Connect with us

News

Trump Signs Order Demanding Citizenship Proof In Elections As Experts Kick

Published

on

By Kayode Sanni-Arewa

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday ordered tighter controls on federal elections, including requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote, as the Republican continues to attack a system he insists remains tilted against him.

Experts swiftly denounced his executive order as an abuse of presidential power that could ultimately prevent millions of Americans from casting ballots, and rights groups already have vowed to challenge it in court.

Trump, now in his second term, has never acknowledged his defeat to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, and he maintains baseless claims of massive election fraud — particularly in absentee voting, a method which has become widely used across the United States.

Advertisement

“Perhaps some people think I shouldn’t be complaining, because we won in a landslide” last November, Trump said as he signed the executive order in the White House.

“But we’ve got to straighten out our election. This country is so sick because of the election, the fake elections,” he said. “And we’re going to straighten it out, one way or the other.”

Several states allow absentee ballots to be counted if they arrive after Election Day, provided they are postmarked before the polls close in their state.

For law professor Richard Hasen of the University of California, Los Angeles, this “dangerous” executive order could “potentially disenfranchise millions of voters.”

Advertisement

On his Election Law blog, Hasen calls Trump’s directive “an executive power grab,” and notes that federal elections are largely the responsibility of the states, with Congress setting rules for the conduct of elections.

The Brennan Center, a nonprofit public policy institute, denounced the executive order, posting on X that it “would block tens of millions of American citizens from voting. Presidents have no authority to do this.”

The powerful civil liberties group ACLU also slammed the order as “an extreme abuse of power” and suggested legal challenges would be filed. “We’ll see him in court,” it said.

Voting in US federal elections by non-citizens has been a criminal offense for decades, with the law threatening fines, imprisonment and deportation.

Advertisement

AFP

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Hajj commission in trouble over N90bn subsidy as Reps insist there were infractions

Published

on

By

The House of Representatives ad hoc committee investigating the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria over the 2024 Hajj exercise has found the commission guilty of several infractions.

Chaired by the member representing Jibia/Kaita Federal Constituency in Katsina State, Sada Soli, the committee has submitted its report, outlining its findings and recommending reforms to prevent similar issues in future Hajj operations.

At a plenary on July 14, 2024, presided over by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas, the House set up the ad hoc committee to probe the operations of NAHCON and the Federal Capital Territory Administration Muslim Pilgrims Board following a motion sponsored by Mr. Omar Bio, representing Buruten/Kaima Federal Constituency of Kwara State.

In May 2024, the Bola Tinubu-led government provided a N90bn subsidy for the Hajj exercise.

Advertisement

This move sparked discontent among many Nigerians, particularly in light of the ongoing hardships exacerbated by the removal of the fuel subsidy.

Critics argued that the subsidy should have been directed toward addressing more pressing national issues rather than a religious obligation.

Despite the Federal Government’s intervention, state governors expressed dissatisfaction with NAHCON’s handling of the operation, particularly regarding accommodation in Muna and the inadequate Basic Travel Allowance for pilgrims.

In response to growing criticism, President Tinubu relieved NAHCON Chairman, Jalal Arabi, of his duties in August 2024, replacing him with Abdullahi Usman.

Advertisement

Prior to this, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had indicted Arabi and NAHCON’s secretary, Abdullahi Kontagora, in connection with an alleged multi-million-dollar fraud scheme.

The Reps committee accepted memoranda from key Hajj stakeholders, including the Association for Hajj and Umrah Operators of Nigeria, which represents licensed private tour operators, detailing severe challenges faced in dealings with NAHCON.

A copy of the report, exclusively obtained by The PUNCH, revealed a series of infractions, including financial mismanagement, logistical challenges, and a lack of transparency.

The committee uncovered serious deficiencies in the quality of accommodation provided to Nigerian pilgrims, particularly in Mina and Arafat, where tent allocations were inadequate despite the high fees paid.

Advertisement

Overcrowding in Tent A (VIP Tent) was exacerbated by a change in Saudi Hajj policy barring upgrades on the e-track platform, causing distress among high-profile pilgrims such as governors and traditional rulers.

Furthermore, many pilgrims who paid premium rates were housed in substandard facilities, leading to disputes and dissatisfaction.

The investigation revealed a lack of harmony between NAHCON and licensed tour operators, marked by poor communication and mutual distrust.

Tour operators raised concerns about discrepancies in NAHCON’s fee structure, citing inconsistencies in charges imposed on private operators versus state-sponsored pilgrims.

Advertisement

Hostility between the two entities hindered smooth coordination, leading to service failures that directly impacted pilgrims.

The exclusion of tour operators from key policy decisions deepened the divide.

The committee raised significant concerns regarding NAHCON’s financial management.

Pilgrims paid as much as N9m each, yet there was no clear breakdown of charges or justification for the high costs.

Advertisement

The N90bn federal subsidy was not transparently distributed, with some pilgrims benefiting more than others without clear criteria.

There were allegations of financial mismanagement within NAHCON, which contributed to the dismissal of its chairman over fraud-related concerns.

Additionally, NAHCON transferred the entire subsidy amount into its offshore accounts in Saudi Arabia, but there was no tracking mechanism to verify how these funds were spent.

The committee also examined Nigeria’s Bilateral Air Agreement with Saudi Arabia, which mandates that a Saudi airline airlift 50% of Nigerian pilgrims.

Advertisement

This arrangement was seen as potentially disadvantageous to Nigerian airlines, limiting their participation and affecting the local aviation industry.

The committee recommended that the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority and the Aviation Ministry clarify the terms of this agreement to protect Nigerian airlines’ interests.

The report also highlighted significant gaps in NAHCON’s regulatory oversight, citing a lack of uniform service delivery across different states.

Coordination failures between NAHCON and state pilgrims’ welfare boards resulted in varying levels of service quality for pilgrims from different states.

Advertisement

Accommodation arrangements posed a major challenge, with pilgrims facing overcrowding and poor living conditions in Medina and Mina.

Transportation logistics were another area of failure, with delays in movement between Makkah, Mina, and Jeddah causing severe distress to pilgrims.

Elderly pilgrims were forced to walk long distances due to poor coordination of buses, while others were left stranded at checkpoints. Financial mismanagement within the FCT Muslim Pilgrims Welfare Board was also exposed, particularly overspending on staff delegation.

Although only 20 officials were budgeted for, 54 were sent on Hajj, leading to unpaid estacodes and additional financial strain.

Advertisement

The report also examined the role of the Central Bank of Nigeria in handling the Personal Travel Allowance for pilgrims.

The CBN highlighted the challenges posed by fluctuating exchanged rates between May 15 and May 30, 2024, and the resistance among pilgrims to electronic card payments.

The committee noted that the CBN recommended NAHCON submit the full list of intending pilgrims at least 30 working days before departure to allow banks sufficient time to process payments and avoid last-minute pressures.

To prevent a repeat of the 2024 issues, the committee recommended publishing a detailed breakdown of Hajj fees, justifying each charge.

Advertisement

The Personal Travel Allowance system should be reviewed to ensure fair and adequate disbursement to pilgrims, with an upward review of the $500 PTA to a more reasonable amount.

An independent audit of NAHCON’s financial records should be conducted to identify and address financial mismanagement.

Stricter penalties for service providers who fail to meet their contractual obligations were also suggested.

Furthermore, the committee recommended a review of the Bilateral Air Agreement to protect Nigerian airlines’ interests and the creation of an independent complaints resolution mechanism for pilgrims.

Advertisement

The committee also proposed the establishment of a Hajj Tribunal to resolve disputes promptly.

The breakdown of the subsidy expenditure lacked proper transparency, with NAHCON

Officials providing conflicting figures during the investigation. According to NAHCON, N79bn was allocated to 48,414 state pilgrims, while N7bn was given to 1,884 Hajj Savings Scheme (HSS) pilgrims.

However, there was an unaccounted balance of N4bn, which NAHCON failed to properly explain. The commission claimed to have used the funds to sponsor one thousand officials to the hajj; it was however unable to provide verifiable records of these officials to authenticate this position. This raised serious red flags about whether the full subsidy was utilized for its intended purpose or if portions were mismanaged.

Advertisement

The committee also found that NAHCON transferred the entire subsidy amount into its offshore accounts in Saudi Arabia, but there was no clear tracking mechanism for how these funds were spent.

This lack of accountability made it difficult to verify whether the funds were used strictly for subsidy purposes or diverted for other expenses. Furthermore, there were inconsistencies in how much each pilgrim actually benefited from the subsidy, with reports suggesting that some pilgrims received little or no reduction in their total Hajj fees.

Another critical issue was the absence of a structured refund mechanism for surplus funds. Some state pilgrims were downgraded in accommodation or received lower-quality services than promised, yet there was no evidence that excess funds were refunded to them.

Additionally, the committee discovered that some service providers had refunded certain amounts to NAHCON, but there was no clear record of these refunds reaching the affected pilgrims. This raised further questions about the handling of surplus funds and the overall accountability of NAHCON’s financial operations.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the spokesperson for the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria, Fatima Usara has pledged the readiness of the agency to continuously seek ways to improve on Hajj operations for intending pilgrims.

In an interview with The PUNCH, Fatima denied knowledge of NAHCON’s indictment, saying, “What I read on the pages of newspapers are resolutions and recommendations for further action. Personally, I am yet to see the full report so I cannot ascertain your claims.

“However, NAHCON has always reiterated its readiness to continue working on improving Hajj operations for Nigerian pilgrims and will continue to work closely with relevant stakeholders interested in improving the welfare of Nigerian pilgrims.” [The Punch]

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Tinubu to embark on working visit to Paris

Published

on

By

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will depart for Paris, France, on Wednesday on a short working visit, the Presidency has revealed.

A statement signed by Tinubu’s spokesperson, Bayo Onanuga, said that during the visit, the President will appraise his administration’s mid-term performance and assess key milestones.

He added that Tinubu will also use the retreat to review the progress of ongoing reforms and engage in strategic planning ahead of his administration’s second anniversary.

This period of reflection will inform plans to deepen ongoing reforms and accelerate national development priorities in the coming year.

Advertisement

Recent economic strides reinforce the President’s commitment to these efforts, as evidenced by the Central Bank of Nigeria reporting a significant increase in net foreign exchange reserves to $23.11 billion—a testament to the administration’s fiscal reforms since 2023 when net reserves were $3.99 billion,” Onanuga said.

He added that while away, President Tinubu will remain fully engaged with his team and continue to oversee governance activities.

He will return to Nigeria in about a fortnight, according to the statement.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Ex-HoS Allegations Against Fubara: 30 CSOs ask security and anti-graft agencies to summon suspended governor, CoS

Published

on

The Coalition of Civil Rights Organizations, otherwise known as Centre for Credible Leadership and Citizens Awareness (CCLCA), on Wednesday demanded the immediate probe of suspended Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara following the weighty allegations levelled against him by Dr. George Nwaeke, the former Head of Service of the State.

Highlighting some of allegations during a press briefing in Abuja, the Director General of CCLCA, Dr Gabriel Nwambu called on the Nigerian Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to carry out an in-depth investigation of the allegations against the Governor.

Dr. Nwambu emphasized that these allegations, if substantiated, highlight a serious crisis in governance and pose significant threats to the stability and integrity of our democratic institutions.

According to him, Dr. Nwaeke had made several alarming claims that the CSOs believe warrant immediate investigation by the appropriate law enforcement agencies.

Advertisement

He noted the CSOs, numbering 30 are standing in solidarity with Dr. Nwaeke who has offered to share evidence of corruption and other constitutional infractions perpetrated by Governor Fubara and Mr. Edison.

“We collectively urge the relevant authorities to act swiftly and transparently. It is imperative that these allegations are addressed to restore public confidence in the institutions of governance in Rivers State and Nigeria as a whole”, he added.

The DG commended President Ahmed Bola Tinubu for his decisive intervention in declaring a state of emergency in Rivers State, which he said has helped to stabilize the region during this tumultuous period.

Dr. Nwambu explained that the President’s action, confirmed by the National Assembly, was a critical step toward upholding democracy and ensuring the welfare of the people of Rivers State.

Advertisement

He recalled the former Head of Service allegations against Governor Fubara as follows,

“Directives for Arson: Dr. Nwaeke alleged that suspended Governor Sim Fubara instructed his Chief of Staff to burn down the Rivers State House of Assembly to derail his suspected impeachment. This act, if proven, represents a direct violation of Section 14(2)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, which mandates that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.

“Corruption and Financial Improprieties: It was stated that a bag of money was handed over for the purpose of executing this alleged arson. He also alleged the disbursement of large sums of money for personal interest of the suspended Governor Fubara implicating high-level corruption under Section 15(5) of the same Constitution, which emphasizes the duty of the state to combat corruption in all its forms.

“Threats to Public Safety and Security: Dr. Nwaeke expressed concern regarding planned sabotage of state infrastructure, which aims to incite public disorder. This falls under the purview of Section 1 of the Terrorism Prevention Act (2011), reinforcing the need for immediate intervention to safeguard the lives and property of citizens.

Advertisement

“Collusion with Militant Groups: Allegations of meetings between the governor, his Chief of Staff, and militant leaders pose a serious threat to national security and violate the provisions under Section 43 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended concerning the right to property, as these actions endanger public and private assets, including critical infrastructure.

“Subversion of Labour Rights: Dr. Nwaeke also revealed attempts to compromise Labour leaders in the state to quell dissent. This breaches Section 40 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to peaceful assembly and association, fundamental pillars of democracy.

“In light of these allegations, we strongly urge immediate action by the relevant agencies of Government”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News