Connect with us

Foreign

Trump cautions Iran’s Supreme leader, says “we know where you’re”

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

President Trump has revealed that the US knows “exactly” where Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is hiding but is letting him live “for now,” as Israeli and US sources say the commander-in-chief is heavily weighing whether to conduct military strikes on Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

And the world was waiting on his decision Tuesday.

Trump, who ran three times for president on an “America First” platform of opposing costly Mideast quagmires, openly threatened Tehran and called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” following Israel’s punishing bombardment of the country’s military and nuclear infrastructure.

“We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding,” Trump truthed. “He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.”

Advertisement

“But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

He convened an 80-minute meeting with his top national security officials in the West Wing’s Situation Room on Tuesday a little after 2 p.m. to weigh the legacy-defining decision.

But, “as always, President Trump alone will make the call,” a source close to the Pentagon said Tuesday.

The source speculated that there’s an 80% chance the president would launch airstrikes to support Israel.

Advertisement

Early Tuesday morning the president told reporters he was “not too much in the mood to negotiate” and was seeking a “real end” to the Iran-Israel conflict.

The Situation Room meeting featured Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard.

A source familiar with Trump’s deliberations said he “likes people who know what they’re talking about and are honest with him.”

Additional sources in both the US and Israel told The Post they suspect that the president will act militarily — pushing past an outcry from some of his populist movement’s leading figures who doubt the wisdom of doing so.

Advertisement

Similarly, an Israeli official said Trump’s positioning of military assets in the region suggests the US is willing to help Israel destroy Iran’s nuclear sites.

Another Israeli source told The Post that Israel and the US has “reached a strategic window of opportunity” — where the parties have both the proper intelligence and weapons capabilities to wipe out Iran’s nuclear program.

The precise conversation within the Situation Room was unclear, though key players have well-known views on Iran and regional military operations.

Vance and Gabbard in particular are associated with the non-interventionist wing of Trump’s political base — with the VP putting up internal resistance to a decision earlier this year to bomb Iran-backed Houthi fighters in Yemen.

Advertisement

Gabbard, a former Hawaii congresswoman, left the Democratic Party and backed Trump in last year’s election largely over foreign policy.

A source said Gabbard has been at the White House and in the Situation Room consistently since the conflict started on June 13 — after reportedly missing a June 8 gathering at Camp David where Trump was informed that Israel’s attack on Iran was imminent.

Gabbard said in March that Iran wasn’t close to developing a nuclear bomb — contradicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims.

Hegseth and Rubio are more firmly tied with the Republican Party’s hawkish wing.

Advertisement

They were joined at the Situation Room meeting by Steve Witkoff, Trump’s Mideast special envoy, who led efforts in recent weeks to force Tehran to strike a deal to avoid a looming Israeli attack.

Although Trump floated hours earlier delegating Witkoff and Vance to negotiate with Iran, the Situation Room meeting ended with no plans for any such diplomacy, The Post confirmed.

While the president initially vetoed Israel’s plan over the weekend to take out Khamenei, both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have indicated that the nations are nearly done waiting for Tehran to give up its nuclear program.

Trump ran for office in three general elections on a platform of keeping the US military out of Mideast quagmires — but has at moments taken limited military action in the region, including in 2020 ordering an airstrike to assassinate Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in Iraq.

Advertisement

The US military has guided 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs that could more effectively collapse underground nuclear facilities — averting a potential incomplete demolition of sites by Israel, which has been dropping 2,000-pound bombs sourced from America.

Netayahu on Monday night told ABC News that he was not ruling out killing Khamenei, 86, if necessary.

“We are doing what we need to do,” the prime minister said.

Khamenei has served as Iran’s supreme leader since 1989 following the death of revolutionary leader Ayatollah Khomeini, who established the country’s theocratic regime after Iran’s US-allied shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, fled in 1979.

Advertisement

Opponents of the Iranian government described its feckless defense against Israel as evidence that the regime was on the verge of collapse.

Reza Pahlavi, the last shah’s 64-year-old son, on Tuesday called on Iranians to stage an uprising to topple the government.

“The Islamic Republic has reached its end and is in the process of collapsing. Khamenei, like a frightened rat, has gone into hiding underground and has lost control of the situation,” Pahlavi claimed in a Persian-language video posted to X.

“The regime’s apparatus of repression is falling apart. All it takes now is a nationwide uprising to put an end to this nightmare once and for all. Now is the time to rise; the time to reclaim Iran.”

Advertisement

Pahlavi claimed that “Iran will not descend into civil war or instability. We have a plan for Iran’s future and its flourishing. We are prepared for the first hundred days after the fall for the transitional period for the establishment of a national and democratic government.”

Israel on Monday secured air superiority over Tehran, and Trump on Tuesday said “we” now have control over Iran’s entire airspace — seemingly indicating that the US and Israel are standing strongly together.

“We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn’t compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured ‘stuff.’”

“Nobody does it better than the good ol’ USA.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/naijuinz/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Foreign

Iran cautions, says Middle East war will expand geographically  If US falls for zionists deception

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Iran’s army has warned that the conflict in the Middle East could expand further if the United States launches additional attacks on the Islamic Republic, ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Washington this week.

Army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia issued the warning during an interview with Iranian state television on Sunday, July 26, saying any renewed US military action would widen the geographical scope of the conflict.

“I believe that if the Americans once again fall for the Zionists’ deception, or move in line with them, and insist on continuing the war, particularly through air strikes, geographically this will expand further,” he said.

Akraminia claimed the conflict had already spread to the Bab al-Mandab Strait at the entrance to the Red Sea, referring to the recent escalation involving Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi movement and Saudi Arabia. “The scope of our operations now encompasses the entire region, from US bases in Jordan to the countries along the Persian Gulf,” he said.

Advertisement

He added that the United States now faced an increasingly unstable security environment in the Middle East and suggested Washington was reassessing its approach. “The situation in the Middle East for the United States is difficult and unsettled,” he said, adding that the US was looking “for a new strategy.” “We are prepared for each of the options and scenarios that appear likely.” The comments come ahead of Netanyahu’s scheduled meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday.

According to the Israeli prime minister’s office, Netanyahu will depart for Washington on Monday before meeting Trump and attending the funeral service of Senator Lindsey Graham, whom the statement described as “a friend of Israel.” Since Trump’s return to office last year, the two leaders have met six times, most recently in Washington on February 11.

While Trump and Netanyahu initially presented a united front following the launch of military operations against Iran in late February, reports suggest differences have since emerged over whether to continue military action or pursue diplomatic efforts.

Netanyahu has previously described Trump as “the greatest friend” Israel has ever had in the White House. Earlier this month, Trump also spoke about their relationship during an interview with Axios. “We get along very good. (Netanyahu) knows who the boss is,” Trump said.

Advertisement

Relations between the two leaders reportedly came under strain during ceasefire negotiations between the United States and Iran in April. The ceasefire has since collapsed.

Continue Reading

Foreign

Iranian Commander Issues “One-for-One” Threat to US Over Citizen Deaths

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

A senior Iranian military commander has threatened that one US soldier would be killed for every Iranian citizen killed in US attacks, marking a sharp escalation in rhetoric as tensions between Tehran and Washington continue to intensify.

Ali Abdollahi, commander of Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, said on Friday that what he described as a principle previously demonstrated on the battlefield would now become an official equation governing Iran’s response.

According to Abdollahi, any US attack resulting in the death of an Iranian citizen would trigger a direct response against American forces.

“For every martyr from the proud people of the Islamic Republic of Iran, one American force will be eliminated,” he said.

Advertisement

He concluded his message with a strongly worded warning directed at US forces, saying they had been issued what he described as “a one-way ticket to hell.”

The remarks come as military tensions between Tehran and Washington continue across the region, with both sides exchanging threats amid the ongoing conflict.

Separately, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran would not accept a temporary ceasefire under any circumstances unless its demands regarding the Strait of Hormuz are met.

Araghchi said the current dispute with Washington is not the result of a lack of mediators, noting that Pakistan and Qatar continue to play mediation roles. Instead, he argued that the core issue lies in US policies, which he said must change.

Advertisement

Responding to a question about discussions with counterparts from Russia, China, Ukraine, and Pakistan, Araghchi said Iran maintains continuous and organized consultations with Moscow and Beijing and engages in dialogue whenever opportunities arise.

He added that recent meetings with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov provided an opportunity to discuss the conflict in greater detail.

Regarding Pakistan, Araghchi said it was natural to discuss mediation initiatives and proposals with Islamabad but reiterated that the fundamental problem between Tehran and Washington is not the absence of mediators but US policy.

Araghchi also stressed that Iran would not yield to what he described as American pressure or intimidation.

Advertisement

“Iran has shown that it will not bow to US coercion. We do not respond to the language of force, pressure, or threats. We are not afraid of threats, we do not submit to pressure, and we do not accept the language of intimidation,” he said.

He reaffirmed that protecting the Iranian people and safeguarding Iran’s interests in the Strait of Hormuz remain fundamental and non-negotiable principles for Tehran, adding that Iran would maintain its current position until what he described as the legitimate demands of the Iranian people are achieved.

Continue Reading

Foreign

Biya’s Long Absence Raises Fresh Questions In Cameroon

Published

on

By

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Cameroon is facing renewed political debate as President Paul Biya remains outside the country for 48 days, raising concerns among opposition leaders and many citizens over delays in government decisions and the country’s leadership.

Biya, 93, who has ruled Cameroon for more than four decades and is the world’s oldest serving head of state, left the country on June 7 for what officials described as a brief private visit to Europe with his wife, Chantal Biya.

Since then, he has remained in Switzerland, where he has frequently travelled over the years.

His prolonged stay has again led to rumours about his health. Earlier reports claimed he had been admitted to a clinic in Geneva, but Cameroon’s Communication Minister, Rene Emmanuel Sadi, denied the reports on June 18, insisting that the president had not been hospitalised.

Advertisement

Despite the government’s assurance, opposition parties say Biya’s continued absence has left the country without active leadership.

Mamadou Mota, vice-president of the Cameroon Renaissance Movement (MRC), said the situation reflects a clear gap in the country’s institutions.

The leader of the Cameroon Democratic Union (UDC), Patricia Tomaino Ndam Njoya, also called on the government to create a clear legal process for determining when a president is temporarily or permanently unable to carry out official duties.

The ruling party has rejected claims that the country lacks leadership. Higher Education Minister Jacques Fame Ndongo said President Biya remains fully involved in government work and continues to receive and review official documents wherever he is staying.

Advertisement

This is not the first time Biya’s absence has attracted public attention. In late 2024, he also spent about 50 days outside Cameroon, leading to similar concerns.

The opposition Social Democratic Front (SDF) described the country as operating without active direction, saying government activities appear to be continuing without proper leadership.

Many Cameroonians have also expressed frustration over the slow pace of government decisions. Viviane Ondoua Biwole, a public management professor at the University of Yaounde, said many people are tired of waiting for changes. She noted that the current government has remained in office for eight years, while many citizens expected a cabinet reshuffle after the last election.

Biya secured an eighth presidential term in the October election, but the result sparked protests across the country. Security forces moved against demonstrators, and the government later confirmed that several dozen people died during the unrest, although it did not release a full casualty figure. Opposition parties rejected the election outcome, while several Western embassies reacted with caution.

Advertisement

In his New Year’s address on December 31, Biya promised to appoint a new government in the coming days. More than seven months later, no new cabinet has been announced.

At the same time, municipal and parliamentary elections have been postponed several times, allowing current office holders to remain in their positions beyond their expected terms.

Although Cameroon has introduced some constitutional and institutional changes, including replacing the heads of both chambers of parliament in March and creating the office of vice-president through constitutional reforms in May, no one has yet been appointed to fill the new position.

The uncertainty has also encouraged the spread of false information. In June, fake documents made to resemble an official presidential decree were sent to a state-owned radio station in the capital, claiming that a vice-president had been appointed. Journalists verified that the documents were not genuine and refused to broadcast the claim.

Advertisement

As questions continue over who could eventually succeed Biya, political observers say there are reports of disagreements among people close to the president.

According to political analyst Stephane Akoa, different groups within Biya’s inner circle are competing for influence, while First Lady Chantal Biya is becoming more involved in government matters and is increasingly mentioned in discussions about appointments and key decisions.

Under Cameroon’s constitution, if the presidency becomes vacant and no vice-president has been appointed, Senate President Aboubakary Abdoulaye would take over temporarily until a new presidential election is held.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News