ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ola Olukoyede, says more than 40 staff members have been dismissed for corruption and financial malpractice in the last three years.

Olukoyede disclosed this on Monday in Abuja at a media interactive session to mark his three-year stewardship at the commission’s headquarters.

The chairman also said that about five of the commission’s staff are currently being prosecuted for corrupt practices.

“In the past two and a half to three years of my service, I have asked them to dismiss over 40 staff on account of corruption and financial malpractice. More than five of them are being prosecuted at the moment,” he said.

The EFCC chairman said some of the affected staff members are already being prosecuted, while case files involving others are being prepared for prosecution.

“You can follow those cases in court; they are public knowledge.

“If that is what people do in other agencies and I arrest them, I investigate them, I prosecute them, why must I just dismiss you if you do it within our own system and I’m not prosecuting you?” he asked.

Olukoyede said the disciplinary measures were part of efforts to ensure EFCC personnel were held to the same standards of accountability the agency demanded from other Nigerians.

“You must be sure that your hands are clean. You can’t be fighting corruption when your hands are soiled with corrupt practices,” he said.

The EFCC chairman also announced the renaming of the commission’s former Internal Affairs Department to the Department of Ethics and Integrity as part of its drive for “internal cleansing.”

He said the commission had also introduced a gift policy to strengthen transparency and prevent conflicts of interest.

According to him, under the policy, staff will be required to declare gifts above a specified value, including those received from friends and relatives at home and abroad.

“The commission will also define the categories of gifts personnel can accept and require officers to account for their sources of income and standard of living,” he added.

The chairman called for stronger institutional reforms and policy changes to fight corruption, saying law enforcement alone could not win the war.

“The most effective system that fights financial crime is not law enforcement. It is the policy regime, institutional reforms that close leakages,” he said.

He urged the media and civil society to return to their watchdog roles.

(NAN)

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has defended its decision to include former Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, Betta Edu, in the campaign structure for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s 2027 re-election bid.

The ruling party maintained that Edu remains entitled to participate in political activities because she has not been convicted of any offence arising from the allegations that led to her removal from the Federal Executive Council.

The APC’s position was made public on Monday by one of the spokespersons of the party’s campaign committee, Kemi Asekun-Shittu, during an interview on Channels Television’s Morning Brief.

Edu’s inclusion in the campaign structure has generated controversy, particularly because President Tinubu suspended her from office in January 2024 following allegations relating to financial impropriety. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) subsequently investigated the matter.

Defending the decision to give the former minister a role in the campaign organisation, Asekun-Shittu argued that an allegation or ongoing investigation should not be treated as proof of guilt.

She said it would be unfair to prevent Edu from participating in political activities indefinitely while awaiting the conclusion of an investigation.

According to the APC spokesperson, Edu should be allowed to continue her political career unless and until a competent authority establishes her guilt.

“I’d like to say that for Betta Edu, for example, she has not been found guilty. And it would be unfair to ask her to leave her life or refuse to live until the EFCC declares her,” she said.

Asekun-Shittu added that there remained a possibility that Edu could ultimately be cleared of the allegations against her.

“We believe that there is a very likely issue that she may not be found guilty,” she stated.

She further argued that Nigerian citizens who choose to participate in politics should not be prevented from doing so solely because they are facing unresolved allegations.

“Besides that, we also know that with politics, every Nigerian is allowed to be a politician if they choose to be. And we do not believe that we should then hold her life still or keep her stagnant until the case is decided,” she added.

The APC spokesperson also noted that the matter had remained unresolved for a considerable period.

“It’s been almost two years of that case. She does deserve an opportunity to present herself again for the party,” she said.

Edu’s reported appointment has attracted scrutiny because of the circumstances surrounding her departure from the Federal Executive Council.

She was named Director of Women Mobilisation in the APC Presidential Campaign Council for the 2027 election.

Her appointment has raised questions among critics who believe that someone previously removed from a ministerial position over allegations involving public funds should not occupy a prominent role in a presidential campaign organisation.

However, Asekun-Shittu maintained that there was a distinction between holding a public office and participating in the internal political activities of a political party.

She argued that the APC was entitled to decide who it considered suitable and capable of contributing to its campaign efforts.

“I do understand. There is no report. I also need you to see it from this angle. The fact that it’s an internal party affair,” she said.

“If we decide that she’s going to be useful and be able to work on behalf of the party, she does have a right. It’s not a public thing.”

Asekun-Shittu acknowledged that Edu had faced allegations concerning the alleged misappropriation of public funds but stressed that the matter remained under investigation.

“She was alleged to have misappropriated public funds. That matter is still with the EFCC. It is being handled. She has not been proclaimed guilty and deserves an opportunity to continue to live her life,” she said.

Edu is not the only prominent figure whose reported inclusion in the campaign structure has generated public interest.

The names of several serving government officials have also reportedly appeared on the list, including the Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji; Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Taminu Yakubu; and Director-General of the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC), Bisoye Coker-Odusote.

The inclusion of serving public officials has also raised questions about the composition and final status of the campaign structure.

However, Asekun-Shittu clarified that the list was still being reviewed and had not yet been finalised.

According to the APC spokesperson, the party was still consulting and deliberating on some of the names contained in the proposed campaign structure.

“With regards to the other names you have mentioned, the list is not yet final. There is a lot of deliberation still going on,” she said.

She added that changes would be made if any individual was subsequently found to be legally ineligible to participate in the campaign structure.

“If it is found out that they are not allowed to play in that turf, I believe that the needful will be done,” Asekun-Shittu stated.

The spokesperson also assured that the APC would comply with relevant laws and regulations governing political activities.

She said anyone eventually found to be unsuitable or legally barred from participating would be removed where necessary.

As preparations for the 2027 presidential election gather momentum, the composition of political campaign teams is expected to remain a subject of intense public scrutiny.

For now, the APC’s defence of Edu is based on the position that the allegations against her remain unresolved and that an investigation does not, by itself, constitute a conviction.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

The G100 has proposed a Government of National Competence based on a single four-year transition term for Nigeria’s opposition parties.

Mallam Salihu Moh. Lukman presented the proposal on Monday at the Summit of Nigeria’s Opposition Political Parties held at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja.

Representatives of the African Democratic Congress, Allied Peoples Movement, Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peoples Democratic Party, Peoples Redemption Party and Social Democratic Party attended the summit. Presidential and vice-presidential candidates and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives were also present.

Lukman said the proposed government would rest on competence, integrity, national inclusion and fair representation of every party that joins the effort. He said it would follow a disciplined Four-Year National Reset Programme.

“The Framework before you propose something more demanding than a merger of ambitions: a Government of National Competence, built on competence, integrity, national inclusion, and fair representation of every party that contributes to the effort,” he said.

He added that the arrangement must be secured by a political commitment to a single four-year term written into an enforceable Transition Charter.

Lukman stressed that the commitment must go beyond verbal promises. “We want to underline the word ‘enforceable.’ This gathering does not need more sincerity. Nigerian politics has never suffered from a shortage of sincere promises. What it has suffered from is promises that nobody could enforce when the person who made them changed his/her mind,” he said.

He insisted that any agreement reached must be written, witnessed and carry consequences.

Lukman recalled the history of opposition politics since 1999. He said the opposition contested the presidency divided in 2003, 2007 and 2011 but achieved victory in 2015 after parties agreed on rules of engagement. He said that discipline was abandoned in 2023, when opposition votes were split.

“The winner took just under nine million votes. One opposition candidate took close to seven million. Another took just over six million. Thirteen million votes on one side of the argument, under nine million on the other. And the side with fewer votes formed the government, lawfully, constitutionally, and entirely predictably,” he said.

On the structure of the proposed cooperation, Lukman disclosed that three standing coalition bodies are being proposed. These are a Central Leadership Committee, a Publicity and Communication Committee and a Legal Committee.

He said five Working Groups, each with one representative from every participating party, would produce working papers within four weeks. The papers would cover a National Covenant for Democratic Renewal, a Single-Term Transition Charter, a National Reform Programme, a Framework for Opposition Unity and a Roadmap to a Common Presidential Candidate.

Lukman clarified that the summit was not asking any party to dissolve or any candidate to stand down. “It is not asking any party to dissolve. It is not asking any party to disappear into another party. It is not asking any candidate to stand down this morning… That question is not on the agenda of this Summit, and any report that says otherwise will be wrong,” he said.

He urged party leaders to approach the process with candour. He warned that concealed positions had undermined previous coalition efforts.

“A hard line declared this morning is a problem that can be solved between now and the Second Summit. A hard line concealed this morning is a coalition that collapses in October, and that one will collapse in public too, only later, and at far greater cost to everybody in this room,” he said.

Lukman said the G100 convened the summit without backing any particular candidate or party. “We are not promoting any candidate, no preference among the six parties in this hall, and nothing to gain from one of you rather than another.

“Our only interest is the one stated in the Doctrine we published on August 2: that a democracy is sustained not merely by holding elections, but by the credible possibility of an alternative government,” he said.

He said the proposed framework would be developed further by the working groups and presented to a second summit for consideration and adoption.