Connect with us

News

US Lawmakers Query Trump Admin Over Chinese Chemical Shipments To Iran

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

US lawmakers have called for the Trump administration to respond to reporting that Chinese firms are helping Iran rebuild its ballistic missile program in defiance of United Nations sanctions.

The call, from Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi and Joe Courtney, follows CNN reporting last month detailing what Western intelligence sources said were several shipments of sodium perchlorate, a missile propellant precursor, from China to Iran since the end of September.

These shipments are “indispensable to Tehran’s efforts to rebuild its ballistic missile arsenal following its 12-day war with Israel last summer,” the congressmen wrote in a letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe.

“Beijing’s support for Tehran’s rearmament is deeply concerning and provides yet another example of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) willingness to abet authoritarian aggression from Europe to the Middle East,” they said.

Advertisement

According to CNN’s reporting, European intelligence sources say 2,000 tons of sodium perchlorate, the main precursor in the production of the solid propellant that powers Iran’s mid-range conventional missiles, have arrived from China to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas between late September and mid-October. The chemicals were bought by Iran from Chinese suppliers, the sources say.

The deliveries, which analysts say could provide enough chemical for roughly 500 ballistic missiles, appear to show Iran is stepping up the rebuilding of its missile program, which was depleted by the conflict with Israel in June.

They also come as there has been increased concern in Washington about potential emerging coordination between China, Iran, Russia and North Korea. US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping met last month for talks that resulted in an economic truce de-escalating their trade war.

“Beijing’s latest shipments of these critical chemical precursors indicate that US actions to date have failed to deter it from supporting Tehran’s procurement of offensive military capabilities,” Krishnamoorthi, who is the ranking member of the House Select Committee on the CCP, and Courtney, ranking member of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces, wrote in their letter.

Advertisement

Beijing’s support “not only increases Iran’s threat to its neighbors but also assists Russia and pro-Iranian proxy groups like the Houthis whose missile programs Iran has previously supported,” the Congressmen said.

The shipments also “contravene sanctions the United Nations reinstated in September that prohibit international support for Iran’s ballistic missile program and development of nuclear weapons delivery systems,” they added.

Krishnamoorthi and Courtney called for the Trump administration to explain what actions it was taking to “respond to the PRC’s (People’s Republic of China) continuing support to Iran’s ballistic missile program,” including in coordination with US allies and partners.

The Trump administration in April announced sanctions on a dozen entities and individuals based in Iran and China for their role procuring ballistic missile propellant ingredients on behalf of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Advertisement

Last month, more-than-a-decade-old UN sanctions on Tehran were restored by a so-called snapback mechanism – a provision for Iranian breaches of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) deal to monitor its nuclear program.

Under the sanctions re-imposed last month, Iran shall not undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. UN member states must also prevent the provision to Iran of materials that could contribute to the country’s development of a nuclear weapons delivery system, which experts say could include ballistic missiles.

States are also required to prevent the provision to Iran of assistance in the manufacture of arms.

While the shipped substance – sodium perchlorate – is not specifically named in UN documents on materials banned for export to Iran, it is a direct precursor of ammonium perchlorate, a listed and prohibited oxidizer used in ballistic missiles.

Advertisement

China and Iran
Experts say that the sanctions’ failure to explicitly prohibit the chemical may leave China room to argue that it is not in violation of any UN ban. China, along with Russia, opposed the reimposition of the UN sanctions, saying it undermines efforts for a “diplomatic settlement of the Iranian nuclear issue,” and may not see it bound by those rules, as such.

In response to a question from CNN last month about the recent shipments, a spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that while he “not familiar with the specific situation,” China has “consistently implemented export controls on dual-use items in accordance with its international obligations and domestic laws and regulations.”

“We want to emphasize that China is committed to peacefully resolving the Iranian nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means and opposes sanctions and pressure,” the spokesperson said.

CNN reporting last month followed the journeys of several cargo ships identified by intelligence sources as being involved in the latest deliveries of sodium perchlorate from Chinese ports to Iran, using ship tracking data and the social media of their crew.

Advertisement

Several of the cargo ships and Chinese entities involved are under sanctions from the United States.

Some of those vessels appear to have gone back and forth several times between China and Iran since the end of April. The sources say their crew seem to be employed by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and their regular social media posts provide a trail of their stops on the China to Iran journey.

Similar shipments had previously been reported, and entities in China, long a diplomatic and economic ally of Iran, are also known to use a network of vessels to filter US-sanctioned Iranian oil to the country.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Reps Move to Modernise Price Control Law, as Bill Pass Second Reading

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives on Wednesday pushed forward sweeping reforms to Nigeria’s price control regime, as lawmakers approved key bills for second reading amid spirited debate on parliamentary procedure.

Leading debate on the Bill to amend the Price Control Act, Ahmed Munir, declared that the 1977 legislation had become obsolete and ineffective in the face of present-day economic realities.

“The original intent of the 1977 Act was global, to protect ordinary Nigerians from hoarding, price gouging and artificial scarcity. However, the mechanisms it put in place and the list of commodities it covered are completely out of sync with the economic realities of 2026.

Advertisement

“As it stands today, the Price Control Act is blindly a dead letter law,” he said.

He criticised the existing penalties as “laughably low” and faulted the Act for failing to define essential goods in line with the needs of modern households.

He stressed that the amendment would not amount to a return to rigid price-fixing.

“While inflation has external and structural drivers, we cannot ignore the local menace of unscrupulous middlemen, artificial hoarding and predatory price-fixing by cartels, taking advantage of the vulnerability of our people. The current 1977 Act fails us in two major ways — obsolete penalties and vague and outdated definitions.

Advertisement

“This amendment does not seek a return to archaic, heavy-handed price-fixing, which we know destroys businesses. Rather, it introduces a smart, balanced and realistic regulatory framework.

“This bill is not about suffocating the free market. It is about putting a civilised guardrail on it. It ensures that while businesses make legitimate profits, the desperate situation of our citizens is not weaponised against them by cartels,” Munir argued.

According to him, the proposal will “bring transparency to supply chains and give teeth to the regulatory bodies like the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission”.

He urged colleagues to back what he described as “this vital, people-centred bill.”

Advertisement

When put to a voice vote by the presiding officer, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas, the House unanimously adopted the motion and referred it to the Committee on Commerce for further legislative action.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: ‘Hope Is Here’: Reps Rally Support for State Police Ahead of Crucial Constitutional Vote On Thursday

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

…as Deputy Speaker, Regional leaders declare House united on security reform

By Gloria Ikibah

The House of Representatives has intensified its push for the establishment of state police, declaring that lawmakers are prepared to take decisive legislative action to address Nigeria’s worsening security challenges.

Addressing journalists alongside zonal and caucus leaders of the House, Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu said the National Assembly was determined to complement the efforts of the Executive through constitutional reforms that will strengthen policing and improve response to insecurity across the country.

Advertisement

The bill sponsored by Deputy Speaker Kalu and 14 other lawmakers, was passed on February 20, 2024, it seeks to transfer “Police” from the “Exclusive Legislative List ” to the “Concurrent Legislative List”, effectively empowering states to have state to have state-controlled policing.

It proposes 16 alterations to the constitution and introduces a comprehensive framework to ensure cohesion accountability,  and uniform standards between the federal police and state police.

The bill also seeks to establish State Police Service Commission as distinct from the Federal Police Service Commission with clearly defined roles and jurisdictions.

Kalu argued that while Parliament had continued to exercise its oversight powers by summoning security chiefs and government officials, lawmakers must also deploy legislative solutions to tackle the root causes of the nation’s security crisis.

Advertisement

The Deputy Speaker noted that the House had always positioned itself as a platform where national challenges are debated and practical solutions developed through legislation.

He said: “When we say that security of lives and property is a primary purpose of government, what do the executive think that that particular section refers to? Does it consign the three arms of government? And if yes, what is the executive doing? While we call them to order as Parliament and as allowed by Sections 88 and 89 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended, the question becomes, have we done our part in regards to the expectation of 88 and 89 as it consigns legislative functions?

“We have always referred to the Parliament, the House of Representatives, as the solution hub where hydra-headed problems of the country are presented and solutions given to them in security and legislative tool to cure it.

“Whilst we call the chief service chiefs to come and meet with us to dialogue, while we call ministries of finance, budget office and all the others, there is the need for us to use legislative tool to block the car.”

Advertisement

Kalu praised members of the constitutional amendment committees and regional leaders of the House, describing them as the driving force behind the ongoing efforts to reform the nation’s security architecture.

“These men here are the real leaders of the House of Representatives who have been working night and day.

“When I mean night and day, I mean literally night and day.”
According to him, lawmakers have concluded that the current constitutional framework governing policing is inadequate to meet the security expectations of Nigerians.

“We have discovered that leaving the law as it is will not give us that expectation that all Nigerians have placed in the expectation basket with regards to curing the issue of insecurity.

Advertisement

“Therefore, we decided to prioritise the issue of unbundling security-related problems, response time through the legislative tool of legislation, targeting policing”, he said.

He disclosed that consultations on state policing had attracted broad support from critical stakeholders, including the Inspector-General of Police, governors and the Executive arm of government.

The Deputy Speaker argued that constitutional provisions, particularly Section 214 and related clauses, would need to be amended to pave the way for state police.

“And we said as it is today, the structure which has been agreed to by the IGP and his team, national consensus has also arisen on it, the executive have bought into it, the governors have bought into it, that there is the need for state police.

Advertisement

“The Constitution as it is, especially Section 214 and other consequential amendments in that particular Constitution, would not birth the state police that will guarantee what we’ll be looking for in the space of security.”

Kalu revealed that the House will move to vote on the constitutional amendment proposals, with state police placed high on the agenda.

He added that the announcement was intended to reassure Nigerians that lawmakers across the six geopolitical zones and the Federal Capital Territory were united in support of the proposal.

“So we are here to announce to Nigerians that hope is coming, that hope to have a better response time to incidents of crime is here, that we have decided, do talk, that by tomorrow we’ll be voting on the Constitution and in that we’ll be prioritising state police.

Advertisement

“This is us telling our supporters, our constituents across the nation, that your leaders are represented here, that the six caucus leaders, including the FCT 37, they are here, regional leaders and zonal leaders are here and all of us are together on this mission.

Dismissing reports suggesting that efforts were underway to frustrate the proposal, the Deputy Speaker insisted that the House remained firmly committed to the reform.

“The Speaker has asked us to come and address Nigerians to assure them that hope is coming and there is nobody stopping us from going ahead with state police.
“We’ve read a lot of things on the news that people are trying to stop it. No, the Parliament is marching forward and by tomorrow we’ll be concluding on this”, he noted.

Expressing confidence in the next phase of the constitutional amendment process, Kalu said lawmakers expected strong support from state governors and Houses of Assembly once the proposal leaves the National Assembly.

Advertisement

“This is what we have come to inform you that hope is here and by tomorrow state police will make it in our constitutional amendment.

“We are hoping that by the time we finish tomorrow it will be going to the states and because we have seen the body language of the governors of these 36 states, which is in support of state police, they will work hand in hand with their Houses of Assembly to ensure that it is returned back to Mr President for his assent as quickly as possible”, he added.

The Deputy Speaker also issued an urgent appeal to lawmakers currently carrying out oversight assignments across the country to return to Abuja for the vote.

“We’re also using this opportunity to invite our members who are currently handling oversight function across Nigeria. Let them cut it short and fly in. It’s an emergency situation.

Advertisement

“They should cut it short and fly in tomorrow. We want all our members to be in the House so that will show our constituents that we are in support of state police and that security is priority on our list”, he said.

The proposed state police framework remains one of the most closely watched constitutional amendment initiatives before the National Assembly, with supporters arguing that decentralised policing will improve intelligence gathering, strengthen local security responses and help address the country’s persistent insecurity challenges.

Continue Reading

News

Blackout hits Abuja, Nasarawa, AEDC explains

Published

on

ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad
ADVERTISEMENT
Zoom Ad

Abuja Electricity Distribution Company has announced an electricity outage in parts of the Federal Capital Territory and Nasarawa State.

AEDC disclosed this in a notice on Wednesday.

The disco said the outage is due to a technical fault on the transmission company of Nigeria (TCN) 132kV Apo – Karu – line 1.

Consequently, bulk electricity supply has been disrupted in areas in Abuja and Nasarawa, including in Karu, Nyanya, Jikwoyi, Kurudu, Orozo, Karshi, Mararaba, Ado, New Nyanya, New Karu Uke, Masaka, Auta Balaifi, Keffi, Nasarawa Toto, Akwanga, Nasarawa Eggon, and environs.

Advertisement

The disco, however, assured electricity restoration.

“The technical team of the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) is currently working to restore power supply around 3:00 pm today, 10th June 2026.

“We regret the inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your patience and understanding,” AEDC stated.

Daily Post

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Naija Blitz News