Connect with us

News

Falana drags Mack Zuckerberg’s Meta to Court ,demands $5m over alleged invasion of privacy

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr. Femi Falana, has instituted a $5,000,000 (Five Million US Dollars) lawsuit before a Lagos High Court against Meta Platforms Inc., the U.S.-based tech giant owned by Mark Zuckerberg, over alleged invasion of his privacy

In the originating motion brought pursuant to Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and section 24(1)(A) and (E) & Section 34(1)(D) of Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, Order 2 Rule 1 Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules, 2009, by his lawyer, Olumide Babalola, the human rights Lawyer accused the organization of publishing motion images and voice captioned, “AfriCare Health Center,” in their website to the effect that Falana has suffered a disease known as ‘Prostatitis’, which the lawyer claimed constitutes an invasion of his privacy as guaranteed by section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.

Falana claimed the publication and the video as released through the organization’s platform -www.facebook.com, is “false, inaccurate, misleading and unfair to the Applicant and thereby violates the provision of section 24(1)(a) and (e) of the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023

Advertisement

To this end, the reputable lawyer was praying the court for a declaration that the “Respondents continued publication of the Applicants name, still and motion images and purported voice on a page and video captioned “AfriCare Health Centre on their platform – www.facebook.com to the effect that the Applicant suffered from a disease known as ‘Prostatitis constitutes an invasion of the Applicants privacy guaranteed by section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.”

Besides, he is praying the court for an order mandating the “Respondents to forthwith remove, erase and delete the video captioned “AfriCare Health Centre on their platform – www.facebook.com.”

For the damages the publication has caused him, Falana, was asking for a general damages in the sum of $5, 000, 000 (Five Million US Dollars) and a consequential order that the court may deem fit to grant in the circumstance.

Falana who claimed that the published false video about his health status, which is his private life has rubished his image and the name he built over the years.

Advertisement

He argued that the publication by the Respondent which is false, offensive and disturbing paints him in a false light, that has caused him mental and emotional disturbances.

The grounds upon which the originating processes was instituted was that the Applicant as a reputable person is guaranteed the enjoyment of fundamental right to privacy under Section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and that the Respondents published the Applicants name and images and ascribed a false illness to him and thereby violated his right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution and Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and he has suffered emotional and psychological distress as a result of the false story

In the affidavit in support of the motion, Falana claimed that he is known for his fearless legal battles, often taking on cases against government policies and actions that infringe upon the rights of citizens and that his law practice covers a broad range of areas, including constitutional law, civil rights, public interest litigation, and international human rights law.

He said further that he is recognized for his work in defending freedom of expression, advocating for the rights of marginalized groups, and challenging governmental overreach.

Advertisement

He alleged that the Respondent is a media company operating a global social media platform known as www.facebook.com. and that on the 16th day of January 2025, he discovered a video of his person was posted on the Respondent’s platform under the page named “AfriCare Health Centre on Respondent’s platform – www.facebook.com. which he tendered as an Exhibit in the suit.

He noted: “In video that carries my name, picture and purported video, I am reported to have said that: “My name is Femi Falana, and I have been battling prostatitis for over 16 years. At the age of 50, I was diagnosed with this condition. Every day I faced pain, discomfort and constant fatigue. I had trouble urinating lower back pain and other symptoms that made it difficult to live a full life.

Despite consulting the best urologist in the country, no one could offer me effective treatment, I was prescribed numerous medications, physical therapy even surgery but the problem was that these methods only temporarily relived the symptoms.”

He bemoaned the wrongful publication that he has been greatly prejudiced by the video of the Respondent’s on the grounds that his health life is part of his private life and he has never suffered any disease known as ‘Prostatitis’ in his life.

Advertisement

He averred that, “I have never had any dealing with the Respondent or its pages on issues with my health life.
The video and its contents are false, inaccurate, misleading and unfair to me. The video paints me in a false light and as such an invasion of my privacy.”

He claimed that the Respondent operates global platforms and anything published on these platforms are accessed and viewed by millions of people around the world. Hence, the stories have been viewed by millions of people since January 2023 when they were published on the Respondents platforms.

He said, “For the purpose of this suit, I do not find these stories libelous but since they are false and fabricated against me, I find them offensive, reckless, insensitive, disturbing and unjustifiable intrusion into my privacy by painting me in a false light.

“By the video, the Respondent’s page has given me a publicity that paints me in false light as the insinuations in the video are false and they infringe my right to privacy right to be let alone.

Advertisement

“At the time of deposing to this affidavit, the video has been published to the entire world on the Internet, and it has remained there for several weeks.

“For their failure to verify the page and video before publishing, I believe the Respondent’s publicity of my name and image in a false light was done carelessly and recklessly to draw traffic to the Respondent’s platform to boost its advertisement revenues.

“I believe that the Respondents use of my name and image in the video is unfair and insensitive to my feelings since they never verified the claims as expected.

“I find the Respondents’ publicity of my photograph and name in a false light highly offensive and emotionally disturbing. This continues to cause me anxiety, sadness and exposure to ridicule.”

Advertisement

He therefore prayed the court for a rescue and save his image from being ruined.

News

Narrow escape: American Airlines plane catches f!re at Denver airport, 12 hospitalised with minor injuries

Published

on

It was narrow escape for passengers on an American Airlines flight were forced to stand on the wing of the plane at Denver International Airport as they evacuated the aircraft after one of its engines caught f!re Thursday evening, sending thick black smoke billowing into the air.

American Airlines Flight 1006, a Boeing 737-800 en route to Dallas-Fort Worth from Colorado Springs with 172 passengers and six crew aboard, diverted to Denver around 5:15 p.m. local time, after the crew reported “engine vibrations,” the Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement.

“After landing and while taxiing to the gate an engine caught fire,” the statement said. The FAA is investigating.

Shortly before landing, the plane’s pilot notified air traffic controllers in Denver that the flight was experiencing engine issues, but it was not an emergency, according to air traffic control audio from LiveATC.net.

Advertisement

Twelve passengers were taken to the hospital with minor injuries, the Denver Fire Department revealed.

CNN

Continue Reading

News

Justice Delivered! Nigerian lady falsely declared dead wins UK court case, retains £350,k home

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

A 55-year-old Nigerian lady June Ashimola, who was falsely declared dead, has appeared via video link from Nigeria before the UK High Court to prevent a convicted fraudster from seizing her £350,000 home in Woolwich, southeast London.

Ashimola was reportedly declared dead in February 2019, sparking a protracted legal battle over her estate.

However, she presented herself before Deputy Master John Linwood, asserting that she was alive and was a victim of a scam.

Advertisement

According to DailyMail on Wednesday, the court heard that following her wrongfully being declared dead, power of attorney over her estate, which consisted primarily of a house, was granted to Ms. Ruth Samuel, acting on behalf of Bakare Lasisi, who falsely claimed to have married Ashimola in 1993.

However, the judge ruled that the supposed marriage was a fabrication and that Lasisi did not exist.

According to court records, Ashimola left the UK for Nigeria in 2018 and had not returned since.

By October 2022, power of attorney had been awarded to Samuel on behalf of the fictitious Lasisi, who laid claim to Ashimola’s estate.

Advertisement

The judge ultimately found that Tony Ashikodi, a convicted fraudster who served three years in prison in 1996 for obtaining property by deception, had orchestrated the elaborate scheme to seize her home.

“This is an unusual probate claim in that the deceased says she is very much alive,” Deputy Master Linwood remarked, describing the case as a web of fraud, forgery, impersonation, and intimidation.

The root of this claim is a long running battle or campaign waged by a Mr Tony Ashikodi for control and/or ownership of the property.

‘Ms Ashimola left the UK for Nigeria in about October 2018 and has not returned since. This claim involves wide-ranging allegations of fraud, forgery, impersonation and intimidation,” Linwood added.

Advertisement

Despite visa challenges preventing her from appearing in person, Ashimola’s identity was verified through passport photographs, leading the judge to dismiss the claims against her estate.

After reviewing the evidence, Deputy Master Linwood ruled, “’I find Ms Ashimola is alive and that the death certificate was forged and/or fraudulently obtained or produced or concocted.

“Her alleged death was part of Mr Tony Ashikodi’s attempts to wrest control of the property from her.

“The person who appeared before me and identified herself as Ms Ashimola was physically like her photographs in each passport.

Advertisement

“I find that Ms Ashimola was not married to Mr Lasisi and that the marriage certificate is a concocted or fraudulent document for these reasons.

“I do not accept Mr Lasisi exists or if he does is aware of his identity being used. I do not accept that emails supposedly from him were actually from him.”

He further accused Ashikodi of attempting to mislead the court and found that both Ashikodi and Samuel were either directly involved in producing the fraudulent documents or knowingly relied on them.

He added, “I find that the probate power of attorney submitted supposedly by Mr Lasisi and Ms Samuel was a fraudulently produced or concocted document.

Advertisement

“The death certificate was not proven to the necessary standard in that only a copy was produced. The provenance was unknown. There was no evidence before me that it was a genuine document evidencing a real event.

“I find it was forged and/or fraudulently produced or concocted. The persons who relied upon it namely Mr Tony Ashikodi and Ms Samuel were either directly involved in its production or else knew it was false.’”

As a result, the power of attorney was revoked, safeguarding Ashimola’s rightful ownership of her £350,000 property.

The court also heard that legal costs incurred by both parties have exceeded £150,000, an amount that may surpass the property’s equity value.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

MAN laments 66% rise in manufactured goods exports, insists it’s poor

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria has said the 65.84 per cent increase in the value of manufactured goods exported in 2024 from 2023, stating it is below expectations.

The PUNCH found that the gross value of manufactured goods exported in 2024 was N2.28tn, an increase from N778.44bn in 2023.

While manufactured goods exports in 2023 were worse than the previous year, export value slumped in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Advertisement

The National Bureau of Statistics’ Foreign Trade in Goods data showed the sector’s export value sustained growth in the first quarter of 2024 with N268.70bn, N480.82bn, and N1.04tn in the second and third quarters, respectively.

However, the export value of manufactured goods dropped by 52.48 per cent in Q4 2024 as the NBS reported a lesser value of 494.22bn.

Secretary of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria Export Promotion Group, Dr Benedict Obhiosa told The PUNCH in a phone interview that the decline in the manufacturing sector’s Q4 2024 export performance stemmed from a hostile operating environment.

“The operating environment has been very hostile for the manufacturing sector over the past two years, especially in terms of infrastructure,” Obhiosa stated. “The high cost of energy, high cost of borrowing, erratic fluctuations in the exchange rate, among others has culminated in the low performance of the manufacturing sector.”

Advertisement

MAN has called attention to the manufacturing sector’s debilitating state. Earlier in its Q4 2024 Manufacturers Chief Executive Officers Confidence Index, MAN’s Director-General, Segun Ajayi-Kadir noted, “Findings show that production and distribution costs surged further by 18.2 per cent in the quarter under review, from the 20.1 per cent increase witnessed in the preceding quarter.”

Meanwhile, MANEG’s Secretary, Obhiosa disagreed that the improvement in export value from 2023 was not enough to celebrate.

Obhiosa argued that while the NBS data revealed a slight increase, it does not transcend to growth in the sector. He explained that the manufacturing companies were still performing “far below their installed capacity.”

He declared that a more concrete path out of the challenge was an increased government commitment to issuing manufacturers export grants.

Advertisement

“To maximise the potential of the manufacturing export sector, the Federal Government needs to be more deliberate and action-minded about fully implementing the Export Expand Grant aimed at boosting the non-oil export sector in Nigeria,” Obhiosa stressed. “Historically, EEG has been found to have spurred non-oil export growth in Nigeria.”

Obhiosa alleged that the Federal Government was complicit as it had not paid the EEG leading to years of payment backlog.

He explained: “If the Federal Government can be consistent with the payment of EEG, you can rest assured of higher foreign exchange earnings and inflow to Nigeria as export proceeds payments. As a result, many informal sector operators will even be attracted to the formal export channel.”

According to the NBS, the value of manufactured goods traded in Q4 2024 stood at N8.96tn, representing 24.50 per cent of total trade.

Advertisement

The main export commodities were unwrought aluminium alloys exported to Japan and China, dredgers exported to Ivory Coast, and cathodes exported to Japan and China.

The NBS added that manufactured goods were mainly exported to Africa at N215.85bn, followed by exports to Asia valued at N165.97bn and Europe at N62.13bn.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News