billion arbitration proceedings filed against Nigeria by Sunrise Power over an alleged breach of contract by the federal government.”

The panel of arbitrators must have been embarrassed for Nigeria; because, it is quite possible that they have never had testifying before them one former President on account of a nation’s alleged breach of contract. Here was Nigeria dragging in two old men, former Presidents, who got their poor country into $2.3 billion hot water.

The first question obviously is: did Obasanjo and Buhari, individually and collectively, feel embarrassed to be sitting in front of the panel of arbitrators?

Advertisement

Let’s face it. There are some situations in which a honourable person, not to talk of a former President, should not find himself in public. For God’s sake, this is N3.68 trillion contingent liability to which Nigeria is exposed by the two former Presidents. And, they returned, without briefing the people whose funds they were about to throw away; as if nothing happened. The truth is; a lot might have happened. If the panel delivers a verdict against Nigeria, up to $2.3 billion, Nigerian assets everywhere in the world can be seized – including the Presidential jet

Every country has the government it deserves”. John de Maistre, 1753-1821.

Somebody else had warned that the people must be prepared for the punishment that results from choosing bad leaders. That, notwithstanding, is this leadership?

What have Nigerians done to deserve this sort of thing? The worst part of the whole thing lies in the fact that the two of them will get away with this act against the poor people of Nigeria.

Advertisement

Both of them being unrepentantly self-righteous will still continue to condemn corruption; as if what brought the nation to this dangerous situation was not ultimate corruption of administrative and legal processes under their governments. Like a lot of the problems facing us now in Nigeria, this one also had its origins in Obasanjo’s government, 1999-2007. Those old enough, as well as those with any sort of memory, would recollect that Obasanjo collected $13-16 billion with the stated intention to increase the nation’s power supply to 10,000MW per day by the time he left office in 2007.

His Minister of Power was Engineer Lyel Imoke. How and why a major contract, – worth $6 billion and expected to generate 3,050MW from a hydropower station situated at the Manbilla Plateau, Taraba State, was assigned to the Minister of State, our brother, Dr Olu Agunlove remains a mystery. Today, that behemoth is perhaps the biggest abandoned project in Nigeria; and it might soon set Nigeria back by N3.68 trillion. It has already sent us retro walking into the dark ages.

The original mess-up started between Obasanjo and Agunloye. After initially approving the contract, the ex-President, for reasons known to him, changed his mind and wanted the contract voided. Agunlove has since then been claiming that he received no instructions to stop it and went ahead to authorise Sunrise to proceed, only for the FG to stop it. You don’t have to be an authority on office procedures to realise that something must be fundamentally wrong and questionable in the way the President and Minister handled the matter. In my 52 years working in various organisations, 36 as staff reporting to superiors and sixteen as the Chief Executive Officer, CEO, I have been involved in situations in which instructions and approvals to commit organisation’s funds had later been rescinded by my superior officer.

Thank God, in my MBA course in Boston, it was drilled into our heads that whether issuing or receiving instructions to commit funds, a written memorandum must be sent and received. And, if the original decision is voided or altered, another memo must follow. Obasanjo, in an interview with The Cable in 2023, reportedly said that, “If a commission of inquiry is set up today to investigate the matter, I am ready to testify.” That, to me, is a classic case of medicine after death. All he needed to do all along to exonerate himself was to produce the written authority to proceed with the project and the second one asking Agunlove to stop it.

Advertisement

In one case during my career, my supervisor had instructed me, on phone, to raise a Local Purchase Order, LPO, to be issued to a company. I countered by requesting for the instruction in writing. He called to ask if I was questioning his authority. I sent another memo apologising; while stressing that I will carry out his instructions to the fullest. Six months later, the External Auditors pounced on the LPO; discovered that not only were the prices highly inflated, but, the LPO was issued to an unregistered company.

As the originator of the LPO, I was the first person issued a query. A panel had been set up to look into all the questionable expenditures.

My session lasted less than five minutes. I just presented the two memos between my boss and me. That was the end of the story, as far as I was concerned. My boss faced the music alone.

Given Obasanjo’s lengthy experience in government, starting with being appointed a Federal Commissioner (Minister) under Gowon to becoming Chief of General Staff, CGS, under Murtala, to Military Head of State and finally civilian President, it is shocking that orders issued on vital matters that must be obeyed by subordinates were not issued in writing. By the same token, it is alarming that Dr Agunlove could not also support his claims with written evidence.

Advertisement

Presidents Yar’Adua and Jonathan and their Attorney Generals and Ministers of Power committed unforgivable blunders by allowing the hot potato which Obasanjo and Agunlove left on the stove to remain there. Nigeria’s liabilities would not have been up to 25 per cent what it is now – if it was settled during those eight years.

Buhari, whose government eventually terminated the contract, had no choice over the matter.

His only mistake was procrastination which escalated the possible penalty.

To be quite candid, the panel of arbitrators must be shaking their heads; wondering how a nation with Nigeria’s abundant manpower could have been governed by such leaders.

Advertisement

Obasanjo once described late Chief Bola Ige, SAN, who served as his first Minister of Power and Steel; and failed as somebody who did not know his right hand from his left. It is doubtful if Obasanjo knew that he had hands at all and what to do with them.

News

Appeal Court halts Emir Sanusi’s reinstatement

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Friday halted the reinstatement of Alhaji Muhammadu Sanusi II’s as the Emir of Kano.

A three-member panel of justices led by Justice Okon Abang unanimously halted the implementation of the January 10 judgement, which vacated the nullification of Sanusi II’s appointment by a Kano State High Court, which it held was done without jurisdiction.

The judgement, which was delivered by Justice Gabriel Kolawole, held that the nullification of Sanusi II’s appointment was done without the required jurisdiction and ordered the transfer of the suit to the Kano State High Court.

Advertisement

However, ruling on the fresh applications with numbers CA/KN/27M/2025 and CA/KN/28M/2025, the appellate court agreed that the applications seeking to halt the enforcement of the earlier judgement pending the appeal before the Supreme Court were competent and meritorious.

“The law is settled. The court is enjoined to exercise its discretion judiciously and in the interest of justice,” he said.

Justice Abang also noted that the subject matter before the court needed to be preserved because the applicant had served as emir for five years before his removal, adding that he deserved the right to protection.

On January 10, Justice Kolawole, in vacating the order against Sanusi II’s appointment, held that the matter, being a chieftaincy dispute, ought to have been determined by the high court of Kano State rather than the Federal High Court, which he described as “a grave error”.

Advertisement

The Federal High Court in Kano, presided by Justice Abubakar Liman, had on June 20, 2024, nullified the Kano State Government’s Kano Emirates Council (Repeal) Law 2024, which reinstated Muhammadu Sanusi II as the 16th Emir.

In the fundamental rights enforcement suit by Aminu Baba-Dan’Agundi, the presiding judge further directed parties, including the Kano State House of Assembly, to maintain the status quo during the reign of Emir Ado Bayero.

However, the appellate court in its ruling, cited Section 251 of the Nigerian Constitution and Section 22(2) of the Federal High Court Act to hold that the matter was a chieftaincy and state legislative dispute and not a fundamental rights matter, and such ought to have been taken before the Kano State High Court or the FCT High Court.

“The proper order to make is to order the 1st respondent (Baba-Dan’Agundi) to transfer the pending suit before the Federal High Court to the high court of Kano State where the chief judge shall assign it to a judge who has not been previously involved in the hearing of the suit,” he said.

Advertisement

The judge awarded the cost of N500,000 against Dan’Agundi and in favour of the Kano State House of Assembly.

However, following the opinions of the presiding justice, Justice Mohammed Mustapha and Justice Abdul Dogo that the right order was to strike out Dan’Agundi’s suit filed at the Federal High Court and not to transfer same, the matter was struck out.

The five appeals — CA/KN/126/2024 between the state assembly and Dan’Agundi; CA/ABJ/140/2023 state assembly and Dan’Agundi; CA/ABJ/142/2024 Kano State Government and Dan’Agundi; CA/KN/200/2024 Alhaji Aminu Ado Bayero and Attorney General of Kano State; and CA/KN/161/2020 Kano Government and Dan’Agundi emanated from the same issue before the Federal High Court

[Daily Trust]

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

FG advises Nnamdi Kanu to renounce IPOB for his release

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Media, Mr. Daniel Bwala, has advised leader of the proscribed Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, to renounce his agitation and be release from jail.

One Somto Okonkwo in a verified X handle, @General_Somto, quoted Mr. Bwala as saying, “Nigeria Government Through Its Presidential Special Adviser, Daniel Bwala Has Told The Leader Of IPOB Mazi Nnamdi Kanu To Renounce Biafra And Promise Not To Agitate For Biafra Again, Before Talks For His Release From DSS Custody Will Commence

Continue Reading

News

El-Rufai’s son, Bashir campaigns for SDP, asks Nigerians to save country from ‘area boys’

Published

on

…tells Nigerians

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Bashir El-Rufai, son of erstwhile governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, has urged Nigerians to join the Social Democratic Party, SDP, to save the country from ‘area boys’. Bashir stated this in a cryptic post on X on Friday, seemingly referring to President Bola Tinubu’s appointees, particularly from Lagos State. He wrote: “Join in saving this country from area boys”.

DAILY POST recalls that Bashir’s father, El-Rufai, recently defected from the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, to the SDP.

Advertisement

The Kaduna ex-governor had before his resignation become increasingly critical of the APC-led government under Tinubu. He also cited a widening disconnect between his personal values and the party’s current direction as the reason for his defection. Before now, El-Rufai had criticized Tinubu for only appointing his “boys” from Lagos into political offices. “The president’s appointments are not being made because the appointees are Yoruba, but because they are his own boys, and most of the appointments do not even reasonably cover the South-West,” El-Rufai said.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News